Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
5K Porn
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-High quality production of newer videos
-Finally expanding in finding different talent
-Highly stylized and erotic videos
-4k or higher video quality
There seems to be a changing of the guard with this site. More Euro talent is starting to be showcased, which is great. We could all use a little more of Josephine Jackson, Martina Smeraldi, and Mary Popiense. The site navigation is easy, but could be easier. And the quality of videos and pictures are really great, however in my opinion most of the trailers do a better job than the full videos. The style of videos are fantastic in the newer vids, but some of them can be overly dominated by blowjobs than actual sex. Quite frankly, viewers can get more out of the intro stripteasing that they have shifted to in them in spite of some of the continuity issues that can be spotted in the aesthetics. |
| Cons: |
-Updates only once a week
-Some scenes are the same as Madison's other site
-Limited downloads per week
-Small range of video downloads if you want to collect
-Amount of content is limited, but growing... Slowly
The site only updates once a week, which during the height of the pandemic could have been a saving grace for the site since they were able to have content that didn't look like it was filmed from a low grade webcam like so many other sites were forced into doing. It does alternate updates between 5kTeens and 5kPorn, which is okay, but would like to see twice weekly updates instead.
In the earlier stages of the site, Ryan Madison is everywhere... And there's just something off about his style of sex that's very brutish and barbaric.
There is also a 15 downloads per week limit for the entire site. Not 15 per site. And to add, unlimited downloads for pictures and the handful of BTS videos... Yay... The lowest quality of video to download is at 720p. |
| Bottom Line: |
For $20 in the first month, then $30 for the subsequent months, or if you want to go for $50 for 3 months, I'm not sure if it is completely worth the money or to relinquish a week's worth of groceries to get this membership. Yeah, sure, very high quality videos that look amazing on whatever viewing platform you want to choose (yes, I have casted the videos on my UHD tv and it does look amazing), however they only have reached into the European talent pool only recently. Which might be a saving grace for this site and 5kTeens, because watching Ryan hump girls into submission or until weird things happen is unbearable to watch and sometimes to comprehend. Plus, the download limits? If you want to keep the videos, great, you will need about four, maybe five, months worth of payments to do that at this point. To be completely honest, I only watched about maybe five videos out of the 135 (at the time) that were worth viewing. For whatever previews that were available, the trailers were of a higher "view-ability" than most of the other full-length videos, which is strange... The full videos should never be outdone by the trailers.
If you are a fan of Ryan Madison, great, go for it, and you might as well go for the other sites he has as well. I am more looking forward towards not seeing a site completely dominated by him and more of the current style of videos that are currently being done in the last half of a year. To me, the future productions look better, yet I will be guarded in reconsidering a membership again. |
|
11-03-21 03:54am
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Reality Kings
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
*Top talents in the business make appearances
*New talents are consistently featured with some talent that are hard to find anywhere else
*Consistent updates; two scenes daily
*Very wide range and amount of content to select from |
| Cons: |
*Many sites are not updating at all or very little
*Everything is basically for "RK Prime" for some reason
*Site went through a "face lift" which made navigation harder
*Photosets progressively got worse
*4k not available...still... |
| Bottom Line: |
I first joined the site off and on since 2009, and have seen many changes over the course of 12 years. Some good, some bad, and now it seems like another MindGeek heist with the management of the site.
Throughout the years, the sites that were something to look forward to when it came to updates were First Time Auditions (last update was Dec. 2020) with only 195 updates, Pure 18 (last update was Sept. 2020) with only 158 scenes), Big Naturals (last update was Dec. 2020) with 380 updates, and Teens Love Huge Cocks (last update was Oct. 2020) with only 329 updates.
Where have all the updates gone to? Why abandon their bread and butter? Well, to answer that question, they have and have not. Which makes it seem like they are attempting to "rebrand" without giving it a label. Every thing is being dumped into one site. RK Prime.
RK Prime is the lazy solution to the multisite it seems. You will find that many of the scenes they post for this site should be put into the other sites. By doing this, it makes it seem like most of the site is being neglected. Are they really being neglected? When you start looking around on IAFD and other database sites you will find that they also have deleted or lost scenes, as well. This is a common thing across all MindGeek run sites.
