Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I consider Sex and Submission to be the flagship site of the Kink Network. It's one of the more "accessible" sites to Kink first-time members and the amount of content is impressive.
- Lots of different BDSM action. There's bondage, there's clothespins, there's pinching tongue chains, gag balls, latex, dominating and sometimes, it's all in one scene.
- The average porn user will find more mainstream porn models on this Kink site than most of the other Kink sites, which often have a set, rotating cast of regulars.
- Comes with the entire Kink Network.
- Stays within the mainstream cast formula (b/g, b/g/g, nothing too extreme like on some of the other Kink sites).
- The quality is high. Videos are in 720p. The amount is hard to believe, nearly 650 videos, averaging 45-55 minutes each. Dating back to 2005.
- Download speeds are above average.
- Updates once per week.
Cons:
- This is one of the Kink sites that doesn't have the pictures added back.
- It's repetitive. All porn of all genres becomes repetitive, but BDSM seems to become repetitive faster for me than any other genre.
- Despite it being one of the more accessible Kink sites, it still at times will be too rough for some viewers.
Bottom Line:
Sex and Submission has been around for 12+ years. The content is what you would expect. The actions are also fairly predictable. You'll see women having their nipples clamped, clothespins popped onto them, hair pulled, choked, suction pumps used on their clits during sex, arms tied behind their backs, over their heads and just all-around being dominated. You rarely will see a scene where the female dominates the man. You'll need to check out Kink's site Divine Bitches to see that.
I think if this site has lost any of its appeal its because the general mainstream porn video has become more rough and aggressive. This site started in a period when porn was mostly softer, scenes had themes, then this site came along and said "the theme is women being dominated" and it doesn't change from scene to scene. I am not a huge fan of women being dominated. And it's not because of politically correct reasons. I just have trouble triggering my fantasy brain by saying, "That big man is going to dominate that little woman". My realistic brain knows that wouldn't be a surprise or something worthy of a fantasy.
But ... if you're into females being dominated, you'll be hard-pressed to find a site that does it better than Sex and Submission. I think this site benefits more from Kink becoming a network than any of their other big sites. It seems once the BDSM becomes boring or repetitive, however you like to look at that situation, it stays boring and repetitive for awhile. I only joined Sex and Submission, twice by itself, before the Kink Network came along. Where as I joined multiple other Kink sites, 5 or more times each, before the Kink Network came along. Having the network allows you to move on past the repetitiveness of it to another genre/niche.
As with the other Kink sites, you're not going to get 1080p videos. The videos focus on story/theme and most scenes end up being upwards of an hour each. Anything bigger than 720p would cause the scenes to be in the 5-7 GB range. Their videos are very clear for 720p and look just as good as most 1080p videos.
Their oldest videos date back to 2005. With nearly 650 scenes and weekly updates, there's a lot to download or stream.
Another thing that could appeal to those who are new to Kink is the basic mainstream porn formula used on Sex and Submission. It's often just a male and female. You'll then see some male with 2 females scenes, but it won't go much further than that. Unlike other Kink scenes where there are sometimes multiple men with one woman. On the other hand, I do think, at least for me, the BDSM hurts some of the scenes. They'll have a really pretty model with big natural boobs then slap 10 clothespins on her nipples. That fantasy just isn't realistic for me.
Something I don't think is stressed enough with the Kink sites is the believable acting and enjoyment from the performers. I would still put this in the top 5 sites, on the Kink network, for first-time Kink members to check out. Along with Kink University, its content is just similar to what you're going to see in most porn these days. To make that simpler, there's not much here that's going to make you think, "That's disgusting" or "Why in the hell did they do that?"
Overall, by itself, it's a good site, but would be lucky to finish in my top 10 of Kink sites. I thought reviewing it would give newcomers an idea about the depth of this network. I have at least 9 sites on Kink that I prefer over this one and this one is still an 86. I would be more recommending of this site, by itself, to new Kink members than to former Kink members, but would recommend the site and network as a whole to anyone.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A Kink site, Divine Bitches is probably one of the more far-reaching sites for straight men.
- If you're looking for something different in today's copy and paste world of porn, you're going to find that something different here.
- Should be very high on anyone's list who likes seeing women in power sexually.
- Scenes are relatively long (50-70 minutes) and come in multiple formats for downloading, up to 720p.
- Navigation on just Divine Bitches is simple, but can get tiresome since it's a scroll through scenes site. Navigation across the network is very good though they've joined in the "channels" tab instead of "sites". That's a minor annoyance probably for just me.
- Download speeds are very good, I'm downloading at 90% of my max DL speed and it's consistent.
- Divine Bitches updates twice a month, which is at least acceptable.
- Comes with the Kink network which means you've got access to 29 other Kink-related sites.
- Excellent customer service (touch on in BL)
Cons:
- If you have trouble seeing a woman completely dominating a man then you're not going to like this site at all.
- Pictures are still missing. They are supposed to be returning, but it's a con until they do.
- This most likely is the perfect example of a "niche" site. Which means more people will dislike it before they even try it, thanks to stereotypes.
- I'll put it here with a note that I don't consider this a con, but some will. Highest video resolution is 720p. (Will further in BL)
Bottom Line:
Divine Bitches is a site I once received as a bonus site from Kink. My only interest in it at that time was the scenes with Isis Love in them. Even the scenes with Isis in them weren't as easy to watch as I expected. I should say I think Isis is the best of the models on this site.
What you have here is a big middle-finger to mainstream porn. You won't find a male performer squishing his foot on the face of the female. You won't have four 200 pound men having a gangbang with a 100 pound female. There's anal, but it's not what you're expecting by mainstream's standards. This is what really matters though. The males in these scenes seem to really enjoy the "abuse". Some most likely are gay or bisexual, but there's quite a few of them who have scenes with them dominating females on other sites. I don't mess around too much, in real-life, with dom/sub roleplay, but the models here, both male and female seem to really be into it.
Which is a big selling point of this site. You see genuine enjoyment, satisfaction from both the females and males. It even shows in their post-video interviews talking about the scene.
What you are going to see that you might not like or you might like a lot, is women using strap-ons on men. It's not in every scene, but it is common enough to mention it since some might be offended by it. I try to look at sex as a pure form of lust that is pushed by allowing yourself to do something you wouldn't ever think you would do. Because of this belief, it makes this site even more interesting and believable.
Wanted to mention something here. I've been a member of the Kink Network since they started it back several months ago. They don't use a regular biller like CCBill or Epoch, but do use an in-house biller. They're very easy to contact, respond quickly and should be looked at as an exception to the rule of not joining sites without a reputable biller. I've been a member here 12 different times and have nothing but good experiences with their customer service.
One of my cons is based around the picture sets. For years, Kink had picture sets with each scene, these were especially important to sites like Public Disgrace, where I wanted to see the expressions of the people watching. They're bringing them back, but I don't know when. The other con is they don't offer 1080p on their videos. But thanks to the length of most of their scenes, I'm not for sure if a person would really want to download a 1080p scene that last 70 minutes. The 720p scenes alone can be over 2-3 GB each. Luckily, their videos are crystal clear and I prefer 720p anyway.
This site shouldn't push anyone away. I originally thought it would me, but you see something here that you don't see as much in regular porn. You see the women coming off as powerful, dominant, like their bodies and sexual abilities are so great the man can't stop her. Where as when you see a dominant male, it's usually based around his physical traits being more powerful than the woman's. It shows a different side to sex, the mental side, which is very rare in porn. I can't say I enjoy the idea of seeing a woman stick a dildo up a hairy man butt, but Kink does a good job of focusing more on the woman's body as she's doing it.
If we all really thought about it, we would realize how many times we've complained about too many camera views of the man's butt when he's doing the female model in doggy. Well, on this site, that view is more of the female's butt. I used to join two Kink sites per year. I always considered them my "brain reset" sites that reset my brain from all the mainstream porn I watched. I have a year membership now that they're a network and really don't know if I'll ever cancel it. There's always something at least intriguing.
Still, I'm a realist and know some of the content on Divine Bitches, isn't for everyone. I do think if you have an open-mind and consider that it's still a naked woman and naked man, just like mainstream porn, you'll see that this site is very good. It's kind of like just changing the camera angle. And on top of it all, the female models on this site are almost all very attractive and sexy, even in feminine ways. Also, depending on how familiar you are with Kink, they are very diverse in their models. You'll find models of most races, most body-types from skinny to BBW and all the scenes are exclusive to Kink's network.
As of 2/20/2017 there are 387 scenes on Divine Bitches, top models (my favorites on here), include Ashley Fires, Isis Love, Lea Lexis, Daisy Ducati and Dragon Lily.
I consider this site one of my top 5 sites on the network and would recommend the network to anyone. There's enough "not so rough" and "not too far-reaching" porn here for the average porn fan, but especially recommend it for those who like to see some evolution in the porn world. Also consider the year membership to be the best value in porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of mostly reality porn type content, similar to Reality Kings, Bang Bros, etc...
- Good discounted price through TBP/PU
- Was careful about billing, if you join using Paypal, the biller is Epoch.
- Technical quality is high, 1080p option on every scene I've looked at it (as far back as I've looked 2012). Photo sets are small, but at least they have them in zips, most are close to 2000 long end.
- Download speeds are above average for me, about 75% of my max DL speed on pornsites.
- Seems to have some kind of reward program where you get to pick a "locked" site to open after 30 days of membership. That's almost a con since this site can be a bit frustrating to use.
- By my count, I have access to 27 sites and there's a couple more that are locked. The categories are fairly diverse, including a Japanese channel/site, a Lactating channel/site and a Cosplay channel/site.
- Looks exclusive to me, but I'm not going to guarantee it.
Cons:
- Navigation. That was supposed to be read like this ... "navigation, period." The site can be confusing. There doesn't seem to be a network hub site where you can search across the network, but if there is, it's doing a good job of avoiding me. There's a "network" tab. From it you pick through the different niches. Which will be con two below this one. Once you pick the one you're interested in, the search box only seems to work within that site/channel, instead of the whole network.
- The channels/sites are even confusing. Some sound like porn studios like Harmony Vision, Herzog Videos, while others are just named after their niche like Cosplay and Filthy and Fisting.
- You could spend a month just trying to find a scene you saw on your screen, 20 minutes ago.
Bottom Line:
I've considered joining Stiffia several times in the past since I do like the big reality networks, but I was always put off by the negative comments about frustrating billing hassles. Now that they have the option to join using Paypal/Epoch those billing concerns are gone.
My first thought as a member was, "What have I gotten myself into?" The site itself has a nice layout, clean, non-cluttered pages, but outside of just clicking on latest updates and scrolling through scene after scene, you're kind of stuck with figuring out their wonky search engine. I would fix these issues as simple as this:
Put a network search engine on every page.
Keep the search engine that only searches within one site/channel/niche. It's useful, it's just not real practical to a new member.
Put a network model search engine and again, keep the model search engine for each site/channel/niche.
It's not that big of a change, but it caused me to knock 15 points off my score. I spent way too much time trying to figure out what was what and what I was looking for. I don't think I've ever deducted that many points for any one con, but as you can see in my cons section, the navigation really took up 3 whole/different cons.
Once you figure out how to use the site, you've got yourself a real good network of porn. I just wonder how many people give up on it before figuring it out?
Here I go offering advice again. Merge some of these sites/channels together! I can't figure out what I'm going to find on each different channel. Give me a niche search or something. I just looked at a row of 6 videos, there's an interracial scene, two older women with younger men scenes, an anal scene, and two what looks to be amateur scenes.
Technical quality is very good. I've looked back into the older content and haven't found anything without the 1080p option. Videos are of good quality to my eyes. All kinds of hot models, including some I know of and quite a few I've never heard of. There seems to be a Greek/Spain influence in the models, but I'm not positive of that, just basing it on the female facial features and model names.
One more complaint: The videos have four download options. One option says, "Full HD (1920)", the next ones say "HD (1080)", "SD (720)", "Mobile (480)". Most of us know that 1080 is the height of a 1920x1080 movie, so why are there categories for 1920 and another one for 1080?
It's because they're labeled wrong. The "Full HD" is 1920x1080. The "HD 1080" is actually 1040x584 and the "SD 720" is 720x404. Which for lack of better word is confusing. I've always known 720 as 1280x720, which would still be bigger than the second option on here listed as "HD 1080". Maybe someone who runs it or does their programming doesn't know the difference in the resolutions?
Now that I'm done complaining there's still a really good network here. Problem is I'm as OCDC as anyone you'll ever know and these inconsistencies are going to pick at me until I don't like the network at all.
Normally, I would list all the sites and let the names of the different sites explain what you'll be seeing on those sites, but you can't with these "channels". Gonzo porn studios, reality porn studios, Japanese sex, anal, it's like joining a DVD site with no search engine or eating those jelly beans that are oddly-flavored and wondering if you just ate "booger" or "burger". Cue the Forrest Gump "life is like a box of chocolates" saying.
Still, the content isn't bad. Which is the point of joining a porn site. You have a nice mixture of younger models, older models, all the possible heterosexual niches and it's all in high quality video.
I've saved nearly 1,000 characters just to use for if I recommend it or not.
If you don't mind searching for good scenes, you will like this site. If things like crooked pictures on your bedroom wall don't bother you, you'll like this site. If your spouse leaving toothpaste stains in the sink don't bother you, you'll like this site. Better yet, if you have some extra time on your hands and like the idea of exploring the many niches (that's a big compliment), you'll like this site. As a matter of fact, if you sometimes feel like you don't get the most out of your membership to sites because you download everything you want in the first week, then don't go back, give this site a shot. I can all but promise you, you won't find everything you want in a week.
I'm trying my best not to be too negative here since I understand most people are not as easily-annoyed as I am. And I want it to be known that this site can at least to some extent, compare to the bigger, better-known networks like Brazzers, Reality Kings, Bang Bros, and their porn studio sites are comparable to most porn studios.
But I'm going to say despite my 84 score, I don't see me coming back to this site until they do something with the navigation, search engine and model list.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of the flagship sites of 21 Sextury.
- Quality is still high, options on video sizes are probably unmatched and a whole network of sites comes with it.
- Good TBP/PU price, but if you really like the content here then the TBP/PU yearly price is worth checking out at just over $60 for a year. Which is what I'm in my 6th month of.
- Still updates, but only about 5 updates per month over the last 5 months.
