Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: jd1961 (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (296)  |   Threads Started (18)

1-50 of 296 Posts Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page >

06-03-15  10:31pm - 3273 days #22
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Fake porn deaths are nothing new. Old timers will remember Lisa DeLeeuw, she had people fooled for many, many years. Alive and well.

06-03-15  10:21pm - 3273 days #38
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I've watched American porno since the 1970s, and right now it's the worst I've ever seen it. It's like they all go to the same "bad porn" school! Every single video has the same three or four incorrectly performed, contorted positions. You have the pseudo missionary posiiton, the pseudo doggy style position and the pseudo cowgirl position, all of them utterly non erotic. In every damn video! The ugly shaved genitals, the endless males playing with themselves. The disgusting spitting, the obsession with anal "sex", the stunt cocks making the girls unattractive by pulling on their hair and destroying their makeup. The director mindlessly chatting during sex scenes. It's just a circus freak show, and virtually unwatchable.

The good porn these days is being made in Japan.

09-13-14  03:15am - 3537 days #15
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by graymane:


I'm so glad this thread surfaced.
I purchased real player some time ago, and ever since "cloud" is in a no-parking zone at the right corner of my task bar ....seemingly without any thought of moving.
After download of real player they've been bugging me relentlessly to complete the download by registering and activating the free cloud .....so's I can reap the full benefit.
Red flags went up everywhere! Every time I boot up they're sitting there ..... cup in hand with promises, promises and more promises.
I strongly suspect they've gone ahead and started packing in everything of value I've downloaded even though I haven't authorized it ....anymore they just remind me its going in the cloud vault.
Even being the novice I am .... my first thought all of it is earmarked for buyer sites, or other opportunist for profit.


Go into your program files, and find the Real Cloud folder. Hidden inside is an uninstall folder which you can use to get rid of it. If it doesn't work, reinstall RP and do it again. You aren't the only one complaining of this!

09-13-14  02:50am - 3537 days #12
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
The "site rippers" referred to in this thread are people who download content, and then upload it on a file locker that pays them for downloads and referrals. But, most of them aren't downloading the content from the original sites; no they download it from one another!

Most of these people are from countries like Vietnam and Thailand. The big problem for webmasters is that these people are using specially crafted software that allows them to, from their own computer, post their links simultaneously and instantly to hundreds of forums. One click, and they're all over the internet.

On the flip side, many, if not most, of the file locker services they use are shady, unreliable, and often go out of business without warning. Many times, they simply cease paying the illegal uploaders, and you should see them howl over the injustice of it all! (They have a huge forum where they all discuss this, I'd leave the link but I guess I shouldn't).

The good news for webmasters is that the buzz amongst them lately is that their well is drying up. The file lockers often get their bank assets frozen due to illegal files. I've seen talk of them getting into other scams, like online gambling, or maybe Nigerian email scams is more in their line!

07-05-14  02:07am - 3607 days #33
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Not long now until the internet is like television, which has been prophesied since the beginning. Constant ads everywhere (but not nasty porno of course) and a government license required to have a website, including completely controlled news and entertainment.

07-05-14  01:50am - 3607 days #15
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I wouldn't download X-Art material if you paid me. I've seen free previews---it's junk . Like most American porno is nowadays.

They're seeing their profits going down the tube, and seek a scapegoat. But it's the same with all of them. I just received an email from Naughty America begging me to join for $4. Never seen a site so cheap---but no thanks.

I've consumed American porn since the 70s, I've never seen it so awful, except maybe after the AIDS scare of the late 80s.

07-20-12  02:28am - 4322 days #10
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by pornpundit:


How come 90% of the male porn actors must jerk themselves off rather then going with the flow ?


The operator of the Manojob site told me that most of the males (or "stunt cocks' as he calls them) don't like being touched by girls.

Draw your own conclusion.

03-23-10  09:56pm - 5171 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


Taking a good long look at the stuff I have downloaded the past few years (I got a new pc, so I had to organize everything), the common denominator I noticed about American porno is that it is now completely focused on the male. The slapping, the spitting, the violent sex positions,the caveman like hair pulling, the endless playing with their own dicks, every single video ending with the male pushing the girl away and gratifying himself complete with primal screaming as he masturbates once again for you the paying customer, the endless closeups of the males' faces, the angles that make it seem like you are pleasuring the male, the males' endless, pointless, banal chatter, and did I mention, the endless video coverage of males masturbating themselves, not to mention the males always wrecking the girls' appearances---their hair, their makeup, their dignity,

I can't pay for this garbage any longer.

