Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There is a lot of content - aound 1800 photo sets, about 210 videos, and about 310 models
The technical quality is superb
The models are gorgeous and not the least bit shy
Navigation is same style as other MetArt sites, which is very good
Technical support for all MetArt sites is excellent
Lots of variety in settings and styles |
| Cons: |
Updates aren't that frequent - 11 updates in December, 11 in November, 12 in October, etc.
Almost all the models are from Eastern Europe with a heavy dose of Russia (I don't mind that at all myself, but some prefer more diversity) |
| Bottom Line: |
RylskyArt is one of the sister sites in the MetArt network. That means it shares the excellent technical support and back end technical staff, which is a very good thing.
Rylsky is one of the higher volume contributers to the MetArt site - he has 1731 photos or videos on that site alone, dating back to 2006. He continues to post content there frequently. He started this site, RylskyArt, in 2012. As far as I can tell, there is no overlap between MetArt and RylskyArt - the smae set does not appear on both sites, although of course many models do appear on both sites.
Some models appear here A LOT, so if you have a favorite from elsewhere, you can really add to your collection here. Some examples include
Jeff Milton - 7 films, 54 photo sets
Nikia - 10 films, 74 photo sets
Zelda - 6 films, 60 photo sets
This site is generally soft core with very little girl-girl or masturbation. The emphasis is on the beauty of the ladies. And with them being this beautiful, what else do you need?
The Backstage photo sets (54 so far) are delightful, and show the playful side of many of the models. Some of my absolute favorite photos can be found in these backstage sets.
Rylsky does read the comments and frequently posts a response - it's nice to have that kind of interaction with the photographer. He even welcomes constructive criticism.
The regular price is $29.99 monthly. Currently the PU discount brings it to $9.99, which is an excellent bargain. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
Bottom line - I highly recommnend this site to anyone that enjoys MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, or similar sites. Especially if you can snag a month at $9.99, I can't imagine how you could be disappointed. If the updates were more frequent I'd give it a higher score - that really is the only knock on the site I can think of. |
|
12-31-19 04:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Goddess Nudes
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
2380 Photo Sets
1030 Models
147 Artists (Photographers)
Oldest sets date to October 2009
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Very regular update schedule (Monday through Friday)
Many beautiful models
High quality photography |
| Cons: |
Only 5 updates a week – daily updates would be nice
No videos at all
Most models have only one or two sets on the site |
| Bottom Line: |
Originally, Goddess Nudes was a spinoff from DOMAI. Here was their mission statement:
“GoddessNudes was founded in 2010 and made by the same guy who founded and runs Domai.com and has been doing so since 1997. That's me! :-) (Eolake Stobblehouse)
I bring the same love, care, good taste, and responsibility to this as has made Domai one of the most beloved and respected nude art sites on the web since 1997, bringing European art sensibility to Nudes. And members' reports tell me I'm succeeding.
GoddessNudes shares the fun and beauty with Domai, only even sexier, for those who have been wanting that. The girls show a bit more. Or you could say that on Domai the sexuality is in the background, here it's in the foreground. (Of course that's not to everybody's taste, which is why it's a separate site.) But fun and beauty are still very big components.”
After the Met Art network acquired DOMAI and Goddess Nudes, the sites were updated to more closely match the style of Met Art, although the original formatting of the site is still available via legacy.goddessnudes.com. Except for reasons of nostalgia, I’d say the Met Art style of formatting is a big improvement.
Since the acquisition, both Goddess Nudes and DOMAI have become more similar to their sister site Erotic Beauty. There is still more sexuality in GN than in DOMAI, in the sense that there are many more open-leg photos on GN than on DOMAI. But close-ups are still uncommon on GN, and any kind of pussy play is quite rare. So DOMAI is the softest of the sites in the Met Art network, and GN is more explicit but still soft core.
The quality of the photography is very high, and the web site performs well and is easy to navigate. It has nice features like favorites and comments. Technical support for any Met Art network site is outstanding - you will rarely have a problem take more than a few hours to fix.
Met Art does offer lifetime memberships on its company owned sites (including Goddess Nudes), running from $500 per site to $800 per site. You do need to join one of the network sites first to be presented this option – it never appears on the general sign-up page. But once you have joined one site you can either upgrade that one to lifetime or pick a different one. As an incentive they also will throw in a one-year membership to any other site in the network.