- Good navigation, can jump from site to site in the network, go through the model list alphabetically, by release date, etc...
- Especially fun for us native English speakers, they've now started mixing storylines in and most of the models speak some English.
- Model quality still is as good as any network in the world. Especially for the fans of mid-2000s Euro models.
- Good lesbian content, it's becoming a dying breed, but a lot of the Euro girls won't do anything but solo or lesbian.
- Good download speeds and billing is now handled by Fame, they're okay.
Cons:
- As a standalone site, Pix and Video, once one of my top 10 sites, is only average these days. At least when it comes to current content.
- They removed the tokens that everyone except me hated. I can't count how many free memberships I received thanks to those tokens.
- None of my favorite models are shooting new scenes. Oddly enough, I saw Sandy from Club Sandy on FTV Milfs.
- There's a pro up there about adding a storyline to their scenes. Lets just say it can be a con too. I give them credit for trying it and give the models credit for if nothing else, being cute, while trying to act in what isn't their native language.
Bottom Line:
A long time ago Pix and Video could stand toe to toe with any porn site on the internet. They had star power that many of the America-based sites couldn't have, like Eve Angel, Sandy, Sandra Shine, Sophie Moone, Mia Stone (someone should write a song about her, Stone rhymes with bone, gone). I'm guessing that's one of the downfalls of the porn industry. The models up and decide they want to go get married, have kids and give up modeling without any warning.
Now that I got out my whiny, becoming old part of my review, there's still good news and some bad.
I'm honestly probably too hard on these 21 Sextury sites. I think the network as a whole is still a good value, especially on a year subscription, but I still hate that these standalone sites end up being just a piece of the whole network. If I owned 21 Sextury, I would put all of the content on Club Sandy and Pix and Video. Those sites combined used to cost me $45 a month and I was happy to pay it, even multiple months. I didn't have to go through the hassles of a network. Hassles of a network:
Click on 21 Sextury network. Opens all scenes including bonus and compilation scenes. With my experience dating back over a decade with these guys, I just click on the sites within the network. So, there's a click for Pix and Video. I can now just see Pix and Video's content. But I need to go look at seven other sites, in the same manner and hassle, just to see the content that used to just be on Pix and Video. I have a life here, people.
The new content is good. I just don't see any of the newer models becoming the "next" (pick name from those above).
They're at least keeping up (no 4K) with the technical quality. Their newest videos have 7 different resolutions available, from 180p to 1080p. I didn't even know there was such thing as 180p. Those who like pictures will find quite a bit to like here. Roughly 150-200 pictures per scene, downloadable in zip files and here's why they stand out, the hi-res photos are right at 5000 long end. I still think that's impressive for a site/network that has done everything possible to become a video-preferred site.
The numbers just on Pix and Video are impressive, but I think it brings up a fair debate question. If you're running a network which would be better to say, "My network has 21 sites on it" or "my one porn site has 9,500+ scenes"? Which is what you're getting with the whole network.
Here's a rundown for anyone who hasn't ever joined it and is considering joining:
There's female solo, lesbian, boy/girl hardcore, fetish (foot and pee) and blowjob scenes.
The female solo and lesbian scenes are the majority on Pix and Video. It was a site to introduce new models and focus on their big star models in the mid-2000s.
The male talent varies, but you're still going to run into guys who were around way back in the early 2000s like Thomas Stone, who is in one of the newest scenes and back in 2002 was in one of Eve Angel's few b/g scenes.
There's no limits, videos are clear and is the case for most of the 21 Sextury network, have a warm color tone as do the picture sets. There's downloads for the videos and picture sets.
Models are generally younger (18-24), but you'll find some older models, especially in the archives.
There's very little diversity in race of the models. You will find a few black/biracial girls, but the sites are based in Europe and from what little I've heard, the sites would like to hire a more racially-diverse collection of models, but they're just isn't that much diversity available.
It's a good place to start your porn collection. It's a good place to become a porn hoarder, for example, Eve Angel has 144 scenes, which is 144 videos and 144 photo sets on the network. I'm sure if you find one or two models you really like you would be happy with a one month membership just to get all the content they have of your favorites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I think it's one of the better values in DVD sites, but you have to like the content, which can be on the harder side of things.
- Possibly the best navigation for a DVD site. You get to go through an entire process of elimination when picking tags until you find exactly what you're looking for.
- Video quality is very high, they're one of those sites that sometimes goes a bit overboard on the bitrates, but if you like high quality, it's here.
- Something I think pushes them ahead of other DVD sites is the vast majority of videos come with photo sets that are downloadable.
- Lots and lots of anal if that's your thing.
- Very diverse selection of categories. They've got everything from BBW to Bisexual threesomes to transsexuals to ... enemas.
- Many major porn stars are here. I would go as far as saying if they're a hardcore pornstar, they're on here. Don't hold me to that.
- Good DL speeds
- Fame billing, it's not bad and I've never had a problem with them.
Cons:
- Didn't take long for me to remember my boredom with DVD sites. It happens. The scenes are well-shot, the talent is top-notch, but if you're not careful you'll end up feeling like you've seen it all before.
- If you're going to be downloading the 1080p videos, the majority of them are well over 2 GB, some go as high as 4 GB.
- Screen can be a little cluttered from the main page, but it's not because of ads, it's just they cram a lot of content on each page. It's like a double anal penetration happened.
Bottom Line:
I think Evil Angel is bordering on becoming a mainstream site. Which is why someone would tell potential customers to make sure and look at some of the content before joining. I personally like a lot of it, but there's some of it that's pretty offensive. Especially if you don't like gaping or spitting into buttholes, a gold medal awaits Evil Angel if that ever becomes an Olympic sport.
I join Evil Angel once a year for one month. Their content falls somewhere between Kink and mainstream hardcore. They're very good about shooting a scene with at least some kind of theme to it and I would even say they have overall high production values, but there's not a lot of difference from one scene to the next unless you jump to a different category/niche. That's okay though. It's a DVD site.
For a long time, I opted to join the VideoboxEvil Angel channel, but I've probably said this before, if you do that, you're missing out on a lot of content. This site blows the VideoboxEvil Angel channel away and it's just as cheap. At this point, I'm even a little surprised that VB still has the Evil Angel channel, since I believe Evil Angel is a competitor to VB.
I mentioned it in the pros, but always like to point things like this out. Each scene/video has a photo set with it to download. There's a lot of those photo sets that are very good, even sometimes better than the actual video.
Navigation should be used as a template for DVD sites, and if I'm not mistaken, it is the same navigation the Fame Digital sites use. You click "category", a huge list of categories pop up. You can then do something like this, mark "Asian", "Teen", "Anal", "Handjob" and it will bring up all of the scenes they have that have all 4 of those in them. It's very useful when trying to find your way through all the content.
According to their search engine they have roughly 14,500 videos. They update with 4-5 scenes per day. If there's any one complaint here it's that the very newest scenes can't be downloaded for a few days. Not for sure why they don't just put them all together and release them at the end of the week.
While I think Videobox is one of the best places to start a porn collection, I'm not for sure I could say the same for Evil Angel. It's a much better join if you've already joined and bored of the more mainstream sites like Videobox. But if you're into the harder content, I like to think new Porn Users aren't, but if you are, then you would be better off starting your porn collection right here with Evil Angel.
One last thing, I find their pricing to be one of the worst. They constantly flash that $39.99/monthly price, but you can get this site for 66%-75% less than that. If you paid $40 for it, I really don't think you'd get your money worth, I sure wouldn't, but at $10-$15/month, it's a very good value. I'll recommend it for anyone who thinks their sexual interests and desires are darker than the average person. Then after those people, anyone who is bored with mainstream porn, even though, be warned, as said earlier, I think Evil Angel is becoming closer to mainstream unless you're willing to dig deep into those categories and find something truly unique.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It's probably the greatest picture porn site on the internet. I consider it slightly intimidating to review.
- Very pretty models.
- To my knowledge, the technical quality (picture resolution) is unmatched.
- The photo sets can be downloaded in zips.
- Advertises 4-6 updates per day. It's been 4 per day during my current membership.
- Good download speeds that seem to choke up and slow down on some sets.
- Considering the size of the site and the overwhelming amount of content, their navigation is very good and often surprises me with how good it is.
- The scenes themselves have become more "adult" or I should say "nude". You rarely see a set now without full nudity.
- Strong network of sites also can be purchased with Met Art.
- The locations of the shoots are often as pretty as the model.
Cons:
- The videos are a complete waste for me. They're usually in the 10 minute range and are usually just of the model rolling around on a bed naked, walking around naked or posing.
- I'm assuming a new porn fan is reading this and needs to know, there's no intercourse, no blowjobs, no double anal penetration to be found anywhere on the site. It's a site about pretty girls being pretty and naked. And yes, I think for many, that's a major con.
- I really wish they would get rid of those cam ads. It takes up roughly 1/3 the page.
- Site itself can be a bit wonky. I've had it close for no reason, refuse to remember my login, store my old login so I login to an account from 2011 and I still think they try too hard to get you to buy an upsell.
Bottom Line:
There's few sites that I consider intimidating to review, Met-Art, might be at the top of the list. First, there's so much content there's no way you're going to see all of it in a month or even a year. Second, even though it doesn't show as much with me as it does with other PU members, I really like pictures. Third, if I was to complain about something that bothers me it's the way the site presents its content and shoots/produces its content.
The reason the photo one bothers me is if I just reviewed it from just what I think about the site, it's going to get a very high score. But ... I don't think their pictures are the best. I prefer FTVs pictures and some of ALS Scan's too. Complaining about how the site produces or presents its content is just a subjective opinion. In a few words, it's a little more artsy than I like.
Then there's the big one. The videos still aren't worth downloading. I think that should be the biggest question you ask yourself before joining Met-Art. If you're strictly a video person, you're going to be disappointed and wondering why everyone scores this site so high. I think for me, it's that I always loved the old porn magazines, but not the tame ones like Playboy. Penthouse was a borderline one for me. I liked Hustler, Gallery, and a few other more obscure ones that showed full-nudity and penetration of fingers. Met-Art does a very good job of recreating those classic magazines in their photo sets. If you think you would enjoy that, then this is a definite join site.
Technically, the newest photo sets are nearing 6000 long end, there might even be some that go over 6000, but I've not seen them. Still, 6000 long end, is big enough to count the fuzz hairs on a model's butt. This is where one of my only complaints about the pictures comes into play. Some of the photos are blurry when viewed in the largest size. I don't get that near as much with FTV or ALS Scan.
Their presentation and style of content can be described this way and it's not about every single set, it's more of an "in general" than blanket statement. It's like when you're younger and see this beautiful girl who smiles at you. You are so excited to go out with her then you go out with her and there's no chemistry, her personality is flat, dull. I normally wouldn't make a comparison like that, but Met-Art is the one site I've always had a slight problem with because of its presentation. For all of their uniqueness, being a photo-heavy site, trying not to be vulgar, it's like the sets become interchangeable. I'm not even for sure this word really fits here, but I would call their content "linear". And I think you have to accept that before you can really enjoy their content. Their photographers, in my opinion, take their work, direction, flow of their photo sets, very seriously. For a long time, I avoided Met-Art because I found the content too similar from set to set.
Now though, I join it once per year and download any of the new sets/girls I like. It took a long time to sort my collection from Met-Art and get it to the point, where I only needed the content from one year. It makes the membership more enjoyable and less frustrating.
The models are generally very pretty, slim, a few have bigger builds, but most are slim. Most of the models are white, which is a bit of a problem for me, not so much from a PC view, but just because I like the different physical features each race has.
They have improved one thing I have complained about before. A lot of the artsy photo sites like to start each set with the model fully nude. Met-Art was very bad about doing this. Now, you'll see quite a few of the newer sets starting with models fully clothed. I've always believed my problem with models starting fully nude was based around my own fantasies of seeing what she looks like with her clothes on then comparing how she looks nude. But I now think it was more to do with their older sets starting fully nude, but not showing pink or buttholes. It would be 120 photos of trying to hide those things. They've improved that, I think it's brought more personality out from the models than the old style allowed.
I really can't convince myself to raise the score any even with the change to more sets starting clothed. I've now been a member on Sex-Art, which Met-Art owns and I prefer it. I also prefer ALS Scan, which Met-Art is partnered with. Other than that, I would think for someone who prefers pictures and hasn't been on many other photo sites, this Met-Art site could easily represent your "100" site. I feel like I'm defending my stance of only giving it an 88, but it shouldn't stop anyone from trying it out, unless you prefer videos by a large margin. I consider myself about 50/50 on photos and videos. If you prefer pictures, add 8-10 points to my score. If you prefer videos, subtract 8-10 points from my score. As an ending compliment, Met-Art is one of the few sites I wouldn't be surprised to see rated a 100.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Hustler, in my mind, the greatest name in hardcore porn.
- Huge site/network. I've seen some content as far back as the 80s, including the legendary, "Deep Inside Vanessa Del Rio".
- Hustler magazine pictorials to look at or download.
- Updates once or twice per week with a full DVD, it varies, so there's no way to put a set number on it or set frequency.
- Beaver Hunt category! My favorite section of Hustler magazine.
- Good download speeds, roughly 70% of my max speed.
Cons:
- A couple of my pros are actually not what they claim to be. Trust me, I'll go into in the BL.
- Video quality is below average at best.
- I once rated this "network" an 80, in 2007, here on PU. My average score is an 85.
- I thought, based on many of the professional reviews, that Hustler had got their site together and improved it. I thought wrong and wonder why it scored so highly in professional reviews. Not looking at that can of worms with a can opener.
- It's not a network. It's a DVD site that puts content, based on category, into a separate category that they so happen to call a different site.
Bottom Line:
Back when I first discovered porn it was a random VHS tape belonging to my uncle. I later found a whole stack of Playboy magazines under his bed. I'm sure I liked them and thought I had found a gold mine. Then, one day, I found a Hustler magazine in his room. I used multiple loud adjectives as I looked through the pages. So much nakedness, girls with fingers stuck in places, it was far greater than anything I had seen before.
When I turned 18, I had been psyching myself up to go to the local gas station and buy a brand new copy of Hustler. It then became a monthly habit. The rush, as I've told a few times, was maybe even greater than the magazine. This made Hustler my absolute favorite name in hardcore porn. And like most men who bought Playboy or Penthouse, I also read every story in Hustler. The jokes were tasteless and hilarious. Then there was the "Beaver Hunt" section of the magazine. It had used-submitted photos in it. Hustler would then pick the best one and give them a money prize. It had the dirty stories in it. Some seriously interesting political stories.