I know Japanese are smarter than we Americans, but porno isn't hard to make! They understand it, we don't. I can live with the mosaic. Edited on Mar 23, 2010, 10:02pm

03-23-10  09:50pm - 5171 days #8
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Looks like porno to me.

02-24-10  08:24pm - 5198 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by markymark:


I've seen a few video clips from what appears to be a site called Girlz-High. The videos were of young Japanese women doing mostly softcore posing. Anyone know anything about this site? I would appreciate any info you can provide. Thanks.

MarkyMark


Google it, and look at the first entry.

02-24-10  12:07pm - 5199 days #36
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


This is totally crazy:
Made some critical comments about:
Thai Girls Wild

Now the webmaster have blocked my access, though I signed up three days ago and payed $ 29.95 for a month. I wrote him AND Epoch (nothing from Epoch yet)


When this happens, get on the billing company's live chat and scream bloody murder---don't email.

02-05-10  09:21pm - 5217 days #2
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I would, but my review would be so negative that I think I'll leave it to someone with a positive experience.

01-31-10  08:49am - 5223 days #57
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by markymark:




As for Japanese porn, I do love Japanese women! I have a few videos of Rio/Tina Yuzuki, Maria Ozawa, and Eri Ito and would love to get more. What sites do you recommend?


actionjav, sexasian18, jsexnetwork all have lots of quality material

01-25-10  09:36am - 5229 days #6
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I replace them frequently, once a year.

01-12-10  08:53pm - 5241 days #54
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by markymark:


Let me apologize in advance if this thread already exists on this forum. I'm a newbie here and I need to vent. So here goes.

After viewing several heterosexual porn sites I want to know; when did the attention shift from female performers to males? I dont understand it, and I find it very annoying.


I couldn't agree more, and I've written these people when i can, and you should do so too. And if the site provides space for commenting, do that too.

It is awful nowadays. There's female talent, and then there are stunt cocks. Stunt cocks should be seen and not heard. Stunt cocks should never put their hands in front of the camera (they always do, as if they are oblivious to it). the stunt cock's face should never be shown in closeup, but I notice they're starting to do that again.

My advice to you: join a good Japanese site, you will be amazed at the difference in quality. And they control their stunt cocks.

01-12-10  08:44pm - 5241 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I'm sorry to hear that, I loved Aunt Peg. She was a good actress for porn. Remember that scene where she was with her boyfriend (John Leslie) and her "daughter" (Dorothy LeMay) comes in their bedroom and asks John to fuck her and Aunt Peg has a nervous breakdown?

RIP

12-08-09  03:48pm - 5276 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky:


The article linked to says that none of the minarets in Switzerland "conduct the call to prayer", so it doesn't sound like the loudspeaker thing is an issue here. If I've misunderstood and it is an issue, then I agree with Denner.

Theologically speaking, Islam is no whackier than Christianity, though its more zealous adherents might be a tad more dangerous, at this point in time; but given enough time (and enough exposure to morons like Kirk Cameron), I would not put any craziness past some of the Christians in my own country.


Is it possible to enjoy porn and not be an anti-religion bigot?

12-05-09  11:59am - 5280 days #4
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I don't like outdoor shoots. The one thing that always bothered me about Femjoy was all the naked girls posing on boulders. Naturally they have to be very careful, so the poses are bland.

12-03-09  12:42pm - 5282 days #11
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


This is a though one - I surely understand Wittyguys point and just read asmith - it's the same.
Then again, like jd - I do not suspect 'payola' here. Take a look at those -let's say 'Top 50 sites' at the TBP scores. Are they not pretty much the same - with a few exception - like the scores of PUs?



For example this site has a higher PU score:

https://www.pornusers.com/review/onlyopaques/

12-03-09  12:35pm - 5282 days #24
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by messmer:


Out of desperation I am ready to become an Asian fan but just like so many others I can't tolerated the mosaic imposed on the best bits of the models. So I'll add my plaintive cry to to that of others: Are there any GOOD Asian (Japanese) sites that cater to foreigners and therefore uncensored! I'm ready to subscribe! :-)


there are, but the gorgeous Japanese girls don't appear in them (except for Maria Ozawa).

12-03-09  12:33pm - 5282 days #8
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
And now we have W Jr. in charge.

12-03-09  01:13am - 5282 days #14
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
If you want to see porn made properly, join one of the premium Japanese sites.

The Japanese are smarter than we are.

12-03-09  01:10am - 5282 days #13
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I think this has been asked before, but are there any sites or companies that make their videos primarily with the oral sex being performed on the female, rather than the retarded blowjob contests that hardcore videos have descended into?




I would hate that, only because you'd see the stunt cock's face filling up the screen. The stunt cock's face should never be seen. I prefer the BJ vids because you see the girl's face.

