Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : Wittyguy (0)

Feedback:   All (830)  |   Reviews (58)  |   Comments (90)  |   Replies (682) Other:   Replies Received (431)  |   Trust Ratings (1) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 26-50 of 66 Page : Page 1 2 3    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 26 Fucked Hard 18 (0) 74.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Scored a $10 Black Friday monthly membership from TBP (currently $18) + No cross sales on signup. Bills through Epoch. + Mostly attractive US models on the main sites. + Very basic web design but it works and getting around is easy. + Decent download and stream speeds + Good production standards (usually). + Good streaming video function in standard, 720 or 1080 for most vids. + Almost all scenes have pics and vids. + Good mix of known pornstars and amateurs. Cons: - This is a four network site and the only one that has any reasonable amount of content is Fuckedhard18. The rest are throwaway sites. -No model info, just a girls first name. Limited search due to funky tagging. - Limited updates (Fuckedhard18 no longer updates). - Most pics are 1020 x 680 or less so it's not really a pic site. - Fuckedhard18 is highly repetitive in its use of the set, shooting angles and “plot” development. - The whole site is pretty much an advertisement to buy porn from other sites. Bottom Line: Like many Americans, I was still tripping on turkey tryptophan when I scored a cheap deal on a Black Friday and quickly came to regret the quality of my purchase. I sort of like the massage themed stuff which is what Fuckedhard18 is but I got pretty much caused me to abandon this network fairly quickly. Well, let's just break this network down by site since that seems like it will cause me the least amount of pain: Newgirlpov: A 15 scene vanity project for the guy shooting it. Girl gets interviewed, screwed a little, dances in her undies to music and has more sex with the dude who makes her call him “Daddy”. Every actress gets a perfect score in the ratings categories the producer lists on every scene page. Yay, participation trophies for all. Just a few pics associated with the clips here. Nothing here you haven't seen done better elsewhere. FuckedhardGFS: About 100 scenes of mostly pornstars posing and having sex in about 1/3 of the scenes. Hasn't updated in years. More amateur in terms of production value. Interesting but the quality is only OK. Bangable: About 200 scenes of random amateur chicks in various states of undress dancing and prancing to music in video scenes that mostly 1 – 3 minutes long (almost no pics). WTF? The only thing that could have made this site enjoyable was if Rick Astley's “Never Give You Up” video came up in the background of every scene because to even call this erotica is just a Rickroll. Fuckedhard18: About 350 scenes and no updates. To describe one scene is describe every single one. Girl walks onto cheapo massage parlor set, strips and gets interviewed by massage dude about pointless stuff. Guy fingers girl, they have sex in 4 or 5 positions while the guy sometimes still chats with her and gives onscreen direction (aka – no romance factor and little connectivity between the actors). Every scene is pretty much the same and involves the same positions and camera angles. The fact that every scene looks and plays out the same sort of killed it for me. Granted, the girls are good looking and some of the sex was OK but it wasn't enough to overcome the monotony for me. TBP lists pics here as 1500x1020 but that's only for about 10% of the scenes. The rest feature 1500x1020 shots of the model posing but all of the action is shot in landscape mode and only reaches 1020x680. All scenes have zips. I downloaded very little video so I didn't really track the specs on the vids and can only say they seem decent. No problems streaming or jumping around in a vid while streaming. The video download options are sometime weird: sometimes you get mp4 and wmv options, sometimes one or the other. I found that the “HDUltra” download option is 1080, the “Mp4HD” is 720 and anything else is either 480 p or standard def. Be aware that there are 22 sites listed in the pull down menu on the homepage. At first it looks great cause it shows Wowgirls, JulesJordan, JoyMi and others. The downside is that there is about 10 scenes for each of these sites and the quality available is less than you get from those actual sites. Basically, this networks seems to be geared towards generating cross sales to these places. Overall, this site seems like it's dead or dying and you're better off saving a few pesos by skipping this one unless you're really into massage content. 12-12-16  04:49pm Replies (0) Review 27 Gaping Angels (0) 77.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: ++ Good $3, 3 day full access trial through TBP ++ 17 site network ++ Exclusive Evil Angel content though some of it may be on other sites + No cross sales on signup + Some 720 sized HD vids + Fast download rates (about 1.5 mb/sec on a single download, about half that for 2-3 channels of simultaneous downloading) + Lots of anal and fetish vids for those into that + No DRM + A good number of recognizable porn stars + 100's of scenes / dvds spread across the network in a variety of niches + Several updates per week Cons: -- Crappy search function and no cross site search -- Photosets are worthless and no zip function - HD streaming vids are pretty choppy even on my broadband connection - A lot of sites have some overlapping content - Video quality varies from great to crap - Many scenes and DVDs lack model info and scene tags - My computer crashed a few times during downloads (not if this is the site but this rarely happens to me) - Limited number of HD movies on each site, older vids are pretty low in quality - If you're from Canada, read the terms and conditions before signing up, it's sort of messed up for the up north folks. - Some of the featured directors sites have actors and/or directors yammering on during the scenes. Bottom Line: Other than the prospect of a cheap full access trial I don't know why I really signed up this site and I guess it shows in my score. For the uninitiated, this site is part of a 17 Evil Angel site network. Evil Angel tends to lean to the harder side of hardcore so don't expect much gentle solo softcore/midcore and story line material in the hardcore. Here's the bottom line: PICS: In the network, most sites have only a handful of pics for their scenes. Most pics are just pose shots before the action. No zips. Good sized but only 30 to 40 pics per set. Quality and cropping varies. Skip this place if you want pics. VIDS: All the sites have some 720p vids that download as MP4 files. All offer a high and low bitrate wmv download as an option. Most come in at 640x480 for the "high" quality content (non HD). All scenes have low and high level streams and the HD ones also offer HD stream but that was choppy even on my high speed connection. Fast download speeds but streaming took about 5 seconds to buffer on the "high" setting for me each time I jumped within a scene. Most quality is average while the majority of scenes are professionally shot with good lighting. NAV: Navigation needs work. No model directory and no cross site search. Many sites have scene tags but many don't and not all are correct. No model info for many scenes so you're stuck if you want to find out who some hottie is. On each site you can search by movie title but the listings don't include all the movies on the site. Basically, lots of hunting and clicking to find what you want. Overall, I can't really recommend joining unless you're a bit Evil Angel fan (in which case you've probably seen most of this stuff) or you're a collector looking to find specific porn stars. A lot of these sites have DVD series but even most of the series are just random or incomplete. This whole network feels a bit like an after thought, which it may well be in comparison to the official EvilAngel website (never joined that one so I don't know for sure). Videobox and similar sites offer a lot more content for the money once you get beyond the 3 day trial period. Once you get beyond the known pornstars, the girls are fairly average looking and the production quality can vary quite a bit. I didn't find a lot that personally appealled to me and even with the crappy navigation / search, it only took me a few hours to scan over the offerings in the areas I was interested in. Average be this place so average be the score. 04-13-11  02:38pm Replies (1) Review 28 Hands on Hardcore (0) 89.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Prior members look for occasional $10 a month memberships in your in box (otherwise $20 a month) + Access to the DDF Network of sites + Over 1000 scenes of mostly exclusive eurobabe hardcore action with updates roughly every 2 days. + Bills through Epoch + Very good download speeds (consistent 2mb/sec for me) + Excellent navigation + The last few years have 1920 x 1080 resolution vids. All scenes have zips but only in the max picture size. + Good model directory that seems complete and shows the tags associated with that model. + Pics come mostly come in 2000x1300 rez. + Professional high end production value. Cons: - About 20% of recent updates is "guest content" that only allows you to stream a video supplied by another site. - Some older vids (I'm talking 7-10 years ago) don't have working streams even though it's indicated as available. - Some content recycling (about 3-4 times a year). - Some "Hidden" content that you can only find via the model directory (my guess is that it's waiting to be recycled). - Searching via tags is, as usual, not really worth your time on a site this size. - Quality still very good compared to other sites bit appears to be slipping a bit. Bottom Line: I was going to do a review on the whole DDF Network but exoticsforme just did a very complete review so I'll just focus on this site as it's the main reason I keep coming back to the network. As you'd expect, DDF puts out high quality product and this site is no exception. Here's a quick run down: PICS: All scenes have pics and zips but zips only come in one size (max rez). The oldest stuff is not worth it at roughly 500x800 rez but most everything the last 10+ years is 2000x1300 or 1600x1000 (for the older stuff). They've cut back a bit on pic count recently - usually topping out at