1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
For what it's worth: I was a member a couple of times. Last time was about 5 years ago. They were touting their "hi rez" then; turned out to be 1024 pixels. The photos were really crappy. Have all of 6 photosets from this site, and if it weren't for the models (Crissy Moran, etc.), I'd have none.
Now, on their site, they say they've got 'em "hi-rez" in three different sizes, but they don't say what the sizes are. (Man, does this get tiresome, this shit.)
The site still looks like it was designed for the days when anything over 56Kbps had some "wow" factor to it. Itty-bitty thumbs, small screen areas for the pages, and such. ("Best viewed at 800x600.")
Until it's clear that hi-rez means 1600px or more, and the pics don't look like they were left too close to a nuclear test site, I'd rather park my $10 at a KFC than blow it on this.
|
07-10-09 12:35pm
Reply To Message
|