But these jerks don't know how to make porn. If they did, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

12-02-09  07:59pm - 5282 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I notice this myself when comparing it to classic porn.

12-01-09  11:06pm - 5283 days #5
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
BTW, a review site can promote all they like...if a site's crap it's crap. Word gets around.

12-01-09  11:01pm - 5283 days #4
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Wittyguy, if TBP was a "payola" site do you think they'd let people like me post reviews, which are listed in all their reviews. I've slammed quite a few sites warning people to never join. I'm about to do it again to a certain site if I don't hear from them in 2 hours! Other users have as well.

11-23-09  10:07am - 5292 days #9
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by pat362:


That's why most guys can't be pornstars. I'm pretty sure there are plenty of applicants for the job on a werekly basis. Getting it hard in a room full of peoiple is one thing, but keeping from cumming on command a completely different thing.


I have to disagree.

The guys in porn must do gay porn before they're allowed into the big money of straight. These guys are just doing it for the money, most of them don't like girls. It's always been that way---Peter North, John Holmes, Paul thomas, Jamie Gillis, Julian, Tom Byron, Mark Wallice---all in gay videos.

Porn is a very closed clique.

11-23-09  10:03am - 5292 days #8
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I spoke with the webmaster of Mano Job about this. He was very good about wanting the scenes to end realistically, but told me that most of the guys in porn don't like cumming when a girl is touching them!!

Most of them are homosexuals.

11-14-09  11:53am - 5301 days #23
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
TBP just provided a good example of what I mean:

https://www.thebestporn.com/review/bigassadventure/

Get these pigs on a diet!

11-14-09  11:51am - 5301 days #10
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Denner:


How many people - males especially - watch porn worldwide on the internet?
Just for the heck of it:
There's just been some kind of poll here in little ol' Denmark that says, that 1/3 of every danish male watch/search for porn on the net EVERY day.....


Too many do.

I think it's ruined porn. Porn is formulated now, I can barely watch it. I hate the concept of "porn star".

Porn used to be real fun.

11-14-09  11:48am - 5301 days #29
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Well, here comes the first problem (bug).

The damn thing won't update anymore. No, I don't have a virus.

MS support isn't of much help. A little research shows this is becoming a real problem.

11-14-09  11:45am - 5301 days #22
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by malikstarks:




Your analysis of the psychological factors are also spot on. Everyone knows that pre-1960's, most men preferred curvier women. Especially when you talk about 19th century and earlier.


Curvy yes---lard asses NO.

Marilyn Monroe was curvy. Fat she was not.

11-14-09  11:41am - 5301 days #21
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Yes, define "Burger King Butt." That's what Voltaire probably would have said.

I'll venture that a BBB is at least 40 IN on a BBW. How'zat?


I mean like Alexis Texas.
She has a pretty face, but a semi tractor butt. At least in some of her videos.

11-08-09  04:39am - 5307 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


I'm old I guess, let me set that straight.

Is it just me, or are big fat asses on women in vogue in American porno?

Browsing through sites, I seem to be seeing this trend more and more.

Or is the "bottom" of the barrel being scraped?

Nothing makes me run away faster.

10-29-09  08:28pm - 5316 days #28
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


That does suck - That was the first app I added to my first PC and, like you, have been using it for years. I just recently found something called Glary Utilities and it is W7 compatible. It's not as one-click friendly as Window Washer but it might make a good replacement until Webroot gets up to speed. http://www.glaryutilities.com/gu.html


That, on the other hand, sounds like a good thing for a change, coming from MicroShaft.

Thanks for the reply!


Thanks, I'll give it a try.

10-28-09  02:03pm - 5318 days #21
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


I'm curious - was it was software or hardware? And, if it won't compromise your privacy or national security or anything, could you elaborate on what the issue is? Like, if it's a USB powered sex toy, I don't wanna know. Also, am I correct in assuming that the troubleshooter in W7 is better than the so-called troubleshooter in previous Windoze versions? You know - the one that always left you at "consult the manufacturer"?

Unfortunately, I have to get serious about putting a new PC together and I'm thinking I might have to take a big leap from W2K to W7. I never did like XP and Vista was never an option to me.


It's software RB, to be more specific Window Washer, which I have been using for years to clean out cache and so forth. Writing them did no good, they just recently upgraded to Vista!

The troubleshooter is good. It allows for making adjustments to the selected software that may (or may not) make it compatible.

10-27-09  11:32am - 5319 days #17
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by badandy400:


I do not have any glaring problems with Vista, well at least non that I have not taken many hours already to fix. But, there is still many things I do not like, particularly the "are you sure you wanna run that program you clicked on?