about 100 while a few years ago they'd push about 150. My only minor beef with the most recent pics is "photo density": meaning you get a decent sized downloaded pic but the file size isn't that large. This is fine for monitor viewing like I do but for those who watch on their big screen tv's the lack of pixels will become apparent. VIDS: The new stuff is very good at a very high bit rate (see the TBP review for more specs) and definitely HD but does not truly qualify as 4k. Download speeds are very good. Recent vids have 4 download options plus stream. For the last 2 years or so the stream function also has tags that let you jump to specific action in the vid with pushing the bar which is nice. With the exception of some pretty old vids the stream function worked well. The oldest content here lacks vids (yep, back in the day when pics were all you got - tells you how far back they go here). NAV: Some of the best navigation I've seen in a while. You can select a site and search by update, year/month, or by tags. You get 20 scenes per page and you can page jump easily. Click on scene and the vid is on top. Scroll down and you get the first page of pics (you can easily go forward back on the pic pages without reloading the whole page). It saves you a lot of clicking and opening scenes in separate windows which is a nice change. Overall, you really can't go wrong here if you're into hardcore. The only real downer is the more frequent use of stream only guest content and the occasional recycled scene. The last few years feature a fair amount of anal content if you're into that. I've noticed that they've expanded their stable of photographers (aka - "outsourced") which leads to some variation of scene quality. Otherwise it's a good mix of b/g and multiple partner eurobabe porn (yes, the vids are in English although it's struggle for some actors). Not too many tatoos and not too many fake breasts which is a nice break too. On it's own I give this site an 89 but when you add in the network with multiple daily updates of high quality nastiness you're easily into a score of 90+. 01-13-16  06:24pm Replies (1) Review 29 Hands on Hardcore (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Almost 800 scenes of nothin' but hardcore banging. + Exclusive content. + About 100 true HD scenes and large sized vids in general. + Professional quality production and lighting. + Good full trial price of $3.50 for 2 days (see review below for tips on saving $$ for more time). + Good DL speeds, various format options for vids and streaming in browser. + High quality pics, all with zips. + Good model directory and generally good search. + All updates are date stamped for future reference. + Multiple language options and a mobile viewing option as well. Cons: - Not all HD labelled vids are HD. - Search options for pics are worthless. - Content gets a bit repetitive. - Currently updating 2x per week but starting in 2012 and going back expect only 1 update per week at best. - Prechecked cross sale on signup. - Some content seen on other sites and some photographers work isn't up to snuff for DDF work. - As usual, oldest content isn't that high quality. - Some content recycled from other DDF sites and the date of publication here may not be when it first came out. - Need more screen cap previews for the vids. - Since I last joined they've removed some of the earliest content. Granted the quality wasn't the best but still not bad compared to some other major sites today. Wished they had kept it or remastered it. Bottom Line: I last joined HoH about 4 years ago. I signed up for the 2 day trial expecting only to be able to grab a year or two worth of material. To my surprise I was done downloading in about 6 hours and I don't use a DL manager or have super fast high speed connections. The lack of updates over the years was about the major downer though. Here's the skinny: PICS: All scenes have zip downloads and the last few years have pics coming in at 2000 x 1300 pixels. Even the oldest content is roughly 1600 x 1070 in size. The tags for photo search are worthless if there even are any. You can tag individual photos with info for others to see (don't know why you'd do this). No real ability to slideshow the pics. Multiple size options available. Some airbrushing on sets. VIDS: All scenes have vids with the most recent allowing for wmv and mp4 download options. Some older vids also have divx or quicktime. All but the oldest material has streaming video with ability to jump around to get a good preview. I had consistent DL speeds of about 1.3 MB/sec on multiple channels. At best only about 80-100 vids are in true HD, most HD labelled vids are just HD size. Starting in 2008, the vid sizes get down to medium size (720x400) and the oldest years don't even get that big and come split into the scenes. I wish they had more screen caps in order to preview the vids without having to stream and jump around to decide if I wanted to DL or not. The site allows you to search by category, date or tags. The model directory is good and has background info. There is some blog material and social media stuff but no one appears to do much with it. They also let you customize the site with favorites and similar items if you stick around for the long haul. There are some special discounts for other DDF sites and independent sites that pretty much match what you can find on TBP. However, if you want to join other DDF sites or the DDF network they do offer a 50% off the first month discount. So, my advice is join on a cheap trial and if you want more hit the discounts page, a better deal than what TBP has going. Generally speaking, DDF puts out a consistent and high grade euro porn product. This site is no different but, if you've seen their sites before, you pretty much know what you're going to get. In that respect, there isn't a lot of imagination that goes into putting the scenes together and so some of the content does get repetitive. Overall, if they hadn't been skimpy with their updates the last 3 years or so I would have scored this in the 90's. So, if you like hardcore of all varieties you can't really go wrong here. 04-07-13  08:33pm Replies (1) Review 30 Hands on Hardcore (0) 93.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Professional photography - Over 500 hardcore scenes (all have pics and vids) - High rez downloads for newer postings (up to 1800 pixels at a rate over 1 meg per second) and no DRM - High rez pics (up to 2000 pixels but most at 1600) with zip available - Only hardcore sex divided into 7 categories - Model index and generally good navigation - Good customer support Cons: - Some content recycled through other DDF sites - Older content is only average quality (standard sized .wmv downloads available only in sections and pics only at 800 x 600) - Pics come up in a separate window - No bonus content - Download speeds can vary Bottom Line: I am a big fan of Deny DeFranco and his DDF sites (1ByDay, Hotlegsandfeet) but had never joined here mostly due to a high fee. I noticed that the site is now $30 month and tried it. First, the site is what it says. No solo or lesbian sets, everything is m/f sex in 7 categories. The professionalism is first rate. No out of focus pics or shakey videos. The models are almost all European. The newer sets, about 1/3, have the high quality download options in several download formats (wmv, dvx). The oldest material, about 1/3 again, can only be dowloaded in sections and only display around 440 x 250. I noticed that download speeds varied depending on the time of day but speeds were generally good. The pics are very good with most being at 1600 pixels with S, M, and L options available. Most sets have around 120 pics. The newest pics in their largest size also have the actual photographic data from the shoot stored in them if you're into that. My only disappointment with the site was that a fair number of sets here also appear on other DDF sites. One of the recent updates (site updates about 2 - 3 times a week) was a set I've had for years. If you're already a frequent visitor to the other DDF sites you might want to consider if you want to join here. This is a great site if you like nonreality based hardcore. The only thing that could really be better would be more frequent updates and more original content. Overall, well worth the money 05-01-08  11:46pm Replies (3) Review 31 Hegre Art (0) 83.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: - Excellent photography - Mostly attractive girls from all over the world - Good customer service - No DRM - Multiple photo download options - Good customer support Cons: - Video quality is average - Most of the models are not very "livley" - Wish there were more models to choose from Bottom Line: As the for the good, this is a very good "art" site with no hardcore, toys and very little lesbianism. the photography is first rate with photo download options ranging from 1200 to 6000 pixels (who but the truly obsessed is going to download and view a 6k picture). Right now there are about 160 different models with the majority having multiple sets. There is a little info about each model which is nice. As for the so-so part of this review (which is why I scored at as I did), a lot of the models are east european and Peter seems to lake the ability to bring them out of their shell. Many models have an ambivalent look about their posing that may be euro kosher but lacks fizz by US standards. Some of the girls are sizzling hot while many are simply good looking teens. The sets also tend to get a bit repetitive at times. I wish there were more models to choose from and that Peter would get a little more creative. All in all, it's a pretty good site. However, for the money, I would probably consider joining Met-Art (never been a member) over Hegre-Art again. 04-08-08  09:56pm Replies (4) Review 32 Hot Legs and Feet (0) 87.