Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large catalog of classic and vintage porn
Most or all your favorite porn stars have at least a scene or two on Private Classics
Considering the tech differences – this older porn looks very good
Has all the quirky and funny, cheesy features you remember or have heard about
Model list is highly effective
Digital copies of the same named magazine
Cons:
Vintage and classic porn can turn into more of an experimentation than enjoyment
It’s possible you may notice what I noticed, porn hasn’t improved that much
Bottom Line:
Private Classics is a big draw for me. I am not really old enough to know about the 60s, 70s or even 80s porn, but I have my beliefs, even when terribly wrong and that explains con #1. At times, I felt like I was experimenting with the video quality and performance as much as I was trying to enjoy the porn. That’s my fault. All my fault.
I don’t believe I know as much about older porn than I thought I did. My fault again. I was pleasantly surprised to see these older technology scenes looking fresh and crisp. The second con is a big one for me. This porn is as entertaining, often more entertaining than the porn we see in 2025. I definitely do not feel like the porn actors and actresses take themselves as seriously as the models do today.
The stories, the music – that’s where you get the funny part and often quirky parts. It makes you wonder if the models could even hear the sounds or music.
Comparing this porn to current porn certainly isn’t the goal or purpose of the site. It is a good way to find out if you have fetishes we rarely see in porn today and if you taste in models is affected by the hairstyles or clothes, but otherwise, it’s really not that different from today’s porn.
You can stream and download the videos and download pictures. There are digital versions of the Private magazines and those are the hidden gems on the site. I enjoy looking through the various magazines and being reminded of the basic goal of porn which is to arouse the viewers. It’s not so much to entertain or to make you laugh, just arouse.
As mentioned, the model list is highly-effective. I only knew a few of the models by name and being able to browse through the models with their names and all available scenes, really made using the site a pleasant experience.
A word that is typically viewed as negative in the context is underwhelming. That is how I felt about most of the content, but it may very well be – I’m desensitized to ‘normal” porn and sex. It’s oddly erotic to watch two people have sex without any kind of silly theme involved. I genuinely could see someone only liking this type of porn. It comes off as much more realistic than the circus acts we see on many porn sites. A fun walk down memory lane even though I didn’t know a lot of this older porn. You can see how much porn has changed and not surprising to me – it’s not really better these days, just different.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
So that’s where DDF went
DDF was one of my picks for top networks back when it was just DDF, Porn World could be even better
Around 15,000 total scenes makes this one of the biggest sites you can join
Quality is excellent across the board
Also offers a view of pay per view porn site Legal Porn
Pictures and videos are all worth downloading
Navigation is pretty good for a network of this size
Cons:
Other than having to ignore the Legal Porno scenes which cost quite a bit for a single scene, there isn’t much to complain about
Bottom Line:
I remember when DDF switched to Porn World, but I forgot about it. I remembered after reading a Porn World review. DDF was one of, if not my favorite, networks. I love the simple focus on the attractiveness of the female models. It is made all the better by the scenes often being hardcore only because there is penetration between a male and female. The bigger picture is the focus on the female’s sexiness. You have the leg and feet content, the not really BDSM but close enough scenes from DDF’s House of Taboo. Those scenes move onto the ones that filled DDF’s One By Day site and there were multiple other sites. All are included on Porn Word.
The videos of the last decade usually have a 4K download option, but I’m still downloading and enjoying HD. There are picture sets, which should be expected from DDF content. His sites almost always had top 5% picture sets. This content represents, in my opinion, the closest any site or network came to creating high level pictures and videos that improve each other. It was and still is common for sites to lean heavily to either the video or picture side, but DDF’s content has always been strong in both pictures and videos.
Let’s talk about Legal Porno, the content that comes closest to being bonus content for Porn World. It is pay per scene or view. If that makes you pull away, you don’t need to feel different or odd, it pushes me away. I join for a membership/subscription. I have bought pay per view scenes a few times and guess if Legal Porno had something that piqued my interest enough, I would consider it, but yeah, the Legal Porno content is fun to check out and consider, but it just feels out of place considering I have access to 15,000 scenes of porn. I just can’t see me paying nearly as much for one scene as I pay for the whole DDF Network content. But I don’t mind it being there.
The models are still in all their DDF glory. DDF seemed to prefer the most feminine forms he could find and made them often look even better than the nearly 10s they already were. There is glam, hose, stockings, heels, lipstick and everything promoting femininity.
I don’t think the navigation has improved since the DDF Network days, but do believe it’s at least almost as good on Porn World. The tags haven’t been altered or changed and are very good and helpful.
It’s an impressive site with excellent quality and gorgeous models. There just isn’t much you will find wrong with this site.
DDF was one of my all-time favorite networks. It was one of the first hardcore pornsites I joined. But back then, I only joined 1byDay and paid a premium price for the one site. All the 1byDay content is available on Porn World and I have to say, it’s still as good as I remember.
I want to say all the DDF content is here, but I can’t say that. There is a lot of it. Around 15,000 scenes. I do believe a few points should be taken off the score for the more complicated site, Porn World’s navigation. It’s not a dealbreaker, not even close. But I was fairly frustrated the first few times I logged in and searched directly for a scene I remembered, only to not find what I was looking for. With that said, a little time and a lot of paying attention has made the navigation good, not great.
The DDF sites I remember the most were: OnebyDay, Hot Legs and Feet, Only Blowjob and DDF Busty. The DDF network, in its early days, was my pick for the best value in porn. It’s still up there and the TBP $14.95 discount makes it even better. It advertises as $44.95 to me.
The videos and picture quality are still in-line with the DDF standards and the models are gorgeous, even still a little glamorous as DDF was known for. There are still updates as well and with a 15,000+ scene catalog, it’s one of the most impressive networks you will see.
Legal Porno also has their content on Porn World and I will admit, there are some scenes from them that caught my eye and made me consider paying for tokens to download. In the past, I probably would have found the Legal Porno content to be frustrating, since it’s taking up space in my vision and not available without paying more for, but enough sites have turned to the pay per view method, it’s just becoming common and I have accepted that.
You receive one of the best mixes of niches and genres with this network. It’s still a show of what a brilliant producer, director and photographer Denys Defrancesco was. His work is up there with the top names in porn history and even with the frustrating navigation, you at least know you’re going to get great content in your search.
This site also would be good for those that miss the 2000s era of porn.
I will confirm that from the best I can tell, all the House of Taboo content is available on Porn World. DDF stepped so far out of his zone with House of Taboo, but it was easily one of the best BDSM sites on the internet. I have downloaded quite a bit of its content from Porn World and consider that content, alone – to make me happy. It’s worth checking out if you’re into the idea of BDSM but back out when you see the “scary” parts. DDF produced BDSM with class and respect. That’s how I feel about his content. And it’s why this is a very highly recommended join.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Likely the largest transsexual collection online
There are over 230,000 scenes to download and over 230,000 photo sets to download.
Up to 4K downloadable videos
All niches within the Transsexual genre are represented
Multiple daily updates
Mostly amateur transsexuals
Cons:
The scenes can be very explicit and possibly offensive to those that are newer to transsexual porn
The site’s navigation is not as good as it should be.
Bottom Line:
If you’re familiar with Porn Box that has the DDF Network on it, you’re at least familiar with Trans Boxxx. It is owned by the same people. The site looks like it would be a great value, and realistically, it is. The first thing that stands out to me is how hardcore and niche/fetish heavy some of the scenes are. The scenes are mostly amateur and it shows both the good ways and bad ways. The good ways include seeing the many niches of the transsexual genre. There is solo, transsexuals with men, transsexuals with women and groups. Transsexual sites typically stick to one of those niches, but you get them all on Trans Boxxx. The bad is pretty straightforward and maybe even expected. Some of the models look like they’re new or newer to transsexual and are just men who are crossdressers. You have a smaller percentage of models that look more like women than men.
If you’re familiar with Porn Box, you may already know and expect the navigation problems. The scenes are very tagged and that makes them show up in searches that are at the mercy of the knowledge of the person tagging the scene. You won’t find a regular model list, but can click on the named models names and see all of their scenes.
You do get multiple new updates everyday. There is a chance, though, that you might not like any of the new updates for a week or more. Like with me, I like the solo scenes and the scenes with transsexuals with women. There will be times there are 10 scenes in a row that have transsexuals with men. Which is my least favorite niche in transsexual porn.
This site is so big that I believe it could be a con. Either that or have better, more accurate tags.
Because it’s mostly amateurs you do get some scenes where the models’ preferences and niches are being covered. This could be pissing, stretching the transsexuals anus with toys and frottage. Transsexual is already a polarizing genre as it is. These more obscure niches won’t help that any, but if you’re into transsexuals, you might like the variety which isn’t normal for transsexual sites.
I like transsexual porn enough that I like the more fetishy scenes. Anything that pushes the boundaries of what is normal makes me happy and aroused. I believe this site, for me, is a very good choice and it’s one I have joined twice in the last few months.