So, a few weeks ago, I thought I would join Hustler's website. It had been 9 years since I joined it. From everything I've read it's improved greatly since then. I joined ... and reality hit, buyer's remorse hit and my first "bad" review in a long time is now being posted.
First, in the categories is "Beaver Hunt". I click on it, it's DVDs from the Barely Legal series. It's not a bad series. It's also not "Beaver Hunt". I was honestly expecting user-submitted photos.
I then clicked on "Magz". I'm going to get to view all the digital issues of all Hustler magazines, right? Wrong. They only go back to 2007. Now hell, if you can put 1986's Deep Inside Vanessa Del Rio DVD on here, you can damn sure put the old magazines on here. It gets worse. No Beaver Hunt in the magazines that I could access. No joke section. No articles. Instead, a handful of pictorials from each magazine with 12-15 photos from each pictorial.
I cleared my head and decided to make the most out of what was quickly becoming the most disappointing porn site I have joined in years. I downloaded a few videos featuring models I like. They were okay, but were a bit blurry/fuzzy. Now these are newer models (Nicole Aniston, Veronica Rodriguez), maybe not "newer", but newer than Vanessa Del Rio. I look at the properties on the videos and see 960x540 resolution. These were downloaded from the "super quality" link. I go back to the available sites and enter "Hustler HD". Download the newest video available, it's 960x540. What the hell? It says HD in the name! I admit, I don't follow the resolution wars of porn, I prefer 720p and consider it the lowest level of HD. So my standards aren't the problem here. I can't imagine what someone wanting 1080p or 4K would think of 960x540 being listed as HD.
Disappointment continued, I went through every site on their "network" and downloaded the newest video they have. Not a single one had a video over 960x540. I stand slightly corrected by myself. I just found one DVD with 720p scenes on it, it's of Asa Akira.
Here's my roundup at this point: Beaver Hunt "site" is not Beaver Hunt. It's Barely Legal DVDs.
The magazines aren't magazines. They are 4-5 pictorials from each magazine.
The high quality videos are below average 960x540 quality. Including the ones on the "site" Hustler HD.
But wait... there is a hustlermagazine site that says it has all of the magazines in digital form. How do I know? It's advertised on every page of this Hustler site. Now back to the layout. You enter the site into a sort of hub. It shows 19 available sites in the network. A few examples of the names, Beaver Hunt, Daddy Gets Lucky, Asian Fever, those sound like real standalone sites that are part of a network, but in reality, those three are in order ... Barely Legal series, the Daughter series of DVDs, (including Barely Legal again), Asian Fever is their commonly-known DVD series' Teen Thailand and random scenes taken from DVDs that feature Asian models.
The further I looked into this Hustler site I started noticing chances to "upgrade" my membership. There's a problem there, why would I upgrade something that hasn't been the least bit entertaining?
The site needs a complete overhaul. Advertising as Hustler with "magz" should include all magazines and every part of those magazines. Advertising HD video should result in HD video. Neither of those said on the membership join pages, "Must upgrade to receive HD video and full magazines". A new search engine would help. Surely there's some 720p videos on here, but I've yet to find them. A simple search engine with an HD filter would do. It receives a 60 simply because it works and has porn on it with many big name stars. I'm guessing the higher def videos are included in the upgraded membership, again, the upgraded membership is not mentioned or offered when you join. Not recommended.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A fairly early version of FTV's take on the MILF genre. Content is being added by the week.
- Same FTV quality as expected. The videos all have 1080p option, picture sets top out at 4000 long end and are downloadable.
- Here's a big plus, there's some models here that are over 30, who I've never seen or heard of.
- Navigation works perfectly, it's the same as FTV's navigation on their other sites and because there's not a lot of content, it's really easy to get around to the content there is.
- Download speeds are in my excellent range. I download in my 90% of top speed range.
- Bills through CCBill
- Very good and limited tagging system, also used on FTV Girls.
- Very happy with the photo sets, most of the models have 3-4 different photo sets (different clothes/location) and in total they are 200-400 pictures of each model.
- Last pro, mainly because I think it will need to be mentioned in cons too. There's hardcore here, meaning boy/girl sets...
Cons:
- There's hardcore here. I don't consider this a con, but I've known a lot of members through the years who believe these solo-type sites shouldn't have men in them, so I thought I would mention it.
- And if you don't like FTV Girl's split video scenes, you're not going to be happy to hear that feature is on FTV MILFs too.
- A small amount of the content is from FTV Girls
Bottom Line:
I think many of us have waited patiently for the new FTV sites to be launched and this is one of them. Here's the good things:
I'm a huge FTV fan. I love the public exhibitionism, the amateur feel of the models, the way FTV sets up photography sets, the quality of the videos. I've also preferred models 25-35 for nearly my entire PU-life. So this site could be everything I've been looking for in a porn site.
The split videos are here. Yes, I've argued, debated and complained about them on FTV Girls, but their webmaster is set on them and he produces content I like so I'm adjusting. I'm still taking 5 points off for it, but if that doesn't bother you, go ahead and add 5 points to the score. Think I took 8-10 for it on my last FTV Girls review. The other "problem" is the filename system. It goes 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06 in each and every set. So, here is my fix that I've been using:
Create a folder of the model's name. In that folder make new folders for the number of sets/scenes the model has. For example, model name, set one, set two, set three, etc... Then use a download manager that allows you to save roughly 20 videos at a time and adjust the folder they are saved in to correspond with the set folder they belong in. By doing this, you offset the filename problem since there's only one 01, 02, 03, 04 in each folder.
One of the best changes the FTV sites have made in recent years is the tagging system. I personally think it's the most useful tagging system I've used. Why? Because it's very simple. The tags are:
1st - Never been in adult before.
Nu! - Public nudity
O - Real orgasms
Dil - Dildo play
Fet - Unique, fetish content
Ex - Extreme content
BB - Naturally busty girl
HC - Hardcore content, boy/girl
SpG - Sporty Girl, includes athletic content.
To top off this handy tagging system, they then list what fetishes, how far the model goes, what act of public nudity, etc...
I think every site should go to a similar tagging system.
Overall, there's a good selection/percentage of 1st time models. By my count, there's 75 models and 23 are 1st time models. There's a fairly decent mixture of body types, but there's not a lot in the way of different ethnicity. I still think finding 23 "MILFs" who have never filmed porn is an impressive number and here's the advantage. The MILFs are more confident than the teens. A lot of the 1st time teens are shy, even backwards and you can tell they have to really push/pull the models to get them to even be comfortable on camera, let alone to be confident on camera. You don't see that as much in this content. Most of the models look like/act like they want to be naked and want people looking at them.
I usually won't do this, but a model that just blew me away on FTV MILFs is Lexi. She is one of the younger models on this site at 28, but she's 5'9" 34E (natural), 26 waist, 34 hips with long, blonde hair. She's one of the few models I've ever seen that I would call stunning. And it's her 1st time on video. Maybe that's where we're at in porn these days. Used to I wanted to see a young model do her first masturbation scene or hardcore scene. Now, I kind of like the idea of the model being late 20s, who has never tried nude modeling, doing her first ever adult video. There's a believable anticipation from these older 1st time models, as if they've wanted to do it all their lives, but are just now getting around to it.
That, to me, is the strongest part of this content. There's something more genuine to it than most porn. Not to write off the teens, but I think even when they're genuine it's just to tease us old men. It makes you wonder how many of these models were told by an ex that they weren't sexual enough or weren't as sexy as the teens their exes watched in porn.
Having said that, there's still not a ton of content here ... yet. But the potential is higher than any site I've been on in a long time.
By my count, based on removing the FTV Girls content that somehow made its way onto this site, there are:
65 sets from FTV MILFs
10 sets carried over from FTV Girls (most of these are 1st time models)
Each set has 200-400 pictures and 1-2 hours of videos.
Of the 65 sets, 13 have hardcore (b/g) parts.
Model ages range from: 24-45, there's one 24, one 26, nearly all the rest are 28-45.
I've long struggled with most porn content. The model is the focus to me and I like models who can arouse with more than their natural, born-with body. Some might call it seduction. Eve Angel stayed my favorite for nearly a decade because of how she looked into the camera. Most of the models here also have that strength. Most of the teen models look at the camera like, "What are you going to do to me?" The models here look at the camera like, "You'll never believe what I'm going to do to you."
I took 5 points off for the split videos and 7 points off for value since it's a small site. Having said that, I can see this becoming my favorite site and a potential high 90s site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network based around multiple fetishes.
- I'll go out on a limb and say this is a network with sites that used to be standalone. The big draw for me was Jerkoff Instructors. It's on here, hasn't updated since 2015, but I lost this content in an accidental hard drive purge. I don't remember it being part of a network when I was a member before.
- You're sure find something you like on this network and probably something that offends you too.
- One of the prettiest, best laid-out sites I've ever seen, but sometimes it does run slow and takes awhile to load.
- There's new updates, but it's not exactly easy to find them.
- Download speeds are very good.
- Goofy, campy porn. Kind of reminds me of 90s porn except they're really trying to convince you of the scene. It's a nice change of pace.
- Pretty models throughout the network.
Cons:
- Where in the hell are the new updates? I have to scan through every single site to find the newest scene from each site. It's not exactly the most user-friendly site.
- You kind of feel like there's a really rich 19 year old who owns this network. He sees October on the calendar and says, "Lets do a Halloween themed site!" Then it stops updating after 8 updates.
- Got me to join for a month, but no new updates on Jerkoff Instructors will stop me from joining again.
Bottom Line:
A few years ago, a site named Jerkoff Instructors became one of my favorite sites. It's a site that features pretty models, sometimes in hose (no panties), stockings (with panties), leggings (no panties). The models then tease, strip, sometimes masturbate and talk dirty to the viewer. It's good content. It's even now fairly unique content. You not only get the tease, panties, see-through hose fetishes in there, but also get the dirty talk fetish too. That was my reason for joining this network. I cleaned out my hard drives last year and mistakenly deleted all of the Jerkoff Instructors content. Bought myself a 4 TB external recently and wanted to add this content back.
The annoying thing about this network is it has a lot of potential. Someone working on this network has a pretty impressive programming background. The site is pleasant to your eyes, content loads as you scroll and they go for high production values, but they have ADD. No direction. No consistency. It really reminds me of that rich kid in college who is extremely smart and talented, but can't make up his mind on what he wants to do. An enigma, if you will.
Several of the sites try to take the angle of the dominating male against teen girl, but they're not rough enough to make it that believable and they're not offensive enough to make it believable either. And the girls are in no more danger than they should be, but they can't even act enough to convince you they are.
I can't really complain about their quality though. They have some 4K scenes, again, I don't have a 4K monitor so those don't matter to me, but they're there.
The majority of the sites do look similar to Kink sites. And are named like Brazzers sites, Teens in Woods, Teen Creeper, Helpless Teens, Brutal Pickups, but that's not to say there's nothing here worth looking at.
I not only appreciated being able to get all of my Jerkoff Instructors content back, but I also found their Footjob Addict site to be very good in a dying niche (It no longer updates either). Strap On Squad is another one I like. It's kind of like Kink-level lesbian scenes, but it stopped updating in September.
I should mention there's lots of tattoos on the models. I've been up and down the debate on tattoos on models and really don't mind them, but I know some people do.
This is my opinion on how to enjoy this network. You have to spend an hour or so finding the sites you like on the network. Once you do that, you can just select the site and download what you want. Until you do that, the network as a whole is a navigational mess. Down the whole main members page is a section for each site with a couple of the site's scenes. Up top in the navigational bar there's a tab for "sites", that's the most useful one. You can then go through each site and find the content you like. If you click "all videos" instead of all of the videos opening up with newest ones first, which is what 99% of sites do, you get a dropdown menu that asks what kind of video are you looking for. The choices are for example:
UHD - Teens,
HD - Bondage, Teens, Foot Fetish, Maledom, Femdom SD - Pretty much the same as the HD ones with a few more added.
If I click "all videos", why is there a dropdown selection box? Shouldn't "all" videos come up? It's again, frustrating. So just stick to using that "sites" tab and go about navigating the network that way.
There's also problems with the way the sites are counted/listed. Just a short explanation:
On the main page it shows 11 sites.
Near the bottom of the main page it shows 15 sites.
On the "sites" tab it shows 46 sites.
Get it together people. I tried to find some kind of logical reasoning behind the differences, but there's not any. Jerkoff Instructors is listed on all three of those locations and it's not updating, so it's not as if the "featured" sites or "top" sites are just newer sites that are updating.
Having complained pretty much throughout this review might make it sound really bad, but if you use that "sites" tab, you'll find quite a bit of unique content that you'll rarely see in this high of a number in quantity. Which should be their selling point to new members. A lot of the sites don't update anymore, but the content a lot of the sites have is content you rarely see. I ended up downloading over 75 GB in 3 weeks, which is quite a bit more than I've been downloading from other sites, at least recently. There's content here that I looked at and thought, "I might want to see that niche one day. I've not seen it anywhere else." I definitely wouldn't recommend it for anyone looking for mainstream content. The newer stuff is more mainstream, but the older stuff is where the value is.
I would recommend it to anyone who liked the Jerkoff Instructors since you can get all of its content here. Also those who are looking for something different. To me, it's a safe join for one month, but wouldn't recommend anything more than that.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A fairly large DVD site with exclusive content.
- Good TBP/PU discount
- Though it's not a big selling point for me, they offer nearly every niche in porn.
- Site navigation is very good, but they do seem to have something going on that slows the site when first loading it.
- A new scene (video not full DVD) added daily and every scene I've looked at has a photoset which is not a separate planned photoshoot, but instead, just stills of the video. They can be downloaded in zips.
- Download speeds land in the "good" area for me which is about 75-80% of my max speed.
- Some rare scenes you won't find anywhere else. For me, there was two Tera Patrick scenes I had years ago, but had misplaced or lost them.
Cons:
- I think the biggest con is that the site can be a pain in the ass. I had left the site, came back to it maybe 10 minutes later, had to sign in again and fill out a captcha. Only to find out my login info wasn't right. I tried three more times and it kept rejecting my login. I reset my password. Signed in, my browser (Firefox) stopped responding. Had to force close Firefox. Reopened Firefox, had to go through the whole login process again. I don't know if they have Java running or what, but whatever it is, it's annoying.
