Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The site is huge – 3,371 models, 7,900 videos, 39,028 photo sets, 4,233,515 pictures
Focus is on non-white ladies
Wide variety of body types, from very thin to fuller figured
I have not had any technical issues with the site.
Frequent Updates – 4 videos per week and 11 photo sets per week
Pretty good search engine
Cons:
Some overlap with the other ATK sites but not a ton (you can tell from the water mark on the set)
Not the most modern site design, but it’s also plenty good enough
Bottom Line:
This site should be a top destination for anyone looking for non-European models. For myself, I found it to be absolutely heavenly for finding black and Hispanic women. The volume of content is hard to believe.
The ATK stands for Amateur Teen Kingdom, but many of the ladies on here are not teens. If you search for models age 24-29, it returns 378 models, and a search for age 30-45 returns 70 models.
Using their search engine, which is based on how the model categorized herself in her model bio, here are some of the ethnic breakdowns for models:
Asians – 393
Black Women – 1032
East Indian – 53
Island Girls – 107
Latinas – 1065
Mediterranean – 324
Native American – 19
Vast majority of the content is solo. There is a sprinkling of boy-girl and a smaller sprinkling of girl-girl. The solo content has some masturbation as well.
I’m an absolute sucker for watching a nude woman give an interview. There are 537 interview videos, and while they don’t always get naked in them, they do in the vast majority. Good stuff.
Few of the models would qualify as 10s, but they are all attractive in their own way. Plus, for me, when a girl takes off her top and/or her bottom, she suddenly becomes super attractive. There is a lot of that here.
The photography focuses heavily on pussy shots in many of the sets. Not true for every set or every girl, but some sets might be three quarters pussy shots. I kind of prefer a whole-woman approach, and there is more than enough of that here, but if you just want 20 (or more) different close ups of her pussy, there are plenty of sets here that qualify. If only 10% of sets are pussy-focused (and it’s probably more than that), there are 3,900 photo sets like that.
The photography often has a lack of imagination on posing. The pictures are technically good quality, but there are more talented photographers out there.
Another plus for me is the amount of smiling going on. I definitely enjoy porn more when the girl is enjoying it herself. Naked Happy Girls are the best!
The standard price is $29.99 for 30 days, $49.99 for 60 days, and $64.99 for 90 days. They use ccBill which is ideal.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Lots of amateurs – few have appeared anywhere else
Visits to the most beautiful beaches
Always fun to see a girl get coaxed out of her top. Even more fun if she is coaxed out of her bottom.
Also fun when a girl needs no coaxing at all – she’s got all the confidence in the world already and is quite happy to flaunt it.
The commenters are quite enthusiastic, especially when a girl finally lets go and really does flaunt it.
Regular updates – every other day.
No download limits as far as I can tell.
Cons:
Many of the videos are kind of grainy
Many photos are out of focus
The models are amateurs, and probably some of the photographers too. So they haven’t developed a full sense of how best to pose for a camera.
Many of the sets make it no farther than Wet T-shirt or hand-bra. There’s plenty of full topless sets, but a lower percentage than you might expect.
Only a small percentage go fully nude.
Search function is quite limited.
Bottom Line:
his site is kind of tough to give a numerical rating to. This site is a lot of fun, I’m very glad I joined, and I will probably make an annual pilgrimage here. But there are enough minor dings that it doesn’t earn a top-shelf score.
One con I mentioned, that many of the girls never go full topless, can also be a bit of a pro. Now when you first go to a set, “will she or won’t she” is a legit question, so it does add some anticipation as you work through a set.
Considering that most of these beaches are well known for ladies going topless, it’s kind of surprising the low-ish hit rate they get in getting the girls to go full topless.
The compensation they offer the girls isn’t that high – a T shirt with the company logo, and digital copies of every photo or video they take of that girl. I suspect that the ones that agree to go back to the apartment for a more extensive photo shoot do get a little more than that.
Videos top out at 1080p, so no 4K yet.
The subscription for one month goes for $24.95, 3 months for about $45 and 6 months for about $70.
I signed up via ccBill which is an excellent biller to work with. Cancellation was very easy.
If you enjoy seeing softcore amateurs, and sometimes very softcore, you will find lots to like at this site. I'd definitely recommmend giving it a whirl
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
1183 Videos, 856 girls
Weekly updates, usually on Thursdays
Videos range from 1 hour in length to sometimes over 2 hours. 90 minutes is about average
Some of the 18 year olds are still in high school when posing
No stupid story. The girls are here to get paid for having sex on camera. The action is all real. And we are here to enjoy that.
All newer videos are available in 4K, 1080, 720 and 480 for downloading. The streaming is done at 720.
Includes access to Backroom Casting Couch and BBC Surprise
Cons:
Very few thunderous orgasms, although plenty of regular orgasms
Almost every scene ends with a facial. Cream pies are rare.
Bottom Line:
This is a sister site to Backroom Casting Couch, BBC Surprise, ExCogiGirls and Hot MILFS Fuck, although only the first two are included in this membership. This site started up in 2006 and has had weekly updates since that time, usually on a Thursday.
This review will focus on Exploited College Girls, not BCC or BBC Surprise. As KatyBuffs mentioned in her review, the site is now going by ExCogGirls, and is de-emphasizing the “Exploited” part. Even from the beginning, the Exploited part probably referred mostly to “college girls need money” than “we’re going to make her do stuff she doesn’t want to do.”
Most scenes have 1 boy and 1 girl performing. There are also some Boy-Girl-Girl and Boy-Boy-Girl. Most of the time there is a single studio guy doing the boy duties. For the past 3 or 4 years that dude has been Tyler Nixon. The two previous studio cocks were Jake Adams and Tim Cannon, both of whom passed away suddenly. The site creator, Steve, served this function for the first several years.
The formula starts with an interview with the girl. This usually lasts 5 to 10 minutes, and is almost always clothed. Of course there’s no need to be truthful when answering the questions, but I get the feeling that all of them really are. Especially for any girl that is first sex on camera or shy, there is a lot of giggling during the interview.
Then they get naked, with plenty of giggling to accompany the jiggling. This part usually takes only a minute or two before the girl is totally nude.
There follows the main event, and the sex is quite hot. Each scene since about 2023 has a helpful orgasm count with time stamps in the description, and there is even a count displayed in the video as each one happens. As I noted in the Cons, few of these are thunderous orgasms – some you might hardly notice. They are both self-reported by the girls after the fact, or sometimes reported by one of the members. But since they are not of the Meg Ryan at lunch variety, there is probably less acting going on and more actual releasing.
