Review
26
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Very large, exclusive collection
+Professional photography
+Many beautiful models: Evelyn Lory, Jana Horokova (as Lisen), etc.
+Photosets usually 100-200 pics each
+two zip options (“hi” 3-4000 px, or “low” 1200)
+Daily photo updates from May 2005 (1 set per day)
+easy, straightforward navigation
+vids in DivX, WMV, QT264, mpeg (formats available vary by the vid)
+can rate both the model and the photographer on a 1-10 scale |
| Cons: |
-sometimes delays updates for a day or two
-max pic sizes vary greatly early in site history (1024px to 40xx 5/05-5/06, but most are 1500 or higher); nearly always 3-4000+ pixel size from 6/06.
-a few unappealing models
-sometimes too little light, too much shadow, blurriness
-a couple of photographers I don’t care for (esp. “Magoo,” who goes too far with the “artistic” effects)
-only 30 vids (the last in July ’06); transition effects sometimes overdone; some vids only 570px long |
| Bottom Line: |
Have been a member off/on since Nov. 2005; currently on a one-year membership.
This is a softcore nude photography site, mostly solo (but no toys), with a smattering of girl/girl lite. The vids obviously amount to just a little “extra” -- like sprinkles on ice cream.
For a softcore photo nut like me, it’s pretty close to the right formula. And there’s plenty of delectable ass to be found in the archives. Per diem, it beats 1byDay, W4B, and even Nubiles in the tushy quality/quantity index.
You might think of it as Met-Art’s kid brother or sister, as it costs the same but only offers 1 photoset per day (vs. Met-Art’s typical 3-5 per day). But it does give an option to join for $6.99 for 2 days, and with a good broadband connection, plenty of time, and enough piping hot caffeine, you could certainly make a killing here.
I’d do the same, but I don’t have that kind of self-discipline.
And I actually like the design and navigation here better than at Met-Art. It’s cleaner and less cluttered.
But on the other hand, Met-Art now offers three pic sizes in zips, and their 1024s do just fine and use less space than the 1200’s offered here. But that’s not much of a complaint.
Be sure to check out the browser options in the top right corner (default pic sizes; "enhanced" to show previous and next galleries; slideshow timing). |
|
06-17-07 12:01pm
Replies (8)
|