One thing that can be confusing is they do credit your account with “tickets”. I haven’t used any of mine. I’ve never been into watching cam shows,but you do get some free tickets.
The quality of downloads does help the site’s review score and it’s a site I will likely join a few more times this year.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
As others have said, the amount of content in this site is pretty exceptional - 14,601 with new updates almost every day - 15 updates so far in May, pretty much all women that work for the European studios, including new babes like Lia Lin & Karolina Geiman. The videos look great and can be downloaded in 5 different sizes, including 4k and new videos have BTS video as well. For me, what really makes this site super fun is the ability to peruse all the material they make available for purchase from all these other studios. The trailers are very entertaining and there's endless amounts of material to peruse using different tags, etc. Warning, though - video quality on the oldest videos is not high. For instance, I find recent videos to have bitrate of 3335 kbps while 2002 videos here have a bitrate of 1064 kbps
Cons:
Their C/S is no fun to deal with, in my experience. You ask a question, you'll be asked 5 questions back before you get an answer to the question you were asking in the first place. Interestingly, the best place to get action on issues may be Pornworld's forum. Most sites eliminated forums when they started to have member complaints about the site. I just checked out a forum thread where a member was complaining about a large number of videos on the site that were not playing to the end or were encoded at a poor resolution. Instead of telling the member to shove off, the moderator thanked him for the list and got it to people to fix the issues. The member who submitted the original list of dozens of videos on May 8 found only 4 videos with issues on June 1. So use the forum if you have C/S issues with this site.
Bottom Line:
Fun is a factor that is not accentuated enough with porn sites. For me, the massive amount of PornWorld material and the un-freaking-believable amount of non-Pornworld material that is available to peruse and check out is really fun and their new material is better than what a whole lot of other sites are doing.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Some absolutely gorgeous women, just Supermodel types from the 90s era
- Films had a real nice nostalgic softness dreamy feel to them- Great exotic style settings and backdrops
- Some good films if you've never been a member of woodmans films
Cons:
- Not the best quality here with resolution as movies made a long time ago
- I feel the women often underused in lots of these movies, often felt my expectations were not quite met
- Photos sadly not great in my opinion
- Porn scenes with plots on lots of movies
Bottom Line:
I have to say this site to me was one of them that looked good on the outside and I really should of looked more into the actual content as that was a serious letdown, having recently been on Woodmans network which included his woodmans films site and downloaded all I liked here and being really blown away by the beauties that appeared, let's just say OMG some of these women were knockouts, absolute stunners that I wish so much you saw the like in today's adult films. So soon after joining I was excited to see more of the same women with more content on this site. Sadly all the good stuff I'd already got, there was the odd movie I got of some decent stuff but lots I found lacked the good sex scenes and were more trying to be a normal movie with a plot-line than outright porn movies which I've never been a huge fan of mainly apart from classics like Emmanuelle.
One of the other main reasons I wanted to join was to see the images too as I remember the 90s style of porn magazines and the look of women in porn in the 90s and late 80s where classy not your fake eyelashes and over done makeup porn you see with stars of today's porn world forcing the glam look there was no need in the first place, these porn photographers and directors back then seemed to hire some super stunning natural women that just had class you don't tend to see so much now, weather it was the film they used back then or the photo filters but I for one love that type of porn, it takes me back to when I first discovered porn so has nostalgic value I guess. One major downside though was the quality of the image for content from the 90s and 80s is it isn't going to be high resolution and I knew that when joining but the images here just didn't really excite me much and were not as good as I'd hoped they might be. For one it was quite hard to find anything decent. You have to go through lots to find anything worthwhile as navigation on this site and search ability is next to none.
The sites is good to look at don't get me wrong if you've not been on the woodmans films site and got them then here is a great place to find those movies, don't expect any high resolutions as these movies were made mainly in the 90s and early 2000s maybe but there is some amazing models to be found that worked for Private in those days, women that you will not believed did porn Silvia Saint, Nikky Anderson, Blondie to name a few, lots of the movies here at least the best stuff in my eyes were directed by Pierre Woodman so lots of the movies feature anal and watching absolute stunning women doing anal on film is always for me a winner, lots of really exotic settings and some of the most beautiful porn ever shot I would think, wish there was porn being shot like this today with the same style of movie filters or whatever they used for that great 90s porn you see but with huge high resolutions, I for one would love porn to look like this quality but done now, sadly most directors at least that I've found film anywhere near as good stuff as found back then, I guess those type of models they used in these movies just don't choose porn as a career or if they did it's doing the self produced stuff on onlyfans or you'd see them on sites like Playboy or Femjoy.
Overall its a good site to discover how gorgeous some of the models were back in the 90s, and you'll discover some good stuff if you've never joined woodmans films before, if you have an have these movies you'll discover much less classics in my opinion.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
***Content, content, content… It’s very overwhelming at first glance at the number of videos that are available to you on first look of the site.
**Features the best stars in the industry from across the world.
*Video and photo quality is decent for what you may need or to satisfy your itch for many, many months plus the number of niche categories that are available for a viewer to search for.
Cons:
***The ticket based system that is available is a joke. The amount of money they are charging and/or the wait you need to do in order to acquire tickets. How about have those sites as separate entities instead of gouging.
**500 downloads per month limit… Sort of…
*The number of doubled scenes that need to be sifted through just to get the one that you have actual access to.
Bottom Line:
Intro:
What used to be known as DDF Network is now Porn World. When you sign up, it then transfers everything over to Porn Box. Not confusing at all. There is a ticket system that is involved, however, that is to access other scenes within the “network” of sites that include Anal Vids, Legal Porno, Bang Bros., etc. It should be noted that some scenes on those sites do find their way into Porn World, and at the very least the screenshot thumbnails of the videos do make that apparent. As a member, you are allotted a number of tickets per month without needing to make a separate purchase to acquire tickets. But, if you just cannot wait, purchasing ticket bundles is an option. There are 100+ studios associated with the network, however, not all are included with the initial membership and tickets will be needed to access those studios.
The photo quality:
Image size, in the gallery photos and not screen caps, that is seen mostly in the newer scenes is at 2592 × 1728 with 96 pixels per inch. The older scenes have pictures sizes at 2592 × 1689 with 72 pixels per inch.
The video quality:
Available downloads are in as follows and where available:
“WEB” - 640 x 480
“VGA” - 960 x 540
HD or 720p - 1280 x 720
1080p - 1920 x 1080
4K - 4096 x 2160
(Some videos will be at 60 fps, but most are at 30 fps.)
Also, video trailers can be downloaded. Some videos have “Behind the Scenes” videos available are are marked on the thumbs with 4K and Closed Captioning tags. The BTS scenes that are available are, what I feel are, true BTS scenes that show more of the directing aspect rather than the “silly off camera” stuff that can be seen on sites like Bang Bros and Vixen.
Pricing:
Month-to-month can run you around $30/mo. 2 month subscription is at $55 and 3 months runs at $80. As far as I can see, there wasn’t anything I saw that was for 6 or 12 months like most sites, but this could be an oversight.
Ticket packages that are available run from 10 tickets for $13, 20 for $24, 30 for $38, 50 for $60, 100 for $100, and 250 for $220. If you do the math on the ticket packages, it doesn’t really make much sense and you don’t see an actual benefit from making these purchases unless you want to go all in at $220 which equates to about $0.88 per ticket.
Studio subscriptions are available at $30 for Bang Bros. Box, Porn World Box, and Private Box. These subs come with the notice of purchase saying that if you have used tickets to purchases any scenes under any of those subscriptions can be refunded to your account.
Not every studio has the aforementioned monthly subscription offer. They do provide a total amount of value of tickets needed to purchase in order collect all scenes under that studio if they do not have a subscription offer. Example of this would be Giorgio’s Lab is valued as $2700 for the complete library currently.
The other stuff:
One thing that seems a bit odd to me was the download limit. From other sites, they all mentioned not having a limit on downloads. I am here to tell you that there is. Around 500 for the month is the limit. Yes. 500 per month. That works out to about 16 downloads per day and 125 per week. Not that bad for sites that set limits like that, however, I think it would have been better served to set a limit per week or day instead of month. If you are willing to put in the time on it, that limit can be reached in a day. The nice thing, like the majority of sites, you can still stream unlimited.
Recommendation:
The scenes are varied and plentiful, so there shouldn’t be any worry about not being able to find content that suits you for that day. It is overwhelming to see how much there is. I’m not sure if there’s anyone that would have enough time to watch half of the scenes available on the initial membership. Since there is so much, you will find your fair share of duds and overall flat scenes that just don’t do a thing for anyone on all fronts. There are a handful of scenes, mainly of models that I looked for, that were well represented and done well enough to be satisfying to watch, and even fewer that I see myself going back to over and over. One thing that I wish there was more of is the sensual stuff. Being that the site doesn’t really touch on the softer and more intimate side of sex drops the rating for me, but one thing is for sure is that the porn here goes hard and that is enjoyable to view as well.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main reason to join the XVideos Red site is the ability to stream and download the premium videos. With the free version of XVideos, you can't watch the premium videos. You can't download them.