- The always con of joining a DVD site. Things get boring and samey-samey after awhile.
Bottom Line:
I've been a member on this site multiple times over the years. Despite being a collector of specific models, I still do like to download random DVDs with pretty girls I've never seen before. I'm admittedly tired of Videobox and Videosz, so I thought I'd visit Fame Digital again.
First and foremost, there are two Tera Patrick scenes on this site that I love. I had both of them as far back as 2009, but since then, a couple of moves and transferring content from smaller hard drives to larger ones has led me to losing some of my favorites, including these two Tera scenes.
The numbers here aren't as impressive as the two bigger DVD sites listed above, but there are advantages. The content is mostly exclusive, which is generally considered one of the biggest cons of DVD sites.
By my count there's 5,964 scenes dating back to 2006. And nearly 500 transsexual scenes as well.
The navigation is good. You will run into some strange results if you mess around with the settings and searches. The Tera Patrick "site" for example, only has a couple pages of Tera, then it starts putting random female models in the other scenes.
A fun one for me is the Silverstone DVD section. Silverstone, at one time, was one of the premier studios for Europe's top-tier models and you'll find some collector-type content in those. Including Sylvia Saint scenes from 10 years ago.
Admittedly, I've been tired of seeing Rocco Siffredi's content for years, but I know there are collectors of his scenes. There's over 500 of those Rocco scenes. Some of the newer ones are pretty good. He's finding models I've never seen.
There's a section called, "Daring Sex" which looks like pretty normal porn.
Maybe I sound like it's pretty dull, but it's really not. I think I just get agitated with these networks that try to be a network when they're really just a site broken in categories (that try to act as sites). I don't know that I would recommend this site as a site to start a porn collection with, but would recommend it to those who have been a member of Videobox and/or Videosz, but are looking for some new content.
Which is a strong suit here. Not only do they offer a fairly large transsexual collection, they also have the m/m/f bisexual scenes that are almost unheard of on straight DVD sites. I've always believed scenes like these separate DVD sites and appeal to a broader audience. That makes the TBP/PU price even better since you can see some content you probably wouldn't normally search out and do so without spending much money.
Overall, I would rank it close to Videobox and Videoz, based solely on the exclusive content they do have. It should be mentioned some of the Devil's Film DVDs are easily found on Videobox as well. I would put it even with smaller DVD sites/studios like Lethal Hardcore and maybe even ZTOD. It's a good value for the cost.
Beware the cross-sale on the registration page, it was about 3 seconds from getting me, but I saw it over in the right margin right before submitting my order. A good join for a month or two especially if you're looking for rare scenes of specific models.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I've probably joined this network as much as any. It's got enough variety to make it good for a one to two month join.
- 16 sites included, there's underlying themes to each of the sites and admittedly, they do sometimes overlap, but there's still a lot of content here.
- Maybe one of the strongest points to make is there really isn't a set flagship site like a lot of networks have. Will go through numbers in BL.
- Good but not great download speeds.
- The vast majority of videos are offered in a minimum of 720p and the videos of the last five years nearly all have 1080p. It can vary slightly from site to site.
- I like the word unique and it fits here. Even though it should be mentioned that unique doesn't always mean you're going to like all of the content.
- Pretty good navigation, but there's that model count problem which I'll list in the cons too.
Cons:
- As with all networks, there's some smaller sites and will go into in BL.
- A lot of the scenes on this network feature many people, as many as I'm guessing, 100+ in the Party Hardcore scenes. They have quite a few models in their model list that have over 50 videos, but I'm guessing they're counting any appearance in a scene as a video count number. Will have an example in BL.
- It will always be a problem that I just don't think can be fixed. There's too much action going on in most of the scenes.
- Another one that's not a terrible con, but scenes are broken into parts, sometimes as many as 6 parts. Reason being, the scene parts are as big as 2 GB each, meaning if you downloaded the full scene you're looking at 12 GB and up.
Bottom Line:
I was first introduced to this network back when it was called something like ErroMax or something like that. I have a strange fetish of imagining my wife or back then, girlfriend, going to a club or party with friends, getting tipsy and going a little too far with the male entertainment. I'm a little perverted in my fantasies. Maybe even a little twisted. I've always been from the belief that fantasies are for our darker thoughts and desires. So Party Hardcore was a big draw for me, much like Dancing Bear from Bang Bros, was.
I'm going to list the sites and will put the number of scenes out from them. Party Hardcore - 500 scenes updates weekly Drunk Sex Orgy - 1,375 scenes updates monthly Cum Squad - 54 scenes updates monthly, but has had some long lulls, as long as 2.5 years of no updates between 2011-2014, but has updated monthly every month in 2016. Pee Squad - 43 scenes updates monthly All WAM - 720 scenes updates weekly Fully Clothed Pissing - 500 scenes updates weekly Fully Clothed Sex - 500 scenes updates weekly
My-Fetish - 184 scenes hasn't updated since 2012 Pissing In Action - 512 scenes updates weekly Mad Sex Party - 144 scenes hasn't updated since 2012 Tyrannized - 146 scenes hasn't updated since 2011 Slime Wave - 318 scenes updates weekly
Party Softcore - 5 scenes hasn't updated since 2011 Orgasmatics - 158 scenes hasn't updated since 2014 Pornstars At Home - 441 scenes hasn't updated since 2014
Leony April - 164 scenes hasn't updated since 2013
That gives them 9 active sites, 5 archive sites.
It's worth mentioning here that some of the numbers don't look right to me. This is especially true on Party Hardcore. The oldest scene available is from 2010, but I know this site has been around much longer than that. That I know of, this network has been through 3 name changes, Orgy Max, Erro Max and now Tainster, so there's a possibility that some of the older scenes belonged to another company and have been removed. Still, there's a ton of content overall.
My biggest problem with the network is the model list. I think another PU reviewer mentioned this as well. A name that I just recently mentioned in a DDF review was Zuzana Z, she's now a seasoned veteran of 15 years in the business. She's listed as having 86 scenes and she does have 86 scenes, but some of them are alternate views like "cam 2" and "lesbian cam" and there are some that are part 1, part 2, part 3, as example, that counts as 3 scenes, even though the parts are from the same scene. It's a relatively small complaint, but it's a little frustrating for a collector.
As is the poor file-naming system. Many of the videos have the same file name so I have a bunch of these 720pfullcomplete(1), 720pfullcomplete(2), that's fairly old school and time-consuming to fix.
Also should mention that Fully Clothed Sex and Fully Clothed Pissing are the same scenes, just the Pissing one is focused on the pissing segment. I won't take anything off for that since people who like pissing scenes might not want to see the rest of the scene.
Of course, the nicest thing about this network is the price. I once paid upwards of $40 for this network, it was maybe $29.99 in Euros, back when the Euro's value was much higher than the dollar. Now they've just gave it a nice discounted price and it becomes one of the better values for your money networks.
I would think those who are into pissing would like this network. Those into dressed women having sex. And as mentioned earlier, those into using the orgy scenes as fantasy material for your own twisted perversions. I do think they have a few sites they could get rid of. The Slime Wave site is a waste to me. It's a dildo that squirts "cum" all over the models and it is one of their weekly updates sites. The All WAM site also has never interested me. I don't get the attraction of seeing dressed women throw food on each other. I should have mentioned that WAM means "Wet and Messy".
But Party Hardcore is still going strong as is Fully Clothed Sex, which has become my favorite site on the network. The other draw here is for those looking for something different than the norm, but not really ready to try the Kink-type sites, it fits nicely in that in-between area.
Last, I always try to do this for collectors. It's always been surprising to me, but they do have a lot of big name Euro models on here. Simony Diamond, Zuzana Z and an old favorite Tea Jul too, just to name a few. Some of Zuzana's scenes really surprised me since they involved her pissing on men, women and men and women pissing on her.
It's a good join for a month or two, depending on how much time you can dedicate to it. It certainly doesn't come off as a budget network as its price to content amount would suggest.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The flagship site of my personal favorite network.
- I originally reviewed 1byday, here on PU, way back in April, 2007. Gave it the same score, but everything else has changed.
- Includes network access to 7 other active sites and 6 inactive (not updating) archive sites.
- The quality is easily some of the best on the internet and it goes beyond just the resolution numbers with DDF content.
- I've seen many different prices, but I joined it last year for a year membership price that was very good and cheap.
- Despite 1ByDay being part of a network, it alone, updates 4 times a week with a photo set and video. The network as a whole updates twice daily with a video and photo set included in each update.
- Very good download speeds.
- 1ByDay is more or less a supersite for individual models, so there's lots of solo content here.
- Epoch is the biller
- Zuzana Zeleznovova and Mia Stone, two of my favorite blondes have their best work here. And lots of it.
Cons:
- Zuzana Zeleznovova, Eve Angel, Mia Stone, Anetta Keys, just to name a few of my favorite models that have a ton of content on 1byday ... have all retired.
- Well, I complained about it on the Club Sandy review, so 1byday used to update twice daily. Though it was in theory and name only supposed to update once per day. It now only updates 4 times per week.
- Current models just aren't what they used to be. That's not to say they're all bad, but I used to download every new update, now it's more like 1-2 per week.
Bottom Line:
Years ago, DDF and 21 Sextury competed head to head for mine and many other people's money. About 5-6 years ago, I would have advised others to go with 21 Sextury, but not anymore. It's not so much a dropoff at 21 Sextury as it is, DDF's sites continually improving. I hate to go into an area that pulls in personal preferences, but DDF has stuck with their guns or maybe more applicable, they've left with the person who took them to the dance.
The reason I joined 1byday/DDF for a year was because of a major external hard drive crash. I lost over 1TB of DDF content. I don't spend as much time on the PC or downloading porn as I used to so I figured a year membership would be good for recovering all the lost content and checking out the newer models too.
1byday continues to produce content that isn't very different from the content they were producing over 10 years ago. It's mostly softcore, masturbation to orgasm, very personal videos and photo sets. This is still my overall favorite genre of porn, but it really is dying off. Which is why 1byday still receives a 94. Most of my old favorite sites/networks have become 95% hardcore. While I believe my taste in porn has changed as a whole, I still do like to see the pretty young women in clothes, then stripping, then masturbating. And overall, I think 1byday alone can fill that niche for me.
If you're unfamiliar with some of those models I named above, but like solo porn, then do yourself a favor and try this site/network out. Check out those models especially. DDF, the man, not just the network name, before retiring, brought out the best (worst? naughtiest?) in Eve Angel, Zuzana Zeleznovova (especially Zuzana) and the incomparable Mia Stone. If you love solo porn, the scenes of just those 3 are well-worth the membership price. Which is the good news, there's roughly 2,400 other models besides them.
There's very little bad news. Seems like the pricing could be a bit of a hassle since I've seen the network listed anywhere from $9.95 a month to $29.95 a month. I seriously am considering just letting the year membership I have recur for another year. It's still cheaper than any of the promos I've seen.
1byday is easily one of the biggest Euro model sites. It has over 4,000 scenes. Each "scene" includes a downloadable photo set and video. And they were doing full 1080p HD as far back as 2010, so there's thousands of videos in HD. Though, as I've said before, I prefer 720p and they also offer it. Their videos and pictures are clear, not nearly as touched-up as other similar sites and the videos are sharp.
I think once you add the network sites you have the best overall value in porn. Much like 1byday has stayed true to its roots, the other sites included have also stayed the same as they've always been. You also don't see as many dead sites here as most networks and maybe more importantly, the sites that are inactive on DDF include a couple that were solo models who retired, so there's no fair way to complain about those.
I think this shows it best.
The smallest active site on the network has 609 scenes. Six of the 8 active sites have over 1,000 scenes. So they have 8 very successful sites in their network. And one of the archived sites has over 800 casting videos on it.
But there's no doubt that 1byday is the site that made this network possible and at least for me, has me considering a 2nd year membership. I really can't say that for any sites anymore.
I'll end by saying I'm probably not completely fair towards the newer content. I'm very understanding towards porn sites being limited to the crowd of potential porn models to hire, but so many of the newer girls and scenes don't live up to the older scenes. It's completely possible that's because their older models are my favorites.
Having said that, some of the newer girls have caught my attention like Cindy. Even so, there's still some old favorites coming back to like one of the newest updates that featured a longtime favorite Simony Diamond.
Continuing in my positive talk of this site is the different ideas used over the years. Very few worked that well, but at least they try. One of my favorites was the split-screen video of models masturbating. It was a unique perspective that other sites/networks have gone on to use it a lot. Then there's one of the greatest scenes ever recorded, Zuzana Z from above, outside, with red hair (after being a stunning blonde for years, very softcore model), grabbing a chainsaw-type device that had its saw/chain removed and replaced by a large dildo. Our once innocent, sweet Zuzana went on to use that powered dildo on herself out in the open until she orgasmed multiple times.
That's it. I've tried and tried to explain what it is I look for in porn and I really believe the uniqueness, the act I've not seen 1,927 times (public exhibitionism not included) and it's what I think DDF does best out of the Euro networks.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I once rated Club Sandy a 99. I feel like me giving it an 82 is a generous nod to nostalgia.
- The site is still updating, but only twice a month. It used to update daily.
- The included network access still makes this a good join for the TBP price. BL will go into this since I'm in a year long subscription.
- If you are a collector of certain models there are plenty here with large archives of content.
- Lots of remastering of old scenes. I consider it a pro since I've seen scenes as old as 2007 that are remastered into 1080p.
- Lots of compilation videos. Those could be a con for some, but they are pretty good for discovering models you might not have realized you like.
- Good download speeds, very consistent.
- Picture sets, downloadable as zips, still come with each scene, but they could make it a little easier to find them.
Cons:
- Two updates per month. I'll never understand the point of having a network that kills off your best-known sites.
- Navigation is best described as clunky. It's worst described as what the hell are they thinking?
- Content split between three networks. And they've removed their previous token system that at least allowed you to join the other networks to get that one or two rare scene you can't find on your hard drive.
- Where's the creativity 21 Sextury used to have?