One other thing – I recently joined one of the sites for a single month, and after completing the purchase, they gave me the chance to purchase a monthly membership to any other network site for a 50% discount – and also the lifetime memberships are available for $400 each (for any site) – so this would be a great way to get a lifetime membership to a site if you are so inclined. The catch is that this discount is available for only 1 hour though. So the plan is, if you want a lifetime to Viv Thomas (for example), get a monthly to any OTHER MetArt site (the cheapest one you can find), but not the one you are trying to get the lifetime membership for. This approach will save you some money, although you won’t get the bonus year on a second site.
Monthly memberships run $29.99, and annual memberships are $99.99. At the moment neither PU nor TBP are offering a discount, and this site isn’t discounted all that often. Although on Black Friday weekend it was available for $9.99. I’d be comfortable paying $15 to $20 per month for this site, but 29.99 seems a little pricey to me. |
|
12-01-18 07:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Stunning 18
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Many gorgeous models
A handful of models appear to be exclusive
Had been on a schedule of every-other-day updates (see cons)
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Very high quality photography
MetArt Network support is responsive
Good site layout, search, comments, features, etc.
Good browsing and download speeds |
| Cons: |
Without warning or explanation, only 5 updates posted in April
Since this is from a single photographer, less variety than you would see at a multi-artist site |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the blurb about how the website describes itself:
Antonio Clemens is one of the most innovative, accomplished, and popular contributors of erotic art photography to the MetArt Network. With the creation of Stunning18.com Clemens now has an exclusive showcase for his unique style of meticulously crafted digital erotica. Working with gorgeous young models from around the world, Clemens uses his camera to capture every aspect of their natural beauty. At Stunning 18 you'll find the girls of your wildest dreams in the most beautiful nude art photos you've ever seen.
The site started in January of 2013, so it has a pretty extensive collection of beauties to look at. The vast majority consists of soft core, glamour type photos and videos. There are also a handful of masturbation videos, and also a couple of boy-girl sets. The photographer has been a prolific contributor to Met Art, where there are several hundred of his sets listed. And while this site is part of the Met Art network, the subscription to either site does not grant you access to the other site.
There are 176 Models, 244 Videos, and several hundred photo sets.
Updates are typically every-other-day. For instance, in 2018, in January there were 15 updates, in February 14 updates, and in March 15 updates. But in April there were only 5 updates, and there was no warning or explanation that the schedule was changing. As of the time of this posting on 5/4, the most recent update was on 4/21.
When it was 2 weeks since the last update, I emailed support and this is what Met Art Network Support replied: (there has been one update posted since I received this response, but only one).
My sincere apologies that the Stunning 18 site has not updated on a regular basis. We are sorry but we do not own the site. The updates are dependent upon the photographer to maintain his update schedule. I do expect the updates will resume soon.
If there will be no update in a certain time frame what we can do is to
Cancel your remaining prepaid time and credit it to another site within our network
OR
Cancel the subscription and we can do pro-rated refund.
We are still hoping that there will be updates soon but that will solely depend on the photographer of the site. If you would like to take further actions with the option outlined above, please let us know.
If you need assistance with anything else, please let us know.
The standard price is $29.99 per month, the PU discount takes it to $19.99 per month. Occasionally you will see bigger discounts to $14.99 or even $9.99, but these dont appear very often or last very long. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
If you are a fan of sites like Femjoy or MetArt, you will find a lot to like here, and plenty to occupy yourself for a month or two. But given the suddenly infrequent updates, I would not recommend a longer term membership unless some suitable explanation is given or an extended period of regular updates resumes. So while annual memberships are offered, I would not recommend one at this time. |
|
05-04-18 07:57pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
29
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates, either photosets or videos (vids are one or two per week).
Excellent photo and video quality
Good download and browsing speeds
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
Beautiful girls |
| Cons: |
Site layout is not quite as good as Met Art, but still better than a lot of sites on the interwebs.
Limited Model Information measurements and home country
Very little striptease action here in most sets, the model is completely nude throughout.
No sexual activity of any kind the emphasis is on beauty. |
| Bottom Line: |
Errotica Archives is another site in the Met Art network. Originally it was a site for the single photographer Erro, who also posted frequently at Met Art, but it has evolved to be more of a multi-photographer site. Erro continues to contribute, but only a few times per month.