-The definition of the videos varies. Many have 240p, 360p, 1080p. Or the highest definition might be 720p
Older videos (mainly 8 years back or older) might only have 240p and 360p. Or go up to 720p.
Newer videos from the last 3 or 4 years might have a 4K option.
-You get a wide range of niches. Covering many different fetishes.
-The content is almost all from pay porn sites. There is probably very little exclusive content. Not a normal pro, but the quality of most of the videos is very good. Sometimes you can see what site the video is from, other times, you can't.
-Streaming playback is good. You can fast-forward the video, and it won't freeze.
-Most videos have lots of tags, to describe the action. No text description of the plot, but a lot of videos have almost no plot, anyway.
Cons:
-The password for your membership is hidden.
On the confirmation email for your membership, they don't list the password.
Instead, you get a hot link to login to the member area.
I contacted Vendo, the payment processor. They could not give me the password for the account.
Instead, they gave me another hot link to login to the member area. I already had that link in my confirmation email.
-Most videos you see(from other paysites) are edited versions of the original video. Most videos are around 10 minutes, some are shorter. But many videos have a message: If you want to see the entire video, join the site this video came from. So I think this is a form of cross-advertising.
-A lot of people saying that much of a tube site content is pirated. But I think that a lot of the content is taken with permission; otherwise, why all the messages to join the originating site of the video?
-The search engine is excellent.
Bottom Line:
-The amount of hardcore videos is huge. Adult Time is the largest network collection of hardcore videos I've seen, but X Videos Red started as a tube site (it still is a tube site, if you're not paying a membership fee, and then it's called xvideos.com). But most videos at X Videos Red are edited videos, not the original videos. Most videos I've seen at X Videos Red are 10 minutes or less, while the original videos were 20 to 60 minutes or more.
However, I've seen some erotic movies at X Videos Red that are the complete movie.
These are mainly European skin movies, but it's a chance to see some old European movies from the 70s or 80s for a small membership price, or for free if you aren't a paying member.
Note: the search says "Search 10,546,022 videos", but that number is probably inflated. I mean, 10+ million videos?
-Not only do you get a ton of models of all kinds (ages, body styles), and the thumbnails can be helpful. I find looking through the videos easier and faster than looking through the videos at Adult Time. Adult Time is a great value for porn, you get a ton of content for a low membership price, but searching the Adult Time content is time-consuming. It's much easier to find pleasing content at X Videos Red. You're getting edited content, but you can join the originating site if you find some videos you really enjoy.
-A lot of the videos give the name of the model. Some don't, which is frustrating, if you think the model is really attractive, or the video is really hot.
-The membership price is not exactly cheap, but not really expensive, either.
$9.99/month, or $7.98/month with a yearly membership.
Although the site is huge, you have lots of categories to make searching easier.
As well as tags describing each video.
-I wonder about the definition of some of the videos. I'm watching a video that is supposed to be 1080p, and the image is not crisp and clear: it seems like the image is slightly fuzzy or out of focus. The details of the video file are 1920x1080, bitrate 2687kbps, so the dimensions should give a clear, crisp image. But the images are slightly out of focus. I'm guessing the fault is with the camera operator, who didn't bother to focus the video.
-Videos download with a generic computer-generated file name. You have to add the name of the model (if you know it), plus title of the video, plus the site name (if you know it).
-There are a lot of duplicate videos with different file names.
-Some videos require a separate subcription. So I guess the thumbnail for the video is an ad, which doesn't hit you at first: you click on the thumbnail, and wonder why the video doesn't load, then realize, you're supposed to join some other site.
-No model index. The models have no stats or bios.
Bottom Line summary:
X Videos Red is the premium version of X Videos. X Videos is the free version.
I suggest using the completely free version to see what the basic site looks like.
Then, start your free 7-day trial of the X Videos Red membership.
That should give you a good idea of whether the site is worth a premium membership.
For a low price, you get access to thousands (millions?) of hardcore videos, with downloading privileges. Covering a wide variety of niches.
With lots of attractive models.
And even though there's a lot of content that won't appeal, it's easier to find the content that does appeal, than at a network like Adult Time, where the navigation is more time consuming.
Adult Time is a fine join.
X Videos Red is a fine join.
There are plenty of fine sites on the internet, that are worth the money.
The main limiting factors are the time you have to spend, and the amount of money you can spend.
It's easy to overspend on porn, since there's so much quality porn on the internet.
But I'm very glad there is so much quality porn available at a low price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Should be called an adventure in avoiding clicking the wrong thing. There’s a DDF Network in here somewhere.
- If you have the patience and no itchy mouse trigger finger, it’s not a bad site at all.
- The navigation is pretty good once you mess with it enough.
- Susy Gala, where the hell did she come from?
- Joining and canceling seem simple enough but their promos do not work. I will explain in the bottom line.
- If you want the short version, the DDF Network is in Porn World and Busty Porn World. I will have to explain this in the bottom line. They have seriously complicated this.
- The navigation tabs are the whole key to making this site work.
- Averages more than an update per day.
Cons:
- It’s not good when I laughed before typing this. Lets just say here, it looks like they have around 50-100 sites on this one site and you have access to two of them. The rest require you to purchase tickets. And no, I’m not clicking the tickets to find out how much they cost.
- Going to a particular model’s page from the model list not only shows you which scenes you do have access to but also blends in the ones you have to have tickets to watch or download. I will make a comment in the bottom line about that.
Bottom Line:
I bit the bullet as they say. I’m a huge fan of the DDF Network and have been since the day they launched the DDF Network. I can tell you the DDF Network is running strong on Porn World. For some reason they do have it separated into Porn World and Busty Porn World (DDF Busty) but I do believe all the scenes are here. Those two combined: Porn World lists 14,008 scenes. Busty Porn World lists 1,942 scenes. That’s almost 16,000 scenes. All the scenes have multiple download options on those TWO sites. The newest scenes have 4K, 1080p, 720p and a couple smaller ones listed as VGA and WEB. Each scene has a full picture set that can be downloaded too. That part, in my opinion, is very good. It could be better. I don’t like that all of the DDF content is now listed just as Porn World or Busty Porn World. You have to dig through the scenes to find the scenes from the different DDF sites but it’s all here from what I can tell. Porn World itself updates daily and Busty Porn World updates 2-4 times a week. I can tell you based on my old stored files, the numbers look accurate on specific models I have collected from DDF.
Now, take a deep breath. On the main screen when you login, and by the way, you are still sent to Pornbox, not Porn World. It’s like someone got a bargain of urls and has to use them all. I’m going to count how many sites are on the main page. You thought I was bullshitting with the 50-100 sites estimate in the cons, didn’t you? There are 158 sites/studios on the main page. Including Bang Bros, Bang Bros add-on sites like Dancing Bear, CFNM Show and every content-maker on Legal Porno. I can get around this. I have figured out click “Porn World” and “Busty Porn World” but you know curiosity is going to cause me or you to at least look at those others. Where I’m going to get a little frustrated is there’s a button that says “Filter studios with full access membership”. I did that. It’s 57 sites/studios showing as full access. I don’t know about you but “full access” means full access to me. You have to have tickets OR you can join the sites. I will use Bang Bros’ add-on site Dancing Bear as an example. It says you can buy lifetime access to the site for $30 or you can buy specific scenes with tickets. I took the risk after saying I wouldn’t. The tickets are 42 for $29. One Dancing Bear scene costs 12 tickets. It’s clearly a better deal to join for $30 but it only lists 82 scenes. Dancing Bear had around 105 scenes when they shut it down. Every single site they have has different rules and prices to join them. The Bang Bros one has 9 lines of rules, something about you can download the last 31 days of new scenes. I am sure there’s another charge to get “full access”. Just avoid that shit.
Porn World and Busty Porn World are good deals. The promos, I received one in email for 3 months for $29.95. Its regular price is $44.95 a month. I clicked on it and the price was $24.95 for 1 month. There was no 3 month option for $29.95. Going to the site through the PU link, the offer was $24.95 for 1 month, the same as the offer they offered me for clicking on the 3 months for $29.95 promo.
Back to Porn World and Busty Porn World. Very good DDF porn. I said for years, the DDF network was my favorite network and the new scenes do not disappoint. It’s just the complication of everything. Where are the House of Taboo updates? Where are the Hot Legs and Feet updates? Where are the Only Blowjob and One By Day updates? They’re all blended in as Porn World. It’s a hassle. I think the part that disappointed me the most was going to a model’s page, I listed her in the pros … Susy Gala. If I search for Susy Gala there are 34 scenes I can download with my Porn World subscription. It says they have 118 scenes of her. Since I don’t have an itchy mouse trigger finger, I clicked to see more. Most of them are not even Susy Gala. The scenes are of other models named Susi not Susy and looks nothing like Susy Gala. Here is what I have figured out.
