| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
ALS Scan
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Over 500 girls to check out
Plenty of resolution options for pics and videos
PU discount is always nice
Decent download speed
Search function (see con)
Some might like the rating system |
| Cons: |
Model names not in file names
Search function limitations
Lots of video without a matching photo set
Pic sets for a BTS video no matching full video?
Only preview for video is a small, fast moving gif
Very little diversity - mostly skinny white girls
Repetitive scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
This wasn't my first time in on this site but it was a good while back and I don't remember it being this bothersome. The only big positives I can say about the site is that they don't feature girls with a ton of tattoos, piercings or breast implants and the 4K video looks really good. After that, the site really left me scratching my head.
I don't understand why the video and picture sections are exclusive of each other and yet come together when doing searches. Searching with a keyword/tag brings up both video and pictures when all I'm after are the videos. I also found that the search function seems to be based on existing tags, so you don't always get results. I think a page with all the tags would end that issue.
Having to manually add a model's name to each file is annoying.
It'd be nice to get an idea of what's in the video before downloading it. There is a link below each video that says Photos, but all that's there are four versions of the cover for the video. Why? What about a photoset? And that gif preview? I use a 43 inch TV as a monitor and it's still difficult to see what's what. I found myself deleting quite a few scenes pretty much right after I downloaded 'em and checked 'em out. A better preview would help them save some server bandwidth.
I've never bothered with rating anything. I really don't care who is the most popular with the masses.
As was mentioned in a comment for the site, some of the stuff is just plain weird, like the embroidery hoop insertions.
I'll admit that it could just be that I'm starting to find all porn getting repetitive but here it just seems so formulaic. Shower? Drop the towel, soak up, go to the vibrator. Outdoor scene? Drop the clothes, show off in a bunch of poses, go to the vibrator or some bizarre insertion.
As a bottom line, I'd say it was easily worth the $5 I dropped on it, and it might be a good one and done site for someone who's never checked it out, but I doubt I'd go back unless I see they revamped the site. I only rated it as high as I did because the video quality is really good. That'll go along way to maintaining the quality when I chop up/cut out the weird parts with my video editor. |
|
12-17-23 12:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
52
|
ALS Scan
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent photo quality
Excellent high definition video quality (Later shoots)
Attractive Babe type girls
Regular updates |
| Cons: |
Vaginal shots are garish (Candy red) which is very unnatural looking.
Excessive focus on fisting
Many older videos are flagged as no longer available |
| Bottom Line: |
This site really is taste dependent. You have to like candy red vaginal shots and excessive fisting which I don't. Also, for some reason, many of the older videos are shown as no longer available for viewing. I guess the site owners don't want to spring for the extra cost of storage. |
|
11-26-07 04:16pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
53
|
ALS Scan
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Most of the models are fairly attractive and (at least to me) relatively unknown -- but they also have plenty of top billing models ready to play with themselves for you.
Over 34+ pages of videos and 53+ pages of photos (60 vids/photos per page) - and they are updating on a regular basis.
BTS videos of some of the photo shoots are nice.
NO download limits (at least from what I can tell) and downloads are relatively fast.
Video file sizes are reasonable with HD usually topping out at around 1.6GB -- 720p is usually much lower at around 500MB. |
| Cons: |
MASTURBATION/SOLO videos only. There may have been a small handful of B/G content, but it was extremely rare (and probably a BONUS from another site). There are a few G/G scenes, but nothing I found particularly interesting.
Content after awhile becomes identical -- different girls, same situations (but isn't most porn?). |
| Bottom Line: |
Honestly, I'm not a big fan of SOLO content unless it includes something extra to spice it up... ALS Scan does not... It's just girls masturbating (some pretty quietly) and that's just not very exciting to me.
BUT! If you ARE into that, you're in luck, because ALS Scan has PLENTY of content for you. With over 34+ pages of videos and over 53+ pages of photos, you're bound to find something you enjoy.
I'd recommend this site to anymore just beginning their porn adventures as nothing here is off-putting or offensive and to anyone who enjoys sitting back with a nice cup of tea and watching soft young girls play with themselves. |
|
05-24-19 08:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
54
|
ALS Scan
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
--attractive models, usually
--high-quality photo techniques
--decent collection of models |
| Cons: |
--more clinical than erotic
--the site emphasizes youthful (legal) females, which means lots of pigtails and the like, which is silly at times |
| Bottom Line: |
I admit it: I've never understood why guys go gaga over this site. Yeah, I know the girls look younger and cuter, and they're willing to push the limits, but too often this site turns models into sideshow freaks, using odd contraptions and (occasionally) human assistants to show us just how far a vagina can be stretched. So hot. Not. Future gynecologists probably benefit from the site, but this isn't erotica, folks. In fact, in most photos, the models look anything but turned on: they're amused or speechless or bewildered. Similarly, I'm speechless and bewildered, too -- by the over-the-top reviews of ALS. |
|
01-07-17 12:14pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
55
|
ALS Scan
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
HUGE Resolution pictures (my screen is not big enough to fully appreciate this)
Exclusive content and exclusive girls
The girls are cute and shaved |
| Cons: |
Expensive.