Finally comes the After Glow and a Shower. With lots of after-action reporting and the girls reliving the best parts of the scene. There is also a zipped photo set with each video.
The tag system is really good. If you go to the advanced filters, all of the tags are displayed so you can easily select one (and also see what options there are). Out of the 1183 videos, here are the counts for some of the tags:
First Anal Ever – 58; First Orgasm – 15; First Sex Toys – 91; Shy – 191; Fisting – 5; High School – 68; Tall – 26; Crying/Tears - 40
They reserve the right to throttle downloading, but I never ran into any restriction, and they don’t specify any. If you sign up via Porn Users, A 2-day trial goes for $1.00. One month is $19.99, rebilling at $19.99. 3 months non-recurring is $75, and one year recurring is $149.99 via PU. ccBill is the payment processor. The addition of two bonus sites makes the value here quite good.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
169 Videos, 129 girls, Weekly updates
Videos range from 1 hour in length to sometimes over 2 hours. 90 minutes is about average
Almost all the girls are really into it, especially the first timers. Several of the first timers have turned into enthusiastic repeat performers.
Lots of girls saying this is their first ever girl-girl – about a quarter of the site
Some of the 18 year olds are still in high school when posing
No stupid story. The girls are here to get paid for having lesbian sex on camera. The action is all real. And we are here to enjoy that.
All videos are available in 4K, 1080, 720 and 480 for downloading. The streaming is done at 720.
Cons:
A small number of what appear to be gay-for-pay (like less than 10 out of the whole site)
Very few thunderous orgasms, although plenty of regular orgasms
Bottom Line:
This has to be one of the top lesbian sites out there.
This is a sister site to Exploited College Girls, Backroom Casting Couch, BBC Surprise, and Hot MILFS Fuck, although none of them are included in this membership. Everything on this site is lesbian action, mostly 2 girls but an occasional threesome. This site started up on April 11, 2023 and has had weekly updates since that time, usually on a Wednesday.
The formula starts with an interview with the girls. This usually last 10 to 15 minutes, and is almost always clothed. Of course there’s no need to be truthful when answering the questions, but I get the feeling that all of them really are. Especially for any girl that is first time girl-girl or first sex on camera or shy, there is a lot of giggling during the interview.
Then they get naked, with plenty of giggling to accompany the jiggling. It’s also charming that women seem to have a compulsion with complementing each other as the clothes come off, something you don’t usually see in boy-girl action. This part usually takes only a minute or two before everybody is totally nude.
There follows the main event, and the sex is quite hot. Each scene has a helpful orgasm count with time stamps in the description, and there is even a count displayed in the video as each one happens. As I noted in the Cons, few of these are thunderous orgasms – some you might hardly notice. They are both self-reported by the girls after the fact, or sometimes reported by one of the members. But since they are not of the Meg Ryan at lunch variety, there is probably less acting going on and more actual releasing. Some of these girls cum a lot. Kelsey Kane is listed as having 32 orgasms in the scene “Saying Fuck Means I am Coming”, Liora Vane has 14 orgasms in the scene “I Love Messy Sex With You”, Liora Vane also has 10 in the scene “My Teacher Asked Me for the Link”, and Ophelia Fae has 10 in the scene “Marking My Territory”. There are also scenes where officially neither girl has an orgasm, so they don’t seem to be inflating that number just for clicks.
Finally comes the After Glow and a Shower. With lots of after-action reporting and the girls reliving the best parts of the scene. There is also a zipped photo set with each video.
The tag system is really good. If you go the advanced search, all of the tags are displayed so you can easily select one (and also see what options there are). Out of the 169 videos, here are the counts for some of the tags:
First Time Les – 44; First 69 – 20; First Sex on Camera – 8; First Orgasm – 3; Shy – 49; Fisting – 10; High School – 23
They reserve the right to throttle downloading, but I never ran into any restriction, and they don’t specify any. If you sign up via Porn Users, A 2-day trial goes for $1.00. One month is $19.99, rebilling at $19.99 (if you skip the PU part, it rebills at $29.99). 3 months non-recurring is $75, and one year recurring is $149.99 via PU, or $199.99 if you just go there directly. ccBill is the payment processor.
This site is highly recommended for anybody interested in lesbian content.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of content - over 2.7 million photos, over 4,300 videos, over 4,800 models
Recent UI redesign is a big improvement
Some real gems in the archives
Weekly video updates on Wednesday – newer vids up to 4K. Around 9 photo updates per month
Streaming video works well
Recent photos are up to 8192 on the long end
The hardcore usually does not include rough sex, more just two people enjoying each other’s company. I prefer that style myself, but I know there is a huge market for rougher stuff.
Cons:
Recent videos are about 75% solo, 25% boy-girl.
Has a captcha when logging in, though it is a simple one, so not a big negative in my mind.
No tags. Search function is pretty basic.
Bottom Line:
I last reviewed this site in 2017, and recently rejoined this past October. From 2017 to then, the UI had not changed at all, and it looked dated even in 2017. Then about 3 months ago, they went through a full redesign, and the new version is a massive improvement over the previous one. So if you’ve joined in the past, it may well be worth a look again.
In addition to the main Teen Dreams site, there are also 11 solo sites included, plus Les Archive. But none of those sites have updated in years.
The redesign really improved the viewing of picture sets online, although for the older sets (like before 2010) the slide show still uses very small pictures. But the more recent ones now have decent thumbnails.
The models are very pretty Eastern European. In the early days they had some real stars on the site, then they got a little more average, but the wow factor on more recent models is moving on up again.
Picture and video quality is very good. Their photographers have a little less imagination than other sites, but at least there is no artsy-fartsy stuff to worry about. And they focus on the girl herself, which is a plus.
I was able to spot a few of my favorite models from years back and enjoyed expanding my collection of those models. The archives date back to 2004, so there is a lot of stuff to look through.
The search function has slightly more than just the basics. You can search on type of action (solo, lesbian, hardcore, amateur or girlfriends), on name, on the first letter of the model�s name, hair color, and breast size.
The regular monthly price is $29.95. The PU discount brings that down to $14.95. Annual are $119.95 and a lifetime is available for $349.95. I picked up a lifetime last fall for $249, which I thought was a good deal even before the web site redesign.