Bottom Line:
I've been hanging onto year-long subscriptions to 21 Sextury and DDF Network for 9-10 months. These two networks have been longtime staples in my porn rotation. The complete dropoff of Club Sandy is a disappointment for me, but not all is lost. I'll try to stick to the good parts then add the bad parts to explain the disappointment.
If you've never been a member here and don't know much about Euro models, then this is a great place to start. The star of Club Sandy, Sandy, has always been and still is one of the prettiest, most erotic European women I've ever seen in porn. The site and network is loaded with her content. Including compilations, Sandy is featured in over 500 scenes. Blue Angel, Eve Angel, Zafira, you name them, they too have 100+ scenes on here.
That's where a problem comes up. The big Euro models were mostly from the mid to late 2000s. Following their departures, they've yet to develop many major stars. So, joining this site and network is more of an archival join. I would like to say the newer content (2013 forward) has some great content, but most of it just comes off as cookie-cutter hardcore porn. My point here is if you've been a member before and still have the content on a hard drive, I'm not for sure there's much reason to join.
The remasters aren't listed as remasters so you have to look for them. One I really liked was an early Blue Angel scene from 2007 that has been remastered into 1080p resolution with 6000+ bitrate, it looks very good. My one problem with the remastered videos is there's no in-between. You can either download the old version, which was 540p or jump all the way to 1080p. I almost always prefer the 720p videos, but the remasters don't have that option.
You really can't complain about the quality here, but you can complain about the newer videos being just like the one released earlier in the month and those are just like the two released last month, this goes on for several years. On top of that, you have the three network split of content. The way they've handled the splitting of their network should be used to show why you shouldn't start changing how things work.
Where I know I'm being too hard on them is the lack of Sandy content, I think she retired a few years ago. Maybe the length of my membership has made me feel like there's just not enough to keep me interested without the "old" models?
Back to the positive:
While they used to be known for removing some scenes, it now looks like they've added all of them back. Including the very rare Eve Angel hardcore b/g scene in a bathroom from early in her career. I've also noticed some older Sophie Moone scenes I hadn't seen in years. Biggest problem here is you have to know what you're looking for so that could be frustrating for new members who don't know about the older models.
I still believe it's worth joining since you do get access to the 21 Sextury network, but I really don't think it's (the network) is even coming close to the DDF network these days.
The good news is the newer content is all shot with the 1080p option. The bad news is a large percentage of the new content is anal/hardcore/boy-girl. As soon as I can re-review the network as a whole, I will and don't see it rating much over an 85 as a whole. Lots of good older content here, some in poorer quality, but still featuring some of the best models in the world.
To end, I think if you're new to the network it's definitely worth a join ... for a month. I wouldn't recommend the year subscription to anyone as I don't think the newer content is even close as good as the older content. Also recommended to collectors, especially if you don't have the remastered older videos. Just make sure the videos you're looking for didn't get sent to 21 Sextreme or else you'll need to join it too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I'm going to guess that this network is the biggest interracial network on the internet.
- It's also has some of the longest-running interracial websites included with it, including Blacks and Blondes, which has been around for roughly 15 years.
- Has what I consider to be the best Gloryhole site.
- Download speeds are very good. Right around 90% of max.
- Quite a few sites are included in the network that I'm pretty sure used to be standalone sites, so it's kind of rare content.
- Good mixture of female models. Most are above-average in looks and play their roles well.
- Very good quality, 720p from 2009 to 1080p starting in early 2012. Most scenes have downloadable zipped photo sets as well.
- Navigation is very good for a network.
- Epoch as the biller.
- Quite a bit of reverse interracial (stereotypical), with black girls being with white guys.
- Large amount of content, will detail in BL.
Cons:
- I've always said the name of this network hurts it more than anything. Can you imagine the look on my wife's face when I said, "I joined Dog Fart Network"?
- Stereotypes are in abundance here. If you're a politically-correct person, socially-touchy person, you're probably going to have a problem with some of the content. I personally find most of the content to be humorous and playful.
- Probably the only real complaint is that the network could be organized a little better.
- There's a download limit, but I haven't hit it yet. I've went as high as 12.5GB in a day without hitting it so I'm not really for sure if it's a con or not.
Bottom Line:
This was only my second time as a member. The last time was 10 years ago and it was only to Gloryhole, which was a standalone site if I remember right. I've always been fascinated by the Gloryhole concept. We live near a university that was supposedly one of the first reported universities to have Gloryholes in their bathrooms.
Nowadays you get Gloryhole.com and quite a few more sites. I'm going to mention this since I recognize some of these sites included in the network as what used to be solo model sites. Models like Spring Thomas, I always thought she was a solo model and her site has been around since 2003, either way, there's 6-7 of those type of sites that look like they were once solo sites. So if you're a fan of any of those models you're in luck with this network.
Now, here's my big reason for liking this network. The Gloryhole content is just more believable here than any other I've seen. And on top of that, your membership also includes Gloryhole Initiations. Those two sites are enough for me to join and be happy with my membership. The two combined have around 900 Gloryhole scenes.
But there's other sites here worth checking out. As mentioned earlier in the pros, Blacks on Blondes is one of the oldest interracial sites on the internet. I remember seeing their content and the Dogfart logo on TGP sites back in the early 2000s. Admittedly, I haven't and won't download much from Blacks and Blondes since it's very common, mainstream porn, but there's over 700 scenes just on that site alone.
I do like We Fuck Black Girls, which goes into the role-reversal of typical interracial porn. You just don't see a lot of black girls in porn these days, but they have 50 scenes on this still actively updating site. The newest update with Jenna Foxx is one of my favorite scenes.
There's really plenty to like here. While not all sites are updating and some are just updating once per month, they still are pushing out updates on average of every other day. I will say I took a couple points off because there's 4-5 sites that are on the border of looking like they're going to stop updating (no updates in 30+ days).
I'll also say their navigation is very good. You have a main network hub that shows all the sites and how much content each site has. Once you click on a site, over in the upper-left corner is the name of the site. You can click that and go to any other site in the network from there. The scenes come up in order of newest to oldest, 5 per page and over on the right side is a jump to page link, which allows you to jump back to any page you want without having to push back buttons or "more" buttons. It's very good and other networks could learn from it.
Here's a list of the sites you get with a membership, how many scenes they have and I'll list if they're still updating:
Blacks on Blondes 765 scenes, still active. Cuckold Sessions 173 scenes, still active. Gloryhole.com 565 scenes, still active.
Blacks on Cougars 87 scenes, no updates since July 2016. We Fuck Black Girls 49 scenes, still active. Watching My Mom Go Black 84 scenes, still active.
Interracial Blowbang 87 scenes, still active. Cum Bang 81 scenes, still active. Interracial Pickups 75 scenes, still active. Watching My Daughter Go Black 53 scenes, no updates since June 2106. Zebra Girls 54 scenes, still active.
Gloryhole Initiations 313 scenes, still active.
Black Meat, White Feet 40 scenes, no updates since June 2016.
Several of those above sites are on the border of being inactive. I counted 5 of those that haven't updated since late August, which puts them right at a month without an update, but maybe they'll come through with those. They seem to update in bunches.
These are the sites that look like they're updating, but I think they're just recycling old content. Main reason for thinking this is the video quality is 720p at best and the clothing, televisions, looks upwards of 10 years old. Spring Thomas, Katie Thomas, Ruth Blackwell, Candy Monroe, Barb Cummings, The Minion and Wife Writing. These sites have a combined 750ish scenes in addition to the sites listed above. There's also two gay sites included, Blacks on Boys and Gloryholes and Handjobs. There's right at 400 scenes on those two sites combined.
It's definitely a network worth looking at for a month or two, especially if you're into the Gloryhole scenes or Interracial porn.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A somewhat hectic, completely perverse site that I've yet to figure out, which at least means it's unique.
- Update schedule is erratic, but they still have a fair amount of updates. So far in September there's only been two updates, in August there were 3 updates and July had 5, so there's no strict schedule, but there's still updates.
- Is part of the Kink Network and stands out for being not nearly as genre-specific as the other Kink sites.
- I would think this appeals to fans of BDSM, role-playing, bondage and voyeurism.
- Fast download speeds, around 90% of my max.
- More amateur interaction than any site I've seen. Will explain below.
- There's a story in most of the scenes and some of the models return to continue their previous stories. It's really not that great, but at least they're trying.
- Navigation is iffy, but once inside The Upper Floor site and away from the network, it's a lot easier to use.
Cons:
- I want to put this first because most of the TBP reviews list these sites, including this one, as having picture sets for downloads. There's no picture sets whatsoever. Not for browsing or downloading.
- These Kink sites are easy to nitpick since they usually are repetitive (by nature of staying true to their genre), but The Upper Floor is different. It's like a mixture of Sex and Submission with the live aspect they've used on several of their sites which includes a live audience, mixed with a renaissance fair that provides sexual stimulants to their guests. It's in the cons because I don't get it. Maybe it's just too far-reaching for me? It's not a big negative, but when you become used to things being perfectly clear then you get a site that you can't even figure out the basis for it becomes a con.
Bottom Line:
The Upper Floor is my least-liked site on the Kink network (boy/girl content).
One of its biggest strengths is most of the people in the scenes are in costumes or if you want to say, non-typical everyday clothes. It's a strength since I either can't tell the amateurs in the audience from the pros in the action. This creates the closest I've seen to a believable public orgy. I could see a bunch of hippies in San Francisco dressing up like miscast medieval characters, getting tipsy, then getting naked and having an orgy. There are believable crowd interactions in the scenes. Many of the women that end up touching a female model or even fingering the model look like regular, everyday receptionists. I'll continue to tap into my imagination and believe their boring daily lives are repressing them sexually. They go see one of these live sex shows on The Upper Floor and lose all their inhibitions.
That's also the problem with the site. I like structure, order and discipline. Hectic is a four-letter word to me. It's kind of like watching a television series by starting with season 4, episode 7 and trying to figure out why you're seeing what you're seeing. You'll also see this with the update schedule. There's no pattern, no "X amount of updates per month/week/day".
The action on this site is mostly good, pretty normal for a Kink site.
And this is my take on what the site is about. If I'm wrong, it's okay, it's my take on it. The males are supposed to be these powerful, rich men who the females want to be slaves to. They have these various competitions like "who cums first loses". The loser then faces some kind of punishment. These scenes are usually shot in a room with 10-15 people. But then there will be scenes of one man and one woman in a closed bedroom.
There's lots of anal sex, quite a bit of throat-gagging and as said in the opening of the pros, perversions. The one big plus for me in the action is when those amateur-looking girls step in and start getting involved in the action. The rest of it comes off as typical hardcore porn in 2016 with an extra dose of bondage/clothespins. Maybe it is like a combination of multiple Kink sites into one?
Either way, I don't think it's enough reason to join Kink's network, but the other sites included with the network make it a good join. With The Upper Floor being a fun diversion from their usual sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Oh my goodness. A Kink network!
- Regular price is $49.95, but I've seen several email promos for as low as $29.95.
- This might be the greatest site in modern (internet) porn history.
- You'll never get through this network in a month. You get access to their listed 23 sites, but there's more content on here than those 23 sites. Will go into in BL.
- Download speeds are almost always very good through Kink sites. I'm downloading at 90% of my max speed.
- I'll all but guarantee you there is something here for everyone. Straight, Gay, Transsexual, Role-playing and Robots.
- I'll go into the amount of content in the bottom line. It's comparable with any network out there.
- I've said it when reviewing their sites before, I think they have the best overall production values of any studio. Fun, creative, goofy and raunchy.
- Two of my all-time favorite models have tons of content on this network, Isis Love and Dragon Lily.
- Search works well, but...
Cons:
- The one big con is the navigation. I consider myself a veteran of Kink sites and know most of the model's names that I like. So I just enter their name in the search box or the site title. It works well for that. Others might not know anything about these models or sites. They're in trouble. As is their mouse's scroll wheel.
- Somewhere along the way, among the 23+ sites, you're sure to be offended by something.
- Photo sets have changed and are now pretty much useless.
Bottom Line:
A Kink network. I wouldn't have believed it if I didn't see and join it. It's maybe understandable. Most of the Kink sites have slowed on their amount of updates, which is what seems to happen to every site on a network these days. I know they've had a few legal problems too, but even with the slower updates, this network has to be one of the best buys, if not the best.
The funny thing here is, I'm not really into most of the harsher genres, but I'll get in the mood for something different and join one of their sites. I'll say by far and away my favorite scenes of theirs are the live ones. There's not a ton of these live scenes, but there's enough to fill up an external hard drive.
But, there's still some sites they've left out of the network. And there's some not listed in your account that you can access from searching for them like Kink University.
The first scene I clicked on that said, "Buy Shoot", made me realize I still didn't have my "100" site. It's still close, but if I join a network I don't expect to have to pay to access other parts of the network.
By my count there's roughly 13,000 videos on this network. To put that in perspective, it's nearly double the amount of videos that Brazzers network has. No slight meant to Brazzers, but they are generally considered one of the largest porn networks on the internet.
Here's a nitpicking list:
I've never known Kink to produce 1080p videos. The largest resolution I've found is 720p, but there's probably good reason behind that. One of the videos I downloaded for this review at 720p, has a 5,000 bitrate and is 77 minutes long, making it nearly 3 GB to download.
They used to have pictures with every scene, but these days I don't see any pictures.
The navigation is very important considering they do have 13,000 scenes. As it is right now, you start scrolling with 20 scenes showing up, then you click more and get 20 more scenes. There is an alternative of going to the actual site/genre/channel you're interested in. That at least makes it easier to scroll through the scenes.
Another tip is to go to the TBP listing and look at the sites included. It shows 23, but at least 4 that are shown on the TBP page do not have a "channel" on the Kink network, but you can enter their names into your url box or click the TBP link to them and they are included too. By my count there's 29 sites included.
My thoughts overall on this network is it has everything needed to be a 100 site. The bad news is, Kink isn't well-known for fixing navigation issues, so those might always be a problem. Even so, this is a massive network with some of the more taboo subjects, plus it should appeal to those who like heterosexual, gay and transsexual sex. I don't know of any network that does that.
If you're used to mainstream porn some of the content here will make you uncomfortable. I struggle with anything that looks abusive, but there's a lot here that shows the models enjoying themselves. Some of their more risky sites have toned down some like Public Disgrace and the BDSM sites, but it's still harder than anything you'll see in a mainstream DVD. Also more creative and sometimes even funny.