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: +++ 10 years of content online ++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff ++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video + Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids + Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality + Updates 2 - 3 times a week + Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs) + 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP + Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually) + Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it). + Overall good quality production and lighting + Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either) Cons: -- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07 -- Navigation and website need a big overhaul -- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them. - Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection) - Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue) - Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes - No search function and no scene tags - Only a few screen caps (get more) - Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available - Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus. - No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email). Bottom Line: When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown: PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big. VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good. OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse. The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this). If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing. I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site. 01-26-11  02:26pm Replies (2) Rating 33 Karup's PC (0) 92.0 No Review. 04-25-08  02:49pm Review 34 Leg Action (0) 71.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + 3 day full access trial for $6 through TBP + Full access to 8 other sites (Swankpass network) + 960 photo shoots and 343 vids + Zip download available + No download limits or DRM + Smallish watermarks Cons: - Search function doesn't work & no model directory - Pic sizes max out at 1020 x 680 - Vids max out at 640 x 480 - About 50% of vids downloadable in clips only - Mostly nonexclusive contact - Updates about once a week Bottom Line: For the price I figured this one was worth a trial. I figured it wouldn't be HotlegsandFeet but I was still hopeful of getting some decent leg shots. As they say "hope springs eternal" ... and this site is just another mediocre pit stop on that long eternal road. Legaction started as a magazine (the other 8 network sites are also mag oriented). These sites never seem to have their act together enough put out a quality web based product and this one is no different. Most of this stuff is nonexlusive as they farmed out a lot of the photography. For the hardcore stuff, most of this comes from Deny DiFranco (DDF) so if you've been to his sites recently skip this place. The rest of the hc is stuff you've probably already seen on other mega sites. The solo material has more stuff I haven't seen before but I can't vouch for exclusivity. The girls here range from known pornstars to amateurs to milfs. The quality of the sets/scenes varies greatly from poor to good. Pictures: As I said, pics max out at 1020 x 680. The photo archieves date back to 1997 but the sets prior to 2006 are crap. You get about 8 - 16 shots per set there (aka: worthless). The newer stuff spreads out to about 60 to 250 shots. Unfotunately, most of the good stuff (aka newer) is also the stuff you've probably seen already. The quality is average (nothing HQ about it). Most of the pics are solo with about 25% being HC and lez. Video: There is only a couple years worth of video but only half have full length downloads available. The full downloads range from about 20 to 90 minutes. You can download in wmv, ipod or watch in flash. The older clip based stuff is strange in that you get 3 or 4 short clips with the last clip having most of the content and length. Again, you've probably seen a lot of this stuff from the DDF sites and other megasites. Quality is so-so; the full length clips at, say, 40 minutes long only come in at about 250 mb in file size. About half the vids are HC and the rest solo or lez. The search function looks good but it doesn't work. You can only search under vids or pics and even then the layout is random, not by date. A lot of models, especially in the pics, have only a first name or no name at all or a "wrong" name so good luck there. There is a model directory. As a bonus you get a slew of crappy 3rd party streaming feeds that I thought went extinct years ago (thus providing proof of "nonintelligent design" at this site): When's the last time you've seen a streaming vids options at 56k, 128k or 250k? The 8 other network sites are similar to here but have their own content and niches. As another mild downer, when I ran my card the confirmation page didn't appear. Thus, I had to venture to my email to confirm everything. Basically, for you leg lovers this site is more like a hamhock then a beautiful gam. The only reason this one scores in the 70's is because of the volume of content and network availability. 04-08-09  05:29pm Replies (0) Review 35 MetArt (0) 91.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: - Excellent photography with photos in sizes going up to approx. 4000 x 3000 pixels. - Newer vids go up 1280 x 720 pixels with good download speeds (older vids are 512 x 330) - 1000+ very attractive models, many with multiple sets - Multiple daily updates - No DRM Cons: - No model info - Vids aren't as good as the photo sets - Site gets a little dull and repetitive - No hardcore or toys or penetration, a few very mild lesbian scenes - Photo quality can vary a little with some of the larger photos being somewhat grainy Bottom Line: As a photo lover I would have to rank Metart as the best solo model / softcore photo sites out there. The photos get insanely large (4000+ pixels - practically life size if you got a monitor that big) and the photography is mostly excellent. With multiple daily updates and over half a million pics no one can complain about a lack of quantity or quality for the most part. I would have to say that the vids lag behind the photos and that the vids mostly parallel the photo sets in terms of content. Like other PU reviewers have noted, they need to expend a little more effort to boost their video quality. As with Hegreart, the focus here is mostly on european girls and for some reason they can sometimes come across as a little "cold" although this isn't a major problem. I did find the site a bit repetitive given that the content is very softcore. Overall, I would join primarily for the pics at this point although the newer vids are quite good in their quality. If the site got a little "edgier" with some toys or lesbian sets I would jump my score to about a 95. As is, I got a little too bored with the vast amounts of material so, for me, a 91 seems appropriate. 05-29-08  06:09pm Replies (2) Review 36 My XXX Pass (0) 86.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Awesome $1, 3 day full access trial through TBP + 13 network site + Good size pics (1000x1500 and larger) with zips and smallish watermark + Mostly exclusive content + Good mix of Euro and American babes + Good action and professional quality shoots + Good download speeds on vids + No DRM or download limits. Cons: - Cross sales on sign-up page - A lot more action in the vids than the pics - Only about 75% of the vids have accompanying pics - Search is OK but could be better - Each site in network updates 2x per month - A few deadlinks and pics that don't load Bottom Line: I signed up for this on the trial not really knowing what to expect and was pleasantly surprised. There's 13 sites with about 850 scenes in total. About half the network focuses on bj's while the rest is HC except for one interview oriented site. The HC focuses on interracial, teen, anal and MILFs so they cover most of the bases. Pics: About 75% of the scenes have pics and all pic sets have zips. Only one size but they are pretty big but not HD in quality. Mostly professional shoots with good lighting. Some had a little graininess while most were quite sharp. You get from 50 to 500 pics per set. There's a lot more on the vids than in the pics (lots of poses before the action in the larger sets). Some sets have split zip files. Videos: These come in mpeg and wmv. Largest size is 640x480 in wmv; other size is 320x240. Download speeds were good. Vids range from 10 to 30 minutes and on the long ones file size goes up to about 300 mb. The quality was pretty good overall and the action was pretty hot. There is a model directory that goes across the network. With this many scenes it would be good have a more detailed search function but getting around and finding what you want wasn't that hard. All the sites seem to be updating which is good. There is some content from Brazzer's and some looked a lot like Newsensations product but I can't be 100% sure. More than 70% of the content is exclusive I'd say. Mostly US pornstars with a few amateurs and euros tossed in. There is a decent amount of pov style shooting which I like but others may not. There are some bonus stream sites tossed in that aren't worth mentioning. Overall, this was a pretty good network with lots of good action. I'm not into the whole bj thing so those sites didn't do much for me. The women are generally attractive and the action is hot and hard with lots of cum shots. Definitely worth checking it out, especially on the trial deal. 05-13-09  11:05pm Replies (3) Review 37 Nakedby (0) 84.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: + Excellent photography featuring natural French girls + About 55 models with over 300 photo sets (all exclusive content) + High rez photos go up to 3000 pixels with zip, most sets have 40 to 100 pics + Good 7 day full access trial of $10 + Some model information provided and nice clean site design + Photo updates every 2 days (vids about 1x per week) + No DRM Cons: - Not really a video site. About 63 vids which parallel the photo sets with most around 7-8 minutes. Quality is very good at 720x575 with WMV, DiVX and QT options - Some photo sets are just continuations of a previous (same basic clothing and/or set) - Pure glamour, no hc, lesbians or toys (if this is minus for anyone) - Some sets a little too dark or fetishy but not bad in my book - Zip feature only available in medium size Bottom Line: Overall, I was generally pleased with this site. I like photos, especially for softcore, and this site has very good photography and huge pics which I would expect from a high quality glamour site. The girls are mostly French and I haven't seen many of them before. The girls are natural (no boob jobs or nasty tattoos) and for the most part seem to enjoy what they are going here. This is all about the girls showing off so don't expect any toys or lesbianism here. Some of the sets do a get a little dark or fetishy as some other reviewers have noted but that seems to be the case with a lot of photographer oriented sites who seem to think this enhances their work but it didn't bother me too much since this is not the general rule here. There are about 12 "mysterious girls" who have photo sets where you don't see their face. They are pretty much average looking and don't really add to the site. If you're feeling rich you can spend a few hundred $ and buy some prints (unless you wanted to show the world your a rich perv I don't know why anyone would if you can download the high rez pics). The site design is simple and clean and you have a model directory. The photos sets are laid out in a magazine style similar to Met Art, Hegre Art and similar sites. For me, this site ranks between Hegre Art and Met Art. Nothing tops Met Art for the sheer content amount and quality. The girls here are not the super skinny types that Hegre Art has a lot of and they don't seem as cold to the camera either. Overall, it's worth the 7 day, $10 trial. There's not really enough content where you need to stay longer. Hopefully the site keeps growing, especially on the video side. 08-14-08  03:48pm Replies (0) Review 38 Naughty America (0) 81.