Badandy, you can turn that off!

Anyaway, W7 has made that less intrusive.

10-27-09  11:27am - 5319 days #16
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by shooterbo:


I finally went reluctantly to Win XP last year after using 98 2nd Ed. all those years. Could kick my ass for waiting so long. Will wait for verdict on W7.


Do you still have a black & white TV?
Lol

10-27-09  11:25am - 5319 days #15
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


Although I've heard some good things about 7, there's another conventional wisdom that says that Microsoft is quick to put out operating systems well before they're tested properly. There's almost got to be the usual driver and compatibility issues like there's been in every transition from o/s to o/s. And I definitely don't trust Microsoft to make things like alternative browsers easy to deal with. Despite the early positive reports, I'm skeptical of their next "latest and greatest".

I'm upset because my next build is going to push me into XP. I can't find a motherboard with my requirements that comes with Windows 2000 drivers.


Actually, W7 has been out since January for anyone who wanted to test it and report back to MS, and I guess many did.

W7 is very helpful as far as compatibility issues are concerned. All you have to do is right click any app and there is a feature to troubleshoot. For me, it's a big improvement over Vista. I've only had 1 compatibility issue. Vista was a nightmare. Edited on Oct 27, 2009, 11:35am

10-25-09  05:21pm - 5320 days Original Post - #1
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07


W7 was released Thursday---so far I like it.

Has anyone else upgraded?

And most importantly, how will it effect porn browsing?

10-25-09  05:05pm - 5320 days #12
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I'm a big fan of cheesy 1970's porno film soundtracks.
I guess it's my upbringing.

10-25-09  04:59pm - 5320 days #12
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by mbaya:


JD1961, Do they both have high quality videos? Can you provide the dimensions and bit rate available? Thanks.


The standard .wmv is 640x480 3100 kbps

They have an even larger size, at least for the newer vids, that I have not downloaded.

10-21-09  09:49am - 5325 days #9
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by mbaya:


I was a member of gagfactor several years ago. I liked it, but at that time it was all clips, not whole videos, with poor video quality. It may have improved though as it has been a long time. Another site is gaggingwhores.com. I was a member here also several years ago and it had low quality videos then.


They have full high quality videos now.

10-20-09  09:35pm - 5325 days #7
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by painmaster22:


Man the last couple of days I have been looking around at some random vids and I really want to find a good site that has a lot of throat deep, balls deep blow jobs in it.

And actually I don't care how the girls look, I just want to see girls go so deep their face turns red, and or they vomit. I watched all the FacialAbuse vids so that's out.


I really like it when stuff comes out there nose while he's still deep in her throat. I watched one where the cum dripped out her nose, and it was amazing.

Anything like that? On a side note, I would almost thing an armature site, with zillions of random vids would be good, but don't know if any quality. I join myGF for a while, but it was actually kinda lame.


I think this is what you're looking for.

https://www.thebestporn.com/review/gagfactor/

10-20-09  09:31pm - 5325 days #6
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


This sounds like something along the lines of Max Hardcore...but he is in jail now, so you might have to keep looking.


His site is owned by the i*s now!

10-20-09  09:17pm - 5325 days #4
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by RagingBuddhist:


I doubt you're alone in your thoughts here. I felt the same way when I joined D Attic, the archives site for D Archives (also known as Dionysian Archives). As it's strictly amateurs, I liked the site enough. But the midi files they play instead of live sound absolutely suck. It's bad enough that I know I'll never join the site again again.


Looks like you put those sites out of business because they don't exist!

10-20-09  09:14pm - 5325 days #3
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
You'll hate me, but with this type of video, I prefer the music. Invariably, the cameraman will talk and say something stupid like "show us your tits".

Hey, sometimes if I'm not busy, I add my own music.

10-14-09  07:44pm - 5331 days #12
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Khan:


If you could offer just one piece of advice to porn site owners, what would it be?


Have a very good search/index.
Make the site enjoyable to be in.

10-12-09  02:29pm - 5334 days #6
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
Originally Posted by Cpmx54:


Okay, maybe this is a stupid question. But, I really would like to know... Where do all of these porn sites manage to find so many hot girls? Especially the teen sites, where the girls really do look 18, in some cases younger...

Classifieds? Forums? Convensions?... All of the above?... There are just so many of them, and they're all so hot..


Were you born yesterday Lol

these sluts are everywhere.

10-12-09  02:27pm - 5334 days #4
jd1961 (0)
Active User



Posts: 296
Registered: Jun 07, '07
I don't think that a comparison is valid.

Fake body parts are things added onto the body. I don't consider them breasts, they're "things".

1-50 of 296 Posts Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.