And if there's any major bonus from these scenes it's that you might learn some new things to try with your significant other. A big plus for me is you don't get a lot of the goofy "sex talk" seen in porn these days. Some of those overly-talkative girls make me wonder why someone hasn't put a ball-gag in their mouth.
Now for the big question. Is it worth staying around for more than a month? I think so, but I don't know for how long. A lot of the sites I like are either not updating or only have 2 new updates a month. As far as recommending it, I would to any porn fan. Sometimes I think being made uncomfortable is a good thing. On the other hand, there's enough regular sex with just a few props added to appeal to anyone. It's the highest score I gave in a long time. I will review a few of the network sites that I believe are reasons to join the network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A different site than you'll usually find on a network.
- Really is a large site considering it's part of a network. Has nearly 1,000 scenes on it.
- Has been around since 2007, but even so, the oldest scenes have a 540p option, 720p and 1080p came soon after.
- DDF's network is easily one of my favorites and it's sites like this one that's easily missed that makes it a great network.
- Despite the content looking to be fairly hardcore to fairly extreme, it's nearly all very accessible to the average viewer.
- Averages one new scene (video + pictures) per week.
- Very good photo sets included with each scene and are downloadable in zips, biggest problem is similar to many other sites, not enough pictures in the sets.
- Around 7-8 MB/s download speed which is on my higher end.
- Excellent navigation, it looks a little cluttered and maybe it is, but it works good.
- Your chance to see some of your favorite softcore models getting a little kinkier than you're used to seeing
Cons:
- DDF's network has had struggles for years now with scene counts. Those are still around. In one place, House of Taboo says it has nearly 1,200 videos, in another it says 990.
- To be honest, if you're looking for something that's a little harder than your average mainstream porn, this will do the trick, but if you're looking for scenes on the level of say kink.com, your expectations will fall short.
Bottom Line:
I admit, when DDF first launched this site I was surprised. I mainly knew DDF for pretty, glam sex, solo girls, pretty clothes, perfect make-up, then out of nowhere came House of Taboo.
I want to stress this point, this is not a good alternative to your favorite BDSM site or your favorite Kink site. That's not to say it's tame, but it is very controlled. One of the biggest selling points is there's models on here that you wouldn't ever see on a Kink site or a BDSM site.
I've wondered if many people even know this site exists. It's never really received a push from DDF, like One By Day, Hot Legs and Feet or even Eve Angel Official have received, but it's sort of a hidden gem on what is already a great network.
Here's some of the things/genres you can expect from this site:
Bondage, both with ropes and wraps.
Somewhat forced insertions, large dildos, sticks.
BDSM-style outfits, rubber suits, rubber masks
Dominatrix (usually only with another woman), including collars, blindfolds, ball gags.
Roleplaying, Doctor exam, jail prisoner.
Spanking and ... peeing.
I know some might consider anal sex to be kinky, but I think in 2016, it's become too much of a norm to be included in the above kinks.
The technical quality is excellent. As mentioned in the pros, the oldest content has 540p videos with 720p becoming standard by 2009 and 1080p becoming standard in early 2011.
I think this site would appeal to anyone that collected the glam Euro models from the mid-2000s. One of the most surprising scenes for me is of Zuzana Zeleznovova. She was one of the most softcore, pretty, almost innocent models I remember from the mid-2000s. On this site, she has a scene where she's bound in chains and pees on herself. Might not sound that extreme, but it was for her. Maybe the most shocking for me is a scene between Eve Angel and Jeny Baby. Eve plays a nurse role, while Jeny is strapped into a straightjacket. Eve proceeds to use a speculum on Jeny, stick various objects, including fingers into Jeny's butt and dominates her. Which if nothing else is funny if you've followed Eve's career as the sweet model who becomes devilish when horny.
The newer scenes don't seem to have as many well-known stars in them and there is a sudden influx of tattooed models, but they still stay true to the different genres.
I consider this a site worth checking out before joining DDF Network since I don't know of any other mainstream network that has anything like House of Taboo. I will say 21 Sextury used to, but after splitting their network into two sites, most of the more extreme sites ended up on a different network, which is why I'm leaning towards preferring DDF's Network. This site adds a nice balance to the network. I mean, we all know we get tired of looking at perfectly made-up, tanned, natural models having sex and need something different ever once in awhile.
My only real complaint is that you can tell some of the scenes are controlled. Sites and networks that specialize in BDSM and the kinkier genres of porn have learned how to make their scenes look less planned.
Great overall site though and one any DDF member should check out, if for no other reason, to see if any of your favorite, usually not too kinky models are doing something you've never seen them do. Would rank it as the third or fourth best site in the DDF Network and one worth joining the network for even if you've got most of the content from the other sites.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A good-looking network that can't seem to make up its mind about what language they speak. This review is for the premium network included with Chicas Locas not just Chicas Locas. They go by the name of porndoe, but couldn't find a hub page to review the network on.
- Good introduction TBP/PU price of 9.95, but should be noted I was charged in Euros not dollars, which was $11 and some change.
- Several interesting and underproduced genres are included in the network.
- Models are mostly younger, 18-25, but they have a few much older models as well. Reminds me a lot of Reality King's style of models. Lots of Latina models that look to be amateur, at least I don't recognize them.
- Blazing fast download speeds at 8MB/s on my connection. I can sometimes get up over 9MB/s, but 8 is very high for me on a porn site.
- I'll go into the numbers in the BL, there's quite a bit of content available for the 9.95 price.
- Navigation is good in some places and just terrible in others.
Cons:
- Here's the big one. If you join for 9.95 you're limited on how many videos you can download per day. TBP lists 3 per day, but the site now says 5. If you join for 24.95, you receive unlimited downloads and 8 more bonus sites.
- Well, some site names are Spanish, I think others are German at least I think it's German, French and English too. They have a button to switch the language to English, but that doesn't change the site names to English, so you have to click on a site and check it out to figure out what genre is.
- Centrobill came up as my payment processor. Those people get my card rejected and cause my bank to send me a text about suspicious activity. Luckily, after rejecting my payment, Epoch came up as the secondary payment processor and approved the same card.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those blind joins I usually hate. I saw it in the new site listing on TBP and decided to give it a try since if nothing else it has amateur Latina girls on it.
I'm admittedly torn on this review. This network has tons of potential, but they use an upgrade system. Get in for 9.95, but if you want to download more than 5 videos a day or want to see all their sites, you'll have to pay another 15.00. It's bad business. Hit a middle ground on the prices, make it unlimited, you'll save yourself a lot of headaches.
What's great about this network is the quality. The videos have up to 1080p option and some of them have as high as 14,000 bitrates. I prefer the 720p which has 8,000 bitrates, but that's because I don't want to download a 4 GB file. One of the 720p files I downloaded earlier was over 2 GB, nearly 50 minutes long. I like the camerawork they use. It's very similar to Bang Bros and Reality Kings. The girls aren't all perfect. You get a blend of slightly chubby, very slim, tall, short, pretty, not so pretty, young, old and so on. This is my preferred style of models on a site.
The navigation overall isn't bad. I know zero models on this network so I went to the model list and just scanned through until I found ones I liked. It has a few good features like the ability to click on a model's name then you can see all of her content on the network. It has a "network" tab that opens up a page with all their sites on it. That's good, but what the hell is a Hausfrau Fricken? Looks like frathouse fucking? It wouldn't hurt to put an English translation under the site names that are not in English. What about a XXX Omas? Does it mean many orgasms? The navigation on the content pages could also be better. As example, La Novice, which I guess is French Amateurs, there's a section with 12 videos, 6 per line with an arrow to open up 6 more scenes on each line. Then down below the scenes it says, "Channel Pornstars". Huh? Beside of that it says "Channel Albums". What? And beside of that it says, "Related Channels". Dude? In all seriousness, I understand what those mean, but why are they floating around in the content area? Isn't there a tab at the top for all sites and pornstars?
On a side note, there was no cross-sales on the join page and there's no advertising in the member's area. It's like they tried to give you too many ways to find the content. Some advice from an old porn reviewer, keep it simple. It gives me and others less to complain about.
The videos are good. I've watched quite a few and liked them. You can download the photo sets in zip files, but they're nothing too great. They're only 1080 on the long end. Maybe the download speed is thanks to them being a newer site with fewer members. I consistently go over 8MB/s on downloads.
Their overall numbers of scenes is pretty good, but I doubt I'll download more than 40-50 scenes total. Picture set downloads do not count against your daily limit of 5.
Some numbers as of 8/29/2016:
Over 500 models, but it's impossible for me to count them all since they include male models in their model list. Still, I would feel safe saying there's 400+ women models, of note, they have a whole site dedicated to older models (both men and women) so there could be a whole section of models you won't like if you don't like older or vice versa. My age cutoff limit stops at MILFs. I love grandmothers in real life, but they've no business in my fantasies or sexual thoughts.
23 sites, not including the VIP sites. Some of these sites are very small (30-35 videos).
974 listed scenes across the network. From the best I can tell that number does not include the VIP sites or photo sets, but this is where the annoying navigation comes into play again. Where's a filter button?
Should have mentioned earlier they have a site that works nearly identical to Bang Bus called Bums Bus. What I do like however is innocent lesbian sex on their site A Girl Knows, which doesn't even seem like it belongs on the network. The Chicas Locas site has what I would consider amateur Latina girls, which is a dying genre and one of my favorites.
So, overall, I think the network is good, above-average even, but I think the next year will play a huge role in how it develops. If they continue to shoot the same kind of porn as now and work on their site (navigation, cleaner interface) they will eventually catch up to the Reality Kings, Team Skeet, type networks. After saying Team Skeet, I would compare this network to it as well, especially in Team Skeet's earlier days. I don't regret joining for the 9.95 option, it's opened up my eyes to a new site I had never heard of. Good blend of genres as well. They even have a tranny site and on top of that, they aren't using the same dozen guys you're used to seeing on the American networks. It's hard not to recommend it since I believe it's worth the price and they look like a good alternative to the American networks.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An often overlooked site that's genre could also cause it to be looked over.
- Despite now being a network site it still delivers 4 updates per week (pictures/videos) in each.
- Has a huge catalog of content, over 2,500 scenes.
- A strong pro for me is it has the foot and leg fetishes involved, but there's also plenty of sex, pretty posing and everything you'd expect from a hardcore site not a foot/leg fetish site.
- Very good quality videos, 1080p videos date back to 2010-2011 and are still in every update.
- Photos can be downloaded in 3 sizes, topping out at 2000 long end and have been and still are some of the best photos you'll see.
- Has the added bonus of being in a network that covers nearly all genres.
- Download speeds are above-average and consistent.
- Navigation is as good as you'll find on a network, though you'll still run into the occasional glitch.
- Archive dates back to 2001, you'll find nearly every top Euro model on this site.
Cons:
- The price without the TBP/PU discount
- Fetish content always carries the potential of being repetitive.
- A small percentage of the foot/leg scenes won't go beyond foot teasing, leg flirting, etc...
Bottom Line:
Way back in the old says of online porn (early 2000s to mid 2000s), DDF sold this as a standalone site and it cost a premium price, seems like $30 back then per month.
Things have changed. I think it's both a good thing and a bad thing in this case. It's easy to see how someone would avoid this site since they might think it's a lot of toe worshiping, toe-sucking and so on. I'll say ahead of time, I'm not into feet, but this is one of my all-time favorite sites. I've always liked hose, fishnets on women and there's all kinds of those scenes on this site.
There's plenty of hardcore here as well as lesbian action. There's a smaller amount of solo and and even smaller amount of tease/very softcore.
The models, as with most Euro sites, are almost always very pretty ... at worst. DDF's sites aren't quite as glam as they used to be and that's now a plus for me. It used to would have been a negative.
The amount of content competes well with almost any 100% exclusive site. Over 2,500 videos, over 2,500 photo sets and the videos have the 1080p option and have for the last 5-6 years.
So, why should someone join it if they're not into feet and/or legs? Simple. The leg and feet category was one that Viv Thomas, DDF and Fred the photographer excelled at. The focus though isn't just on the feet and legs. It's on the panties slipping down the legs then off the feet. It's sensual in ways most porn these days can't even touch. Nothing in these scenes seems hurried. Could be two women in a pool, teasing each other with their toes, which leads to the panties sliding down, which leads to rubbing their legs together, touching, kissing, and finally what looks like believable out of control sex.
The solo scenes offer similar as well. You'll have a solo model teasing the camera, rubbing her own legs, rubbing her feet, panties start sliding and she goes into a wild masturbation.
The scenes with guys involved are also very good. Lots of teasing, fairly good chemistry between the guy and girl (also rare these days), there are footjobs, there are cumshots up legs, but it's still sex, just a little more sensual than we're used to seeing on most mainstream sites.
I would even say I would join it by itself without the network for a month. One of my favorite parts about their videos is they don't go overboard with the bit stream of the videos. A 25 minute 1080p video will be around 1.5 GB instead of the 3-4 GB you see on a lot of sites. I know that's a preference, but I really can't see enough difference between a 1080p video with 3,000 bitrate from one with 1080p with 10,000 bitrate, except in the time it takes to download and the space it takes up on my external hard drive.
I do think the pictures have taken a slight backseat to the quality they used to have on here, but from what I understand DDF is no longer the photographer, so it's to be expected.
The navigation on Hot Legs and Feet could be slightly better. We're getting into the area where less is more. There's 15 years of scenes on here. Just something to make it a little easier to find older scenes. I have trouble remembering all the different model names and end up trying to search through 127 pages of scenes. But maybe that's not a complaint? I was once told if I couldn't offer a fix then there's no reason to complain about it. I do believe their navigation is close to as good as you can get on a site like this one. My advice is to use the model list instead of trying to dig through 127 pages.
Last, the network that comes with this site has no less than 6 other sites I've joined in the past for $30 each. This is a really great deal for Euro-lovers especially. The only deductions I took off the score was for repetitiveness and the lack of adding anything new to the scenes. It was somewhat groundbreaking 15 years ago, but now it just looks like really high production quality porn. I've always believed the leg/feet sex sites were the precursors to today's heartcore sites. Definitely worth a join for anyone.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A huge network that produces mostly mainstream porn, but its archives contain some unique content.
- Great TBP/PU price.
- Very high technical quality, including 4K videos and can also use with a Roku if you use Roku.