Overall, the content is almost the same, but the climate is changing as such that the sites that made RK and reputable name in the adult multisite biz is now looking a bit lazy. The marketing ploy to bolster "all these sites" with "all these models" looks a little like a wolf in sheep's clothing with a handful of the newer scenes becoming more and more gimmicky with a weird and very niche twist. If one were to buy, you would be buying for the name, which is fine. A name can be dependable to an extent and are guaranteed a product of its name with their older content, but a name can only carry you so far before realizing the potential that other sites can bring and take you to. |
|
12-22-21 12:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Nympho
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
***Some of the hottest models in the industry
**Video quality
*Site navigation is done with relative ease |
| Cons: |
***No HQ pics, only screencaps
**Search features are pretty much nonexistent
*Not exactly what you could say varied in presentation |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, this is what I will say about Nympho: Cut and paste.
What I mean by the first line is that there isn't much variety in what you get from scene-to-scene. They have the same basic formula on how the scenes materialize and progress. Are they exactly the same? No, that's not at all what I am saying, but just be prepared to have those deja vu hee-bee-jee-bees when perusing scenes throughout the site.
Members can expect high quality videos with overly ambitious attempts at glorifying screencaptured photo sets. The latter is a major "no" for me. With how the models are prepped and dressed, I had expected better with hi-fidelity photosets worthy of adding to that photo gallery on Photos ready to be displayed on your TV. But no, I was left with feelings of despair and what could have been as I stared with disscontempt and disbelief.
This may be due to owning an older computer, but navigating from page to page trying to find scenes to enjoy wasn't exactly expedited in a way that would have catered to maximum enjoyment. But once things finally got going, members have approximately 230 scenes to choose from with an average of 995 "pictures" per set.
Knowing that how the scenes have a tendency to manifest themselves, and a group of sites that are overly eager to exploit the anal genre, I'm not sure if there's much motivation to venture into the partnering sites of All Anal, Anal Only, and True Anal. The reason I chose this over the others was due to the fact of not having being beat across the head with anal scenes. It's not a knock on the genre, but being overdone can be tiresome.
One thing is for sure, the site is raunchy and can access the deepest inner pervert in all of us. To that, I will give the site credit for doing right. Not exactly the most enticing review I have written, but I personally don't see much potential beyond this point for the site. |
|
10-11-22 06:49pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Wankz.com
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
HD scenes
Yes. They do have HD scenes, but most of the SD scenes have better quality than the "HD" scenes they have available. And the 4K scenes are a punchline to a joke that no one got.
Decent Photosets
This is the only saving grace. The photosets. I have said this before in some other reviews, and I will say it again. The photosets are complementary and can enhance the scene. In this case, the photosets are the only thing worth downloading since it seems that they are the highest quality items on the site and have a high view-ability compared to the videos.
Some major names
Riley Reid, Faye Reagan, Kelsi Monroe, Lexi Belle, and Angelina Valentine just to name a few that are featured on the site. Some of the "newer" stars that make an appearance are: Taylor Whyte, Sheri Vi, Gina Valentina, and Scarlett Sage... If that gives you any idea of how "new" some of the scenes are. |
| Cons: |
4K scenes?
They really aren't 4k. Some of the scenes look like they are somewhere in between 540 and 720 masquerading as 1080.
New scenes?
The "updates" that are posted look like they were done about 10-15 years ago at the start of HD filming. There is not really any true update schedule, and they come out whenever which makes it frustrating. The partner sites that you get with a membership update more frequently, however they lack quality, as well. |
| Bottom Line: |
***Buyer Beware***
This site is partnered up with Lethal Hardcore, or is it Lethal Pass? Hard to tell. Any new scenes are not posted through this site, but their partner site and they are atrocious. It looks like it was shot from an iPhone... 10 years ago. Both streaming and download qualities suffer greatly, and direction of the scenes look tired, old, and just sad. The search features that either site have is clunky and that is being generous with the adjective. At least the older scenes have a "classic" feel to them, but that's the only draw to the site since the "newer" scenes look like they are old and the only thing worth looking at are the photosets.
