| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
X-Art
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pros : beautiful models, some of which are the sexiest I have seen in some time. Lily has to get a mention as one of their top models and her videos set is such high quality even if it is very short.There are now 63 very sexy models with photo sets available in 3 sizes. |
| Cons: |
Photo quality is totally inconsistent and in many cases very poor consisting of soft or over exposed photos. For HQ photos there is very little detail.
The videoes are too few and again not all of the same high quality as Lily's. They are also very short appprox 3min in duration. |
| Bottom Line: |
I as a picture lover fail to see how other reviewers can score this a 95 which puts it in the same bracket as MET ART, Hegre, Femjoy etc which it clearly is not. I have seen photos on all these sites where you can see the very hairs on the models arms and the goose pimples from a cold room used for the photo shoot. These are not of a similar quality nor is there the same volume of models and photos. Bottom line very sexy models but they are being done an injustice. Improve the quality of the photos and this could bea top site but not yet. |
|
02-06-10 07:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
77
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
02-05-10 07:49am
Replies (4)
|
Review
78
|
X-Art
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful young slim models professionally photographed. Not porn star type models. Young fresh faces enjoying the cameras eye. No cosmetic body enhancements. Video technique improving with time. Increasing use of video. |
| Cons: |
Shoots need more of a story line using clothing props. Fantasy build up from clothed to nude instead of too many similar nude shots in one set however beautiful they are. Improved eye contact with camera. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is the best in it's field & improving with each update. I find it very rewarding for my erotic needs & the photographer is open to ideas. Highly recommended. |
|
02-04-10 09:23pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
79
|
X-Art
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
# nice girls
# good quality
# HDV videos
# partial HC content
# functional design |
| Cons: |
# HIGH PRICE
# 1 update every 4th day
# small archive
# no bonus contents |
| Bottom Line: |
X-art aka Beauty Is Divine was always a great source for inspiration full of angelic looking babes.
I see the change from BID to X-Art with mixed feelings. The additional hc content stays in total contrast to the "old" days and unique contents and make it just another teensite.
I totally disagree with majestix opinion because the price is way to high for a site that updates only every 4th day and offers a small archive.
X-art is for people who do not need a daily update and don't want to miss nicely shaped and flexible teens in quality scenes. |
|
02-01-10 02:11am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
80
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
01-30-10 10:13am
Replies (0)
|
Review
81
|
X-Art
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Extremely high quality and original content. Photographic style that captures the beauty of the girls. I have never been disappointed by an update. The memberships costs are extremely low for the quality of the content and frequency of updates. |
| Cons: |
The updates could contain more photographs but everything that is in the updates is pure quality. No filler shots |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has amazing content. Many of the photographs have an editorial quality and uniqueness that is hard to come by. The quality is 2nd to none. I am continually impressed by the quality found at this site. I highly recommend this site. |
|
10-03-09 12:40am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
82
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
07-29-09 04:52pm
Replies (2)
|