- Updates can be a little uneven at times, but they seem to average around 2 new scenes (photo and video) each day. I've seen a few days with 3 updates, a few other days with 1, but it generally averages out to 12-14 per week.
- The biggest plus for me is the archived content, especially the "live" videos, will go into in the BL.
- Lots of niches, but in general, most of the content is similar with just a few changes in the storyline.
- Navigation is good for a network of this size. Good can be a misleading word. The categories work good and the model list works even better, but it's all a little cluttered and can be hard to find the tab/category you are looking for unless you stick the model list, which is what I do.
Cons:
- There's an ad that pops up each time you sign in, but it's at least easy to see how to avoid clicking on it. It does make the network a little more confusing since it has scenes that look like the scenes I've seen on the site, but says you need to upgrade. For all future references for webmasters. I'm going to start upgrading to sites that don't ask me to upgrade.
- Download speed. I've seen complaints about this on Naughty America. My speeds aren't terrible, but they are slightly below my average speed. I'm downloading a video right now as a test. It's downloading at 5.1 MB/s. My average (for porn sites) is around 6 MB/s and some sites go as high as 9 MB/s. The slower speed makes it frustrating to download the bigger files.
- This one doesn't bother me, but there's lots of implants and tattoos.
Bottom Line:
The very first time I joined Naughty America was in 2004. I joined because of the site So Cal Coeds. It was one of the first amateur sites I had seen and being from Southern California it just seemed like the perfect site.
Since then, Naughty America has grown into one of the largest, oldest porn networks on the internet. Much like everything else that gets bigger, better, it also develops a familiar feeling you get from the other big networks like Reality Kings, Brazzers, Bang Bros, etc...
A feeling of "I've seen all this before." And the one I feel the most towards these sites, "Are you even trying anymore?"
Don't let that dissuade you. There's a lot of high quality content here. Production values are about average and there's so many models you can't really complain about them since you'll see 5-6 you don't like then see 5-6 you do like.
I'm surprised by the time and money they have put into new technology. They have a whole new Virtual Reality site. Which by the way is no use to me. One of my eyes was damaged when I was a teenager. I can't use VR glasses properly. But it's still there. They also have Roku controls which I have tried and it works as good as any site's Roku channel. They also are doing the 4K videos. But none of those were big draws for me.
Back a few years ago, I had an external hard drive that failed after being knocked off my desk. Most of the content on it was easily replaced, but I had my Naughty America Live series on it. To this day, I would rank that series as high as nearly all series I've seen on any site. It's kind of like having a hidden cam and watching the models. There's a theme. Library, gym are my favorites. The model starts dressed, reading a book, sitting in a school desk, working out, then strips and masturbates. I never understood why they stopped the series, but it was worth a monthly membership just to get all those back into my collection.
Even if those don't interest you there's probably something on the network that will. Like most networks, they're really just a big site that takes each niche and names it like it's a separate site. They have 47 sites by my count and that includes the 7 live sites.
They've been doing the MILF genre as long as any of the networks if not longer. I remember having access to Seduced by a Cougar back 10+ years ago. And in my opinion, they lean more towards the MILF models these days than the teen models. That's not to say there's not teen models, but I would estimate 65-35 on MILFs to Teens. I normally prefer the MILF models and have for years, so that part works better for me.
Besides having 4K, they have had 1080p videos since sometime in 2009. It's worth mentioning here that around mid-2009, they started offering 1080p and 720p on all their videos, but only in Flash format. It's hard to tell when they switched to .mp4s, but it's somewhere in the 2012-2013 range. I never had a problem with any of the formats, but know others have said they felt like it was a hassle. Of course, you can get VLC media player and it plays all of the formats, which is what I do.
They also include a picture set with their videos/scenes. This is one of those better than nothing situations. They include several hundred photos, low-quality, most are 1000 high end. So they're not trying to be the next Met Art, but they do at least offer those in downloadable zips for the picture-lovers.
It's hard to find a lot wrong with the network. The download speeds are a problem if you want the 4K videos. And while the ads are there they're not obnoxious or placed strategically to get you to accidentally click on them. If I found anything I would call a major problem it would be that the site is just getting too big. You could spend a month just browsing it. It's similar to Videobox in that sense. I just downloaded all the live archived videos and found a couple of favorite models and downloaded their sets. I figure if I start digging into all the sites I'll end up frustrated and not download anything.
That's hardly a fault of Naughty America, as much as it's me not having enough time to dig through all the content.
I would recommend it for new members especially since a new member could probably fill up an external hard drive with quality porn for the low price. Return members will still find enough new content or in my case, lost content, to enjoy a month or two subscription. It's just not quite up there with Reality Kings for me, but it's close.
Oh and one last thing, my billing for it was done through Epoch, one of the best billers in the porn world. Easy to cancel.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Another first time join for me. A heartcore site with a lot of high quality content.
- Others might not agree on this, but I prefer the pictures on this site to the videos. And the videos aren't bad at all. The pictures are just that good. (Will praise more in-depth in BL).
- Very pretty, natural models.
- Updates aren't daily, but looks like they average 2 videos a week and 3 picture sets. Or at least have since I've been a member. One week was just 2 photo sets and 2 videos, but they could use a little more structure and order to the updates.
- Uses CCBill as biller, been a long time since I joined a site that uses CCbill.
- Good amount of solo sets which I still prefer, but has plenty of boy/girl sets, boy/multiple girls and some girl/girl.
- Some 4k videos for those who want those. Still not really a big deal to me. Videos have 1080p option dating back as far as I have looked.
- Should have started the pros with this. Photo sets start with model(s) clothed!
Cons:
- I really hate this one since otherwise this site is near perfect. The navigation is a pain in the ass. It's not terrible, it works well, but there's one long page of updates. Hopefully you like scrolling. You can get around this by going to the model list, but I don't know most of these models. They have a drop-down box that allows you to filter with like 4K only, photos, videos, so that's why I say it's not terrible, but even after filtering, you're back to scrolling.
- Could use more girl/girl. I could even do without the boy/girl on here.
- The old "that's not really a con" con, would like more photos in the picture sets.
Bottom Line:
For whatever reason I've avoided joining X-Art for years. I think it has to do with my frustration with the heartcore-boom from a few years ago. It was everywhere, even on hardcore networks.
I think it creates a philosophical problem for me. I just can't see something staged ... as love. Not to worry, it's why I also don't watch mushy television shows. I know they're actors and the stories are fictional.
Outside of that, the only real fault I can find on this site is the navigation. I really don't even know what would fix it? Either way, I scanned as far as I could to see when the 1080p videos became available and after using hyperscroll for nearly a minute straight, I made it to 2010. Those had the 1080p option. The problem with this long scrolling screen is it causes a computer to lock up as it loads more scenes. I'm usually working on something else when checking porn sites out so I have to stop whatever I'm doing.
Hard to believe that's a complaint, but my PC is on the higher end. I don't know if that would muck up an older computer or not.
The rest is good. Models, much like Wow Girls, are really pretty younger women. I want to say there's a little more variety here with body size, but it wouldn't be a big difference. These models all look like fit college girls. I can tell because my wife has girl-crushes on college girls and she really likes these models.
One thing I will compliment that probably isn't mentioned much is these girls look more like regular girls than glam models. Which is really great for me. A couple that stand out right now for me are Lily Ivy and Melissa Moore. They both remind me of girls I see over at the local college. Especially in their dressed pictures.
Which is another big plus that's probably not mentioned much. All of the picture sets I've looked at start with the model in clothes. It's usually regular everyday clothes like a tank-top and shorts, some of the multiple people photo sets start in just underwear, but that's even better than starting out nude.
The solo videos are as good as any site's solo videos, believable, passionate masturbation. The girl/girl videos are also believable. The boy/girl videos are okay. It's the same problem with all heartcore sites. Heartcore tries to sell too much realism. I don't like realism in my porn and seem to become cynical towards it. No big deal though, some will really like those boy/girl scenes.
The photo sets could have more pictures in them. Quite a few are under 50 photos. Usually 100 is a good number. It's not really a complaint since I'm saying I would like to see even more. The photo sets can be downloaded in 1000, 2000 and 4000 high end. Download speeds are excellent on both photos and videos. I'm downloading the videos at 7 MB/s, which is above average for me.
There's only so much praise you can give a site. Having CCBill as a biller is even a big plus these days. Very pretty models. High technical quality. Models dressed at the beginning of photo sets. Downloadable photo sets. Fast download speeds. That nearly fulfills my entire mental checklist of what I want from a porn site, but there is the clunky navigation and the similar build/race models to complain a little about. Though neither of those are enough to pull this site down. I consider it a little better than Sex Art and put it well above Wow Girls.
I'll go as far as saying it has made my list of sites to return to. That list is very small these days. Would recommend it to everyone.
Edit: didn't remove any points for a minor annoyance, but wanted to mention it. When I first joined and signed in, it took me to a community page. I don't have much interest in community pages on porn sites. I thought I had joined something besides a porn site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- My first time as a member to this fairly large, technically impressive site.
- Very pretty models. You might actually get bored with the models because they're all so pretty.
- Technical quality is excellent. Most videos start out with the 540p option, have the 720p option and the 1080p option. Things can get confusing here and I'll go into that in the cons and BL.
- Also a good site for those who like pictures. The pictures are downloadable at 1000 long end, 2000 long end and 4000 long end. Most sets have 75-100 pictures.
- Very good download speeds. I've consistently downloaded at 7.5 MB/s
- Daily updates.
- Decent blend of scenarios, solo, b/g, g/g.
- Very good navigation, clear and easy to use site overall.
- Uses Vendo as their biller, I've used them a few times and haven't had any problems.
- Good passion and believable scenes.
Cons:
- Well, there's one really big con. I feel duped at times. I go to model list and there's a really hot model, so I click on her and there's no content of her. I find another really hot model, click on her and it has one scene then says out from it, "If you're interested in more from this model check out FantasyHD with our special discount. No, no, no. This is a premium cost website. I understand when Reality Kings lets a person join for $10 then advertises their other sites, but not for a $30 site. Then I click on some other videos and it says, "Upgrade to diamond level". What the hell? I was going to upgrade until I saw the price of $68. I'm sure to go on about this more in BL.
- It wouldn't hurt them to add some variety to their models. Maybe a few tattooed models? Maybe a model that has ate a full meal in the last month? No offense is meant, but look at as a warning for those who aren't into just slim/slender models.
Bottom Line:
Edit: Just want to add that I received both Wow Girls and Wow Porn right off the bat. I had forgot this when typing out the pros. Looking at the past comments, I see several members talking about having to wait a month or two before getting access to Wow Porn. It is available now right from the start with Wow Girls, but it too also has the scenes that want you to upgrade to diamond before you can see them.
I've of course heard a lot about this site over the last few years. I will say, there's some really pretty models on here. Some of the prettiest I've seen. And many of them are doing hardcore. This site kind of reminds me of the heyday of 1byday/Twistys/Club Sandy, the mid-2000s boom of glamour models. Except most of these Wow Girls do more than solo scenes.
I'll get the negative out of the way since it really hurt my scoring of this site. Ads are one thing, but to have dozens of models in Wow Girls model list that are being pushed for you to join other sites is even more annoying than ads. There's even some models in the model list that have no content available anywhere on any of their sites or partner sites. Then there's scenes in the updates section that are not available with your "gold" membership and can only be seen if you pay $68 to upgrade to diamond/Shane Diesel. I complain enough about the American networks using tricky advertising to get you to click on them, but making me open a scene only to find out I can't see it, might be even worse. Why not just shade it out and put a diamond on it so I know I have to join diamond to access the scene?
The good news is, the rest of the site is very good. I'm still not really into the whole heartcore-style of porn, but it's not quite as mushy here as on other heartcore sites. The girls make up for it. Very few sites can compare with the quality of models this site has.
There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason to which scenes are "diamond" scenes. I've been able to access some of the 4k scenes and 60fps scenes, but others say I have to upgrade. While even worse, it seems like the older scenes are all stashed away somewhere since they too say I have to upgrade to diamond. Meaning, it's obviously not just the high technical quality that defines a "diamond" scene.
The pictures are probably an overlooked strength of this site. All of the picture sets I've looked at have the model starting out clothed and ends up fully nude.
The site's navigation is easy to use. Click a scene, scroll down to the bottom and click your desired format/quality, done. No goofy dropdown boxes or 61 formats.
The most important part of this review, for me, is that this is one of the first sites that has made me really look at the price of the site. I'm not for sure I can justify the $30 for this site. I've reviewed sites recently that had double, even triple the amount of updates, 1080p videos for 1/3 the cost of this site. The quality, production quality, is higher here, but I still don't know if it's enough for the price.
I did not figure the price into my rating, but it does give me reason to wonder if I'll join this site again.
I could see recommending it to anyone that doesn't mind the price. At least for one join. And I at least appreciate them not automatically upgrading me when I clicked on it to see what the price was going to be.
I don't think it's as good as Sex Art and I've just joined X-Art for the first time too, but haven't had time to spend comparing this site to it. I will eventually.
I would recommend this site most for those who like really pretty, glamour, prissy, girly-girls. Back 10 years ago, I probably would have rated this site a 100 just for the overload of prissiness from the models. I've gotten older and probably dumber. I'm just not as picky anymore. And as said above, would compare this site very favorably to Twistys at its highest point. Beyond that though, it's comparable to nearly all the other sites with Art in their names.
Also will say I love the settings used on this site. All the way from the furniture to the distant views behind the action. It's really great.
I know my score is pretty high for all my complaints, but I can only score so low when there's this many pretty/prissy girls in one place. Will be interesting to see if this site starts to offer their upgraded membership cheaper. I would give it a go at $20 upgrade or $50 for the full experience. I took off roughly 10 points for the annoyance factor of the upgrade to diamond/model upsells to other sites and models with no content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- One of my favorite networks. Was even a favorite way back in 2010 when I originally reviewed their site "Innocent High" which was the flagship site of a then growing network called Team Skeet.
- Network has grown quite a bit over the years. Back in my old review there were 9 sites back then, now there are 20+.
- Good quality videos and photosets for each scene.
- You get one new scene per day. Each has a video and photoset.
- HD videos started as far back as 2008, which wasn't that far into the network's existence.
- Very good download speeds, I'm downloading at 7.5 MB/s, which is pretty close to my max and it's needed if you want those 1080p files since some are as big as 3-4 GB each.
