Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Vintage Flash

Vintage Flash (0)

Newbie
88*
2Cigars1Woman (0) 06-09-25  07:36pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A throwback to the classic pin-up girls
I thought it might be non-nude but it's not, full nudity throughout
Beautiful models in vintage lingerie
The videos are good and the pictures are as good or better
Even the hairstyles of some of the models look like styles of 50 years ago
Very professional feel to everything on the site
Cons: It's not too soft for this type of content, but there's no hardcore sex
The oldest videos are terrible quality
Bottom Line: Vintage Flash caught my eye while browsing for sites I haven't joined. I love old style pin-up girls and with Vintage Flash, you'll see absolutely everything. I can remember looking at old pin-up girl content and thinking it was beautiful but not that sexual. This site changes that with full nudity and explicit posing.

The whole site is like an homage to the pin-up girls of 50 years ago. The lingerie looks the same as the styles of yesteryear, but the models are now showing everything. I'm sure some would prefer the old style of tease only, but seeing legs spread was my sign to join.

I do appreciate the artistic part of this site. They have taken a once popular style of photography and updated it. I would even say similar to when sites like Met-Art started taking more explicit photos.

With the lingerie styles being based on the old styles, it was even more appreciated to see some of the models wearing vintage hairstyles. It really does look like someone took pin-up pictures years ago and now we are getting to see the more explicit photos.

The site allows downloads of the videos and photosets. This could be important to someone reading it, the pictures – for me, are better than the videos. I'm not judging in technical terms. I'm saying I prefer the pictures. Videos have, in many ways, greatly improved porn, but not this style of porn. This style of porn, to me, is best viewed as still images. There are various reasons including me liking the tease of it, but also because I don't think, a woman stripping off 1940s style panties isn't near as sexy as flipping to the next picture and seeing the panties a little lower.

This content takes us back to a simpler time when femininity was worth more than an orgy. The models do a great job of replicating the women our great-grandfathers loved looking at. The producers deserve credit for keeping nearly every part of the photos or videos how those would have looked while taking a chance with more explicitness. I would score it higher but am just not used to reviewing a site based on an established concept. Very good site especially for those wanting some nostalgia.

Reply To Review Add Review to Favorites

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to 2Cigars1Woman!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.