|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
Divinx (0)
|
| 1-48 of 48 Posts | Page 1 |
| 03-19-21 05:07am - 1158 days | #6 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
ManyVids is better than c4s in some respects (for instance, once you buy a clip, you can stream/download it anytime, whereas c4s gives you 1 day to download, and that's it. On the other side, I prefer c4s gif previews when browsing content. When you suscribe to a profile, it can be stream only or stream/download. Just read the fine print before suscribing. I don't care too much about the distinction, because it's very easy to download from ManyVids even when it is stream-only. As I'm not going to post the content anywhere, I feel it legitimate to do so. You should notice how many clips there are, and how many are given by the suscription, because at times you are only given a small fracton of the whole. But all the figures are clearly indicated, as well as which clips are not included in the membership. | |
|
||
| 03-19-21 04:51am - 1158 days | #39 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
I remember having discussed that One-Click-Purchasing swindle from BangBros in this forum, long time ago. I suffered it. Well, the solution: clear your cookies, so that they cannot identify you. Otherwise, they suscribe you just by browsing the site! (any of those that belong to BangBros). | |
|
||
| 02-27-21 03:54am - 1178 days | #7 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
I'm having the same problem, I just cannot suscribe to sites managed by Vendo. After entering the card data, etc, it leads me directly to the site's homepage, that won't accept my credentials. There's vendostore.com, where you can find lots of adult sites to suscribe to. For some sites, clicking on "Buy" leads you to the site, and then you can suscribe in the usual manner, but not through Vendo. For the sites which are directly managed by Vendo, clicking on "Buy" brings up the join page, and you are doomed to fail again. If you come to succeed, please don't forget to tell us how you accomplished it. | |
|
||
| 10-25-20 07:38am - 1303 days | #35 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
I believe this photo may be from the time she had already started to get implants, but she sill looks beatiful: https://i1.sndcdn.com/artworks-000073568131-7or5w8-t500x500.jpg And she has become like this: https://i.pinimg.com/736x/35/f7/dc/35f7dc268d1e327ff34f5207e2ad424b.jpg  Is she insane? | |
|
||
| 10-25-20 07:12am - 1303 days | #34 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
I very much like canadians. Romanian and italian as well. Aletta Ocean is one of the worst cases I can think of, because she was really beautiful, but this gorgeous bitch turned herself into a disgusting witch by all sort of offences to her body. I think she wanted to conquer the world, and believed a pair of big mammals would help. That wasn't enough, so the mammals became even bigger, and her lips were engrossed. That wasn't enough, so she kept on destroying all her natural beauty. | |
|
||
| 10-23-20 04:40am - 1305 days | #30 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
I agree with all your complaints. Plastic surgery is a catastrophe, ruining the best of beauties, and turning atraction into repugnance. Piercings come next, I do really distaste them, all of them. Same for tattoos, but they can be more acceptable if they are artsy and not too big or striking. Contrary to rearadmiral, I do not like anal gaping; but love pussy gaping. Generally speaking, I do not like anal, but there are exceptions. I also dislike over-acting or pain, and any kind of abusive and degrading demeanor against the sexual partner. There is much of that in these days. And very long closeups means losing much of the best the scene has to offer. Agree with marcdc1: "It's all about the talent enjoying herself. If she's not having fun the scene I can't get into it." Now, sometying I hate myself, but has not been mentioned yet: oil. If there's oil, I skip the scene. I like them natural, no piercings, no botox, no oil. And no aggresive fingering to make her squirt; it looks like rape. Wraith0711: "my all time favorite model Cherry Potter got almost EEE implats and just destroyed herself." OH NO!  Time to sing American Pie. | |
|
||
| 10-19-20 02:01am - 1309 days | #19 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
I bought 8 TB disks from Intenso because of the many problems with smaller ones, but there's a con: they quickly stop spinning, until they are required again, and then it takes a lot of time before they respond. Annoying. | |
|
||
| 10-19-20 01:56am - 1309 days | #18 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Good recommendation. | |
|
||
| 10-19-20 01:56am - 1309 days | #17 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Good recommendation. | |
|
||
| 10-19-20 01:54am - 1309 days | #16 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Good recommendation. | |