At the top of any page there is a tab for “library” click that. In the search box change “store” in the drop-down menu to “library”. It then lets you just search within the scenes you do have access to. Once you do that or just go to Porn World or Busty Porn World, you’re at least out of that 156 site/studio minefield. I’m going to score it well. Once you get beyond the hassle, it’s DDF Network and the tags at least somewhat lead you to specific sites from DDF, like the tag, “masturbation” that’s usually going to be One By Day content. It’s workable and manageable but the top score I’m going is 90. I believe my last DDF Network review was 98. Patience, calm the itchy mouse trigger finger and focus. It’s better than not having any access to the DDF content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Vintage and classic porn DVDs from the 1960s – early 2000s.
Downloadable magazine photo sets from the Private magazines also going back to the 1960s.
The site is laid out well, with selections for movies, models, magazines, 00s, 90s, 80, 70s, 60s, also has a section for black and castings.
Currently have exactly 400 models with some having over 100 scenes each.
Just under 1,900 scenes, unlimited downloads.
Can also search by full DVDs, there are around 300 full DVDs, including the very first porn DVD I watched.
Cons:
I am not for sure how much of a con this is, but the videos have only one download option. Besides that, a lot of these scenes seem very short (some under 5 minutes).
No category search or tags
They have updated, but there are no dates and no way to know how often they update.
The filenames do not have the DVD’s title in them.
Bottom Line:
One of my favorite sites is Vivid. I only watch their “classic” DVDs. The stories are usually at least better than we see in current DVDs and I think the models are more believably into the scenes as in newer porn DVDs. I was recommended this site as similar to Vivid Classics and in some ways, it is, in other ways it is not.
I do like the magazines section. Being from India, I have very little experience with the porn magazines and seeing the photo shoots from those shows how much porn has progressed.
One part I misread was I thought I also received access to private.com, which has their newer scenes on it, but you have to join it separately.
I have not watched a lot of the oldest scenes. I like the 90s and 2000s. They not only have some story and continuity from scene to scene, but also do not feel like current porn. The production does not seem as planned out. When I watch newer DVD scenes it seems like they follow the same exact plan from start to finish in every scene. These scenes sometimes will just have oral or a quick sex scene that leads into the next scene. It is too bad these DVDs cannot be downloaded as one whole part. Considering the scenes are mostly standard definition (480p range), it makes the files small and I would think a full DVD would be under 1GB.
There is a good selection of models. I know of some of them. And even though it seems like some of the scenes have been edited, these are still the only porn DVDs I really like. You can even get a porn history lesson here by watching the DVDs from the different decades. I think I would call it the evolution of the cumshot. The older scenes were mostly body cumshots, then the boobs cumshots and into facials in the newer scenes.
I do not know why these older scenes have a more authentic feel to them, but they do. Maybe they were better actresses?
The site really needs a tag system or categories. You are just handed the site with newest updates and have to decide what looks good without knowing what happens in the scene.
The first DVD I downloaded was Tatiana 1 which was the first porn DVD I ever watched. I thought it was older than the site lists it as 1/1/1998, but it was still fun watching it again.
There are a similar number of classic scenes here as on Vivid’s site, the quality is overall similar to Vivid’s classic scenes and the stories are as well. I think that is the market this site would appeal to. If you are into classic Vivid DVDs, I believe you would like this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy to use site
-Videos can be sorted through number of views, by month, year, and their advanced search has a mountain of keywords
-Each girl has a bio section with info like country they’re from and birthday to boob and shoe size. All of these are tags as well. The ‘extras’ section tells you what other DDF sites they are on
-Quality filming and editing
-Videos and photos downloadable (newer ones in HD)
-They have a really cool feature ‘skip to action’ where you can skip to actions such as pussy licking, anal insertion, orgasm etc.
-Movie trailers for each video can help to choose videos without skipping through the whole thing/watching something a bit meh
-Over 700 models and 800 videos
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross sales for Wow Girls and Fuckin HD on signup
-Not all content is exclusive
-Not all videos are available to stream (some only download)
-Upload schedule very erratic, they could upload 5 videos a month or 2
-Not all models are natural (a con for me) and are mostly white and slim
Bottom Line:
Euro Girls On Girls is the lesbian part of the DDF network. While content is not exclusive to Euro Girls on Girls, it is apparently exclusive to the DDF network. They do crossovers from their other sites if they fit. Many of the models work for other sites in the DDF network, and the girls’ profiles tell you which other sites. As the name suggests it’s not masturbation, it’s two or three girls together, I only found one foursome.
The site is mostly softcore porn with lots of pussy licking and kissing. A lot of oral and use of toys but not many of them are more hardcore bondage etc. If that’s what you’re looking for, try house of taboo in the DDF network (many of the bondage and dom videos were crossovers from this site).
There are currently almost 850 videos and almost 750 models, which is saying something. Although most of the girls were eastern european, I love that there are girls from a lot of different countries with cute accents and looks. One of my cons was that there were many girls with fake boobs but as there’s so much content and girls, you can find what you like very easily (you can use filters for ‘natural’).
Some of the videos start with some kind of setting which seems nominal and I would rather do without (eg pretending to go for a job interview) as it was badly done and acted, sometimes with terrible costumes. I’d rather them not go to the trouble if they can’t act. I did enjoy once that part was over with and they spent time enjoying each others bodies.
It’s worth it to pay for access to all 12 DDF sites (plus 5 archive sites) at $29.95 per month than pay $19.99 for just this site, although at the moment they do have a deal of $12.50 per month for life.
Overall a very slick, well thought out website with heaps of well-made content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the best, biggest and longest running (still active) hardcore sites.
- 1,641 scenes as of 1/20/2020, video and photo set included with each scene.
- The continued improvement of the navigation of all the DDF sites is seen here as well.
- 847 models and the majority of them are European glam models crossing over into the world of hardcore.
- They go much more hardcore than I think most porn fans realize with over 350 DP scenes and 850 anal scenes. Those DP scenes are the vaginal and anal DP, not the vaginal and oral DP.
- Updates 4 times per week.
- Very high technical quality (see bottom line)
- No download limits and videos and photos are downloadable.
- Navigation feature that allows you to search by year which dictates the video/technical quality. Very impressive but simple feature other sites should look into.
- Bills through Vendo.
Cons:
- Some of the male talent is annoying and I do think that's a con since a lot of scenes are 2 guys on 1 woman.
- The oldest content needs to be remastered.
Bottom Line:
DDF is still my choice as the best network on the internet. They have real standalone sites that they give you full access to all of them with a network subscription.
Hands on Hardcore was never a favorite DDF site. Usually when dealing with hardcore the only thing that really interests me is who the female model or if it's a unique niche of hardcore. Hands on Hardcore has both of those. There are models here that were once known as sweet and innocent, panty sliders, light masturbation and now they're in the middle of two men dual penetrating them. That makes it an unusual niche since it's not what you're used to seeing from these models.
The navigation here should be a model for other networks. It's not like this is a newer network either. They have worked very hard to make these sites work just like the standalone sites they are. Most networks don't do that. If you're on Hands on Hardcore and click model list, you get the model list just for the models on Hands on Hardcore. If you click a tag on Hands on Hardcore you get just the Hands on Hardcore scenes with that tag in them.
I mentioned the feature that lets you search by year. A lot of sites do that but they have their years grouped by video quality. Watch how nice this is, years 2011-2020 (Full HD), these have 1080p, 720p, 540p and 360p. Years 2006-2010 (HDV), these have 720p, 540p and 360p.
That alone tells us there are 15 years of updates with HD quality. They also have 4 years of archive content, some of it has 720p, the very oldest scenes are split into 4-5 parts and that's the ones that need to be merged and remastered but it's less than 50 scenes.
These scenes average right at 30 minutes each. Some I have seen are as short as 20 minutes, there are some in the 40-45 minute range.
The photo sets are very good, are downloadable in zips and I want to say they're not screencaps. Old BTS videos from DDF showed hardcore scenes being photographed separately from the videos and they start with the model fully clothed with a 5-20 photo tease in her clothes. The pictures then show the sex. The photos are available in small, medium and large downloads. The large ones top out at 4000 long end.
The content itself is hardcore. There's no light touching or soft music and to me it's as good as any non-extreme hardcore site. The guys can be annoying. For one, very few speak good English and for two, they're robotic. In some ways that could be a good thing since it allows the focus of the action to be on the woman but when she's 120 pounds and the guys are 220 pounds each it's not exactly easy to see her or focus on her.
There's also an advanced search that would take up all my characters to explain. It has clothing types (more than 20), location (more than 20), action (more than 50), toy type (more than 10) and model type, includes hair color, boob size, eye color, body art, skin color, natural or enhanced boobs and nationality (35 of those).