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + $10 a month thru TBP (you can renew for less than that going through cancellation) + Bills through Epoch + Almost 7900 scenes of hardcore porn going back over 14 years over a 40 site network with thousands of porn stars (big emphasis on American babes) + All scenes have pics with zips and vid downloads sized from postage stamps to 4k monsters + Updates about 10-12 times a week + Navigation is pretty easy + Access to VR content without paying extra + Streaming vids have the small pop up window showing what action is occuring where when you move across the time bar. + Professionally produced content with good lighting and generally good production values + There is “live show” content that has been archived for those who like that stuff Cons: - Cross checked presale upon signup - Ads, upsells and (new to me) offers to text with favorite porn star (cause you know all she's doing is waiting for you to send her a dic pic) - Download speeds vary a lot, from acceptable (2 mb/sec) to 1990's call me in 3 days when the download is done (single digit kb/sec ... yes, that's “kilobyte per second”). Steaming at even the lowest resolutions can be challenging a times too. - Things get real repetitive real quick. Very little imagination or originality here. Just a generic hardcore site. - 40 sites on the network but the only two themes are co-eds and milfs. - Lots of tats and lots of silicone. - Some sites are dead and most only update sporadically but given the over all uniform nature of the site it's too big of a deal (the sites aren't really niche specific) - Obviously, the oldest content isn't nearly as good in quality as the more recent stuff. - Have do a “check the boxes that apply” captcha every log in (challenging for my IQ). Bottom Line: So, let's face facts. In short, given the sheer volume of downloadable porn at your finger tips you really can't go wrong for a $10 monthly membership. Hell, I spent more than that on a 6-pack at the store the other day. However, unless you're used to sipping the low end crapola (beer or porn, doesn't matter) you're gonna get tired of this place in short order. Yes, you do have some cuties in the form of co-eds and some mighty fine milfs but the lack of originality and repetitiveness of the scenes kill the fun fairly soon (Look! A big chested tatted up gal getting it on with the neighbor checking the usual position boxes. Repeat ad infinitum.) Toss in the god awful download speeds that rear their ugly head in seemingly random times and you won't be spending month after month here. Here's the details: PICS: I have to say that pics are actually one of the highlights here for me now. The early stuff (start to early 2013) is only 1000x670 but after that it jumps to 1300x900 and then to 2000x1600 in 2014. Do note that the 1300x900 pics almost always come in 150 or 300 dpi so they're effectively twice that size or more assuming you adjust your pics for 72 dpi imaging on your display. As usual there is generally more action in the vids than on the pics. It isn't uncommon for the pics to not really have anything to do with the video scene either which is fine by me (2 for the price of one in my book). A minor beef is that once the resolution size jumps up to 1300x900 or more you get a lot of pics (often 250-400) but you get dozens of pics showing the same damn thing which gets annoying while creating unneccessarily large zip files (500 mb isn't uncommon). VIDS: I know that my computer and my wireless router aren't setting any speed records but, as noted above, this place can make dying of boredom a real possibility at times. Assuming you get a decent connection the viewing ain't bad though. They claim 1080 going back to about 2009 but some of that I think is suspect since they have been remastering some older content and they claim you can download that in 4k … in other words all you're getting is lower end video fomatted as 1080 or 4k. However, within the last 4 years everything seems good. You can download the short 5 minute version in quicktime, you got mobile downloads, wmv clips and full length, and full length 480, 720, 1080 and 4k. You can stream in 480, 720 or 1080 although a few sites had problems loading streams for me. You also have roku options that I didn't use. VR comes at no extra charge but the VR scenes only come in VR, no 1080, etc. The vids look good even at 480. NAV: Navigation is not a total disaster here like it often gets on networks of this size. The best way to go is go through by site or by model. A few sites have a lot of pages but you can manually enter the page number in the url to get where you want faster. All scenes are dated. There is model directory that seems complete but has almost no useful info (lots of stars born on January 1, 1600) and the same dreadful lines are used to describe every starlet (“she has a body made for porn and is ready to f*ck”). Like I said, there isn't a lot of originality going on here. It's all single camera action with the usual set ups and usual positions. There is a little POV but mostly standard shoots through and through. There's very little of anything other than white booty with big tits and tats grinding away. I have to agree with Exotics4me and his review (always read his reviews) that it's about 2/3 milf action and 1/3 co-ed action. If I had categorize this site in two words it would be “Brazzer's Lite” - you get a lot of the same looking girls but without the production value and less originality (if you can call Brazzer's original but that's a story for another day). For me, this place gets an 81 mostly because of the crapola download speeds I suffered through. Still, for $10 a month, I'll probably come back again in a few years. 10-02-16  10:29pm Replies (2) Review 39 Naughty America (0) 84.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: ++ 30+ sites, 1700 models and 4100 scenes to keep you busy ++ Very good tags and cross site search functions ++ Lots of video options, especially the new stuff, and goes up 1080p + Cool function on the new videos where you hold your mouse over the play back bar and it shows what is happening during that section of the movie + Lots of social media and site interaction if you're into that stuff + Good monthly price through TBP + Others have said that the "live" section was gone in earlier reviews but it appears to be back, at least in recorded form. + Lots of American girls + Professional lighting and production value + Lots of options available for customer support and I got a prompt reply to my one issue. + All the content besides the live shows is hardcore Cons: -- Not enough pictures and they're low quality (don't join for the pics) -- Problems with downloads using Mozilla and with older scenes -- Slow site at times (they need more servers) - Cross sales on signup - Stupid social networking keeps popping up Bottom Line: I sort of joined this site at a bad time given I didn't have a lot of time to use it during my month and I'm sort of in a porn burnout phase. Nonetheless, I had mostly good experience but there wasn't enough to give it a top notch score that with a little effort this place could achieve. PICS: Don't join for the pics. All scenes have pics but even the newest scenes max out at about 60 pics with a size of about 900x600. Too few and too low quality that could easily be solved. This site will never cross 90 for a score in my book so long as this continues. Also, when clicking a photo to bring it up to full size, you automatically go into slideshow mode even if you try to turn it off. All pic sets have zips but generally the pics on the network need help. VIDS: The newest vids are great. You have mobile and "normal" download options. Sizes go up 1080p on the new stuff, older vids generally max out at about720 or 480. All vids have full scene or partial scene D/L options. All vids have stream options although even with a broad band connection the streaming was jumpy when trying to view it above 480 resolution. Download speeds were OK at 400 to 500 kbs. With older vids I sometimes had problems getting them to DL in the .wmv format (the only option available) because the screen taking you to the download page wouldn't download ... how's that for irony. As noted, the newer streaming vids let you mouse along the playback bar to reveal what action is taking place in that part of the scene. There are no screen caps though. OTHER: Search is great. Scenes seem well tagged and the search engine is very good and comprehensive. There is no real model info though beyond the name. Navigation needs some work (a fair amount of clicking sometimes). There are a fair number of boob jobs and the chicks, while most are US born and bred, are mostly average caliber porn stars. Not much anal but the site is mostly hardcore. Lots of niches with 30+ sites but the theme is pretty constant throughout the network. All high production value except the pics. The social networking aspects are probably the best I've seen including a wiki (just a link ofr now) and a forum and user feedback galore if you're into that sort of stuff. The damn social networking needs to just go away though (pops up every new screen). The site can be slow at times and I didn't like the fact that when viewing a specific models portfolio (many have multiple pages) that when navigating you always have to go back to page 1 even if you last on page 6. So, there is lots to see and get involved with. For me, the pictures are a big negative along with some slow navigation and downloading issues. Overall, it was worth the money but I'd like to see some changes before I go back again. 