|
||
| 10-19-20 12:55am - 1309 days | #7 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Annotating actors, etc. means too much effort, so I use to put it in writing a program that reads the webpage, extracts the data, and creates directories for each movie. The descriptions go into a file (descript.ion), which can be read by old ACDSee v2 file manager / image viewer. That also takes time, but creating software is a hobby for me. Afterwards, I start downloading whatever is of my interest, and delete unneeded directories. And you can always describe what you have downloaded, via ACDsee, that is. I use to search with File Finder, a tool from Power Desk Explorer, again an old program, but I've been quite happy with it for so many years. Newer does not always mean better. In the case of site designs, newer has become worse in almost every case. | |
|
||
| 11-28-18 02:14pm - 1999 days | #6 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
StasyQ.com | |
|
||
| 02-07-18 02:23pm - 2293 days | #7 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Sometimes I write for my own use applications that extract data from specific web pages. Never tried writing a general purpose one, it would be very complex and I'm too lazy for that (BTW, I'm no professional programmer, but it's something I can do rather easily). As for managing your clips, look here: http://vidine.net/ I have not tried it, but it looks good. | |
|
||
| 10-04-17 10:28am - 2420 days | #28 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
I would put Vendo in the trusted list. Very easy access, and never had a problem with them. | |
|
||
| 01-27-17 02:03pm - 2669 days | #19 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Some sites that you might add to the list: EroticaX 21naturals GFELife LustHD VersoCinema X-Sensual I have only been a member to 21naturals, but I think they all fit in the cathegory. Now, as for non-aggresive group sex, depends on what you understand by group sex, but some of the following might apply: GroupSexGames, or its prior reincarnation, FuckingGamble DrunkSexOrgy PartyHardcore StudentSexParties sites from the CzechAV network: Czech Mega Swingers, Czech Home Orgy, Czech Parties, Czech Garden Party | |
|
||
| 01-27-17 02:02pm - 2669 days | #5 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Private has lots of the best stuff in production terms. Of course, the resolutions of old were not as high as current ones. Personally, I prefer their older style, though, when they produced great movies. It's an easy to browse site for a guest, so you can see by yourself the available material and resolutions. Video format is mp4. With a suscription to Private, you also get lots of classic and casting content, but I believe you don't get all of it. | |
|
||
| 01-27-17 10:16am - 2670 days | #16 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Google adult model agency -lots of them. | |
|
||
| 01-12-17 01:30pm - 2684 days | #13 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
gvtta, if you suscribe through Epoch, all goes well. Try using "the trick" (filling a wrong termination date for your credit card) that sends you to the secondary processor, Epoch. | |
|
||
| 11-18-16 03:16am - 2740 days | #7 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
I have a suscription to Reality Kings and some of the sites it offers through its Porn Portal. Needed to update my credit card information. I could do that via a chat with an MBI-Probiller assistant. She was very helpful, even offered me a better suscription cost (now I only pay half of what I was paying so far), and made the transition to the new card without losing any of the sites. I needed to talk to my bank in between, the process is a bit complex, but she had patience, and helped all along. So, all in all, I can only have good words for their customer support. | |
|
||
| 11-18-16 02:54am - 2740 days | #11 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
There is free software that extracts individual screencaps (VLC, as explained above -problem is, it only extracts the clip as long as it is being played). More usually, software creates a sheet with the screencaps, watermarking each with its time along the clip, so you get a single image file where you can see all that happens in the clip, and the exacy moment when it happens. "Image Grabber II NET" can do both. It's slow, though. "Thumbnail Me" is fast. "Scene Grabber NET" is another option. Many others... Then there is "Auto Movie Thumbnailer", only for the brave. Very configurable, but complex. You can find all those, and all the best free software for videoediting, with helpful comments, and a helpful forum, at Videohelp Another helpful forum would be Doom9 | |
|
||
| 11-16-16 07:56am - 2742 days | #8 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