- Billed through Epoch, which made me very happy considering the last few sites I've joined used billers I hadn't heard of.
- One of the best, if not best networks for those who like variety in their models, race, size, boob size, butt size, etc...
Cons:
- I don't know if the network is still ran by the same people as it was in 2010, but they've worked some frustrating parts into the site either way. From the Team Skeet homepage you can select "Sites" tab which spares you the frustration of sifting through the updates with ads and locked scenes. What's a locked scene? It's a site within the Team Skeet network that's not included with the Team Skeet network. Huh? Lost 5 points there. I will further this in the BL.
- Like a lot of the bigger networks, they try a new niche, only to stop it just 20-30 scenes in.
- Has lost some of its original feel it had back in 2010.
Bottom Line:
Team Skeet's original charm for me was Innocent High and Oye Loca. I always liked the innocent schoolgirl look and Innocent High had all of their models wearing their own schoolgirl outfit. Oye Loca is a mostly South American shot Latina site. My name alone says I like the Latina girls (but not exclusively Latina) and Oye Loca was one of the very few sites that had an authentic feel to their scenes, the models also were mostly amateur Latina girls.
Then it grew as a network and Innocent High and Oye Loca became just a part of the network. Innocent High used to update weekly, then it went to one update every two weeks, now it's starting to look like it's going to be one update per month. Oye Loca used to also update once a week, now it's once a month. I talked to their webmaster way back years ago here on PU and he talked about how hard it was to find amateur Latina models for Oye Loca, so I can understand, but those were my two favorite sites on this network.
That's not to say it's going downhill. Overall, the network has added some new very good sites like Exxxtra Small, Teen Curves, She's New and Teens Love Money, so all is not lost.
My one big con/complaint is the way they list their network sites. At the top of the homepage there's a tab for "Sites". Since nothing is made clear, I'm going to help anyone out who is interested in this since I think it's unfair for a network to do this. All the sites below are not only listed in the Team Skeet "sites" tab, but also in the Team Skeet dropdown menu.
There are six sites listed as Team Skeet sites that you cannot access without upgrading your account. These sites are: Punish Teens, BFFs, Teens Love Black Cocks, Family Strokes, Daughter Swap and Sis Loves Me.
This leaves you with 20 sites that are at least still active and included with your membership. You can see how the network has grown, but can also see why it can be a bit frustrating when looking at their site list since adding all those up comes up to 33 sites, but you only have access to 27 and only 20 are updating. It's understandable with some of the bigger, older networks, but this network hasn't been around as long as those others.
On top of that is the less original feel the network once had. As you can see the "step-sibling", "family", "sister" niches have slipped in.
Still, in all fairness, it's a very good network for the cost. You do have to do mouse Olympics to avoid some of the ads, but they are very good about getting believable "teen" models going on 24. And again, I don't know if it's the same guys who used to run it, but they were friendly, helpful, fun guys towards members.
Even with my complaints, I would still recommend it over nearly every network except maybe Reality Kings. And if they're not owned by Reality Kings, they're at least affiliated with them since I saw longtime Reality King male talent J-Mac in a Team Skeet scene.
They also have a few sites that I think offer some good potential if they'll keep them running like CFNM Teens and She's New. CFNM Teens hasn't updated since late May, so it's possible it might already be dead, it only has 28 scenes on it, but this is a niche that continues to be overlooked. Take it from the old psychologist, these CFNM sites are great for couples to watch together, but no one seems to be able to keep them going. Reality Kings has a good one, but it stopped updating too. She's New is a site with amateur models trying to make it in porn. I'm sure they'll slip a few already models by me since I don't keep up with new models like I used to, but it seems pretty authentic. That will always be a hugely-popular niche.
So, outside of the no longer updating sites and the sites you have to unlock, there's really not much to complain about. The videos are very good as are the picture sets, which are downloadable in zips. The vast majority of scenes show girls having fun and enjoying themselves, which to me is also a big strength of Reality Kings. I was both surprised and happy with those download speeds. I will say the network itself is slow when loading, but everything else moves along good.
Would recommend it to everyone except those who like older models (I'm one of those), but don't let that sway you away. There's plenty of curvy young women on this site, which is usually the reason for preferring older models and there's plenty of entertainment and niches covered to fill most porn fans hard drives with hundreds of gigs of high quality porn. If not for the ads and "upgrade" button, this network would have received a 97, but it's a 92 instead.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A huge network with enough content to make three or four networks, won't be surprised if they eventually try that.
- Quality of new videos are very high 1080p with high bitrates to match, they've had the 1080p option for 6-7 years, but the older ones have lower bitrates.
- Two new scenes per day, each includes video with multiple format options and a very large photoset/screenshot downloadable zip as well (600-800 photos).
- Navigation continues to improve on all of these large networks. It looks like they're using similar software to run their sites on. Considering the size of this network and amount of different niches, their navigation is bordering on being excellent.
- Fairly impressive number of their sites are still active and updating, which is pretty rare for these big networks in 2016. More detail in BL.
- I'm sure it's subjective, but I like their models as a whole. There are lots of tattoos, lots of implants and lots of big asses.
Cons:
- Download speed isn't that good. Mainly because it's inconsistent. I'm not for sure if they cap members DL speeds, but can say most of mine download at 3.2 MB/s here on Brazzers. I've reviewed other sites where I was getting close to 9 MB/s. That's way too big of a difference.
- Their billing as usual is frustrating. First problem is it has a dropdown box when you're signing up. It recognizes the discounted price you are to receive. The dropdown box has "yes, sign me up to brazzersnetwork for $24.95" or "no, I don't want this special offer". What the hell? Paying full price is beside the "yes" answer? Getting a discount is passing up a special offer? Then to cancel you can either call them, chat with them or email them. There's no CCBill-type cancel option of doing it from their biller's site. You have to just jump through a hoop and hope the person you talk to, chat with, reads your email, cancels your account. They did send a cancel confirmation.
Bottom Line:
It had been maybe 5 years since I last joined Brazzers. I have more than my share of bad stories with Brazzers, but they have the site "Moms in Control". It's a site with women 35-45 that catch their niece, whatever fake relation they come up with, having sex and the older woman joins in. I really like this niche and it was my main reason for joining.
I can confirm quite a bit of the older content has been removed. One of my all-time favorite exhibitionist sites was Asses In Public. It's still here, but is down to 16 scenes. I have upwards of 100 scenes from it (from 2010) on my external hard drive.
That download speed issue is a problem too. I actually have a scene downloading right now and it's an older scene. I've always assumed the more a scene is being downloaded the slower the speed, but this is a scene from four years ago and I'm only getting 3.2 MB/s on it just like I get on the newest scenes. I was on Reality Kings a few days ago and consistently was hitting 8 MB/s.
Good luck with the billing company, ProBiller, I've not had any problems with them, but I've always talked about hating a hassle. That's what you get with ProBiller. How freaking hard is it to make an automated cancel page? And that dropdown part from the cons is just tricky. I've had issues with Brazzers doing similar before. I remember they used to have the annoying cancel page where you clicked cancel and it would say, "Do you want to cancel your membership?" You would click yes, it would then say, "Are you sure you don't want to stay on as a member?" Tricky wording. Looking for people to make mistakes by clicking the wrong answer.
Onto the content, this is where they excel. Moms in Control is one of the very best of its niche. And it already has almost 60 scenes. They then go through their typical Big Tits sites, Big Tits at Work, Big Tits at School, etc... They also have Big Tits in Sports, which is a poorly-represented (across the internet) niche that I like and it has over 250 scenes.
Their update schedule is acceptable with two new scenes per day (across the network, not on each site). Maybe more impressive is the fact that they have so many active sites on their network. As of June 28, 2016:
I'm counting 33 sites. Of those 33 sites, 18 have updated in the last two weeks and a couple others are borderline if they're still updating. That's pretty impressive.
One of the things worth mentioning is that this is very much a porn star network. You will occasionally find a newer or lesser known model on here, but the vast majority are the best known models. To me, that's both a plus and a minus. A lot of this content is similar to what you can find on DVD sites like Videobox, so it makes collecting certain favorite stars frustrating since you might already have a scene that is similar to one you get here on Brazzers, even though Brazzers has 100% exclusively shot scenes.
These are the sites I ended up liking the most:
Moms in Control would rate it around 90 by itself.
Big Tits in Sports would rate it around 82 by itself.
Big Butts like it Big would rate it around 85.
Day with A Pornstar would rate in the mid-80s for a least some originality.
Hot and Mean would rate in the mid-80s, but this site has changed quite a bit over time.
One I thought I would like, but don't is ZZ Series. This is Brazzers attempt at creating something like a DVD with a full theme carrying over for multiple scenes, including a parody of Game of Thrones.
So, there's plenty there to keep me (or you) busy for several months, especially if they're only going to let me download at 3 MB/s.
I'll add something a little different here. I too hate their ads and their embedded videos, those chat girl ads are maybe the worst. Here's what I do:
When you login and are on the homepage, go to the top where it says "Explore", click that and you'll be in a less cluttered, less ad-filled area. By doing this it removes the embedded video at the top and it removes the chat girls completely. Once into this part, the only ads I'm seeing are at the bottom of the page which isn't too bad.
Much like my previous reviews of Brazzers, I think they have very good content, very high quality content, even great navigation, but they could make everything easier, especially canceling. When I have trouble canceling a site that delays me returning more than anything else and it's the biggest reason I chose a 90 score. I don't know for sure how much higher the score would be without the canceling hassle and/or the tricky wording when joining, but I can say it would be a network I would join more than once every 4-5 years.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A large network of very varied genres.
- You're sure to find some genre you like, handjobs, hardcore, trannies, midgets, hairy women, older women, older men with young women, solo girls, wet and messy (WAM).
- Technical quality is questionable, but the downloads work good and the navigation is good, so I'm listing it as a pro.
- A lot of the picture sets come in downloadable zips.
- The problems others have had with this network's billing seem to be fixed. I canceled with no problems.
- Quite a bit of the content is exclusive, but they do use their own content on more than one site. For example, Lori Anderson's My Sex Life has a handjob section in it. The network has a handjob site that is mostly the Lori Anderson handjob videos.
- $9.95 TBP/PU price
Cons:
- Ads, there's an ad at the top of every page that offers a free one day subscription to another site. If I remember the small print it then rebills at $39.99 after one day. You have to avoid clicking it. Then when you go to leave the site and get your mouse pointer up to the url box of your browser, another ad pops up for Jim Slip's site. It's a bit annoying.
- The site design isn't that bad, it has a hub page that has all available sites which can be accessed with one click, but every site works differently and there's no uniformity between the sites.
- I'll go over the mix of genres this network has in it, but I'm really surprised by the extreme differences.
- It's hard to say on the exclusive part. Most or all of it looks exclusive to me, but there's fudging. The site "Teen Photos" comes off as a purely amateur site, then right there on the first page is the forever cute Addison Rose. The advertising of this site in particular comes off as self shot.
Bottom Line:
This is one of my lowest scores I've given in a long time. For those that don't know, I very rarely go below a 70. I try to keep my scoring range in 71-100. My apologies on that part since I can't figure out the difference between a 50 and a 70. By giving this network a 75, I'm saying it's not that good, but if you're interested in the content they have it could be worth a one month join especially with the great TBP/PU price of $9.95.
I'll start with my single biggest complaint. I can't tell you how I dislike sites/networks that don't put dates on their content. It's for multiple reasons. One, if you date your content, it makes it easier to tell when you started putting higher quality videos on the network. It shows if you're still updating. It gives us an idea if the content is just old content being used as archival fill.
That's my feeling with this network. I really don't remember all these sites being in the same network. I've looked at Tampa Swingers before, but don't remember it being in a network this large. Same with Lori Anderson's My Sex Life site. It looks like these are sites that have all stopped updating and were put together as a large collection.
There's nothing wrong with that. There are good things here. The network works well as long as you dodge the ads. I'm betting those ads are the kind that sign you up just from clicking on them. One sits roughly 1 inch above the "see all updates" button.
I'm going to start with Lori Anderson's My Sex Life. Lori has been around for a long time. Her cam schedule on her site still has her listed as active. Freeones has her listed as active since 2004. Most of the content on here looks to be from 2004-2008, basing it on the picture quality and video quality. The videos are 480p. The pictures are 1280 long end and a little blurry. She comments on one of them and says something about her pussy in picture #24 being the cleanest pussy ever. You can't even see it because of blur. She also doubles as one of those models that shouldn't write their own blogs/comments. She explains in one of the sets that she washes her pussy twice a day with a shower massager and never goes to bed without washing it again. Seriously, this is porn, turn me on, don't tell me about your hygiene regimen.
From looking at the other sites, I've not seen a video over 480p. I have seen a few that do have dates on their updates, but can tell you some are wrong. On Teen Girl Photos, a site that's not half-bad, they have picture sets of Addison Rose listed as 2012 that are from 2007-2008, how do I know? I've been collecting her content since 2007 and have sets that look identical to the ones listed as 2012 from 2007. This site is advertised similarly to those "My GF" sites, "Teen Amateur Self-Shot" sites, but like those sites, very little of the advertised content can even be found. Still, it's not terrible especially if you collect any of those models. I think most of that content appeared on Twistys, Teen Dreams, back years ago.
Then there's the unusual, but appreciated mix of genres of sites. If they had a CFNM site I would say they have all genres covered. So there can be a positive there. You might find a few gems you haven't seen before. That's another positive, the network works really well. You're taken to a home page hub that lists each of the sites included in your membership. You can get to each one by clicking them and you don't have to sign in again.
As soon as I start saying positives, a negative comes up, for some reason, after about 30 minutes on the network, it stops recognizing me as a member and gives an unauthorized message when I click on a set/scene. I hit refresh, it recognizes me as a member and pops its tricky ad up in the middle of the page again. Get that off there.
Whether to recommend this network is where I'm most torn. I won't be joining it again and will only keep a small folder of content from it. But if one of those genres or more than one is something you enjoy, you might like it. Just be warned about those silly ads, the fact that you have to refresh it every 20 minutes or so and that I'm going to take a guess and say there's no new content on this network and hasn't been since 2013 or so. There's a handful of scenes that say 2015, but I don't see it in the technical quality of those. So, look at the content and decide if those varied genres would be enough. I think it's the only thing this network really has going for it.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