07-11-11  03:42pm Replies (3) Review 40 New Sensations Network (0) 77.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Access to 26 site network (no access to their parody porn site which they are best known for today) + Thousands of scenes available + Mostly exclusive content (some DDF and lesser known site scenes tossed in) + Decent price of $15 month through TBP + Almost no download failures + Network updates about 4 to 5x a week but only on a few sites + Lots of good looking, mostly American girls + Mostly good lighting and professional shooting + Videos have screen caps, all scenes have zip download option + Bills thru Epoch, no cross sales on signup and easy cancellation Cons: - Lots of recycling of content between various sites and some recycling of older content. A lot of content can be found as updates on 2 - 3 different sites in the network. - All but a couple of sites are dead or infrequently updated - No real ability to search, no model directory, updates are rarely dated - No HD vids, all are 640 x 480 - Download speeds vary from 800 KB/sec to about 50 KB/sec depending on time of day but was mostly around 100 to 200 KB/sec - No stream options in screen but you can watch a stream via a media player but it's almost impossible to jump ahead or back except at lowest band width. - Pics only come in at 1020 x 680 but there are zips - Too much use of fish eye lenses, especially on pov shoots (vertigo here we come). - Very repetitive in terms of scene layout - Network feels lost, not really a pic or video network, just a compilation of stuff that hasn't changed in years. Bottom Line: There was PU poll question this week asking about the first porn site you ever joined. While this wasn't the first for me, it was certainly a staple for me back in the late 90's and early 00's when 800x600 pics and postage stamp sized vids were standard issue. Unfortunately time has passed this site by and this is probably my last visit here. For uninitiated, this network is 90% hardcore with a few lez and solo shoots tossed in. Here's the overall skinny: PICS: I primarily joined this time since I'm more of a pic guy. Although the pics going to back 2007 are 1020 by 680 I still get good resolution on my 24" monitor with them. The oldest content is 600x800 and is functionally useless. Most sets have 100 to 200 pics. The bad news is that they seem to be cutting back to only a few dozen so-so quality pics per scene in the last year. There is a fair amount of fish eye lens use on some sites which hurts after a while. VIDS: Let's face facts, this is not a video site. Your only option is 640x480 .wmv downloads (or the same for ipad/psp). The psuedo stream function is marginal at best. Some of the vids even look sort of bad this level of resolution but everything going back to 2008 looks decent. Downloading is a chore given the slow speeds present for most of the day (it's currently taking me over an hour to DL two 450mb vids). NAV: Navigation on the network was apparently developed during the internet stone age. Each site comes up in a new window. No search engine period. You can only look up models for each individual site. I frequently found myself digging through my download file to see if I had nabbed the same scene off of a different site on the network because of the recycling of content within the network. A number of sites stopped listing dates on updates to make it seem like they're not dead. OVERALL: The only sites that continue to update regularly are Freshoutofhighschool, Newsensations, UnlimitedMILFs and Jizzbomb. The main emphasis on them (except the milf site) is younger porn stars. There is a fair amount of uniform and other outfit shoots which I like as a nice change of pace from the usual porn offerings today. The action is usually pretty good, the girls are pretty good looking and there is a lot of content provided you are willing to deal with what is now average at best quality. That's why I gave the network a score of 77. However, this network just seems to be treading water until the owners can no longer make money offering what they have been doing for so long. I see no reason why a network that's been around for so long can't make the leap into the 21st century by offering HD vids (some of the nonexclusive DDF material can be had in HD on the DDF sites) and bigger pics (a few sets do offer 1500x1080 sizes here, apparently someone forgot to "dumb them down"). Like I noted above, this network just seems lost given the lack of high quality vids and the new found emphasis on limiting the number of pics per set. The lack of navigation and search adds to the sense that this place is just going through the motions in hopes of grinding out a buck or two. For those PU readers who hold on to a sense of nostalgia about the "good old days of porn", I offer up this network as an example that the good old days weren't always so good in comparison to what's out there today. 07-16-13  02:29pm Replies (5) Review 41 NS All Access (0) 81.0 Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review. Pros: - Hundreds of attractive porn star models in about 2800 sets (pics and vids each) - Exclusive content - Good TBP discount price of $15 month - Access to 14 sites and some bonus material - No DRM - Newer vids come in at a decent size (640 x 480) with a stream rate over 1 mps Cons: - Small pics (600 x 800 and oldest sets getting even smaller) with limited positions and most having less than 80 pics per set - Older vids come in at 320 x 240 with a stream rate around 500 - 600 bps - Navigation needs work - Site gets repetitive - Some sites have stopped updating Bottom Line: I used to join this site about once a year and returned a few months ago after about 16 month abscence. What I found was that in terms of quality the network lags behind the pack. The newer vids (over a 1000 of them) come in at the larger size but only in wmv and real formats but then the quality drops. The older vids are way too small and only come in scenes, not full movies. For hardcore lovers, Newsensations, MrBiggz, POVfantasy and Jizzbomb are by far the best sites of the bunch. There is some set overlap between the sites but not much. The bonus material didn't really add anything to the network. I like pictures and the photos only come in at 800 x 600 which is a shame given todays standards. The poses get repetitive and the hardcore content is limited to only a few different positions which tend to be the same from set to set. At 60 - 80 photos per set (the old stuff has even less) there just isn't enough. The navigation needs work given that it doesn't list all the models in all the sites and after the posts move off the recent updates pagethere is no indication of when a set was posted -- if you've been a member before this is a real pain given the hundreds of models. If you've never joined then the TBP discount probably makes it worth your while given the volume of material available. For me, I think I'm probably done coming back unless they seriously upgrade their quality. 06-05-08  05:14pm Replies (0) Review 42 Nubiles Porn (0) 88.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: + 750 hardcore scenes of attractive nubile aged porn featuring a good mix of Euro and American girls (what's not to like). Also a good mix of pornstars and relative unknowns. Mostly b/g content with some lesbian and 3 some. Limited anal / fetish content. + All scenes have pics with zips and at least 720 HD video (Half the scenes have 1080 sized vids). + Almost all exclusive content. + Numerous download options for vids and numerous playback options for streaming. The site also remembers your stream preferences. + Good D/L speeds for me; about 1.5 - 2 mb/sec. + Some interesting niche sites like Petiteballerinas and several milf + younger girl on boy sites. + Bills through CCBill. + Mostly professional production level porn with good lighting. Cons: - Streaming playback was choppy for me at HD levels, had to resort 640x340 size for smooth playback. - Only updates about once every 3 days. - Limited model info. - Tags and categories are bit too limited for a site this sized. - There was a stretch of a few years where most of the models and scenes were basically teeenmegaworld / 3xgirls content (not exactly duplicates but the same models and style of shooting). - Could use more dual camera work and some of the scenes do lack a bit of passion (just going through the motions). Limited story lines / plot if any. - Prechecked cross sale on signup page and you can't chose your own password and username. - Model names for the Euro girls, especially on older updates, is sketchy. File naming on downloads is also poor (no names, just numbers or scene names). Bottom Line: In a nutshell, this is the hardcore version of nubiles.net. Pretty much all the content on nubiles will be found here minus the softcore / solo stuff. Thus, what you get is banging hot young bods in banging action. Exoticsforme did a good review recently so I'm not adding a lot here other than to mostly echo what he said. Here's the skinny: PICS: All scenes have zip downloads available. About half the scenes have 2400x1600 sized pics while the newest half (late 2013 onward) go up 5760x3480. As with most sites, there is usually less going on in the pics here than with the vids. As usual, most pics are just HD video screen grabs but overall they look pretty good with limited pixelation. Most scenes also have screenshots to view. In browser viewing is at the 2400x1600 level. VIDS: Starting in late 2013, you get 6 download options (1080 down to 480). The other half (2013 and earlier) at least have 720 vids. Good production qualities overall with good download speeds. In-browser playback a bit choppy at HD levels for me. Limited dialogue and plot lines in the vids. Most vids 20-30 minutes long. The 1080 sized vid files can get overly large (3-4 gigs). NAV: In a word, "meh". The easiest way to download (short of DL manager) is to just go through all 50 pages