What I always considered one of the biggest strengths of this site was the long term relationship some of the models had with the site. For example, Iveta has 41 galleries posted from 2007 to 2013, with a handful after that. Nikky has 43 galleries posted from 2006 to 2013. Belle (aka Indiana A) has 37 sets from 2011 to 2015. Antea appears in 204 galleries (!) from 2006 to 2017.
Lately, it has started to feel a lot more like its sister site, Erotic Beauty. It seems like just one more place for various models to post a set or two that didnt get posted at Met Art. There is still a lot of high quality content here, but Errotica Archives no longer feels as unique as it once did.
Almost all of the photo sets and videos involve solo girls, and the ones that have two or more are just nude girls near another no sexual activity is going on.
The girls are very beautiful, rarely shy, and photographed with great technical skill. The site performs well.
The site boasts 319 Models. Its hard to get a good count on the total number of photo galleries, but the main site goes back to 2005, and the archives contain some sets from 2004. There are over 600 videos.
The PU discount of $19.99 for a month is a good value. Annual memberships go for $99.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
You should certainly find plenty of material here to occupy yourself for a full month if you take the plunge. And if any of your old favorites have an extensive representation here, you will think that you hit the jackpot. |
|
07-30-17 06:39pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
30
|
Sweetheart Video
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Video updates are usually every three days (except as of 4/17, the last update was 4/3)
Extensive collection of photos in addition to the videos
I really like the BTS features
Streaming works on all the videos
All video downloads are available in various formats, up to 1080p
Includes several bonus sites
Browsing, streaming and downloading speeds are pretty snappy
PU discount price of $14.95 per month is pretty reasonable |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
No model info
Streaming quality is not HD more like 480p or 540P
Searching returns stuff from all the sites on the network there is no good way to search and only get lesbian content, which is what this site that I signed up for (Sweetheart Video) focuses on.
Logging in requires entering a Captcha. This has now switched to a photographic Captcha, which I am finding to be pretty annoying, definitely worse than the text Captcha they used previously |
| Bottom Line: |
As part of the Mile High network, Sweetheart Video also includes access to these other sites: Bi Empire, Doghouse Digital, Cherry Pop, Lesbian Older Younger, Mile High Selection, Reality Junkies, and Sweet Sinner. (Girlfriends Films also appears to be owned by the same outfit, but it is not included in this network of sites and requires a separate subscription).
In this review I will focus only on the content on Sweetheart Video, not the other network sites.
It appears that Sweetheart Video started up in 2011, so they have a pretty extensive collection of stuff on line. There are about 1000 video scenes on line and almost 400 models on the site.
Every video I have looked at (excepting the BTS features) has a run time of between 25 and 35 minutes. Theres usually a couple of minutes of setup story before moving into the love making, so the story line is more ancillary here than on some other sites.
One of the neat things is the BTS (Behind the Scenes) features. They usually include a post-scene interview with the ladies. (Sometimes its a pre-scene video taken in the minivan while theyre driving to the shoot location). Its quite enjoyable to hear them talk about what they liked about the scene and each other. The fact they are both usually buck naked is a plus. Two nude women in full afterglow can be extremely charming.
Searching will return values from all the sites in the network, which is good and bad. Good if you want to see anything a particular model might appear in, bad if youd prefer to focus only on lesbian content.
Heres an example of file download size for a video that runs 25:36. 1080p runs 1.26 GB, 720p runs 922 MB, 540p runs 369 MB.
One thing to try is to go to the sign up page, then go back, then go to sign up again, then back again. (Like youre thinking about it but not sure). Eventually youll get a pop-up chat window where youll be offered a discount code. Or the standard PU discount is $14.95 which is pretty good. Standard non-discounted pricing would be $29.99 for monthly or $119.40 for annual.
Heres what the update schedule was for March 2017. Videos were posted on the 1st, 4th, 7th, 10th, 13th, 16th, 19th, 22nd, 25th, 28th, 31st. (Also on 4/3 but as of 4/17, no video updates since 4/3). Photos were posted on the 1st (2 sets), 4th (2 sets), 10th (4 sets), 13th (3 sets), 16th (3 sets), 19th (3 sets), 22nd (1 set), 25th (1 set), 28th (2 sets), 31st (2 sets).