Bottom line – this site has really upped its game. It had been quite stale for the longest time, even though it was still plugging along. If you like a site with pretty girls in mostly softcore pics and vids, this site is definitely worth a look. And if they increased the frequency of updates to daily, then my score would easily move into the 90s.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Sticks with their theme, which is girls in office outfits or uniforms
Lots of topless nudity
Lots of content – 652 models, 1,593 videos, 757,008 images
If you enjoy being teased, you will get plenty of it here
Very well executed site
Both thin and fuller figured ladies
Ages range from teens to forties
Cons:
Not as much full nudity and the nudity that does occur is not explicit at all
Bottom Line:
Only Secretaries is one of the sites in the Only All Sites network. I joined this as a stand-alone site, but it’s also possible to join Only All Sites at a higher price. If you do that, you also get access to Only Tease (the flagship site), Only Silk and Satin, Only Opaques, which are all actively updating and quite large in their own right. These other sites are also included, but no longer updating: Only Costumes, Only Sportswear, Only Carla (solo site), Only Melanie (solo site). This review focuses on Only Secretaries.
The site started up in October 2007 and has been updating regularly since then. Updates come daily, and some times there is a second update on the same day. So you have a big archive plus lots of new material.
As a teasing site focusing on the uniform or office dress style, you will get a number of pictures with the model fully clothed, flirting and showing just a little before going back to SFW. But eventually the clothes do start coming off (at least a little). If you appreciate watching a lady unbutton her blouse, or unzip her skirt, or unhook her bra, then this is the site for you.
The regular price for Only Secretaries is $24.95. 2 months is $44.95, 3 months is $59.95 and 6 months is $99.95. That is the going rate for any of the other sites in the network. Only All sites, starts out at $44.95 for 1 month. If you spend a few minutes poking around on the site, an offer will pop up for the first month at Only All Sites at half price. There are very few other discounts offered here.
One unusual practice is that at the end of a photo set, the model will hold up a package of the stockings or panty hose that she wore for the shoot. One thing less common on this site than an exposed pussy is bare feet. They take their stockings seriously here. Sometimes the feet do get exposed, but that’s only when they are changing socks or stockings and the new ones go on pretty quickly.
One helpful feature is the Site Search, which includes the Nudity Level, which can be Discreetly Nude, Discreetly Topless, Figure Nude, Non-Nude or Topless. Discreetly Topless means the bra does come off, but nipples are not visible, with hands or something else covering those bits. Similar for Discreetly Nude, but the panties come off, and you don’t get a full frontal view.
Even those with Figure Nude are not explicit at all. Legs are very rarely spread open, and there are no close ups between the legs. But you will get at least a glimpse of those fabulous feminine features (most of the time - it seems sets with the model in full pantyhose usually don't take those off). And while I think the classification is generally accurate, it is not 100%.
Using their search, I came up with:
Figure Nude – 1,409 Picture Sets, 407 video sets
Discreetly Nude – 442 picture sets, 63 video sets
Topless – 3,977 picture sets, 1,074 video sets
Discreetly Topless – 204 picture sets, 37 video sets
Non-nude – 127 picture sets, 21 video sets
Here are some examples of other criteria you can search on. You can also combine search terms to really narrow things down. Holdup Stockings – Blue (or whatever color); Breasts – Average, Busty, Enhanced, Natural, Petite; Changing Legwear; Costume – Bunny, Burlesque, Cossack, etc; Boots – Ankle length, knee length, thigh length; Nylons – various colors; Skirts – various lengths or materials
Some models have had quite long careers here. For example Joceline had her first set posted on June 8, 2008 and her most recent was on March 28, 2026, with more on the way.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The annual price is very reasonable - $50 and it does not automatically renew
The teasing is very good
Much of the teasing happens in public
Very few pussy shots – some might make that a negative
Quality photography and videos
This is the only site like it that I have ever subscribed to
Cons:
I tend to like more full nudity with my soft core
Not every model is a 10 – for some that might be a pro, more girl-next-door types here
Bottom Line:
After reading some of the very enthusiastic reviews for this site, I had to give it a shot. I’m certainly glad that I did. For me it’s not in my top 5 list of sites, but it is still very good, and this is a unique offering in the world of porn.
This site loves to build anticipation, not just within a set, but across sets. Almost always, the first time a girl appears, she stays clothed throughout, except for some flashes here and there. Now you have to wait if you want to see more – and it’s not a sure thing when the next appearance will be. Sometimes it’s a day or two between sets, and I have seen it go over month before the second set appears.
The vast majority of the models are amateurs, but there are more than a few that have done a significant amount of porn work at other sites, both before appearing here and after. The amateurs can range from shy to outgoing. It’s charming when a girl is really trying to decide whether or not to remove the panties. You can also see her exhilaration once they are off and it’s just her and nothing else.
TBP categorizes the site as Non-Nude, and I don’t think I’d agree with that. There is a significant amount of nudity overall, although many sets have none at all. But that’s usually building the anticipation of waiting for the reveal, and really, that’s one of the charms of the site. It’s the “darn, I wish I could see more of her” and then finally getting the chance to do so.
I think in the early days, non-nude might have been an accurate label, but even the photographer says that has changed over time.
From his About:
“Do all these women get completely naked and show everything?
No. I created Zishy with the focus being on tease. Over the years, I have worked with more and more women who are comfortable with nudity, but I still avoid any explicit open-leg material. Bare vagina is beautiful, I just prefer to leave something to the imagination.”
Some of the commenters get annoying when they complain about not enough pussy shots. They need to learn that a woman is more than just the stuff that surrounds a vagina.
Because of the complaining mentioned above, recent years have focused more on pussy shots, with the girls contorting themselves into strange positions to grant the desired view.
This is a softcore or glamcore site, so you are getting very little beyond close-ups (which are not in every scene)
Bottom Line:
I’ve already reviewed a number of sites in the MetArt network, but surprisingly I’ve never reviewed the flagship site. So here’s my take.
If you like looking at beautiful, naked women, this is the site for you. Everything about this site is excellent. The women are beautiful, the photography and videography are high quality, navigation is good, tech support is good. All softcore sites should aspire to be like this one.
Ladies with the most appearances: Suzanna A (139), Candice B (100), Zelda B (85), Anna AJ (82), Clarice (81), Sybil A (81), Sapphira A (79), Mia Sollis (79), Nikia A (77), Sharon E (74). The latest videos are available in 4K, the oldest (from 2000) Top out at 360p SD. For photos, the largest top out at 6720 on the long end.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
NOTE: RABBITS REVIEWS IS CURRENTLY OFFERING A LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP FOR $199. I paid $500 for my lifetime membership in 2017 and couldn’t be happier with it.