of the nubiles-porn site. All updates are listed on there. As a short cut, note the scene number you left off at and hand type it in when you next log in to continue. The tags and categories are too general to be of much use. There is "public tags" section here which is new to me but is worthless are it's mostly douche bags saying "hot girl needs anal". The model directory seems complete but has almost zero info on the girls. OVERALL: Despite my usual gripes about sites this ain't bad. I pretty much go what I expected at a decent level of quality without too much hassle. Do note the following: Most of the updates come in two sites: PetiteHD and Nubiles-porn. The other sites update just once a month. DriverXXX no longer updates and was stupid anyway with poor quality (the driver / male has his face digitized out in the vids but not the photos, give me a break). A lot of the Euro girls are shot by the same guys who bring you Teenmegaworld / 3xGirls so if you don't like their stuff be warned. I did come across a couple of scenes though that already occupy my hard drive. Most of the scenes are farmed out so quality can sometimes be a bit iffy (Teacherfucksteens has really poor sound quality). Most of the scenes are shot using a single camera and single mic which is usually static and can be a bit dull after a while. There is some POV style shooting in the scenes for those interested in that. If you're wondering if you should join here or nubiles.net, it doesn't matter. You have access to all the sites through here and price is the same. If you got time, browse the nonhardcore babes too as there's a ton of them (multiple daily updates). Overall, this is a good quality hardcore teen oriented site. The action can be a bit repetitive or uninspiring but no real complaints. Gotta like that in my book. 07-06-16  07:35pm Replies (4) Review 43 Only 3X (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Daily updates back to July '06 + No DRM + Good sized pics (most 1600x1065 or larger) and all have zips + Many HD vids (1280 wmv) and rest come in up to 512 or 640 wmv + Some exclusive content and a good content mix (about 2/3 HC and the rest is lez and solo) + Decent $15 month discount through TBP Cons: - Navigation and technical issues caused unnecessary pain and suffering - Lots of nonexclusive photo sets and partial sets - Quality can vary from OK to very good - Not DL manager friendly - Issues with having to keep logging in - Incomplete model directory - Large-ish opaque watermark in lower right cornor on all pics and some vids Bottom Line: The bottom line here is that this site initially comes across as being in the same general family as 1byday or Pixandvideo but it's really more the red headed step child as it ain't getting, or giving, enough love and is stuck with the second tier material. When you log in you can view the material by model directory, some general categories or the monthly calendar layout. The model directory is incomplete so it's easiest to view by the calendar. You don't know if a certain day is a pic or vid unless you hold your browser pointer over it (files ending in F = photo, V = vid and A = both although there are very few pics to see in these). There were also a few other technical glitches I came across but nothing too bad. Click on a day and new window pops up (must turn off pop-up blocker). Then you select the vid size or photo. Sometimes you get another window, sometimes not. This makes it ill sutied to DL managers. Don't open any other windows or make browser changes because you'll be logged out. Don't leave the site unattended for more than 10 minutes or you get logged out. After a few hours you'll get logged out. Each time you have to circle back to where you left off. Photos. Most of the photos are nonexclusive except for the photos that have matching vid sets (most sets don't have pics and vids, just one or the other). The nonexclusive stuff ranges from the older and more obscure stuff not many have seen to the stuff on every megasite. Some of the nonexclusive stuff gets pixeled at the 1600 level. The exclusive sets can be incomplete in comparison to the vids and are smaller (most come in at around 60 to 80 pics). There are some HD pic sets (3500x2300) but you'll be pressed to find more than 20 per set and they download seperately and copy the the regular resolution pics of the set so it's more of a novelty than an attraction. Videos. The vids are pretty good except for the first few months were quality is average. Pretty much all the vids come in up to 512 or 640 wmv and the download speeds are OK. The quality on the vids is generally better than the pics and there are more vids than photo sets on this site. There are more HD vids with the newer material (2008). The updates (daily) vary. Some months you get a bunch of pics, others a bunch of vids. When the photo and vid sets match, the "mate" set can be weeks or months apart. The actors are all euro models except for some of the nonexclusive stuff. Most of the women are attractive but not many total hotties like the more premium sites. It claims to be brutally HC but there's really nothing too brutal about it but there is some anal and dp action. Overall, the site isn't bad considering the price and the amount of content. If you can get over the technical issues it's not bad but the quality does vary, especially on pics. I wanted to give a higher score when I first joined but for now an 83 seems appropriate in my book. 11-19-08  04:57pm Replies (2) Review 44 Paul Markham Teens (0) 77.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large number of models - Easy Navigation - User interaction (ratings and feedback) - Directory of almost all models - Preview options for vids - Numerous vid download options including podcast - Small Medium & Large pics with zip available - Young attractive models (18-22) with no exceptions - For a $2.95 trial you can't really go wrong Cons: - Nonexlusive content that has been around for years - When searching I came across some models that were not listed in the model directory - Repetive content - Content rotates - Pics not in high rez although they do go larger than full screen Bottom Line: I've looked at this site for a while and finally did the $2.95 trial. If you have been downloading porn for any length of time you'll quickly notice that this stuff has been around for years. None of the content, from what I could tell, is exclusive. For me it was a trip down memory lane and an opportunity to download a few things that were wiped out years ago. There are 100 boy/girl sets with about 1/3 of those being videos; about 150 lesbian sets and hundreds of solo model sets. For newbies who don't mind 90's looking and dressed euro models, I reccommend the site. For those who have been around a while I would join only if you haven't seen this stuff before. Generally, I only found a few vids and picture sets that I haven't seen before but I'm sure would be on another site like Karupspc or similar site. I did like the multiple picture sizes (large typically goes slightly bigger than full screen), zip features, and model directory. I did come across some models when using the search function that weren't in the directory. I have noticed when looking at the site previously that there is content rotation. Also, the format is pretty much the same for the models and it can get repetitive. If there was exclusive content or more boy/girls sets I would score this site in the mid 80's. As it is now, it's worth the trial. I will note that when you cancel you have an option to continue for $19.95 per month. 03-21-08  10:12pm Replies (4) Review 45 POV Network (0) 64.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Access to 5 sites - In expensive trial ($5) - Some high quality vids and OK photos - No DRM - Exclusive content Cons: - Sites are poorly designed - Sites stopped updating as of 1/08 with few updates prior to that - Most sets are lower quality vids and pics - No zip and only one photo size - Many dead links - Not a lot of content - Admitted history of problems with sites by the webmaster - Newer pics have large watermarks that sometimes obscure "the stuff" Bottom Line: This one was pretty much like a bad trip down memory lane. If you remember what porn sites looked like 10 years with broken links, one size fits all vids and photos and minimal web design then you have this site. I took the trial primarily for povporn.com There were about 30 to 40 girls there. Of those, about 12 had better pics (1020 x 660) as well as good quality vids. The rest had 800 x 600 pics with low quality vids that have to be downloaded in segments. Two other sites only had about a dozen sets each. The main emphasis of the network is on Petersgirls which had the most content but was almost all softcore. By the time I got there, I was pretty much "done" with the whole thing and didn't look at much. I got a good laugh at the Lapdancegonebad.com website. None of the photo links worked and there 8 videos. The main page had about 24 months of updates. There were no updates on any of the page. Instead there were some webmaster postings dating back to 2006 trying to calm customer complaints about bad links, slow updates, etc. His excuse then was bad support staff and people taking advantage of him. The next month, though, he was bragging about he was going to build a porn empire and turned down a $1 million offer for all his content. Apparently, he "relaunched" in the summer of 2007 but the same problems seem to have continued. Basically, this network is a waste of time even for the trial offer. Let's just say I took one for the team here. 04-21-08  06:47pm Replies (4) Review 46 Private.com (0) 84.