Navigation: other reviewers have stated that it has gotten better but it's worse than any other site that I have used. Limited search options.
Site Design: Amateur design, like a personal homepage from end of the ninetees. Strange choice of colours and fonts
ZIPS: the older zips that I wanted to download where strangelly organized, when unzipping they were put into 2-5 different folders.
Content: I simply don't like the content, all sets are similar; most include: Fisting, large toy insertions, Insertions of everyday objects like hotdogs, bananas, etc into pussies, Speculum use, Pussy gaping. The girls seem to laugh and enjoy themselves in a very NON erotic way. None of the girls seem horny: to me it is NOT exciting seeing a 18 old girl putting 3 hot dogs in her pussy while laughing like a kid.
But if you like the above, sure then my cons are yours pros and you'll love ALS. |
| Bottom Line: |
I am sorry if you fans get angry for not giving it a better score but I am sure most "normal" pornsuers would agree with me: This site is not just any teen site, it is pretty out there with lotsa fisting and putting instruments and food in a fetish kind of way into small girls pussies. Rather off-putting and not my kind of tea at all. For 9 out of 10 pornusers this site is crap, for the rest who likes all the things I listed in theCONS I am sure it is great and worth the 95 something rating that fooled me into signing up. |
|
06-09-08 10:45am
Replies (5)
|
Review
56
|
ALS Scan
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Nice European and American solo and lesbian girls
-The sex is good and hard
-No men (except for the director, whose voice features in most movies)
-Variety of set locations, inside and outside
-Range of movie sizes, up to HD for many
-Movies are reasonably filmed and edited
-No music soundtrack (always a good thing)
-Zipped picture sets |
| Cons: |
-A lot of fisting. If fisting isn't your favourite thing, this site may become boring fast
-Lots of movie downloads are just filmings of photo shoots - and anyone that has seen a photo shoot will know that the reality can be boring and show the falseness of the situation
-Many of the movies are just 'behind the scenes' features
-Some movies are not even porn - they are just naked girls in public locations acting goofy
-Entire photo sets are spread over several updates
-Male director talks during movies (that has lost 20 points alone). He also sounds gay, and I believe he is called Alex. (Yes, indeed.)
-Design/Navigation is terrible
-Proper porn movie content is not as huge as other similarly priced sites |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like lots of fisting in your solo or lesbian porn (and I'm sure many guys out there do), and like hearing a male voice giving instruction and encouragement to the girls, then I would recommend this site to you.
As well as the fisting content, there are a couple of nice tribbing scenes too, and most of the girls generally seem very convincing and genuinely enjoying the sex - although there are clearly some 'actors' here not genuinely getting off. There's some anal too - but not in most scenes. And there is some peeing that tries to pretend it is 'squirting' (does anyone really believe that?) as well as some honest peeing, and a few apparently genuine orgasms where white girl goo is seen oozing from the open pussy (although after a fisting session you can't be sure it's not just lube).
There are better looking sites out there, offering more variety with better navigation and bigger content - but if you are looking around for something new, and can cope with the negative points mentioned, it might just be worth a look.
Highly recommended to guys that enjoy hearing a male voice (and especially a gay-sounding one) talking while they wank. The score leaps to 85 for those people. |
|
01-12-08 06:07am
Replies (14)
|
Review
57
|
ALS Scan
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
ALS has been setting the bar high for years.
-all models are shaved and otherwise natural
-over 500,000 pics in zips
-resolution 2000x3000
-overall amount of content is overwhelming
-lost count of videos, but I'd guess over 3000
-most videos in 1080P
-mostly solo and g/g
-subjects also include b/g, peeing, dildos, speculums, fisting, anal insertions, anal fisting and lots of outdoors and BTS
-newly redesigned and searchable website with tags (90% of peeing content was tagged correctly, I looked at everything on their site and tagged the remaining 10%. You are welcome.)
-one, sometimes two updates daily
They are remastering lots of their older stuff. How cool is it to see those favorite pics of yours from years ago in more detail than ever before? This is one of the coolest things going on at ALS right now. I give them so much credit for staying true to their roots, and for putting in the real effort and investment that it takes to do this. |
| Cons: |
I honestly can't come up with any cons here.
Some past reviews have mentioned their introduction of b/g content as a con, while other have considered it a plus. I'm pretty neutral on it personally. To those who feel that ALS is straying from their roots with b/g content, I will say that is not true. ALS has done b/g content in their early days too, including one video with Mia that I'm thinking of, it was just rare back then.
The merger with Met Art was totally a good thing, all concerns regarding that have not played out, and they have kept everything that made them unique and great while totally modernizing their site.
