| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
1401
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
01-10-12 03:20pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1402
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
An interesting trip for you out of your comfort zone then, RA.
As regards animals.
Whilst I don't think it adds much to a photoset or video,
I think at times they perhaps might get away with a cat or dog, or pushing it a horse, or two. :)
It really depends on the level of intimacy! :0P
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-10-12 10:00am
|
Reply
1403
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
No, I don't think so.
I share your concerns.
Perhaps that was what gave me an element of unease whilst browsing the site.
With a few sites the personality of the model leaps out at you, which I really like.
With a lot of others it is noticeable, here it appears to be dourly supressed, in the name of 'art'.
Not good!
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-30-11 07:41am
|
Reply
1404
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
I agree with you, otoh.
It is another one of those frustratingly 'nearly' sites.
Rather than striving to crash through the barrier and make a rivetting site, they do more, more & more of the same, which obviously does work for some folk.
This only serves to add more to the frustration for the likes of ourselves wanting a step or two beyond.
What I found most frustrating was that the thumbnails for each set looked identical after a little while searching.
I think it is a problem with sites that have pretentions of 'art'.
Cap'n :0/
|
12-30-11 04:18am
|
Reply
1405
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
A solid review of a classic site.
I'm afraid though what I said in my comment last year still holds true for me.
'I appreciate this purports to be an artsy site, and I can take that at face value.
What really disappoints me about this site is the lack of variety & creativity.
It is all very formulaic & repetetive.
Sure beautiful girls, scantily clad to nude, usually outside.
Most of the thumbnail set 'covers' blend into each other.
There is so much material, I am bound to have missed a few gems in there, but searching through the 'covers' to find one that stands out gets dull.
A shame, but that is the way it strikes me.'
Cap'n :0/
|
09-24-11 12:55am
|
Reply
1406
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
fredv's Review
A fine start! Welcome.
I can agree with your point of view on this one.
Formula is fine, but with this quantity it really needs more variation for any model or photographer to stand out.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-10-11 11:19am
|
Reply
1407
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Yes, there needs to be at least some variation, to maintain interest.
I soon tire of the artsy fartsy stuff! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-06-10 08:55am
|
Reply
1408
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Yes, it is not so much the huge volume, which is not a problem in itself, it is more the artsy thumbnails are so similar it is difficult to pick out galleries that are likely to appeal.
For instance, last time I was a member, I found no more than 2 dozen galleries that appealed enough to download. Seemingly no more than one or two per model. For such a huge site that is very few. Typically I have half a dozen sets of each model that appeals at the end of a months subscription.
I just found it too tiresome:
Click....'No, that doesn't appeal.' x100
1 'Ah that is a good one.'
Too frustrating!
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-05-10 02:45am
|
Reply
1409
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gregdd's Reply
Your views are very interesting.
I do tend to work through the archives model by model.
The last time I was a member a few months back, I just found the thumbnail for each gallery looked so similar, it was a lottery whether I was going to like it.
Most sites I can usually tell from the first preview thumbnail.
Not at this site though.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-23-10 03:21pm
|
Reply
1410
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
gregdd's Comment
I am a photo freak.
When I was a member a few months back, I found there was a great degree of artsy 'sameness' about the thumbnails for the galleries, so it was difficult to pick up on sets which appealed.
Do you think there has been a recent improvement in the photography side too?
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-23-10 09:23am
|
Reply
1411
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
I am sorry to say I think the vast majority of their sets are formulaic.
So much so, that there is often little to choose between the menu thumbnail of each set.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-02-10 10:29am
|
Reply
1412
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
nbaby8's Reply
No, I don't think I have seen enough generally but....
On the whole, fair comment there, I think! ;0)
Cap'n :0)
|
05-24-10 11:01am
|
Reply
1413
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm glad I saved you money, time & patience there then!
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-04-10 11:14am
|
Comment
1414
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
05-04-10 10:14am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1415
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Thanks for the additional info there, Denner.
Much appreciated.
I will have to give it a try soon, I think ;0)
Cap'n.
|
04-18-10 09:03am
|
Reply
1416
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
I get the impression it is mostly outdoor full nude?
Is there much in the way of indoor striptease sets here, please?
Cap'n :0/
|
04-18-10 03:44am
|
Reply
1417
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
To be honest the conversions used by CCBill have always been a little on the 'mean' side so far as Sterling customers are concerned.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-29-10 12:21pm
|
Reply
1418
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Well according to current conversions it comes out at just under $22.00, so at least it is closer than usual.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-29-10 11:48am
|
Reply
1419
|
Metcn.cc
(0)
|
Reply of
Lovechina's Reply
Don't get me wrong.
I can understand your points.
I like the models & photography.
It is just they look to be in a very dodgy position as regards the website texts.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-04-10 01:56am
|
Reply
1420
|
Metcn.cc
(0)
|
Reply of
Lovechina's Reply
This from the first page of the tour:
' METCN is a complete immersion in flawless beauty. Welcome to the most imitated nude art site in the World.'
I saw that at MET ART.
and on the last page of the tour.
' Enter your email above to receive hundreds of free photos and our exclusive newsletter, filled with photos of our gorgeous Met-Art legendary models, and their biographies. As a bonus, you will receive instant access to a special gallery, filled with photo samples. At Met-Art we value your privacy. In fact, we have never sold, traded, or spammed a single e-mail address. Our newsletter, unlike most sites, is handled by a professional company to ensure your e-mail address's security and privacy.'
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-03-10 06:34am
|
Reply
1421
|
Metcn.cc
(0)
|
Reply of
Lovechina's Reply
Thanks for the extra insight.
It is very interesting.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-03-10 05:36am
|
Reply
1422
|
Metcn.cc
(0)
|
Reply of
Lovechina's Reply
No, not the models.
The wording on the first & last page of the tour is very similar to MetArt.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-03-10 05:30am
|
Reply
1423
|
Metcn.cc
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Yes the wording on the home page uses similar phrasing & the final tour page pretty much asserts that it is a Met Art site.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-02-10 09:00am
|
Comment
1424
|
Metcn.cc
(0)
|
|
12-01-10 12:45pm
Replies (10)
|
Reply
1425
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Looks flashy & pretentious to me, I'm afraid.
Intro video is pretty, but lacks substance.
Preview area mostly soft focus & retouched.
He obviously loves himself though. ;)
Cap'n.
|
01-12-13 04:04pm
|