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: + Over 6,000 hardcore and lesbian scenes of mostly exclusive hardcore porn + A lot of attractive euro girls, mostly teen to early 20's with a few MILFs as well + $15 a month through TBP + No download limits + Good download speeds for me, about 2-3 mb/sec + HD files are not excessively large but no file size is ever given + Get to see a lot of porn stars, especially early in their careers + In browser playback is mostly smooth and you have different stream options + Allows for comments, saving scenes as favorites and rating scenes + Updates 6x per week + Mostly high production value, lots of exotic or unique scene locales too + About 90% exclusive content or at least Private media exclusive Cons: - Prechecked cross sale - Support is a bit questionable - Almost, but not quite, a site for picture oriented porn geeks - Limited model info, model directory not complete - Search functions limited and scene tags are too broad for a decent search - File names are terrible - About 40% of content is not HD and there's some psuedo-HD as well - Some scenes get repeated/recycled, especially early on - Cannot download 4k vids, only stream them - Just because an update occurs today doesn't mean the scene was shot recently ... or even this century (I'm not kidding). - Lots of anal and dp if that isn't your thing. Bottom Line: This incarnation of the Private website started in 2010 and consists of 251 pages of updates as of August 2017. This site is really a tale of 2 halves. Keep in mind that the date a scene is posted is not when it was shot. Thus, the oldest 125 pages is mostly content shot in the 90's or early 2000's on VHS and converted in 480 digital format. Ouch! Because Private was mostly about producing porn in exotic locales a lot of the early scenes suffer from poor lighting, poor sound, not so special special effects, tons of shitty background music, and the then European obsession with endless closeup shots. Because some scenes were shot in a foreign language Private decided to have the dialogue and sex sound overdubbed on some of these. I challenge you to not laugh as a low quality, poorly lit scene streams hideous overdubbed sex sounds from a double penetration with smooth jazz blaring in the background. Some early scenes get recycled too. Things finally change with roughly the updates from 2013 onwards (the most recent half). You get HD vids on most updates. By 2014 you start getting reasonable picture counts with sizes coming in at 1600x1060 (96dpi) with some sets getting up to 1500x2300. 4K vids arrive in late 2015 but you can only stream at 4k, not download. They also get away from the obsession with closeups and some of the ultra exotic locales in favor of more set work with higher production values. Here's some specs: PICS: Not all scenes have pics (even recent ones) and most are at 1000x1500 (96dpi) with 1600x1060 sizes or larger coming since about 2014. The pic count offered by TBP and the Private is exaggerated. The early scenes only offered a few dozen pics at best and the majority of pics are mostly the obligatory pre-scene pose shots. Starting around 2012/13 you get more scenes with reasonable pic counts (80-200 per scene) without the endless posing. Like most sites, the vids typically show more action than the pics. All scenes with pics have zip downloads although file names are just a series of letters and numbers. The photo viewer sucks though, you only get 8 pics per page and have to frequently jump though a lot of pages to see if you want to download the zip. Pics aren't always in order either when viewing in browser or opening the zip file. The pics tend to be good quality but limited size makes this an iffy site for pic lovers. VIDS: As noted above, a lot of the early content is just old standard media shots or VHS shots converted into 480p. 480 is only download option for about 40% of the content, otherwise you have options of 480, 720, 1080 or phone. HD comes along in 2013 but, suspiciously, you have 720 or 1080p as options – no transition from 720 to 1080 or “i” to “p” on the HD. I didn't dig into this deeply but given the age of some of these scenes there is no way they could have been shot at 1080p. Thus, my claim of “psuedo HD” on some scenes applies. Download speeds were good though and the file sizes were reasonable – I download mostly in 720 and half hour scenes were usually 500-700 mb. Scenes range from a few minutes to almost an hour, most fall into 15-30 minutes. Navigation needs some work. Pagination is limited, but you can manually adjust for page numbers to jump around as needed. Model info is limited. Tags are too generic for any meaningful search and some scenes are mislabelled or tagged as well. As noted above, the picture viewer needs work. The inbrowser stream player works well and has the pop-up screen shot available on the time bar for most videos although how well it works varies from scene to scene. Really the only way to view this site is to page by page. You signup (less prechecked cross sale) through rocketgate. To cancel you have to submit a support ticket. I was canceled within minutes but I did a confirmation email. Private also makes pretty clear that they don't do support. A lot of the older content is endemic of what Euro porn used to be: closeups, background music, actors looking at the camera, and very male-centric in that the hot girls are really just willing props with an orifice for you to stick your meat into them. Often, if it went into one orifice it was going into all three. More recently it's a lot more reflective of what you see on DDF, 21st sextury and teenmegaworld. I stunned to see some heartcore type as recent updates. The scenes also have more of a story arc (no dp's within minutes of a girl meeting 2 strangers in the woods) and less emphasis on exotic locations and more on production value. While the production value rises some of what made Private Private has disappeared. It's less focused on exotic locales and scenes with lots of hardcore action and is now more generic in that the scenes now look like they could be shot by any of the major Euro companies. Overall, the site gets most of it's points from the fact that there is so much content. It's too big to fail but could be better. 08-07-17  03:06pm Replies (2) Review 47 Pure Mature (0) 79.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + About 215 scenes of exclusive milf / mature hardcore action featuring mostly attractive gals. + All scenes have vids and about 98% have pic sets with zips. + Multiple download options on vids and vid quality is good. All vids have at least one HD download option. + Good download speeds for me (about 3-4 MB/sec). + Decent price of $18 month through TBP. + Bills through Epoch. + The inbrowser video player works well. + Good production values across the board. + Model directory seems complete. Cons: - Not really a picture site (see below). - Downloaded files and vids poorly labelled (just numbers). - Too much music in the earlier produced vids. - No real search function or tags. No model information. - Pretty much M/F hardcore, not much anal or 3 way and zero solo or lesbian if you're into that. - A bit too "heartcore" for my tastes. - Updates only once a week. - As one sort of expects with the older actresses, there is a lot of silicone to look at. Bottom Line: Wasn't really sure what I'd be getting here when I signed up other than a more mature line of starlets. Overall, it's pretty much a straight M/F hardcore site featuring pornstars in their late 20's to late 40's. The girls are mostly attractive pornstars (no BBW) and the production value is good to excellent across the board (no amateur feel to it). Here's the specs: PICS: Like I said this isn't really a picture site. The pics dating from the beginning to late 2014 have portrait resolution of 1500x2700 but only have landscape resolution of 1500x840. What went wrong there? Others are a hodge podge of different sizes (a lot of 1000x1500 though). The most recent pics are all 1000x1500. The pics mostly look like HD screen grabs so there is some blurriness and cropping is questionable at times. A lot of scenes are shot in bright light or white backgrounds which causes some pixelation and washout. Most of my downloads were done in hopes that I could salvage some stuff that would look good on my monitor as opposed to looking forward to editing the sets later. VIDS: Download speeds were good for me. With earlier vids you get options 1080 mpeg or wmv or 480. Starting in 2014 you also get 720 resolution options. This mostly a "heartcore" site which means lots of bright background lighting. The older vids show a bit of pixelation because of this but it improves over time. Also, through late 2013, the theme was "heartcore" (aka - porn for mimes) meaning that no one in the scene makes any real sex noises. Apparently the producers noticed that and thus incorporated random porn synthesizer music into various parts of the scenes to take it down another notch. The music goes away for the later vids (late 2013 onward) and the action gets more heated but there are no real story lines or conversation in the vids. The camera work is decent though and you do get some nonstandard views which is welcome. NAV: As noted, it's pretty basic. You can only search according to model, date or ranking. If you are looking for something specific in a scene then you'll have wade through everything to find it because nothing is tagged. MISC: There is a fair amount of POV style shooting here (run by remote or a cameraman, not the herky jerky hand held stuff done by the guy). The scene shifts in the vids can be a bit choppy at times too. Otherwise, the main theme is heartcore or heartcore with a slight edge. No real slapping or spitting here which is fine by me but it's almost too tame, especially if you've seen some of the actresses other work. As a comedian once said, "If the sex ain't dirty, you ain't doing it right." If you're looking to add to your mature video collection it's worth taking a look at. Otherwise I'd say it's OK. If you're into pics then I'd say move along. Average is the site so average be my score. 