You can do marvels with free software: - VirtualDub - Avisynth - AvsPMod (an Avisynth editor -recommended) For instance, the following Avisynth script ------------- V1=DirectShowSource("Video1.mp4") V2=DirectShowSource("Video2.mp4") V3=DirectShowSource("Video3.mp4") V4=DirectShowSource("Video4.mp4") Above= stackhorizontal (V1, V2) Below=stackhorizontal (V3, V4) V5=stackvertical(Above, Below) Return V5.reduceBy2 ---------------- combines 4 clips, each at a different square of the screen. | |
|
||
| 03-19-16 01:12pm - 2984 days | #4 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
That's it! Mind, it does contribute to its enjoyment if it's aestehtical too. But functionality has to be foremost. When it comes to porn, the site should be designed in a way that it helps you find what you want, and get to it, easily, naturally, and in only a few steps. There are sites that have no search fuction (or broken), and a models list in random order -oh my... I hate that. But besides those navigation problems, now you find difficult to read grey letters where formerly there were easy to read black on white, etc. -oh my... | |
|
||
| 03-19-16 12:57pm - 2984 days | #3 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Oh yeah, since the days of Nikki Knights! I really like Ash Hollywood amd Kate England a lot. | |
|
||
| 03-18-16 01:00pm - 2985 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
An increasing number of sites have been changing design for the worse. Why do they take the pains to make a change, just to offer a worse produt? I guess they have fallen under the curse of web designers. Web design was once clean and rigid: just HTML. Then came Cascading Style Sheets, that embellished the product -right. But then we entered the era of dynamic design at all costs, with lots of javascript and what not. There are javascript libraries that allow you to do all sort of fancy things -but mind, that doesn't mean that you must do them. Unfortunately, porn web-designers feel they need to -all for the worse. The most annoying change was performed recently by Private.com. When you moved your mouse to the right side of the screen, an overlapping box would appear, hiding the button for playing full screen. They have been wise enough to remove that silly fanciness. When there's too much content for a page, you divide it in several pages, which you can access independently, right? Not for the PUBA network, they are comitted to the annoying "loading" fanciness. When you reach the bottom of the page, it displays "loading", and starts to load more. You get again to the bottom of the page, and it displays another "loading", and loads more content. If you want to get to the very last content, you need to load, one by one, all the former content. And you are advise to keep it loaded! Beecause if you get out of the page, and try to come back, you shall find that you need to go through all the "loading" nightmare once more.  I like the network's content, but I shall not suscribe to such a pain in the ass design. Many a preview page, of many a site, features nowadays that silly "loading", but fortunately it's just for the preview, and you don't go on loading till the end of days. What about the 21s (21sextury, etc)? Once a member, always a member, so you can browse the content, even if not currently suscribed. But they have recently contributed their own fanciness to this nonsensical trend of worsening all the designs. At present, all the scene thumbnails have an overlapping image of a lock, a big lock, and lots of shadow over the thumbnail, so you can barely see it. The result is annoying, and almost impedes browsing. What about Tainster? They had a no-complains model of design and navigation. It reamins, more or less, but formerly if you were looking at part 1 of a scene, you would easily find the links to subsequente parts of the same scene. Not any longer, but you can certainly find lots of adverts and offers, that make it really hard to find what you really do want to find. Formerly, you could read the whole title of the scene -not any longer. If it was already good, why did they changed it for the worse? A mistery... perhaps the curse of the web-designers? Then there's X-Art. See this comment: https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=95252 Again, trying to be fancy is something that web-desginers enjoy, but porn users may be, probably, not. On the other hand, sites like Reality Kings keep good old design. Tidy, functional. There are some ads at the side, but no big problem. Let's pray they have no intention of changing it. Because it shall mean paying a web designer just for making a worse site (crazy, isn't it?). There may be more examples, but enough for now. All in all, they are making an annoying experience of what should be an enjoyable one. And the end result for the "fancy" sites may be a "catch the content and fly, to never return". Webmasters, mind: nothing like the Kiss principle (Keep it simple, stupid). | |
|
||