Regular pricing for MetArt is $29.99 per month. The standard PU discount is usually $19.99 per month. During the holiday season they are offering a $9.99 special, and that will almost certainly be offered again during major holidays. Over on RR the special price as of today is $5.00 per month.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large site with frequent updates.
1255 Models, 3694 Photo Galleries, 1202 videos.
Met Art management and tech support, which is always excellent.
Cons:
Mix of both old and new content. Quality varies, especially with the older content. New content is from Thierry Murrell.
The stuff being recycled from justteensite.com isn’t as high quality as the newer stuff, or the stuff originally posed on this site before the changeover from Antonio Clemens to Thierry Murrell.
Bottom Line:
This site is run and supported by MetArt (but not a part of MetArt Network) and where all the material provided here is from Thierry Murrell. When it started up, it was all material sourced from Antonio Clemens.
Updates are quite frequent, ranging from 1 to 4 updates per day. Mostly softcore stuff, but occasional boy-girl and girl-girl. The solo sets are mostly just stripping and posing nude, but some masturbation also appears. To me, the solo, just nude stuff is the best part of the site. But YMMV.
A lot of these sets are clearly older. Models that are now in their 40s are appearing with new sets and looking as young as they did in their first appearances. I’ve been able to confirm that a lot of these sets first appeared on justteensite.com, a site that went under a few years ago. But there is also newer stuff coming in.
“Antonio Clemens” is a pseudonym for Alexander Ovchinnikov. When Stunning 18 first started up, all the stuff appearing on this site was from Antonio Clemens. This guy’s work also appeared elsewhere under the Henry Sharpe pseudonym and Thierry Murrell pseudonym. It’s also true that not everything published under those names was photographed by Alexander Ovchinnikov – so they are sort of an agency name for multiple photographers. (Antonio Clemens is only Alexander Ovchinnikov).
I reviewed this site back in 2018, and was quite a fan of it. Then suddenly, all the new postings stopped, without warning or explanation. A few years later I was looking at the blog on AntonioClemens.com. Around that time in 2018 he posted a screed accusing Met Art (which publishes Stunning 18) of improper behavior and threatening legal action. I assume that legal action did not lead anywhere based on how things have proceeded since then.
So all that stuff up above I’m pretty sure is factual. The following stuff is my speculation. I think when justteensite went under, MetArt bought the content, and is now re-publishing it here at Stunning18. I believe Thierry Murrell was a primary source for the stuff published on justteensite.com. I’m guessing that Alexander Ovchinnikov wanted to be compensated again by MetArt for the stuff purchased from justteensite.com and MetArt countered that no, you got paid the first time, so we don’t need to pay you again. That led to the final rift between Antonio Clemens and MetArt and the site’s new direction.
Anyhow, back to the current situation. Ladies with the most appearances: Martina A (186), Isabella (64), Brigitta F (57), Nicole (56), Yana F (50), Natasha S (49), Irene (48), Melena A (42), Avril A (42), Olya N (36), Anoushka E (33), Annett A (31), Delilah G (30), and Anjelica (28). Irene is a personal favorite of mine who only has a small handful of appearances on any other site.
The standard monthly price is $29.99, and annual are $99.99. The PU discount brings the monthly down to $19.99. Around holidays you can expect to find discounted pricing down to $9.99 a month.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
With any of these satellite sites in the MA network, the general recommendation is to join Met Art first, since it is the flagship site. But if just Met Art alone isn’t enough for you, then Stunning18 would be a highly recommended addition to your subscription package.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautiful girls, beautifully photographed.
All the good navigation and tech support you can expect from a Met Art network site.
A very fine soft core site.
More than enough good stuff to justify a monthly membership
Cons:
Recent changes make it indistinguishable from the sister sites DOMAI, Erotic Beauty, or Errotica-Archives.
Only 2 updates a week, on Monday and Friday.
Bottom Line:
This is a very enjoyable soft core site. I last reviewed this site in 2018, and not a lot has changed. The biggest change is the less frequent updates, but the overall style of the site is basically the same.
Years ago, this was a sister site to DOMAI, which was run by Eolake Stubblehose. DOMAI was a very tame site, basically the tamest site you could have with full nudity. Goddess Nudes was largely created as a place to show some of the slightly more explicit shots, where the girls opened their legs. As Eolake’s health failed, he sold both sites to Met Art. For a few years the 2 sites continued following that pattern, and both sites updated 5 days a week.
At some point, this changed. Updates went down to 2 per week on each site. In addition, the four sister sites of DOMAI, Goddess Nudes, Errotica-Archives, and Erotic Beauty became indistinguishable from each other. Then during Covid, the four sites were used to post some older stuff that had never made it to being published. That wasn’t a bad thing, because a lot of these sets were more than good enough for publishing. But then they would push out some other photos from the same shoot to a different site. Sometimes that even happened a third time. At least each time they published the photos were slightly different from each other, but this was really milking it, in my opinion.
If you’ve never joined here before, there is a lot of good stuff to peruse. No download limits or DRM, and good speeds most of the time. (Some times the sites will slow down and even stop, but after an hour or two everything is back to normal).
3,110 photo galleries, 1,279 models, 162 artists
No videos at all, except for the “Staff Selections”, which are an extra charge.
Met Art does offer lifetime memberships on its company owned sites (including Goddess Nudes), running from $500 per site. You do need to join one of the network sites first to be presented this option – it never appears on the general sign-up page. But once you have joined one site you can either upgrade that one to lifetime or pick a different one. As an incentive they also will throw in a one-year membership to any other site in the network.
Monthly memberships run $29.99, and annual memberships are $99.99. The PU discount is typically $19.99. During holiday periods (like Christmas, Valentine’s Day, Easter, etc.) the site is usually discounted to $9.99 a month. For 10 bucks this is a worthwhile join for anybody that likes this content. 30 bucks a month is pricey for the value.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Stunningly beautiful women. Really stunning.
Very high quality photography
Lots of variation in locales. Many of the pictures would be interesting on their own even if there wasn’t a beautiful naked woman also in the picture.
Billing is via ccBill. PayPal is also an option.
480,211 images and 811 videos.
Cons:
Updates are only every other day. Also, some shoots are divided in 2, so it kind of feels almost like they are 4 days apart.
Bottom Line:
One of the best softcore sites anywhere, with a large catalog. The models are all stunningly beautiful. Almost all of them probably come from Eastern Europe.