Bottom Line This is a good Lesbian site, although if the lack of updates in past 2 weeks is an indication, this might become a non-updating site. Although you should be able to get a daily update if you consider all the sites in the network it just wont be lesbian content in most cases. |
|
04-18-17 04:12am
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
MetArtX
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily Updates, either a photo set or video, with about a 3:2 ratio of videos to photos
Excellent technical quality
Wide variety of locales
Gorgeous girls, including many favorites from Met Art
Excellent navigation and web design
Good browsing, streaming, and downloading speeds
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2) |
| Cons: |
Occasional logon problems that have been plaguing the entire Met Art network recently maybe once or twice a month
Has the feeling of girls putting on a show, rather than girls enjoying themselves |
| Bottom Line: |
Solo masturbation photo sets and videos are the raison detre for this site, and they do these very well. The technical implementation of the sets are everything you would expect from a Met Art network site.
The site only started up in March 2016, and there are currently over 330+ videos and 220+ photo sets on the site. They have adhered to a daily update schedule since their inception, and they show no sign of slowing down, so there is plenty of content here.
Maybe its just me, but I did not find this site to be among my favorites. Theres nothing to complain about from a technical or quality aspect. The girls are gorgeous. So why is my reaction kind of meh?
For one thing, from a story telling aspect, theres a lot less that can be done with one person in the video instead of two, so there is a repetitiveness that is inevitable in this kind of site.
I think the other thing that disappointed me is that I hoped for more feeling of intimacy. As I said in the cons above, it has the feeling of girls putting on a show. And yeah, I know, duh, that is exactly what they are doing. But at their other network sites like Viv Thomas and Sex Art, they do achieve that suspension of disbelief where you feel like you are watching a genuine story of some kind.
The videos have a rote aspect to them in most cases. The first part is the girl teasing for the camera to get the guys aroused. Then its time to go masturbate. This one-two formula is quite common.
What I am hoping they can achieve is a feeling of getting closer to the models. For my favorite example, Id offer up Michaela Isizzu in Alone over at Sex Art. Ive watched that video 50 times and it never gets old. So they do have it in them.
Standard membership rates are $29.99 per month and $99.99 per year. The PU discount brings the monthly charge down to 19.99.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
One other thing I recently joined one of the sites for a single month, and after completing the purchase, they gave me the chance to purchase a monthly membership to any other network site for a 50% discount and also the lifetime memberships are available for $400 each (for any site) so this would be a great way to get a lifetime membership to a site if you are so inclined. The catch is that this discount is available for only 1 hour though. So this can be a good way to get a lifetime membership for a bit of a discount to any network site, or else pick up a monthly or annual discount for some second site. But the time limit on the discount makes it very helpful for you to know ahead of time that it is being offered, so you can think about it a little before hitting the join button.
The Bottom Line is this is a very well executed site. For me, some of the artistry isnt quite there yet. But if you are really into masturbation photos and videos, this site is definitely worth a look. |
|
09-14-17 07:54pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
32
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Daily updates
4701 Photo Sets, 1979 Models, 186 Artists there is a lot of content here
Generally high quality photography
Many of the models are gorgeous
Wide variety of settings and styles
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2) |
| Cons: |
No videos at all
Considerable overlap with DOMAI
Most models have only one or two sets
Occasional clunkers in the sets
Suffers the same occasional logon glitches as all the sites in the Met Art network. Maybe once or twice a month that can last for a couple of hours. |
| Bottom Line: |
Erotic Beauty is a sister site in the Met Art network. It was previously named Met Art Models. The updates on the current incarnation of the site date back to 2005. Its core competency is soft core nude photography.
It generally has a feeling of being a landing spot for sets that, for whatever reason, were not placed on Met Art itself. This does not mean that the content isnt good, although overall I would say the stuff on Met Art averages out to higher quality than the stuff on Erotic Beauty. There are fewer models youd rank a 9 or 10 on EB as opposed to MA. Maybe more at EB would be called pretty than gorgeous. But then, A Pretty Girl is Like a Melody, so pretty is nothing to sneeze at, especially if shes naked.