| 03-02-16 03:55pm - 3000 days | #7 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Colette is somewhat different from X-Art, with director and performers commenting on the scenes. | |
|
||
| 11-01-15 03:43am - 3123 days | #7 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Nobody mentions Reality Kings? Many niches, user friendly, lots of content. | |
|
||
| 09-29-15 06:45am - 3156 days | #14 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
MagikSex had content shot by Magic View Entertainment, which can still be found at Private.com, just look for anything from the "Private Gold" series. Also, be warned about exclusivity. I've seen content from LustHD on TheArtPorn. According to The Best Porn review, it's LustHD that has exclusive content, not TheArtPorn. | |
|
||
| 09-23-15 09:07am - 3162 days | #784 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Well, then I can understand what they say, that they "don't buy any content", assuming FuckingGamble is now (more or less) GroupSexGames. But the "We shoot" statement, in the present tense, needs be evidenced by new updates. Of this I'm not sure. I can recognize most of the content from the old FuckingGamble, but cannot swear that _all_ the content is inherited. All in all, let's hope they really do shoot, and continue producing new material. The fact that the new site is a barebones version of the old, does not give much hope, though. | |
|
||
| 09-22-15 08:30am - 3163 days | #9 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Ryan Madison? Love his work. A macho, but not a machista. | |
|
||
| 09-22-15 07:53am - 3163 days | #782 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Did you write to groupsexgames directly, or did you write to Tainster? I believe Tainster has exclusive content, and I assume the same for SinDrive and Bimaxx. But GroupSexGames certainly has content formerly on FuckingGamble. Unless they pretend to be the same site revamped... | |
|
||
| 09-22-15 05:30am - 3163 days | #12 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Isn't DoghouseDigital a canadian producer? At least, it has made a lot of movies with canadian performers (Erika Heaven Kelly Summers, Cherry Potter... among my favourites). | |
|
||
| 09-22-15 05:19am - 3163 days | #6 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Botox - that surely ruins a face. It changes a pretty face into that of a hag. Out of compassion, I shall not provide examples, but some sites, in particular, have plenty of pornstars that bear that stigma. Edited on Sep 23, 2015, 09:17am | |
|
||
| 09-22-15 04:39am - 3163 days | #10 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Many a CFNM site believes the genre is just meant for blowjobs and handjobs, some even believe it must always be POV. I love CFNM, bu for me it has to be just porn with clothed females. Why? Because women can look so pretty and sexy in the proper dress. Unfortunately, sites either just go for the cumshot, or have the women clothed in a queer way. A network with lots of CFNM content, because almost all of it is CFNM, but with variants, according to site, is Tainster. And it makes CFNM porn the way I like it; except I do not like very much their kind of clothing... I mean, women I see on the streets do not wear like that. Anyway, take a look at any of their sites (PartyHardcore, DrunkSexOrgy, etc.) and you'll see what I mean. They even have a site called FullyClothedSex (and another, FullyClothedPissing, which has the same action as the former, but with a pissing finale). For me, the clothing and colour adds to eroticism, and await in the hope to see more sites that offer it -some day... | |
|
||
| 09-22-15 03:13am - 3163 days | #11 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
What you mean is very clear for me, I call them "artsy", others may call it "glamcore", and all in all is something we had been waiting for. Except I DO NOT like the white backdrop, and the brightness oversaturation of the image. I found that much whiteness unerotic. And it is eroticism that really defines the kind of sites you are referring to. MagikSex is a site with the highest erotic values, imo, precisely because they make a great use of colour, and costumes, and sets. Anyway, I can add a long list of sites that might meet your criteria, if it's not too narrow. This is my asembled list: 21naturals Babes DaneJones ElegantRaw Eleganxia EpicSex EroticaX EroticSnap FantasyHD GFELife HollyRandall JoyBear Joymii LustHD MagikSex n-timate NubileFilms several of the Nubiles network (Nubiles-Casting, etc.) Passion-HD SexArt TonightsGirlfriend TheArtPorn WowGirls, WowPorn X-Art | |
|
||
| 09-22-15 02:58am - 3163 days | #7 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