I did find a few of the actions worth mentioning: Dripping Icicle, Titty Twins and Biting.
Even though it's not my favorite DDF site this site is either the best hardcore standalone site I've been on or it's not far behind. I did notice in the actions it even has Double Vaginal, only 4 of those but it still continues my belief this is not what people expect from a DDF site and that's what makes it good. DDF has long been one of the greatest softcore, glam, solo, passionate lesbian producers then out of nowhere comes this site that looks like it belongs on an American network.
I wouldn't recommend it by itself. The whole network is usually available for a cheaper price than the standalone sites are and as you have read earlier in this review, the navigation is so good it's like having multiple standalone sites. You do have to login on each site. That's a common problem with someone makes a network out of previous standalone sites. The navigation gets messy and you never feel like you're seeing all the content of whichever site you're looking at.
The real compliment is I would rate it as only my 5th or 6th favorite DDF site but based on quantity, quality, navigation, this is a site that's near the top of its genre.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the best blowjob site on the internet.
- Huge site for such a specific niche (1767 scenes)
- Everything DDF records is high quality and that is in both technical and performances.
- 945 models
- Currently is updating twice a month.
- Very good tagging system that is as accurate as you can ask for one a network and site this large.
- Photo sets that include the models fully clothed and posing, they are downloadable as zips.
- Easy signup and cancellation through Vendo.
- Includes access to the DDF Network, but can be joined by itself as well.
- Covers multiple clothing niches including some women leaving part of their clothes on, some fully nude, others in their underwear.
Cons:
- The common one with a specific niche, the scenes can become repetitive.
Bottom Line:
I'm usually not into blowjob sites. Only Blowjob is an exception. First, you have the top-tier models that DDF brings in. Second, you get the DDF high quality photos and videos. Third, those clothing fetishes and how believable the women are at making you believe they love giving blowjobs. Some of these women look like they're french kissing the dick.
The numbers are there: 1767 scenes, those include a video and photo set with each.
The amount of models on a specific niche site is unheard of for me, nearing 1,000.
The technical quality includes photos that are 2000 long end with zip file downloads. The videos have included 4K option since January 2017, there are also 1080p, 720p, 540p and 360p.
Their streaming videos now have a "skip to action" feature that let's you jump to "ball licking", "masturbation", "handjob", "cumshot" as a few of the examples.
Something I've always believed they do as good as anyone is varying the cumshot. There are facials, in the mouth, on the boobs, on the ass and they do have scenes that venture outside of only blowjob and slip some sex in. I like the variation. It makes it more believable that the blowjob led to more.
You can join this site by itself, usually for $5 to $10 cheaper than the whole DDF Network costs but if you catch the whole network on sale it's easily a better deal.
There are also multiple scenarios here despite it being a blowjob site. There are male/male/female, male/female/female as well as one on one.
There's very little to complain about. I would score it higher if I was really into blowjobs. The women are mostly European. They make good eye contact with both the camera and the guy and their moans sound very realistic and not faked.
The older scenes don't have the "skip to action" feature on them and are not as high of quality but that's to be expected.
I would recommend the network to anyone and if you're a blowjob lover you definitely should try this site out.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
It is rare, in my opinion, to see a site of unique, fetish content on a network -- House of Taboo is that.
Over 1,250 videos and 1,250 photo sets.
They are only averaging a couple updates per month, but there is a huge, excellent network included (DDF).
Should appeal to those that believe sites like Kink are too hardcore or too fetish-heavy. This is more like mainstream porn meets their kinky friend for a night of fun.
Rarely seen props and contraptions; in my opinion, these are probably made for DDF to be less strenuous or stressful on the models.
Very mainstream porn models are even in these scenes. With the content being exclusive I would think those are rarities.
Cons:
Some of the models look overwhelmed even in the lesser restrictive bondage and props.
Not a high percentage, but 10% of the scenes don't even use a fetish. Maybe their costumes are the fetish? It's not a big deal.
Bottom Line:
Kink's Network is my favorite bondage, BDSM network, but House of Taboo shows a lighter, more mainstream accessible side to bondage and BDSM.
I couldn't possibly cover all the niches and fetishes they cover. You do see a common theme of light bondage. It could be the model's hose tying her legs open or bounding her arms behind her back. They use minor ball and gag devices as well. They have scenes with what I believe in a homemade pillory, head/hands through holes to present the model as helpless.
In the cons, I mentioned some of the models looking overwhelmed. For some viewers of this type of content that is a good thing. When you watch bondage porn both the male and female are usually equally experienced and adept at using the bondage. You don't get that feeling here. You feel like the woman just had her arms bound behind her for the first time. I wasn't for sure if that is a con or pro. Experienced bondage sex can become repetitive. I listed it as a con because that could bother some viewers. It doesn't me. The House of Taboo scenes are entertaining and most of the time you see a very enthusiastic struggle from the female model. In my mind, they are torn between fighting the bondage and submitting to enjoy the sex.
One of the biggest differences between House of Taboo and a site like Sex and Submission is the amount of major star models on House of Taboo. The scenes are on the harder side of mainstream hardcore, including double penetrations, bound mouth with anal and even bound mouth and hands double penetration.
The newer scenes (last 12-18 months) could pass for Kink scenes, that is how hardcore they are becoming. I will share a tip to look at the older content if you are looking for the less hardcore. The older content has more girl/girl scenes and lighter fetishes like urinating/nurse watching and even a fucking machine similar to Kink's.
It is a steady progression and there is content from 2006 - current.
I have not had any problems using the site. It could be a little better with helping me (you, anyone) find similar scenes to the ones we like. They have tags and they work well, but I have seen some scenes that the tags are not right on.
If you are a downloading type, the photo sets can be downloaded and this genre is a good one for photos. I prefer their download options of videos. They have 360p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. The sites with too many options make it easy to click the wrong one. The streaming player is okay, it buffers a lot when I use it, but it could be my internet connection. The older videos do not have streaming option. They only offer downloads on those.
You also receive 16 other sites with the network. There have content in all of the mainstream categories.
House of Taboo is either my 1st or 2nd favorite site on the network. I will try to cover the fetishes I see the most often on it: urinating, light bondage, rough girl on girl, dual penetration, anal, costume (usually latex suits and masks) and props that could be as simple as a ball gag to a pillory. If I could fix one thing about it it would be more updates.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a network discount
-Support link on every page
-Very attractive young Euro stars
-The network offers discounts to join 27 other porn sites
-Many but not all scenes feature anal
-Nice production values
-At least one update per day
-Nice variety of niches
Cons:
-Many download failures
-prechecked cross sells
-Vendo is the biller
-Captcha log in sometimes, but not always
Bottom Line:
The DDF Network describes itself as the “Ultimate European porn videos hub with exclusive 5K VR, 4K and full HD XXX videos for 2019.” It’s headquarters are in the Czech Republic, but the models are from many different countries in Europe. Officially there are fourteen individual sites and 15, 634 videos in total There are 2650 pornstars. As a network I would rate it among the best. The network is discounted by PU, so you get quantity, quality and a nice price.
You can also use your login information for the following sites not officially listed: Innocent Holes, Busty Lover, and Fuck in HD. That makes the total actually 17 sites. The total for IH and BL comes to 116 pornstars and 181 videos. Fuck in HD I think takes videos on the DDF network in HD and puts them on one site. It has 531 pornstars and 1009 videos, but at least some of the videos look familiar from DDF.
With as many videos as the network has, there are a wide variety of niches that are represented. You can find blow jobs, teens, busty, legs and feet, BDSM, VR, hairy, casting, lesbians and the list goes on.
There are no sites that focus on older younger or interracial, but there are a few scenes that do. They don’t have any story driven or couples porn as this is basically nicely done gonzo. The attention to detail makes for one of the best networks of this genre. The direction is excellent as well as the camerawork. The makeup, clothes and sets are top notch.
The models are for the most part exceptionally beautiful Eastern Europeans, mostly Russians, Hungarians and Czechs, between the ages of 20 to 30. The models are predominantly seasoned pros who give their all.
The members’pages feel a bit cluttered and busy and should be simplified. You can search the network, but not individual sites. I found no download limits. There are links to discounts to 27 other porn sites.
I had quite a few download failures and I have no idea why. The network saved my login, however sometimes I had to use a captcha. In spite of all the pluses there is room for improvement.
DDF Network is available with a discount from PU, but beware of prechecked cross sells. Vendo is the biller, but I had no trouble cancelling.