They must be doing something right to keep their models happy, as some of them have really large portfolios, and several of the ones on this list are still active. For example: Stefani (226 photo sets, 16 videos), Karissa Diamond (102 phot sets, 128 videos), Anya (177 photo sets, 13 videos), Alisa (137 photo sets, 46 videos), Talia (166 photo sets, 7 videos), Avery (143 phot sets, 10 videos), Lana Lane (135 photo sets, 6 videos), Lilya (138 photo sets, 5 videos), Aristeia (134 Photo Sets, no videos), Maria (129 photo sets, 1 video), Mila (96 photo sets, 18 videos), Aria (105 photo sets, no videos. You might know these ladies by other names – this site seems to select names that are unique to this site (that is more true for the models that appeared earlier in this site’s history).
All the videos since 2011 are available in 1920x1080. Older videos are in lower resolution, but would have been state of the art at the time they were released. The oldest set on the site dates from 9/9/2003, so there is a lot to look at here.
If I had to pick one site as having the very best photography, this would be the one. It only updates about 1/8 as much as Met Art, or half as much as Femjoy, but on a one-picture-at-a-time basis I’d give this one the top marks.
I do wish they had daily updates, or if not that, at least stop splitting a shoot into two posts.
Pricing starts at $29.95 for one month, $59.95 for 3 months, or $99.95 for a year. I have not seen any deviation from that pricing for quite some time. So if you’re waiting for a discount I’m not sure that one will ever come.
Going to daily updates would bump their score to 95. But even as it now stands, I am quite happy with my annual membership and plan to renew when the time comes.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Unique angle on mostly softcore.
I love watching the long hair flowing as they swim.
No DRM or Download limits
Nice use of feminine flotation devices
Cons:
The last 26 updates are all above water.
2 weeks between updates.
Bottom Line:
This used to be a truly unique site, where you could watch videos of a girl swimming with a loose fitting dress or a swim suit or bikini, then eventually stripping out of it, and then frolicking for a bit under water. This produced a very graceful mesmerizing scene where you could simply admire their feminine beauty. I say “used to be” because as I noted in the cons, all 26 of the most recent activity has been fully above water. But there are a couple hundred videos that work very well with the theme that their intro leads you to believe would be the core of the site. And, well, it used to be the core of the site.
For those underwater shoots, I found one of the things that I enjoyed the most was the way their hair would flow with them or around them if they were twisting in the water. That’s one thing that stands out for under water shoots versus up on dry land.
At some point they started doing shoots near the water, rather than actually under water. They might start out standing in the pool, but they walk out to do their stripping and masturbating or fucking, whatever that scene involves.
For a while, the underwater shoots were video only. At some point they added actual photography, but curiously, even when the video is mostly under water, all the photos were taken with the photographer above water.
Of course, all the girls are actual humans and not mermaids, so there is only so long they can hold their breath underwater before surfacing for air. That does tend to break up the scene.
You can tell that some of them are really enjoying it, while for some it seems at the end they are glad it is over and where can I get my money. So that part is hit or miss. But a fair number of girls have multiple appearances, and those all seem to relish the experience.
There are a handful of boy-girl and girl-girl scenes. Some involve the participants wearing breathing masks so they can stay under water for the duration of the shoot. So if that’s one of your fetishes you won’t want to miss them. They didn’t do much for me however.
The archive is pretty extensive, and more than enough content for a one month membership. Downloads are easy and there are no limits or DRM. If the idea of watching pretty girls swim naked is intriguing I would recommend a sign-up.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Over 500 photo sets and almost as many videos.
All the videos are available in both 1080 and a smaller resolution. Newer ones are also in 4K.
No download limits that I can see, no DRM.
The photo and video quality is excellent.
Cons:
Rudimentary web design, but it's not as bad as some of the older reviews make it
Updates come once a week, on Fridays.
The very oldest sets are photos only.
No model index, although you can search by model name
No dates on the sets themselves, but you can see that they have done weekly updates at least since May of this year.
Bottom Line:
This is a niche site, but I don’t think I’d call it a fetish site. Their front page states that these are gymnasts, ballerinas, and dancers, and that is 100% believable. Many do excellent en pointe ballet. They are not only flexible but strong and athletic, but also quite feminine – no bulging muscles. They are all graceful movers.
The vast majority of the content is solo soft core, and consists of a model starting clothed, then eventually ending up naked or nearly so (keeping on a tutu is not that unusual). Throughout the video she will be stretching every part of their body one way or another. Full leg splits are simply the entry level stuff for these ladies. Many can stretch well beyond 180 degrees. Some are so flexible as to qualify as contortionists. And it’s a given that they are not pussy shy when their legs are opened so wide and easy.
There are a few boy-girl sets, and they bring to reality some of the things that are likely going through your imagination as you view the nude stretching.
I was a little surprised to see some of my favorites from other sites appear here – for example Sade Mare appears as Galina Markova, Sofi Roko as Musya Gnutaja, Melena A as Marusya Mechta.
If this sounds like it would be interesting to you, I would highly recommend joining. I’m not going to be a long term member here, but I’m very well pleased with the time I have been here. I signed up for their newsletter before joining, and they offered me a discount from the regular 24 Euro price. A bonus is that once you join, they offer a 50% discount to members for the sister site UnderwaterShow (which I will review shortly too). Billing was through Vxs Bill.
Errotica Archives is another site in the Met Art network. Originally it was a site for the single photographer Erro, who also posted frequently at Met Art, but it is now a multi-photographer site. Erro last posted to this site in 2021.
I last reviewed the site in 2017, and back then it was doing daily updates. That has changed to now only do 2 updates per week, on Wednesday and Friday.
What I always considered one of the biggest strengths of this site was the long term relationship some of the models had with the site. That was true during the time this was exclusively a site run by Erro, but that is no longer the case.
Really, it’s hard to tell this site apart from its sister sites of Domai, Goddess Nudes, or Erotic Beauty. All four of these sites are now multi-photographer, and all four post updates twice a week. They also frequently share postings from the same photo shoot. For example, Errotica Archives might post, say 40-60 of the photos from a shoot. Then a month or two later (or sometimes years later) Erotic Beauty might post a different 40-60 of the photos from the same shoot. So strictly speaking, there is no overlap – none of the exact photos in the first release appear in the second release. The poses are slightly different from one set to the next, but they were obviously all taken at the same shoot.
Almost all of the photo sets and videos involve solo girls, and the ones that have two or more are just nude girls near one another. No sexual activity is going on.
The girls are very beautiful, rarely shy, and photographed with great technical skill. The site performs well.
When I reviewed this in 2017, the model count was 319. As of today it is up to 1057. There are now 84 artists with stuff posted here, compared to the one when the site was first founded. 5023 Photo Galleries, still posting 2 updates per week. 644 videos, but the last new one was posted in 2018. The oldest stuff dates back to 2004.