One issue I have is the considerable overlap with DOMAI, also in the Met Art network. For example, say a photographer goes out with a model and takes 500 pictures at a single shoot. Then maybe 50 or 60 of those will be posted on DOMAI in a set. Then a few months later, a slightly different 50 or 60 photos from the same shoot will be posted on Erotic Beauty. (Sometimes EB gets them first, sometimes DOMAI). This can actually be a good thing if you really loved a particular shoot with a model, since it gets you more photos of that girl. But it does feel a bit like you are being taken advantage of when you come across something like this.
EB would also sometimes post 50 pics from one shoot, and then later 50 more from the same shoot, and sometimes even a third posting from the same shoot. This was quite common a few years ago, but is pretty rare now from what I can tell.
While the site does not loudly proclaim itself as an all-natural site, the covers for their photo sets all bear the mark EroticBeauty.com Naturally Beautiful Amateur Nudes. And I think there are very few models with breast enhancements on this site.
The site navigation and style is very similar to Met Art, which in my opinion is excellent. Favorites, comments, all the stuff you would expect. Browsing and download speeds are good.
Ive seen other reviews mention something about the navigation, and not being able to paginate through easily when browsing. One way to get around this is once you see something like page01 at the end of the URL, you can replace the 01 with any page number you want and so jump to the middle of the series.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously its pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus its not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
Regular pricing for Erotic Beauty is 29.99 per month, or 99.99 per year. The PU discount brings it down to 19.99 per month.
The bottom line is there is more than enough content here to keep you busy for a month. |
|
01-31-18 08:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
Love Hairy
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
All of these models have appeared on one or more of the Met Art sites. So you can be sure that they are extremely beautiful.
You get all the benefits you would expect from any other site in the MA network. Technical support via email is excellent. I also have not needed a lot of tech support either. I’ve never had an issue with their billing. Navigation is identical to the main Met Art site, as are comments, tags, etc.
Solid amount of content – 196 videos, 1487 galleries, 548 models, 155 artists.
I simply adore the pic of Eddison that is usually displayed on the site’s home page. |
| Cons: |
Some of these might qualify as “barely hairy” – so if you’re into a really full bush you won’t find a lot of that here. Even a small tuft of unshaven hair is enough to get added to this site. Most of the women have trimmed pubic hair, and a small percent have armpit hair.
Updates are infrequent and irregular. For January 2025 they came on Jan 2, Jan 3, Jan 5, Jan 7, Jan 22, and Jan 25. Next month it was Feb 2, Feb 5, Feb 9, Feb 12, Feb 26. The oldest photo set on the site is dated 5/4/2001, although this site didn’t appear as a stand-alone site until well after that.
The standard price for Love Hairy used to be quite reasonable, but now it matches any other MA site most of the time. At the time of this posting, the PU “discount” is $29.99 – I would never pay that much for this site. So wait for a holiday discount. |
| Bottom Line: |
Love Hairy is one of the sites in the Met Art network. I don’t believe any of the content is exclusive to Love Hairy – in fact you can usually tell from the cover photo where it appeared originally on one of the other MA sites. The set is identical to the one posted on the originating site – exactly the same number of pics, same photo size options, same everything.
Even before joining, you can do a good amount of reconnaissance on the site. On the Models page, you can sort by Top Rated, Newest, Alphabetical, Most Viewed, Most Favorited, or Most Appearances. And if you click on the model herself, it will take you to a page where you can see which movies and which photo sets she appears in. Then you can get a page of thumbnails or usually a short clip of the video.
Old timers like me generally prefer the natural (unshaved) look for a grown woman. This site gives us the chance to see all the lovelies that appear on the MA network with their pubes intact, all in one place. If you’ve already joined multiple MA sites, you’re going to see very little new content here. But it is a convenient option when you really miss the good old days.
The best time to join is almost always on a holiday – most Met Art sites will offer discounts where it costs between $5 and $10 for a month. I got in at $7.99 for a month, and I think at that price this is an excellent value.
I doubt anybody would take out a long term membership to this site. But if’s definitely worth joining if you appreciate the natural look and can get it at a discounted price. |
|
03-16-25 11:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Layout is almost a clone of MetArt, which has very good layout
Excellent photo and video quality
Good download and browsing speeds
Beautiful girls
Support of the MetArt Network
An excellent softcore site with an extensive archive |
| Cons: |
Down to only 2 updates per week
No new videos since 2018
Limited Model Information. Just measurements and home country
No sexual activity of any kind. The emphasis is on beauty.