I would not recommend getting a membership to this site more than once. But I also would not getting a membership to this site at all if you want a fully honest recommendation. If you want to download all the things that you find good, do so at a budget and get out immediately. |
|
11-27-21 08:52am
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
I Am Eighteen
(0)
54.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
***There are not very many, if any, pros that I will put just to preface.***
Older scenes are posted, and from what I could tell, they are from around the late 2000’s through the mid 2010’s. Some recognizable names did make an appearance on this site, but they are very few in number. The models that do appear are okay at best, and only those who are “true” consumers of porn throughout the years will recognize the names and the few pieces of work each have done during their short lived careers. So, I guess that would be a slight pro in that regard when finding talent that had a “here today, gone tomorrow” type of career.
Membership grants you access to DVD site called “Best DVD Porn,” as well as, Lethal Hardcore. |
| Cons: |
***Doesn’t seem to be updating anymore.
**Very, very few scenes. Some are good, but most are not worth the time.
*There are other network sites, but those don’t look like they are updating, and the focus shifted towards the VR videos, thus sites like this one are neglected. |
| Bottom Line: |
First off, let’s look at the pricing:
2-Day trial at $1
1 month at $15 (Normally $20)
1 year at around $80 (Normally $110)
Each offers an add-on of WankzVR at $5/mo
I Am Eighteen is a site that is a part of the Wankz network of sites. There are 62 sites in total through this network, plus access to other sites that were mentioned in the “Pros” section of the review. As you can see just above the start of this text, there is virtual reality with this site as well, but it costs extra.
Now, the dirt on I Am Eighteen. Being that it is not updating, just for the sake of collecting older scenes of some now big named stars in the industry, it might not be worth keeping a subscription beyond a month. The site does not have any sort of download restrictions, and if you have the space and a little bit of time, the collection from this site alone can be downloaded in about an hour. Some of the scenes say that they have 4k, but it’s an extremely low quality and grainy 4k. Same can be said for the scenes that have 1080p and 720p downloads available. From my experience with the site, it is just better off just to download the 480p versions of the video since the “high definition” videos are just larger, resized formats of the standard definition version. If you do happen to lean on the side of the higher definitions of videos, decrease the viewing size a little; that seems to help with the overall quality in my opinion. Plus, the naming system they used for the downloads are a bit different in that they basically put the description of the video in the file name and you may or may not get the model name in there to help with selecting the video. Chances are, if you download your content, you will spend some time renaming everything to fit how you want to stay organized.
The content that is available seems to run between 2006 or 2007 to 2016 and they only have 90 videos available. Some scenes are just solos of the model, whereas most other scenes that are available are b/g scenes done in a slightly scripted gonzo style of film. The “newer” videos have a “storyline” in them, but they are poorly done and just drenched in sleaze and every cliché associated with porn. Granted, I will give them some credit for having scenes featuring Janice Griffith, Jillian Janson, Megan Rain, and Amia Miley just to name a few. However, having just a few names laced into the collection to bolster the repertoire isn’t enough to cover up poor writing, mediocre direction, and average editing.
Photo sets are a little difficult to get and take some extra steps to figure out how to download that isn’t very apparent to a beginning to average user. Once you are able to figure out how to acquire the photosets, here is what you will expect for the scenes that do have a photoset attached to them:
Resolution: 1600 x 1067, and this is consistent throughout all the sets that are available. They are true stills, no screencaps, and no screencaps they claim to be stills or HQ photos. Each set varies in the amount of pics that is associated with the scene, but you should expect anywhere between 150 to 300 pics per set. There are a few that reach the 600+ mark on pics, but I feel that they did do one good job and that is to have representable photosets if we are looking at quality alone for the time.
In conclusion, I Am Eighteen is comparable to what most of us have dealt with at least one time in our lives. A vision never realized. While the argument can be made for “look at all these great deals” from the other sites that are available to you with a membership, however it cannot be ignored to see how much is not updating throughout the site. It is not just I Am Eighteen that was forgotten over time. The one glaring thing about this is that the video quality is not great, and makes it very difficult to find anything enjoyable with a given scene. If anything, if you are considering joining, I would join just to collect all that you can for a month and then leave. There isn’t much going on for this part of the site, and quite frankly living with just the fond memories of what was just good enough for me. |
|
12-28-21 11:29am
Replies (0)
|
|