06-25-15  05:14pm Replies (0) Review 48 Reality Pass HD (0) 77.0 Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: + 5 site network (4 HC, 1 Lez) + Good TBP $5, 3 day full access trial + Some exclusive content which updates once a week + Some HD vids + A slew of nonexclusive material (1000's of pic sets and vids covering softcore, HC, lez, IR, etc.) Cons: - Painfully slow download speeds - Navigation and search is poor especially when dealing with nonexclusive material - Exclusive material quality is only average - Incomplete model directory and scene tags Bottom Line: I find this strange to say but the nonexclusive content is what makes this site, not their original stuff and that ain't saying much. Here's the breakdown: ORIGINAL CONTENT: 5 sites all link together. Pics come in at 800x1200 and all have zips - pics appear to be HD screen caps and aren't as complete as the vids. Vids come in streaming, 820x480 and 1280x720 HD and include clips and full scenes. The download speeds suck, around 150 kb/sec. The 820 and 1280 sized vids (roughly 700 mb and 1 gig in size) are almost impossible to download due to the length of time it takes. The quality is only average. You get iffy lighting and production but and the girls are teens/20's but only average looking. There is only one update each week between the five sites. Most only have about 12 sets so far. NONEXCLUSIVE MATERIAL: This was the best part of the site. There are literally 1000's of photos sets and vids from about 15 to 20 production houses. You also get access to 380 DVDS but those are pretty old titles. Three big problems here. First, navigation is a pain. You can only jump 5 pages at most - not cool when dealing with this volume. Second, search is limited. You can search by about 20 categories. Then you can search by tags within categories. Tags and categories and model directory are all incomplete and sometimes mixed up (you get teens in the MILF section, some HC sets don't appear in the HC category, etc.) Also, porn stars who have multiple names require multiple searches - no cross referencing. Third, you don' know what you're getting unto you dig into it. Pic sizes range from 600 to 2500, you can only find out by clicking on pics to see what you can get before you try to zip or view further. Vids are similar, you don't know if it's partial scenes or full scenes and the quality and sizes are all over the board (no HD nonexclusive vids though). Couple this "hunt and peck" search method with the slow speeds and it's a royal pain in the ass. As a plus, you get a lot of major production stuff (at times it looked like a Twistys or PaulMarkham or LegSex clone site) and you get Devils Film shots and other good stuff. So there is good stuff there but you have to spend a lot of time looking for it although you can search by production house if you want. If they shelled out some coin for some servers and bandwidth and improved their search and navigation this site could easily score in the 80's. As it exists now, I can't really recommend it. If you do join you get the option of a $10 per month for life discount when you cancel but there's nothing here you can't really see within the trial period unless you plan on downloading a lot ... in which case it may take your lifetime to get it all ;) 01-02-09  01:53pm Replies (0) Review 49 Suze Classics (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Good $10, 7 days full access trial + Also get full access to suze.net and suzevideo + Definite retro porn from the 80's and 90's + Pics remastered up to 1200x850 with zips + Good quality vids + Exlusive updates (er, "retrodates" perhaps) 3-4x a week + No DRM Cons: - No video and pic set overlap (aka - no pic sets and vids of the same scene) - No real HC photosets - Site still smallish - Prechecked cross-sale(s) on sign-up page - Advertising on the pages but no too annoying Bottom Line: If unshaved muff and names like Raqueal Darrian, Savannah, Christi Canyon and Teri Weigel bring back fond memories then this site might be worth donning your smoking jacket, trimming your 'stache and sitting back to go stroking with the oldies. This site features porn US stars from the 80's and 90's. Here's the basic breakdown: Pics: There are about 110 sets and all have zip. Three sizes going up 1200x850. All are basically digitally scanned photos from the original pic or negative and there is a smallish transparent watermark. Surprisingly there was very little graininess so the quality was good for what they were. The original lighting and cropping sometimes suffered though. The sets are somewhat small (most having less than 50 pics). I counted one true hc set but there were a few psuedo hc sets (no penetration) from the days when the skin mags couldn't show that stuff. This is defintely glam porn so if amateurs are your thing you probably won't be too into this. Vids: About 75 vids using WMV player only. 3 sizes to choose from (300k, 1 gig and 2 gig) and they're about 15 minutes long. The largest sized out at 720x540 and they streamed for me around 350 kbs. Almost all the scenes are HC and remastered from the original film or tape. Again the quality on the remasters was very good but the original lighting and directing sometimes left something to be desired. Still there was some hot action here. I'm scoring this site on it's own at an 82 simply because it's still growing, the original quality was sometimes suspect and for some reason this site did less for me than I expected it would. As I noted, you also get full access to Suze.net and Suzevideo. When you consider the network as whole, I'd score it around an 89 or 90 because the other two sites save it (See my comment on the suze.net page entitled "Site Stats Update" for what the network currently contains). They have also added a forum but it's still relatively new, not real informative and the only person from Suze who seems to contribute is Holly Randall (she seems to be running the show now). There is a model directory but it doesn't have much background info on the models themselves. There is also a search function for various sex acts and poses. If you're into retro porn, the 7 day trial price makes it worth checking out. For me, it was more of reminder of how much better porn is today than it was years ago but there is still some decent stuff there. 01-22-09  06:20pm Replies (1) Review 50 Suze Randall (0) 83.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: + Full access 7 day trial for $10 through TBP + Almost all original content. Some shared DDF and Holly Randall content. + Lots of content: About 650 hardcore photo sets and 4800 pic sets overall and all sets have zip function. About 1500 videos. + Membership includes Suze Classics for those looking to fill their 80's and 90's porn fix (that site factors into all the stats mentioned here). + Newest pics have 2400x1600 resolution and newest vids are HD with 1080 resolution. Newest vids have a stream option and multiple download options including wmv and mp4 files. + Good consistent download speeds of between 1MB - 2 MB/sec up to 6 channels. + Starting to remaster some of the old content + If you like glamor porn this is probably one of the best sites to visit. Has porn star from today back to the 80's. + Multiple weekly updates and all updates are dated for future reference. Cons: - Search function and tags are a mess and not real helpful. - There is a model directory but no model info. - No screen caps or ability to preview vids. I couldn't make the stream function jump ahead, I had to wait for the movie to buffer in order to jump while watching on line. - Quality takes a nose diver prior to 2010 with no HD vids and pic sets maxing out at 1000x1600 with most sets having smaller pics. Older vids don't have stream capability so you have to download them to know what they're like and the quality can be almost unwatchable by today's standards. - Fairly generic porn with mostly known porn stars. - Some advertising on each page. - There is a forum and FAQ section but it looks to be pretty much dead. Bottom Line: I last joined this about 5 years ago and dug it since it had a lot of content, decent pic sizes and decent videos for the time. However, time is not always kind and this site has been left a bit in the dust and it's caused me knock 8 points off of my original score. Here's the lowdown: PICS: I still this site primarily as a photo site. There are more vids now but pix are what Suze got started doing back in the 70's and this is what Holly Randall, who does the shoots today, mostly focuses on. Tons of pics but most sets have less than 50 pics which is a bit skimpy. The sets, at least the older ones, also have jumbled material so when you look at them online or unzip the folders the content doesn't progress smoothly from beginning to end. This was the case 5 years ago and is so today. The oldest material (probably half) has pic sizes that work only if you view porn on your phone. They are slowly (I mean slowly) remastering some old stuff into larger sizes but only by scanning the original pics which results in some graininess. Everything has zips. VIDS: The newest vids are great but there aren't a lot of them. As mentioned, the lack of a preview or screen caps isn't fun, especially when probably 2/3 of the vids don't have in browser stream options. The quality is all over the board to on the older vids, some are fine and others aren't worth it. Personally, I got frustrated because I'm not going to DL and watch a slew of vids just to see if I like the content. NAV: Navigation, in a word, "bites". The navigation is the same system they've since they opened I think and it shows. You can search pix by tags but you can't search videos this way, you have to search all "hardcore" for example to find the vids mixed in with the pix. You only get 10 search results by page and you can only jump ahead or behind by a few pages. When you have 100's of scenes with the same tag this is a pain. Also, if you relied on the tag "hardcore" you would think they stopped shooting hardcore in 2010. Nope. You have to look under different tags to find the newer stuff. Some vid scenes of the same photo shoot also have different tags. A small minority of tagged scenes do not appear in the tag search results either. Basically this site is too big for this crap and it definitely hurt the final score. They need to scrap the status quo and start over on the layout and search/tag system. I liked this site more before because I was more into glam sites since most amateur or gonzo sites didn't appeal to me. Now, when I look it and see the over saturated colors, small editors choice photo sets and porn stars past their prime doing generic scenes it doesn't do as much for me. DDF, 21stsextury, the WOW sites, teenmegaworld and others do a much better job of giving you fresh faces, quantity, quality and all in a more user friendly package. Overall, I still recommend the site given the vast amount of original material it has and the ability to look at the "classic" porn of the last few decades. Also, a lot of the content is decent in quality and the stuff within the last 18 months or so is top notch in terms of HD vids and large pic sizes. So, it's worth a join but probably not for month, the 7 day trial is probably all you need unless you have limited time to hunt through the site to find all the goodies. 01-31-13  07:26pm Replies (3) Shown : 26-50 of 66 Page : Page 1 2 3    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.35 seconds.