The same goes for software, you can make and download a copy very easily. Now, it is that very same easy and cheap reproducibility of the item at sale that made the big business of Microsoft or the artists, time ago. Consider vinyl. The material cost of the disc was very low, yet each disc was sold at a high prize, rewarding artists with millions. Then came the tapes, and the recording cassettes, that allowed you to record from the radio. The very same fact that the material on which the recording is made is very cheap, that once drew millions to artists, became the thing that allowed us, poor mortals, to enjoy their works without spending a money we did not have. Digital era has only emphasized this trend. If people have to pay for downloading, then you get very rich, because you sell thousands or millions, at a vey low production cost. But if people can get it for free... Well, artists of old earned more money than they deserved, just because vinyls were cheap to produce, artists of today are on the contrary position. But as long as this world is based on competition instead of collaboration, these things are going to remain with us, with no easy solution good for everybody. | |
|
||
| 09-22-15 02:05am - 3163 days | #780 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
GroupSexGames is one of the sites at the Tainster Portal. It has some of the content of FuckingGamble, but not all; perhaps they intend to keep adding more content in a future time? Hope so. I liked Fucking Gamble, and every game was divided into a lot of parts, had photos, and many unique good features. GroupSexGames, at least when accessed within the Tainster Portal, does have no photos, lack of information on performers, and the whole game in one long clip (mind, they can be hours long). So all in all, they provide a cut out version of FuckingGamble, with just the basics. Let's see if they update with new games, that would be great! | |
|
||
| 06-15-15 11:54am - 3262 days | #10 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
A simple search at The Best Porn for "Cosplay" shall bring some sites which are not japanese. I know one of them, Cosplay Babes, which I received with a membership to Stiffia. This one is hardcore, although most of the stuff is solo or lesbian. Then, there's Cosplay Erotica, which I have never been a member of, but does indeed look erotically enticing. | |
|
||
| 06-15-15 11:35am - 3262 days | #16 | ||
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Where's that comment?
You may suscribe, and cancel easily, depending on how you do it, and then you shall not be able to discern the problem. First of all, the worst thing about Bangbros has not to do with unsuscribing, but with suscribing, instead. I remember entering the preview page of a Bangbros site, clicking on "Next Page", and then receiving notice that I had been suscribed to the site! I was at the time suscribed to one of their sites, so they had my data, and apparently was tracked by cookies, and they just added a new suscription, which I had not asked for. Now, they have clones of their sites, each has to be cancelled via a different processor, and you may end entangled in a maze. But if you know which site you did suscribe to, and through which processor, you should be able to unsuscribe. I did -but certainly, we do not want to go through so much trouble. At some moment, when trying to cancel, I was lost, wrote to Support, and got a reply. Not that they solved the problem right then and there, but at least it served to regain my forces and eventually free myself from them. | ||
|
|||
| 01-16-15 10:53am - 3412 days | #3 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Once upon a time, when Jeanna Fine was a pretty blonde woman, they would film 2 minutes of sex, cut it into 4 half a minute parts, and join them repeteadly in all the differemt combinations mathematics allow, to get a several minutes long scene. THAT was dissapointing. On their behalf, I can say that usually (though not necessarily always!) they were clever enough not to deliver the cumshot before the sex. | |
|
||
| 01-16-15 10:34am - 3412 days | #11 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
I'm receiving regularly offers for Club Seventeen + 2 other sites at $20 (actually $19.95). The other 2 vary: they can be Jim Slip and Lara's Playground, as in your case, but formerly they were Red Light Sex Trips + Elegant Raw, or Beauty and the Senior + Group Sex Games. A great offer, indeed, if the sites suit your taste. | |
|
||
| 01-02-15 07:59am - 3426 days | #104 | ||
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Right! The Best Porn has always being my almost exclusive reference for porn reviews. I have just always trusted them. But I noticed they lacked something which other review sites offered: some free stuff to illustrate the site under review. At least a page capture from the members area, as even without any free image or video to download, it can be at times more informative than many words. Hope the exciting changes to come provide something of this in an easy manner, easy navigation, just give a much better functionality. It's great the allurement to fall on the glamour side, master yoda 