I feel this is one of the best networks for gonzo porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a network discount
-Support link on every page
-Very attractive young Euro stars
-The network offers discounts to join 27 other porn sites
-Many but not all scenes feature anal
-Nice production values
Cons:
-Many download failures
-prechecked cross sells
-Vendo is the biller
-Captcha log in sometimes
-Must log in to other DDF network sites separately
-Modestly sized archive with 50 pornstars, 73 videos and no photos
-May not be updating. The last update was in January of 2019
-Very limited search ability
-There is no link to or mention of access coming with purchase of DDF Network
Bottom Line:
The DDF Network describes itself as the “Ultimate European porn videos hub with exclusive 5K VR, 4K and full HD XXX videos for 2019.” It’s headquarters are in the Czech Republic, but the models are from many different countries in Europe. There are fourteen individual sites and 17,394 videos in total. As a network I would give it a 95. The network is discounted by PU, so you get quantity, quality and a nice price.
Innocent Holes is one of the sites in the network and has never had a review or comment here on Pornusers, TBP or Rabbits Reviews.
I found this site by accident, checking out the listing of sites that are owned by DDF. When you join the network, it is not listed as one you have access to and there is no link to it. The TBP website lists all the other DDF sites but not this one. The mystery deepens as the site URL says Innocent Holes, but the site itself says Busty Lover.com on the members’ page. The preview makes no mention of the DDF Network as being available and the join price is only $4.95.
This site has a mid to late twenties focus. Nearly every model looks Eastern European. Most are from the Russian Federation (sixty percent), but a significant number are Czech or Hungarian. All the models are white and there is no ethnic, body type or age diversity to speak of. One model is Mexican, but that is it.
I did not recognize many of the Euro pornstars. I did, however, see a few big names such as Lady Dee, Gina Gershon, Katrin Tequila, and Stella Cox from the UK.
There is quite a bit of anal, but not in every scene. I counted 24 anal videos of the 73 on the site. There is not any very extreme sex. I would call it premise driven. For example a woman who appears to be rtoo young to drink has sex with the bartender after he did not want to serve her. Some scenes feature two women, but there are no lesbian scenes and every scene has a male model in it.
I came to this site expecting very little and was extremely and pleasantly surprised. The videos are all in HD, some are 4K, so the quality is excellent. The models are across the board outstandingly beautiful and the performances are pretty good to excellent. I compliment the director for the high production values as the models show a lot of sexual energy and enthusiasm. The sets, lighting and camerawork are excellent.
The only options for searching are 4K, Anal Sex, Group Sex, Uniform, Brunette, Blonde, Black Hair, Blowjob, Gym and Teen. By the way there are 21 videos of the total of 73 with 4K and the rest come in sharp true HD.
The site may not be updating any longer. In January of 2019 there were four updates and none have been added since then.
I would give this site an 85. It is too small for a higher score, but I would reconsider if the site is still updating. The videos that are available are quite well done and thoroughly enjoyable.
If you see this site as an extra in a network that is quite excellent, the hot videos are a bonus to what you already paid for. In that case the site rates a 95.
My advice is to sign up for the network and use your log in directly. Don’t sign up directly for the deal price of $4.95 as I suspect you don’t get the whole DDF network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has discount
-Top notch Euro stars
-Photos for almost every video, but small and low quality
-Support link on every page
-Offers discounts to join 27 other porn sites
Cons:
-Many download failures
-prechecked cross sells
-Vendo is the biller
-Captcha log in sometimes
-Must log in to other DDF network sites individually
-Modestly sized archive with 84 pornstars, 199 videos and 9893 photos
-Not updating. The last update was May 28, 2015
-No way to search for anything, no use of any tag system
Bottom Line:
The DDF Network describes itself as the “Ultimate European porn videos hub with exclusive 5K VR, 4K and full HD XXX videos for 2019.” It’s headquarters are in the Czech Republic, but the models are from many different countries in Europe. There are fourteen individual sites and 17,394 videos in total. As a network I would give it a 95. The network is discounted by PU, so you get quantity, quality and a nice price.
Hairy Twatter is one of the sites in the network and has never had a review here on Pornusers. It features somewhat hairy models, but not any extremely hairy ones that you find on some sites in the niche.
The scenes range from masturbation, sybian riding, and lesbian to heterosexual hardcore. What you see here is standard, predictable mainstream porn.
Of the 199 scenes, 32 involve shaving. Maybe it is just me, but I don’t find that of any interest at all. If I joined to see women with hair down there, why would I want to see them removing it? The act of shaving is not erotic and there are plenty of sites with women who are already shaved.
The site is no longer updating, with the last new video added in May of 2015. The site members’ pages are very bare bones and there is no way to search. Ouch.
If you are a fan of hairy women, this is not a good example of the genre. The videos are all in HD, but not very unusual or exciting. I would give this site a 60 or 65.
If you see this site as an extra in a network that is quite excellent, the few hot videos are a bonus to what you already paid for. In that case the site rates a 75.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has discount
- Huge archive with 936 pornstars, 1745 videos, 126099 photos
-Extensive tags for searchinghen streaming
-Top notch Euro stars
-Excellent production values. Well dressed, nice makeup and sets.
-Photos for each video
-Support link on every page
-Offers discounts to join 27 other porn sites
Cons:
-Irregular update schedule
-Many download failures
-prechecked cross sells
-Vendo is the biller
-Captcha log in sometimes
-Must log in to other DDF network sites individually
Bottom Line:
The DDF Network describes itself as the “Ultimate European porn videos hub with exclusive 5K VR, 4K and full HD XXX videos for 2019.” It’s headquarters are in the Czech Republic, but the models are from many different countries in Europe. There are fourteen individual sites and 17,394 videos in total.
In two reviews on PU in 2018, Exotics gave it a 98 and Lk2fireone a 95. The Best Porn and Rabbits Reviews both rated it a 94. As a network I would give it a 95.
The network is discounted by PU, so you get quantity, quality and a nice price. Only Blowjob is a site within the network that I thoroughly enjoyed. It used to be a separate site with a much higher price.
This site alone is huge and has 1745 videos with 936 pornstars.
The quality and attention to detail makes this the best site for blow jobs in my opinion. The models are cream of the crop Euro stars who wear great sexy oufits, tasteful makeup and the sets are excellent. The performances are very nicely done, even if some do become routine and mechanical. Being a European site, you can’t expect much ethnic diversity, but there are some Asian as well as black women.
The most recent videos have options for VR, 4K, as well as full HD. There is a photo set for each video.
The member’s pages work well, but could be a little less distracting. Each page has a link to support, so cancellation and help are only a few clicks away. I really liked the first class search engine that uses an extensive tag system.
Two points stand out as unusual if not unique.
First, if you stream the video you can jump to where the action tag is located. For example, you can jump immediately to the cum shot whenever you want.
Second, many of the scenes are threesomes or foursomes. Of these many feature several women and one man. That is a bit more expensive to shoot and not at all common for a blow job site.
There were a few things I did not like:
prechecked cross sells when joining, too many download failures, and an irregular update schedule.
This year there have been four updates in January, two for February, three in March and five in April. Blow job sites generally post updates more frequently than this one does. Not a major complaint, but there is room for improvement.
I enjoyed the site a lot. Sites featuring bjs are some of my favorites.This one is well worth the money as it is arguably the best in this niche.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of (if not) the most beautiful pornstar on the internet. If you like European girls, its the best network I found for that.
-If you really love big tits, its also the best network I found for this with lots of very juicy big tits and the videos will take advantage of it with lots of tits licking, fucking, showing them when fucking etc.
-Large collection of only exclusive videos with many unique websites that are updated frequently including dedicated ones for teens, big tits, blowjobs and more.
-High quality porn video with high sexual tension. Many videos will include very good preliminary sex including kisses, french kisses, licking etc. You'll really want to fuck these girls like no other pornsites!
-Good site design with easy navigation and good stream quality
Cons:
-Subscription is expensive compared to other big porn networks like DDF
-Too many masturbating only videos. Yes the network have all kind of porn, but these kind of videos seems to be predominant.
-I would like to have pictures of the models and not just scene-captures photos.
Bottom Line:
DDF Network is simply one of the best porn network you can find. Not only all content is exclusives, but its also one of the only place you'll find almost exclusively european girls. So if you like a particular UK pornstar for exemple and only see 2 or 3 videos of them on popular pornsites, good chances are you'll find many videos of these girls on DDF. I know its a matter of opinion, but personally, DDF have the most beautiful pornstars I've seen and I'm subscribed to many pornsites
Also, if you love or have a particular fetich for big boobs, DDF is also one of the best place I've seen for this. There is a dedicated site for those girls that still have frequent updates and the girls have really, really big tits. If you want big tits like Jasmine Jae or Emma Butt, you know what I'm talked about - and many girls at DDF have big tits like that that'll make you hard almost instantly. Plus, videos featuring big tits will take advantage of this with tits licking, fucking, bouncing while fucking and the camera always showing those tits so you'll always see what you really want to see.
The Network have many niches websites with still are updated weekly (so new videos everyday overall) including ones for teens, blowjobs (and its one of the best of this kind) and more.
