| User Reviews (7) |
|
User reviews consist of pros, cons, and other thoughts.
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ A Dogfart site that could easily be missed
+ Good download options up to 1080p on the videos
+ More believable gloryhole scenes than most gloryhole sites
+ Includes access to the Dogfart network
+ Creative scenes that include nearly or maybe every sexual act
+ Seems less scripted than most Gloryhole sites |
| Cons: |
- It does not update near enough
- Relies on dated taboo (interracial) |
| Bottom Line: |
I also reviewed Gloryhole.com from Dogfart. The difference between the sites is like night and day. While both sites rely on interracial taboo and gloryholes, Gloryhole Initiation, feels more like a culmination of all the positives Gloryhole.com has with nowhere near the amount of negatives.
One of the biggest ones is the viewer engagement of looking like unscripted scenes. It is one of Gloryhole Initiations strongest points. I do believe the Gloryhole setting requires the scenes to be unscripted-feeling. Do we really think a woman walks into a public bathroom and decides to blow some stranger through the bathroom stall? There’s no way to get around that one. It’s such an appalling act to think of, the rest of the scene has to develop the credibility and believability. Gloryhole Initiations does that. I want to think if a woman is willing to give the stranger a blowjob through the bathroom stall wall, she also will be willing to have sex through the gloryhole and be near dominant herself.
That is the problem with using interracial as the genre. Interracial porn, for most of its existence shows the black male being dominant. Gloryhole Iniations is non-white women with white men. It shows the awareness Dogfart possessed going into the planning of these sites. Is it more believable for a black woman to be dominant with a white man than a white woman being dominant with a black man?
It’s rhetorical and is best thought about as changing the viewer’s mind before they watch a scene. Gloryhole Initiation has intrigue and questions about what you’re going to see in each scene, but Gloryhole.com just has the same script scene to scene. This niche, Gloryhole, to me has to be spontaneous feeling to the viewer as my mind tells me the decision to participate in Gloryhole, would be spontaneous.
The video download quality is HD with 4K costing extra. The downloads are unlimited and I’m glad of that. I downloaded more scenes from Gloryhole Initiations than I did from the rest of the Dogfart network combined.
I do believe the inclusion of Gloryhole Initiations with the Dogfart network, gives us, the viewers, the impression that Dogfart knew Gloryhole.com was becoming redundant. Glorhole Initiations is worth the price of a Dogfart membership by itself. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (0 Replies)
|
| Status: |
Review is over 2 years old and no longer counts toward score. |
| View: |
Read Expired Review (3 Replies)
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
|
|
| User Comments (0) |
|
Ask a question, give quick feedback, warnings, etc.
Be the first to comment on Glory Hole Initiations!
Add Comment
|