The PU discount of $19.99 for a month is a good value. Annual memberships go for $99.99. As of today’s review, there is a sale on for $9.95 per month. These sales pop up pretty regularly during US holidays. If you miss this one, the next one will probably be at Thanksgiving.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 to $800 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it is pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it is not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
You should certainly find plenty of material here to occupy yourself for a full month if you take the plunge. And if any of your old favorites have an extensive representation here, you will think that you hit the jackpot.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Prior to their move from Australia, this site was one of the very best anywhere. The stuff in their archives from this period is extraordinary.
After you logon, in the top right, it tells you how many days until your next rebill.
Lots of content – 1984 models, 7049 shoots.
Cons:
Starting in June 2023, they stopped making any new shoots. This is announced on their internal forum. They are still posting one update a week, but the backlog will have to run dry at some point.
The regular monthly subscription is expensive, and the discount for longer terms is minimal.
Updates are only 1 per week.
Many models have had their content removed, at their request.
You need to give 7 days notice to cancel your subscription rebill. But otherwise it was easy.
Bottom Line:
I have to give credit to KayTBuffs for talking me into signing up for this site again, and I am super glad I did.
Providing a score for this site is kind of tough. For the version in Australia (up to 2010), I’d give it 100. It was darn near perfect. For the version in Europe up to 2023 (while they were still doing photo shoots), I’d give it 88. For the most recent version, I’d give it an 80.
Especially during the period where they were based in Australia, the site emphasized fun more than anything else. It didn’t have to necessarily be sexual fun, just naked fun (the best kind)! I think they also got some of their models via a couple of girl friends (not necessarily lesbian lovers, just girls that are friends) who would sign up along the lines of “I’ll do it if you’ll do it.” There are a lot of girls with only one shoot and then they are done – they got the rush of thousands of paying customers signing up to look at their naked body, hopefully enjoyed their time in the buff, and have returned to normal life.
I think part of the attraction for a site like this is that most of these women fall into the category of “pretty” rather than “super model”. These girls feel like they are in my league – like if I asked them out they’d probably say yes, assuming they are currently not in a relationship. And based on the fun they are having in their photo shoot, I’d expect to have fun with them on a date.
Models can request that their content be removed. Abby Winters will honor that request, although if they appear in a group, then that content will usually still be on line. As a human being, I can certainly understand this and applaud them for doing so. Their sets go back to 2000, so some of these ladies are now mothers with kids in school, and it can definitely be awkward for junior to have his/her classmates comment on Mom’s porn career. But as a porn purchaser, it is disappointing to see that some of my favorites no longer appear on the site.
One thing I enjoyed as I looked through the archives, the Girls Down Under tended to keep their feminine furriness intact Down There. So many beautiful bushes in one place was a real treat.
There are over 3000 different tags you can search on. It isn’t obvious how to get to the Advanced Search though. The search bar on the main page will only search for models by name. But you can type in just about anything, and when it comes back with nothing found, they will present some random shoots for you to look at. There is now also an Advanced button, and if you click that button, you will have more options.
Alternatively, go to abbywinters.com/tags and you will get a (very long) list of every tag that has been used as a tag on the site. You can break that down a little bit, by Model Tags, Shoot Tags, Video Tags, or Image Tags. Then click on a tag, and it shows you everything that had that tag applied. These are mostly user-supplied tags, and spelling (and misspelling) matters. For example clicking on the Model Tag for “fair skin” returned 240 models. Of course, a model might actually have fair skin but not be tagged this way, or she doesn’t have fair skin so was tagged incorrectly. But it’s not a bad feature to check out.
The ”fetishes” section is a nice feature. “We call activities and aspects of our models "fetishes" because we cannot think of a better word.” These are curated collections centered around something like Girls in Dresses, Topless in Jeans, Tan Lines, Natural Redhead, Glasses on Naked Girls, Full Body Standing Nude, Large Natural Breasts, Tiny Breasts, Rubenesque, etc.
The Boy-Girl stuff on the site is pretty unique – these are actual real-life boyfriend and girlfriend.
Some porn royalty have appeared on the site. Katya Clover (as Caramel S), Ryana, Eve Sweet to name a few.
A pointer – when you go to sign up, scroll down a bit on the home page to find the Deal of the Day. These deals rotate every 24 hours. Most of the time it offers 10% off on a membership. Some times it offers bonus credits in case you would rather buy only a few sets rather than do a full membership. And occasionally there will be an offer for buy one month, get a second month free – that is the one I used when I signed up.
Bottom line – I highly recommend this site to anyone, especially if you can get the buy-one-month-get-one-free deal. No telling how much longer this site will be around.
Also , a bit of history:
2010 – The Company was charged and found guilty of “producing material a reasonable adult might find offensive,” a crime in the state of Victoria (Australia). This caused them to relocate business and staff to the Netherlands. Also starting in 2010, all videos were released in HD1080. Then starting in 2020, videos were released in 4K.
Daily updates, sometimes a couple extra each week. 1 video each week
They replaced their more-annoying-than-most captcha with what looks like a Cloudflare to show you are human. I use Firefox for my browser and have never had an issue with this.
The site is quite stable and download speeds are solid.
Cons:
Still some technical glitches, although much better than for the review I wrote a while ago. Several models have no thumbnail on the model page, even though all their sets and videos appear to be fine.
I don’t think they have any videos in 4K, which is fine with me as I usually download at 720, but that could be a drawback for some of you. All the more recent videos have at least 1080 as an option
Bottom Line:
I last reviewed this site in 2017. It hasn’t really changed that much since then, except for adding many more photos, videos and models since that time.
I’ve signed up for the annual membership several times over the years, and have always been quite happy with my purchase. I just finished my most recent year and I’m still a happy camper, and I will be back again soon. I wish they offered a lifetime membership, but unfortunately they don’t. The annual price of $79.95 is quite reasonable. The regular monthly charge is $29.95 but there are frequent sales for $14.95 per month.
This is a very solid soft core site, with excellent photography and videography. The archives contain many beauties that are simply breathtaking. I felt that in the past 12 months the number of OMG sets was not as high as in other years, but of course a lot of that depends on personal taste. Every girl on the site is at minimum beautiful. Out of the nearly 2000 models on the site, I added 334 to my Favorites and downloaded every photo gallery and video of each of these ladies onto my hard drive.
If you like soft core you definitely want to spend at least one month on this site. For me, whenever I do sign up I do the annual sub, and I have never regretted it. I’d rate Met Art a little higher just on volume alone, but this is an outstanding site in the soft core genre.