No real differentiation from the sister sites at Domai, Erotic Beauty or Goddess Nudes |
| Bottom Line: |
Errotica Archives is another site in the Met Art network. Originally it was a site for the single photographer Erro, who also posted frequently at Met Art, but it is now a multi-photographer site. Erro last posted to this site in 2021.
I last reviewed the site in 2017, and back then it was doing daily updates. That has changed to now only do 2 updates per week, on Wednesday and Friday.
What I always considered one of the biggest strengths of this site was the long term relationship some of the models had with the site. That was true during the time this was exclusively a site run by Erro, but that is no longer the case.
Really, it’s hard to tell this site apart from its sister sites of Domai, Goddess Nudes, or Erotic Beauty. All four of these sites are now multi-photographer, and all four post updates twice a week. They also frequently share postings from the same photo shoot. For example, Errotica Archives might post, say 40-60 of the photos from a shoot. Then a month or two later (or sometimes years later) Erotic Beauty might post a different 40-60 of the photos from the same shoot. So strictly speaking, there is no overlap – none of the exact photos in the first release appear in the second release. The poses are slightly different from one set to the next, but they were obviously all taken at the same shoot.
Almost all of the photo sets and videos involve solo girls, and the ones that have two or more are just nude girls near one another. No sexual activity is going on.
The girls are very beautiful, rarely shy, and photographed with great technical skill. The site performs well.
When I reviewed this in 2017, the model count was 319. As of today it is up to 1057. There are now 84 artists with stuff posted here, compared to the one when the site was first founded. 5023 Photo Galleries, still posting 2 updates per week. 644 videos, but the last new one was posted in 2018. The oldest stuff dates back to 2004.
The PU discount of $19.99 for a month is a good value. Annual memberships go for $99.99. As of today’s review, there is a sale on for $9.95 per month. These sales pop up pretty regularly during US holidays. If you miss this one, the next one will probably be at Thanksgiving.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it is pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it is not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
You should certainly find plenty of material here to occupy yourself for a full month if you take the plunge. And if any of your old favorites have an extensive representation here, you will think that you hit the jackpot. |
|
09-18-25 06:15am
Replies (0)
|
Review
35
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
5694 Photo Sets, 2393 Models, 199 Artists – there is a lot of content here
Generally high quality photography
Many of the models are gorgeous
Wide variety of settings and styles |
| Cons: |
Only 2 updates per week
No videos at all
Considerable overlap with DOMAI, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica-Archives
Most models have only one or two sets
Occasional clunkers in the sets |
| Bottom Line: |
I last reviewed this site in 2018. The general style of the site has not changed much at all, but the update frequency has dropped sharply, down to 2 updates per week, on Saturday and Sunday.
Erotic Beauty is a sister site in the Met Art network. It was previously named Met Art Models. The updates on the current incarnation of the site date back to 2005. Its core competency is soft core nude photography.
Back in the day, each of Erotic Beauty, DOMAI, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica Archives were somewhat distinctive. But the original owner of DOMAI and Goddess Nudes is no longer with us, and while Erro is still photographing for Met Art, the site named after him is no longer exclusively posting his work. So each of these four sites is now posting only twice a week, and there is no theme to distinguish one site from the next.
Erotic Beauty generally has a feeling of being a landing spot for sets that, for whatever reason, were not placed on Met Art itself. This does not mean that the content isn’t good, although overall I would say the stuff on Met Art averages out to higher quality than the stuff on Erotic Beauty. There are fewer models you’d rank a 9 or 10 on EB as opposed to MA. Maybe more at EB would be called ”pretty” than “gorgeous”. But my absolute favorite photo gallery, with Lisabelle, is found on Erotic Beauty.
One issue I have is the considerable overlap with DOMAI, which has now extended to Goddess Nudes and Errotica Archives. For example, say a photographer goes out with a model and takes 500 pictures at a single shoot. Then maybe 50 or 60 of those will be posted on DOMAI in a set. Then a few months later, a slightly different 50 or 60 photos from the same shoot will be posted on Erotic Beauty. (Sometimes EB gets them first, sometimes DOMAI. And now there might be a third set on Goddess Nudes and a fourth set on Errotica Archives). This can actually be a good thing if you really loved a particular shoot with a model, since it gets you more photos of that girl. But it does feel a bit like you are being taken advantage of when you come across something like this.