You may notice some of the oldest archived sets appear thinned out. This is not new, they were thinned out on their old site too, actually those old archived sets were just samples of what was once available on CDGirlsOnline.com. As part of their renovation with Met Art, ALS had actually brought more pics back online than they had before. |
| Bottom Line: |
ALS - All Ladies Shaved. I obviously love this site, because I have given it my top score. If you look at all of the sites that I have scored close to 100%, they all have one thing in common - they are large, high quality networks that are run like the best of the small operations. This could not be more true of ALS - they go to every length possible to please their customers. Usually, the "Bottom Line" is the section where I go into objective detail about a site. With ALS, I will ask you to forgive me for being a bit subjective, because I would rather tell you the story of my own personal experience. ALS is a site that dates back to 1996, just about my earliest days ever seeing online porn. I didn't find them in the 1990's though, they first came to my attention in the early 2000's. I remember that ALS's pics were the first that I ever saw in 1200x800 resolution back around 2003, and I knew they had just raised the bar on everyone else. Those 1200x800 ALS pics still look amazing today. Back in those early days, I got what ALS pics I could from TGP's and the like because I was not in a position to get a full membership. Over the years, I lost many files, first due to an ill conceived idea to delete my collection, and later to a hard drive crash, but ALS's pics were among the ones that I remembered the most.
So I finally joined ALS a few months ago, hoping to rebuild my old collection and check out all of their new stuff too. I was impressed with the amount of content on ALS's site. They are one of those sites that you really can just get lost in, due to the overwhelming amount of pics and videos. ALS has a very distinctive style. It goes much beyond just having all of their models shaved. They love to do shoots at the beach and by the pool on bright, sunny days. Their models are young and slender with natural breasts and few if any tattoos. They always look like they're having a lot of fun too, and you can see lots of behind the scenes videos where the models are just having a good time with each other and with the staff. At the same time, with all of this lighthearted fun going on, ALS can really push the boundaries. ALS is the only site I can think of where the models seem to be having such a fun time while doing things as extreme as fisting, using speculums, and putting clamps (the ALS "dreamcatcher") on their pussies. Of course, there is lots of peeing too. So, there I was, downloading all of this great stuff from ALS, when I realized that something was missing.
I had some pics from the earliest days of ALS that I just couldn't find anymore. Actually, as I would later learn, the pics that I couldn't find were shot and watermarked by ALS, but they were never on alsscan.com or alsangels.com. They were only released on CD by CDGirlsOnline.com, a site that is long gone. CDGirlsOnlines.com was a site that sold CD's of pics via mail with exclusive ALS pics that couldn't be found on their websites. I was let down, thinking that I might miss out ALS's original, earliest work.
So, I contacted support, and they were incredibly helpful! Support passed my email along to several other employees, each of who were remarkably helpful, until it ended up with ALS's content manager. We compared notes about ALS's pics from it's earliest days, and we looked over the really old stuff that I had in my collection. Almost all of the stuff that couldn't be found anymore was from CDGirlsOnline.com. Despite the fact that they had closed CDGirlsOnline.com years ago, he went the extra mile to help me out. So far, he has found thousands of rare, old pics from CDGirlsOnline.com. The ones that he has found so far were released only for a limited time as bonuses, bloopers, and outtakes on the ALS sites and then removed. Out of incredible generosity, he has made these classic ALS pics from CDGirlsOnline.com available to me. Some people feel inclined to guard and keep secret the rare things that they come across. I would rather as many of you as possible enjoy ALS's pics, so that is why I am sharing this information with you, with ALS's permission. These old pics - bonuses, bloopers, and outtakes - are available to you as well, if you sign up as a member and ask politely. ALS has made no announcement that they will be remastering these pics, posting them on their sites, or making them available indefinitely, but they are available right now by special request. They are not up to current ALS quality standards, they range from 400x600 to 1200x800 in resolution, but they are the sharpest 400x600 pics I have ever seen. It's also really cool to have ALS pics with watermarks dating back to 1996, even if the resolution is low by today's standards. What's more, ALS tells me that they still have everything that they ever shot, some in RAW files, and the earliest content on analog color film, all saved in a storage locker somewhere. Isn't that the stuff of legends? |
|
04-21-14 06:21pm
Replies (5)
|
Comment
58
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
12-01-23 07:44am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
59
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
12-01-23 07:07am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
60
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
05-24-21 08:48pm
Replies (5)
|
Comment
61
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
02-26-17 08:39pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
62
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
06-07-16 08:28pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
63
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
07-03-14 01:45am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
64
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
11-24-13 12:19pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
65
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
08-21-13 01:48pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
66
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
08-10-13 04:54am
Replies (7)
|
Comment
67
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
07-31-13 08:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
68
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
07-22-13 02:15am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
69
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
02-19-13 06:05pm
Replies (15)
|
Comment
70
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
09-13-12 11:10am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
71
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
05-17-12 08:36am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
72
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
03-13-12 06:40pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
73
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
04-25-11 10:39am
Replies (8)
|
Comment
74
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
12-28-10 02:42am
Replies (5)
|
Comment
75
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
08-10-10 01:03am
Replies (4)
|
|