The thing I particularly like about DDF is the high porn quality. Its not just "fucking" videos. They know how to turn you on with tits licking, sexy kisses and french kisses and more.
The only negatives I've found about DDF is the subscription price are a little on the expensive side compared to your average pornsites and they have too many masturbating videos. Yes there's all kind of porn genre, but the masturbating/sex with toys only videos seems to be predominant and its a little frustrating when one of you favorite pornstar have too many of them compared to the other genres.
All in all its that simple : if you love European Girls and Big tits, you simply need to subscribe to DDF - Even if you only have to subscribe to only one pornsite network I highly recommend this one.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Photo sets from the 1960s and '70s display a playfulness, a carefree approach to hanky panky only possible in a HIV free era.
-1st month is under 21 bucks with PU's discount.
-Ah, memories: For those of a certain age, Private XXX magazines were the first taste of hardcore. VHS was still years away.
-Attn youngsters: see what postal inspectors used to devote thousands of work hours to intercept.
Cons:
-Tagline .."..since 1965." yet the oldest videos only date to the late 1980s.
-Eye-watering, mind-boggling, erection-softening effect of clothes, hairdos, household interiors & infrequent shaving from the 60s and 70s.
Bottom Line:
By the late 1980s, Private was on the cusp of cranking out a steady flow of hardcore films with high production values often filmed at exotic locations. To get to that future, Private had to shoot sets that, while not in the same league as say 'Deepthroat' or Playboy, kept the studio lights on, the staff paid. These are the results.
As stated the oldest vids date only to the late 1980s. That's my guess as none carry the production year. Obviously porn stars are desired when fresh then less so as they grow shop-worn then face a transition period when they are either snicked at or admired for their locked in an era appearance. IMAO the gals featured in this 1986-9 stuff have a way to go, dare I say ten years?, before they can be considered hot or even retro by today's audience.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Can choose your own username and password, making the login details easier to remember.
-Easy login. With cookies enabled, the site remembers your login details, and does not require a captcha.
-DDF Network gives you access to 14 porn sites.
-No download limit.
-Content is exclusive.
-Some member sites are https (secure), others are non-secure. So some login details could be compromised by hackers.
-Most videos stream smoothly. The videos are professionally shot (excellent lighting, focus, sound control, etc.). However, some videos do not load (broken links?).
-Nice model page, with good-sized thumbnail, and hot links to her contents at that site. But you have to do separate searches for each site, instead of a simpler system of showing all her videos at the network.
Cons:
-2 pre-checked cross-sales on join page.
-Vendo is the billing agent. I prefer CCBill or Epoch.
-There appear to be a lot of broken links at the 1 by Day site.
The videos will not load or stream from the model's page.
For example: Alisa, Amanda M, Andrea B., Andrea M, and Angelina Crow were just a few of the random models from the letter A that had broken links.
-This is a nitpick, but I don't like the DDF Network logo that is placed near bottom right corner of the video as it plays. Make it smaller, or make it disappear.
-Because of the huge number of models at each site, they need a smoother, faster way to search the model listings. Otherwise, it becomes a pain searching through each page of models listed by thumbnails.
Bottom Line:
14 sites does not sound like a lot of sites: however, this includes a massive amount of hardcore porn:
-Thousands of porn stars featured.
-Thousands of videos.
-Over 1 million photos.
-The sites include an number of niches, as well as some fine archive sites for Eve Angel (a very popular porn star) and Cherry Jul, a gorgeous blonde Russian porn star who gave it all she had in her sex scenes.
The network has a massive backlog of content that should satisfy must hardcore gonzo fans:
-2400+ porn stars.
-14,500+ hardcore videos.
-1.5 million photos.
-There is a new VR site, so you get access to the latest fad in porn.
-Customer support is 24/7.
-The network has daily updates.
-The newest updates are in 4K definition.
The major con would be that this is an expensive network.
The PU discounted price is $24.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
But you can try to find a special offering, for a lower price.
They usually have further discounts on holidays.
Giving the network a score of 95 for the massive content and variety.
But if you are a fan of gonzo hardcore, you could rate the network even higher.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the very best all-around network on the internet.
- Comes with 13 sites, and those 13 sites include at least 8 sites that at one time were successful standalone sites. Eight of the sites are still updating and 5 are fairly listed as "Archive" sites.
- The navigation in its newest iteration blows other networks away. Will further in BL.
- Download speeds are very good, about 70% of my max.
- Averages a new update per day across the network.
- The amount of content across the network is reaching hard to believe levels.
- Ready for this one? Over 2,500 models. And some have over 100 scenes.
- DDF, the producer Denys DeFrancesco, helped create "Leg sex" and is one of the most copied producers and photographers in internet porn history.
- The network itself covers nearly every genre. It's the closest I've seen to complete.
- House of Taboo is maybe the best mainstream accessible kink/BDSM site on the internet and it's included.
Cons:
- Two checked cross-sales sit directly over, "Yes, I am 18".
- Being used to American porn can cause a slight problem here since most of the models don't speak English. The good side to that is the men aren't talking at all in the scenes.
Bottom Line:
There really isn't much at all to complain about here. I've evaluated my last 10 years of porn sites and can say this one easily is in my top 3. I like several of the American networks but DDF has consistently been working on their navigation and for me they've hit a good spot with it. Navigation on a site this large is very important.
I'm going to get the numbers out of the way since they're distracting.
- 2543 models
- 15,161 scenes, each scene comes with a video and zipped photos.
That's a lot of porn. I always thought DDF's biggest strength could also be seen as their biggest weakness. They have variance in their network sites. When you look at most networks the sites really aren't that different, they change a setting, add a few twists to the storyline and call it a different site. The DDF network isn't like that. You have sites that still focus on solo girls, posing, teasing, masturbating. Then they have a couple of lesbian sites. Throw in a couple of hardcore sites. And a kink/BDSM site.
I think for DDF's experience to be understood, one has to consider how successful these sites were as standalone sites. I know at one time, on PU's parent site TBP, three of the sites included here were in the top 10 of overall review scores. I can tell you I paid $29.95 for One By Day, for Hot Legs and Feet and for Euro Girls on Girls. I don't remember what the standalone price was for Eve Angel Official but I paid whatever it was.
I do think that separates it from the American networks. And if it's not known, you can actually still join the sites in DDF Network by themselves for a reduced price.
I can't say I've ever really liked Hands on Hardcore but that's mainly because at this point, I really don't like most hardcore.
The archive sites should be mentioned since these are most likely aimed at collectors. They include Cherry Jul, Sex Video Casting, Eve Angel Official, Sandy's Fantasies and Hairy Twatter. Sandy's Fantasies for those who are curious is the lovely Zsanett Egerhazi aka Sandy from Club Sandy. This content of Sandy is from the earlier years of her career and features one of the most viewed Euro lesbian sets of all-time, it's Sandy vs Sophie Moone, two of the most popular Euro models of the Euro porn boom in the mid-2000s. They were also a part of the group that I once called, "The no take dick six". That name came from watching multiple interviews of Eve Angel, Sandy, Sophie, Sandra Shine, Mia Stone and Peaches. Their English or lack thereof led most to answer, "What's the most you'll do on video?" with, "No take dick, no, no."
While I'm having fun at their expense, they were the models who interested me the most. I couldn't understand how 6 European models who were from Hungary could have that much power over their scenes.
And if you like them, they have over 500 scenes just of those 6.
The big change that led the network to a 98 is the navigation. I don't think many people question the quality of content at DDF but the navigation has been really bad in the past. You could click something and end up on Google, bad redirect urls, dead links, it was terrible.
Now, as of 2/6/2018, you sign in to a hub. Across the top are the names of the still updating network sites. The hub itself shows all updates to the network. Say you want Hands on Hardcore. Click it and the hub reloads with only Hands on Hardcore content. Not good enough? Go directly to "sites" and pick your favorite, you now have a brand new search engine that will just search within that site's content. And you can just search through models and see all their content.
So, why the -2? I didn't put it in cons since it's a minor problem and not to make fun of DDF's tech group but every time they try to fix something, they break it! If you want to go to one of the archive sites you have to sign in one time. It doesn't move seamlessly to them like it does the active sites. That's pretty minor so I took 2 points off for those cross-sales and the biller is Vendo, who I haven't ever had a problem with but those cross-sales could easily be re-checked if trying to click the age consent.
Other negatives aren't worth taking points off like older content not being HD, that's accepted at this point and I'm afraid if we keep complaining about it they're going to start removing it.
Even with my high score, I don't join DDF Network more than twice a year. I mainly focus on the 1byDay, Hot Legs and Feet and House of Taboo content and have all the archived content already on a hard drive. I really think at least 4 of these sites deserve a standalone review but will probably limit it to 2-3 of them.