Gamma manages the site now, and cancellation was quite easy.
I last reviewed this site in 2018. The general style of the site has not changed much at all, but the update frequency has dropped sharply, down to 2 updates per week, on Saturday and Sunday.
Erotic Beauty is a sister site in the Met Art network. It was previously named Met Art Models. The updates on the current incarnation of the site date back to 2005. Its core competency is soft core nude photography.
Back in the day, each of Erotic Beauty, DOMAI, Goddess Nudes, and Errotica Archives were somewhat distinctive. But the original owner of DOMAI and Goddess Nudes is no longer with us, and while Erro is still photographing for Met Art, the site named after him is no longer exclusively posting his work. So each of these four sites is now posting only twice a week, and there is no theme to distinguish one site from the next.
Erotic Beauty generally has a feeling of being a landing spot for sets that, for whatever reason, were not placed on Met Art itself. This does not mean that the content isn’t good, although overall I would say the stuff on Met Art averages out to higher quality than the stuff on Erotic Beauty. There are fewer models you’d rank a 9 or 10 on EB as opposed to MA. Maybe more at EB would be called ”pretty” than “gorgeous”. But my absolute favorite photo gallery, with Lisabelle, is found on Erotic Beauty.
One issue I have is the considerable overlap with DOMAI, which has now extended to Goddess Nudes and Errotica Archives. For example, say a photographer goes out with a model and takes 500 pictures at a single shoot. Then maybe 50 or 60 of those will be posted on DOMAI in a set. Then a few months later, a slightly different 50 or 60 photos from the same shoot will be posted on Erotic Beauty. (Sometimes EB gets them first, sometimes DOMAI. And now there might be a third set on Goddess Nudes and a fourth set on Errotica Archives). This can actually be a good thing if you really loved a particular shoot with a model, since it gets you more photos of that girl. But it does feel a bit like you are being taken advantage of when you come across something like this.
EB would also sometimes post 40 pics from one shoot, and then later 40 more from the same shoot, and sometimes even a third posting from the same shoot. This was quite common a few years ago, but is pretty rare now from what I can tell.
While the site does not loudly proclaim itself as an all-natural site, the covers for their photo sets all bear the mark “EroticBeauty.com Naturally Beautiful Amateur Nudes”. And I think there are very few models with breast enhancements on this site.
The site navigation and style is very similar to Met Art, which in my opinion is excellent. Favorites, comments, all the stuff you would expect. Browsing and download speeds are good.
I’ve seen other reviews mention something about the navigation, and not being able to paginate through easily when browsing. One way to get around this is once you see something like ‘page01’ at the end of the URL, you can replace the 01 with any page number you want and so jump to the middle of the series.
The Met Art network offers lifetime memberships on most of their sites now, usually priced at $500 per site. It only seems to be available to you if you have already joined one of the sites, but once you do, you can sign up for a lifetime membership for any of the sites in the network. Obviously it’s pricey, but if you really like one of the sites the idea of paying once and never having to think about it again is attractive. Plus it’s not that hard to rack up $500 in billing on the pay-as-you go plans if you really like a site. They will also throw in a 1-year membership to a second MA site with any lifetime subscription. And then you no longer need to madly download material before your month expires, and you can spend more time just enjoying the sights.
I’ve also seen them offering specials on lifetime memberships, such as $200 for a site, so if you can get on their mailing list that might also happen (or might not). I’ve also seen them offer most of the MA network (10 sites, excluding Rylsky Art, Eternal Desire, ALS Scans and Stunning 18) with a lifetime membership of 699.99. Again, no idea if this will ever come up again.
Regular pricing for Erotic Beauty is 29.99 per month, or 99.99 per year. The PU discount brings it down to 19.99 per month. Right now there is a July 4 special going for 9.99 per month. These types of discounts usually occur around holidays. The next one might be Labor Day, or possibly not until Thanksgiving.
The bottom line is there is more than enough content here to keep you busy for a month. If you enjoy softcore content, this is a site you should give a look. After you have already joined the flagship Met Art site.
Reasonable pricing, especially on a lifetime membership
Cons:
Older videos in SD, but that was state-of-the-art at the time they were created
There are plenty of studios where I have no interest at all, but on the plus side, you can hide some of them, or else make a list of your favorites and then only concentrate on those faves.
Pricing is in Euros, so you will have currency exchange considerations when signing up.
Bottom Line:
This is now my favorite large network site. Even after eliminating the stuff I am not interested in, there is still a huge portfolio of stuff that I am loving.
I know most reviewers praise Adult Time for its navigation, but for me, Adult Prime is much easier to get around. But maybe that’s just the way my mind works.
Current PU pricing is 19.99 Euros for 1 month, 69.99 Euros for 1 year, and 299 Euros for lifetime.
There are currently 149 “studios”, but not all of them are actually part of Adult Prime. Several are listed as “Bonus” or “VIP”. Bonus Sites give you a sample of the content from that bonus site. Usually it’s a video that you can stream, but not download. The VIP sites are really nothing more than a link to be able to sign up for that site.
My favorite studios include Club Sweethearts, Digital Desire, Perfect 18, and Lesbian Summer. I might do a separate review at some point of one or two of these studios.
Some of the studios are actually quite large on their own, and could easily be successful as a stand-alone site. Many others are small. Some are actively updating, most are not.
