Monsters of Cock (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Access to the enormous BangBros network that boasts around 8,000 videos in total
+4K available for videos dating back to September 2016 down to 480p, much older videos (pre-2009) 720p to 360p
+Sizeable collection of 725 videos, 20-70 mins length each (35 mins average)
+Very lively interracial, wonderful production value shot gonzo style that’s cheesy but still very sexy
+Hundreds of brilliant photos to go around (200-700 per shoot not counting thumbnails), screenshots rich in quantity as well
+A huge wealth of different talents, from the popular to the relatively unknown, mostly aged 20-26 at time of shooting
+Favourite videos and models and create your own library, you can also like or dislike both
+Plenty of tags to choose from under videos or you can use the search engine
+Good to very good download speeds |
| Cons: |
-Updates every two weeks
-Content isn’t entirely interracial, lends to name more than I thought and lacks clear identity
-After logging in, takes you to obnoxious page brimmed with site package deals
-Videos play automatically upon loading
-Extra $5 per month required for 4K access
-Irritating malpractices, more details below
-Rolling watermarks randomly throughout videos across centre
-You can’t comment, they have a feedback utility though I guess
-Search engine misses videos with points of interest due to poor tagging, sometimes they forget to include the model names which is strange
-Site interface in my opinion looks outdated
-Navigation between various sites on the BangBros network is a mess
-Many shoots have huge image file sizes, 500MB is quite common here with some as big as 2.5GB
-4K video file sizes can be as much as 9GB
-Cancelling is cretinous, I had to use their forums to cancel properly
-No downloadable trailer previews |
| Bottom Line: |
Disclaimer: please note that by "interracial" I am referring to black men and not black women, these are industry standard terms not my own.
Buckle up because this is going to be a long one. Had to cover a lot of bases here so for the first time I’m going beyond the limit. This is down to the controversy surrounding them.
BangBros have been in the porn “biz” for a long time and are pretty much a household name these days. If you like porn, you will have at some point almost certainly heard of these guys. I joined in pursuit of Monsters Of Cock as most of the content there is interracial and I’m a sucker for the niche. I have to be honest, I was anxious joining. Reason being these guys have bundled up quite the notoriety over the years, even being dubbed a minefield by people at PU due to their various advertising ploys. However I bit the bullet and tried it out, aware of the potential calamities that lay ahead. I ran into problems alright, but we’ll get on to that soon. Let’s be positive for now.
Monsters Of Cock excel in punching out jovial, ditzy and ultimately sexy eye candy that would satiate many. There’s fantastic interracial. Under the BangBros umbrella, their videography is why they propelled to stardom in the first place. Their capture in my opinion is one of their defining features, similar to a fish eye lens? This style is shared across the board from what I’ve seen. Edges are rounded off in the corners, so the footage bends into the outer reaches. It supplements the action neatly, especially the POV segments which are a sight to behold because well, they’re phenomenal. Not sure if these guys are the only ones who utilise this capture but I know it’s uncommon. The crop of talent here is rich with variety, all the women are from different walks popular or not. Nowadays, the popular talent are more of a commonality.
Quality wise you’ll be in safe hands, the production value keeps ascending. Today the scenes are shot in deliciously crisp, sharp definition. They are diligent here because damn does it come through. On the other hand, sound is an area where they can improve. Some shoots sound very muffled, especially during sex. Unprofessional in my books, usually I am more lenient but it shouldn’t be happening at all considering BangBros’ stature and budgets.
Photos look brilliant, there are hundreds per shoot and they also supply screencaps with similar quantities. I wish more sites did this as having both options are great, makes comparing actual footage with photos much easier. Likewise with their videos, they’re very corny yet undeniably sexy. It can be to their detriment though, whilst browsing videos the photos used as thumbnails on site might not be in the video at all. Clickbait-esque, screencaps would be better. Solo imagery doesn’t appear to be a focus either.
Time we hone in on negatives. Their upload schedule is every two weeks, pretty slow but the network makes up for it. 4K access requires a $5 upgrade per month. A reasonable charge years ago but not now. The site interface here isn’t impressive either, it looks aesthetically deprived. It looks outdated, grey and lifeless to me. If you took a screenshot and told me it was from 2012, I would believe you. Navigation is clunky too especially when browsing sites, no clear designations such as logos or home pages for any of them. Clicking the site links below videos is the easiest way I think. Amateurish qualities if you ask me, this system is crying for an overhaul.
There’s also a lack of identity, is it really an interracial site, has it become one over the years? I see plenty of interracial content for other sites on the network and wonder why they weren’t released here, seeing as their premise isn’t all that different. The name Monsters Of Cock does lend other possibilities, but clarity would be appreciated. There isn’t anything particularly distinct about the way they shoot either, they use the same BangBros formula as everyone else. Story while not a focus can do with some elbow grease on creativity. You’re launched into the action very quickly most times and on occasions it feels like they’re jumping the gun.
Now more familiar problems ensue. Ads, ads, ads. Getting offers after logging in, seeing a long column at either flank on the page while browsing videos saying “unlock” above each site thumbnail. It isn’t as bad as “one wrong click” as I’ve read from some at PU but vigilance is a must. Not what you want at a porn site. They also use a cheap, animated watermark that rolls across the face of videos at times which is obnoxious and serves no purpose. Get rid. Furthermore, there’s a loyalty scheme where every three months of joining lands you a free site. Once I reached the threshold, I expected to choose a site at my own accord, but they chose one at random. Wouldn’t have minded so much if the site didn’t have 10 videos. Tacky moves, amigo. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