The active sites are: 1byDay, Euro Girl on Girl, House of Taboo, Hot Legs and Feet, DDF Busty, Only Blowjob, Hands on Hardcore and Euro Teen Erotica. There's still an emphasis on glam but it's why I just join twice a year. I still like glam to a point and they are shooting the best solo sets.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site has some pros
1) It feature 12 sub sites
2) Their are over 6000 scenes
3) Their are over 900 movies
4) They specialize in DP, Gangbang and Anal content
5) Their is one Fantasy Rape sub site: I Confess
6) Their is no download limit
7) Their membership is affordable with TBP Link
8) Their site is significantly better than the previous one
9) Their are a lot of HQ excellent pics for every shoot and the pics often surpass the excellence of the scenes
10) More than 5 updates per week
Cons:
Their are some cons with this site
1) You cannot download any 4k videos.
2) Their HD option for videos are a little suspect as the size of their files for HD range from 500 mb to barely over 1 gig.
3) Some of the sub sites require separate subscriptions, and some of the included ones are in low def.
4) 62% of their library is in Low Definition.
5) Positions you see on thumbnails and pictures will often not be featured in the sex scenes.
6) Their is a cross checked pre sale
7) About 10% of their HD Downloads are not hd and in fact the coding is so bad they are unwatchable.
8) Most of their current HD content is non exclusive and can be found sometimes in higher quality on other sites. Their LQ content is mostly exclusive.
Bottom Line:
The Good
The good news is this website is 100% better than its last incarnation. The video quality is significantly better too. Private is making a effort to improve and for that they should be praised.
The Bad
The bad news is nothing you will find on this website is better than what another website does. For example over 50% of the HD content on this website is in a superior format on Bang!. Almost all of Privates "HD" content is non exclusive. If your looking for DP then Kink, Bang! and the DDF Network do it better. If your looking for Anal then Kink, Holed and Tushy do it better.
The Ugly
My first paid online job was reviewing Private DVD's. It might surprise some people to hear that Private as a company used to be cutting edge. One of the first to switch to Digital filming they took huge advantage of this and filmed in exotic locations with decent budgets and amazing scripts and set pieces.
That version of private (When they were #1 in European porn production) is long dead. I am kind of a expert on this company so I can say their current business model is to pay the lowest amount possible per scene to paid contractors who loose money on the deal and have no viable livelihood. Their are many good documentaries on this to be found online.
How can Private turn things around?
Literally their IS a roadmap back to success. I am telling you guys at Private it is possible for you guys to hit #1 in Europe again. Literally INVEST in remakes of your very best movie lines. Start with Tatiana, Cleopatra, No Limits and work your way back to the Matador series. You will find the modern audience is dying for the old locations and set pieces and scripts. Even the "Tower" series so controversial at the time can be done MUCH more dark and hardcore now and will find a adoring audience. You guys have the road map to success you just need to follow it back to greatness and profits.
The Bottom line
So why did I join? Because I could tell from just the previews this new Private site was better than its last version. I was hoping they were back on the right path. I actually found some scenes that was exclusive and worthy of any collector of Flexible Sex & Tall Teens (Melisa, Mea Melone, Dila and Carry Cherry).
The bottom line is I do not give the current private my personal seal of approval. They earned a 70 because of their vast improvement in their site. But they are capable of a 100! Owners of Private for porn sake invest in your product, stop buying from bottom of the barrel private contractors. Hire some exclusive stars, rehire your old famous directors or cultivate some new ones. Follow the roadmap you yourselves already have and become the worlds number 1 website again.
I was profoundly unhappy that the 4k is streaming only, most of the library is LQ and the HD is questionable. My final verdict is Skip this site for Pierre Woodman's sites and for Marc Dorcel's sites. Their quality standards are up to modern times.
I have nothing for love and fond memories for Private as a company. Did you guys notice a remake of IT made millions at the box office? Remake your movies well and your website will flourish. You could even make the movies exclusive to the site!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Over 6,000 hardcore and lesbian scenes of mostly exclusive hardcore porn
+ A lot of attractive euro girls, mostly teen to early 20's with a few MILFs as well
+ $15 a month through TBP
+ No download limits
+ Good download speeds for me, about 2-3 mb/sec
+ HD files are not excessively large but no file size is ever given
+ Get to see a lot of porn stars, especially early in their careers
+ In browser playback is mostly smooth and you have different stream options
+ Allows for comments, saving scenes as favorites and rating scenes
+ Updates 6x per week
+ Mostly high production value, lots of exotic or unique scene locales too
+ About 90% exclusive content or at least Private media exclusive
Cons:
- Prechecked cross sale
- Support is a bit questionable
- Almost, but not quite, a site for picture oriented porn geeks
- Limited model info, model directory not complete
- Search functions limited and scene tags are too broad for a decent search
- File names are terrible
- About 40% of content is not HD and there's some psuedo-HD as well
- Some scenes get repeated/recycled, especially early on
- Cannot download 4k vids, only stream them
- Just because an update occurs today doesn't mean the scene was shot recently ... or even this century (I'm not kidding).
- Lots of anal and dp if that isn't your thing.
Bottom Line:
This incarnation of the Private website started in 2010 and consists of 251 pages of updates as of August 2017. This site is really a tale of 2 halves. Keep in mind that the date a scene is posted is not when it was shot. Thus, the oldest 125 pages is mostly content shot in the 90's or early 2000's on VHS and converted in 480 digital format. Ouch! Because Private was mostly about producing porn in exotic locales a lot of the early scenes suffer from poor lighting, poor sound, not so special special effects, tons of shitty background music, and the then European obsession with endless closeup shots. Because some scenes were shot in a foreign language Private decided to have the dialogue and sex sound overdubbed on some of these. I challenge you to not laugh as a low quality, poorly lit scene streams hideous overdubbed sex sounds from a double penetration with smooth jazz blaring in the background. Some early scenes get recycled too.
Things finally change with roughly the updates from 2013 onwards (the most recent half). You get HD vids on most updates. By 2014 you start getting reasonable picture counts with sizes coming in at 1600x1060 (96dpi) with some sets getting up to 1500x2300. 4K vids arrive in late 2015 but you can only stream at 4k, not download. They also get away from the obsession with closeups and some of the ultra exotic locales in favor of more set work with higher production values.
Here's some specs:
PICS: Not all scenes have pics (even recent ones) and most are at 1000x1500 (96dpi) with 1600x1060 sizes or larger coming since about 2014. The pic count offered by TBP and the Private is exaggerated. The early scenes only offered a few dozen pics at best and the majority of pics are mostly the obligatory pre-scene pose shots. Starting around 2012/13 you get more scenes with reasonable pic counts (80-200 per scene) without the endless posing. Like most sites, the vids typically show more action than the pics. All scenes with pics have zip downloads although file names are just a series of letters and numbers. The photo viewer sucks though, you only get 8 pics per page and have to frequently jump though a lot of pages to see if you want to download the zip. Pics aren't always in order either when viewing in browser or opening the zip file. The pics tend to be good quality but limited size makes this an iffy site for pic lovers.
VIDS: As noted above, a lot of the early content is just old standard media shots or VHS shots converted into 480p. 480 is only download option for about 40% of the content, otherwise you have options of 480, 720, 1080 or phone. HD comes along in 2013 but, suspiciously, you have 720 or 1080p as options no transition from 720 to 1080 or i to p on the HD. I didn't dig into this deeply but given the age of some of these scenes there is no way they could have been shot at 1080p. Thus, my claim of psuedo HD on some scenes applies. Download speeds were good though and the file sizes were reasonable I download mostly in 720 and half hour scenes were usually 500-700 mb. Scenes range from a few minutes to almost an hour, most fall into 15-30 minutes.
Navigation needs some work. Pagination is limited, but you can manually adjust for page numbers to jump around as needed. Model info is limited. Tags are too generic for any meaningful search and some scenes are mislabelled or tagged as well. As noted above, the picture viewer needs work. The inbrowser stream player works well and has the pop-up screen shot available on the time bar for most videos although how well it works varies from scene to scene. Really the only way to view this site is to page by page.
You signup (less prechecked cross sale) through rocketgate. To cancel you have to submit a support ticket. I was canceled within minutes but I did a confirmation email. Private also makes pretty clear that they don't do support.
A lot of the older content is endemic of what Euro porn used to be: closeups, background music, actors looking at the camera, and very male-centric in that the hot girls are really just willing props with an orifice for you to stick your meat into them. Often, if it went into one orifice it was going into all three. More recently it's a lot more reflective of what you see on DDF, 21st sextury and teenmegaworld. I stunned to see some heartcore type as recent updates. The scenes also have more of a story arc (no dp's within minutes of a girl meeting 2 strangers in the woods) and less emphasis on exotic locations and more on production value. While the production value rises some of what made Private Private has disappeared. It's less focused on exotic locales and scenes with lots of hardcore action and is now more generic in that the scenes now look like they could be shot by any of the major Euro companies.
Overall, the site gets most of it's points from the fact that there is so much content. It's too big to fail but could be better.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