Love these words! ---- As for the design, I think that css are the way to go. Just provide diferent skins to suit everyone. Black on white, white on black, cybersilver and pomegranate red, whatever! | ||
|
|||
| 01-02-15 07:19am - 3426 days | #14 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
Let's make some calculus. You need not start with Brazzers, you can start from any of the sites adscribed to the Portal. Just start from a cheap one that entices you. Say.. start from DareDorm? It's only $17.95 monthly. Regularly, there are $49.97 lifetime suscription offers, you just have to keep an eye, and wait for the right moment to suscribe. Now, let's sum up the monthly cost of 4 popular networks: Brazzers ($24.95), Mofos ($19.95), Reality Kings ($17.95), and Twistys ($27.95) (though the Portal offers access to several other networks and sites, like Playboy TV, Reality Gang, GFRevenge, Erito, Babes...). They sum up $90,8, with an average cost of $22,7 per site. If you rotate a monthly suscription to these, you end up paying 12 * 22.7 = $272.4 / year. If you do something like that for 3 years, you end up paying 3 * $272.4 = $817.2 Now, if you suscribe to DareDorm, you pay 12 x $17.95 = $215,4 / year. In 3 years it amounts to $646.2. And if you take the lifetime offer for the above 4 sites, you pay for it 4 x $49.97 = $199.88. In 3 years, you pay in a hole $646.2 (Daredorm) + $199.88 (lifetime offers) = $846.08, still more that rotating the networks BUT: we have here DareDorm included, you might have started from Reality Kings, for instance, and would pay much less. BESIDES: you don't worry any longer about downloading as fast as you can. The stuff is always there at your disposal. One day you feel like watching some InTheVip episode, and there it is. Another day you feel like lusting after some gorgeous babe at Twistys, and there she is. Next day you wanna see if there has already been some update in Brazzers -of course, there it is! Well, as long as the PornPortal does not close suddenly before your very nose, you are assured to get more porn for years to come than you can probably be ever able to watch. $199.88 for a lifetime access to 4 major adult networks? Well, it's not cheap, but IF it's not a scam, then it can be a worthwhile investment. One day things may go wrong, you go bankrupt... but you still have lots of porn, because you already paid for it, you just have to pay for one site, but you have access to 5!. Unless it is the PornPortal that goes bankrupt, of course  Well, I followed this path, but after reading this thread I'm bound to pray -just in case! I shall not regret it, though. I have enjoyed it a lot. Anyway, I believe The Best Porn should somehow indicate this in their reviews of the sites that comprise the PornPortal, it might make a difference when deciding which suscription to take. | |
|
||
| 04-02-14 05:42pm - 3700 days | #19 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
The number of those that can earn $1000 a day in a regular job is also limited, isn't it? So, unfortunately, there shall always be a supply of girls accepting to be treated as less than human disposable material; obviously, because it is the number of those that get off on the pain and disgrace of others that does not diminish. | |
|
||
| 03-29-14 01:12pm - 3705 days | #23 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
1. Windows XP 2. Firefox for porn, Opera & Chrome for other things. Each has its own niche 3. read (2) 4. Shall resist upgrades as long as possible. | |
|
||
| 03-29-14 12:57pm - 3705 days | #11 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
If she only had natural tits...
For tattooists, there's Alira Astro. You get to see the tattooing session itself. | |
|
||
| 03-29-14 12:39pm - 3705 days | #15 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
I cannot say how many of their pornstars are canadian, but Mile High Media Inc is canadian, and Doghouse Digital features canadian actresses like Kelly Summers, Erika Heaven, Patricia Pettite, etc. BTW, I love Canadian girls (tell me Lanny Barbie isn't hot!). And you also find much from those girls on the Next Door Pass network. | |
|
||
| 03-29-14 12:22pm - 3705 days | #675 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
I took the full trial (about 3 months ago), and had no complains. I hope the issues are solved, for the benefit of porn users, because the site has lots of good content. | |
|
||
| 01-06-10 05:23pm - 5247 days | #37 | |
|
Divinx (0)
Active User Posts: 45 Registered: Dec 29, '07 |
As far as I know, the abuse and humiliation of women is not admisible under the law. Those that represent it should be brave and responsible enough to stop completely current brutality in porn. Don't expect pornographers themselves to stop it. They seem to be the brutest of all. And many, if not most, of the porn addicts seem to enjoy that brutality as well. Which is why things shall never change unless obliged. And it would not be censorship, just human rights. | |
|
||
| 1-48 of 48 Posts | Page 1 |
|