EB would also sometimes post 40 pics from one shoot, and then later 40 more from the same shoot, and sometimes even a third posting from the same shoot. This was quite common a few years ago, but is pretty rare now from what I can tell.
While the site does not loudly proclaim itself as an all-natural site, the covers for their photo sets all bear the mark “EroticBeauty.com Naturally Beautiful Amateur Nudes”. And I think there are very few models with breast enhancements on this site.
The site navigation and style is very similar to Met Art, which in my opinion is excellent. Favorites, comments, all the stuff you would expect. Browsing and download speeds are good.
I’ve seen other reviews mention something about the navigation, and not being able to paginate through easily when browsing. One way to get around this is once you see something like ‘page01’ at the end of the URL, you can replace the 01 with any page number you want and so jump to the middle of the series.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
I’ve also seen them offering specials on lifetime memberships, such as $200 for a site, so if you can get on their mailing list that might also happen (or might not). I’ve also seen them offer most of the MA network (10 sites, excluding Rylsky Art, Eternal Desire, ALS Scans and Stunning 18) with a lifetime membership of 699.99. Again, no idea if this will ever come up again.
Regular pricing for Erotic Beauty is 29.99 per month, or 99.99 per year. The PU discount brings it down to 19.99 per month. Right now there is a July 4 special going for 9.99 per month. These types of discounts usually occur around holidays. The next one might be Labor Day, or possibly not until Thanksgiving.
The bottom line is there is more than enough content here to keep you busy for a month. If you enjoy softcore content, this is a site you should give a look. After you have already joined the flagship Met Art site. |
|
06-27-25 04:11pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content over 1.7 million photos, over 2,700 videos, over 2,800 models
Big variety of content solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, multi-girl
Some real gems in the archives
Picture and video quality is decent, but not quite as good as the best sites. |
| Cons: |
No HTTPS is used, so your passwords, etc. are not encrypted in transit. Same is true for all your browsing, which your ISP is now no longer required to keep private. So something to think about.
Download speeds are a little sluggish, but not awful
Streaming of videos at higher resolutions really doesnt work at all for me lots of fits and starts
Despite the sites name, few of the models were still in their teens when appearing on here. Its not quite a MILF site but the average age is well above teenager.
Has a captcha when logging in a simple one, so not a big negative in my mind.
Some strange glitches here and there, like no thumbnails being present for a few days.
Somewhat irregular update schedule there were 13 updates in September. |
| Bottom Line: |
There is a lot of good content here, although it is not as easy to find as it could be. The thumbnails are a little on the small side when browsing the sets, so its kind of hard to tell how much you like a girl without going into the actual set.
For me, the archives held more interest than the current stuff, but YMMV. It looks like back in the day this would have been one of my favorite sites, but more recent stuff is just OK. Although they have picked up a few sets of some of the stars you see on other sites, like Nancy A, Gina Gerson, Mila Azul, and Sapphira, and as expected, those are all quite enjoyable.
Picture and video quality is decent, but there are other sites that are better.
I was able to spot a few of my favorite models from years back and enjoyed expanding my collection of those models. The archives date back to 2004, so there is a lot of stuff to look through.
The search function has slightly more than just the basics. You can search on type of action (solo, lesbian, hardcore, amateur or girlfriends), on name, on the first letter of the models name, hair color, and breast size.
The schedule for September had 6 videos on 9/6, 9/12, 9/13, 9/19, 9/25, 9/28. The schedule for September had 7 photos on 9/7, 9/11, 9/14, 9/18, 9/20, 9/21, 9/23.
About the gems I mentioned in the pros section. If you are a collector of Ariel Piper Fawn (she goes by Gabriella on this site) or Eufrat Mai, this site has some of the earliest sets Ive ever seen of these two super stars. Like fresh out of high school. Demi A also has some early sets here.
Billing is PureWebPower.net. I havent used them before. Seems OK so far.
Bottom line, I am glad I signed up for this site, although I wont be a long term member. The gems I found (mentioned above) make it worth it just on that basis alone, and there is plenty of other stuff here to keep you occupied for at least a month. |
|
10-02-17 06:59pm
Replies (1)
|
|