Here is the list of Actual Adult Prime Studios (99 by my count):
Note: Sites with *TBP after the name have a separate review on TheBestPorn
4K CFNM *TBP, Adult Prime Originals, Arousins *TBP, bAmateurs *TBP, BB Video *TBP, Beauty and the Senior, Bi Fuck *TBP, Bionixx, Bondagettes *TBP, Bound Men Wanked, Brasil Bimbos *TBP, Breed Bus *TBP, Club Bang Boys *TBP, Club Castings, Club Sweethearts *TBP, Cockin, Cuckoldest *TBP, Damn Tight, Daring Sex HD, Desi Bang , Digital Desire *TBP, Dirty Gunther, Dirty Hospital, Distorted, Elegant Raw *TBP, Evil Playgrounds, Family Screw *TBP, Fan Fuckers, Fetish Prime *TBP, Flxxxion, Fresh POV, Fucking Skinny, Gender Flux *TBP, Gonzo 2000, Good Morning Sex, Granddadz *TBP, Grandmams *TBP, GrandparentsX *TBP, Group Banged *TBP, Group Mams *TBP, Groupsex Games *TBP, Hardcore Holiday *TBP, Hollandisch Passie, Hot TS *TBP, Industry Invaders *TBP, Interraced, Jim Slip *TBP, Jims Classics, King BBC *TBP, Lady Lyne *TBP, Lara’s Playground *TBP, Lesbian Summer *TBP, Lets Go Bi *TBP, Mams Casting, Man Up Films *TBP, Manalized *TBP, Manko 88 *TBP, Massage Sins, Mature Van, Mucha Sexo *TBP, My Milfz *TBP, My Sexy Kittens, Nice and Slutty, Nylon Flix, Old Hans, Oldie X, Original JAV, Pawg Queen *TBP, Peep Leak, Peg Him, Perfect 18, Plumperd *TBP, Pornstar Classics *TBP, Pornstars Live, Prime 3DX *TBP, Prime Lesbian, Raw Euro *TBP, Redlight Sex Trips, Salsa XXX, Sensual Heat, Shadow Slaves *TBP, Sinful Raw *TBP, Sinful Soft, Sinful XXX *TBP, Southern Sins *TBP, Submissed, Summer Sinners *TBP, Sweet Femdom *TBP, Sweethearts Classics *TBP, SWhores, Teen RS, The Pain Files *TBP, Tranny Bizarre, Trans Happy *TBP, UK Flashers *TBP, Vlaamische Passie, VR Teensrs, Wankrs, Young Busty
Each video is accompanied with a photo set from the same episode, but these are actual photos – not screen grabs
Very reasonable pricing – current PU discount is $14.98 for 30 days, (I got it for $9.95, so better discounts do occasionally pop up) and 1 year is available for $84
Cons:
Updates aren’t that frequent – there were 9 videos posted in April 2025, and 9 matching photo sets
There is a story to each video, but they usually dispense with that within the first two minutes. So if stories matter to you, this probably won’t be satisfying.
Bottom Line:
Nubile Films is a worthy entry in mainstream hardcore porn. There is a huge library of content, the girls are very attractive, the action is quite believable.
Nubile Films is a sister site with Nubiles Porn and Nubiles.net – but the subscriptions are completely separate, and subscribing to Nubile Films does not provide you any access to Nubiles.net. Nubiles.net is one of the biggest and best sites around, so it’s unfortunate you don’t get access to it with this membership. But comparing just Nubiles Porn by itself to Nubile Films, I prefer Nubile Films slightly more. Probably the biggest reason is the presence of Girls Only Porn in the Nubile Films stable – I really enjoy lesbian content.
Nubile Films is a compilation of 5 sites. You can seamlessly move among these sites: Nubile Films – mostly boy-girl action, and the bulk of the scenes fall under this moniker
Girls Only Porn – lesbian and solo girl content
NF Busty – mostly boy-girl action, but the women all have larger breasts
Hot Crazy Mess – no longer updating (last update 2019) – taboo porn
That Sitcom Show – no longer updating (last update 2019) – parodies of existing sit-coms, complete with laugh track, but with added sex
Videos can be downloaded in up to 4K. Even the oldest video from 2012 is available in Full HD. Photos have a max resolution of 6000x4000 pixels. The oldest photo session from 2012 has a max resolution of 5616x3744. I am not aware of any download limits.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very high quality videos and photos
Most videos have an actual story
The videos can be lengthy – some times an hour long
Most videos available in 4K
540+ videos, each video has an accompanying photo gallery
310+ female performers
The PU Discount Price of $12.95 for a month
Cons:
The files are very large – 2 to 3 GB for 720p video
Downloads are limited to 25 per week
One update per week
Vixen stand-alone site is just boy-girl, with varying numbers of boys and girls in a video.
Bottom Line:
The glamour is turned up to Eleventy on this site. It reminds me of the 80’s TV Series Dynasty. Locales, scenery, lighting, makeup, dresses, even the stunt cocks are all dressed to the nines at the start of the episode.
The main reason I joined was because Kelly Collins has some Boy-Girl scenes here, which as far as I know Vixen is the only network that has that with her. Everything else I’ve seen with Kelly Collins is either solo or lesbian. That hardcore content did not disappoint.
Each video has a significant story, and some of the stories stretch across several episodes, and even across some of the sister sites. If a story does have multiple episodes, they do not come out together, one per week, but are usually spread out at least a month apart between episodes.
The sister sites in the network are: Blacked, Blacked Raw, Tushy, Tushy Raw, Deeper, Slayed, Milfy and Wifey. You can join them individually, which is how I would probably proceed, or you can sign up for the whole network, Vixen+. The PU price is $59.95 per month for the network. One thing I’m not sure about – if you sign up for Vixen+, is the download limit 25 files PER SITE per week, or is it 25 per month for the whole network. I only joined Vixen so haven’t tried downloading from multiple sites in the same month.
Even with a download limit of 25 per week, you can download 100 episodes in the course of a 30 day membership, which is almost 20% of the entire site, so they are not holding back all that much from you. And if you like it that much, the price is reasonable enough to sign up again for a second month.
The site is easy to cancel, but be sure to save the email they sent you when you signed up – it’s much easier to cancel if you have that info handy.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Depending on how you join, Includes full access to 4 sites – WowGirls, WowPorn, AllFineGirls, and UltraFilms (some join links might only get you 2 or 3 sites)
Very reasonable pricing – PU discount is $17.95 for a month, or $69.95 for a year – and I definitely recommend a yearly one
Many videos in 4K, 6K or even 8k, and either 30 fps or 60 fps.
Some of the top models have A LOT of content.
They take their time, including lots of foreplay
Some girls have an incredible amount of content
Cons:
You can’t set your own password
Unsurprisingly, the super high resolution and refresh rate on some files makes them BIG.
Bottom Line:
Putting “Wow” in the name of the site makes a lot of sense – I’ve been saying Wow a lot when looking at a photo set or video I haven’t seen before.
Most shoots (but not all) involve both a photo gallery and a video. The photo gallery will come first, and the video can be a day or two later or sometimes weeks later. Usually the two sets will have the same name, but not always.
For all practical purposes, WowPorn, AllFineGirls and WowGirls are now basically the same site. You can log into each of them with the same user ID and password, but when I browse them, I can’t see any difference among the three. Videos and Photos are still stamped with only one of these site names, but the layout of the 3 sites is basically now identical.
Ultra Films requires a different password from the other site, and it does have a different layout. The thumbnails are bigger, and the site just feels newer. But among the 4 sites, I can’t really detect anything to differentiate them in terms of content. WowGirls updates daily, and Ultra Films averages about 3 updates per week.
All 4 sites have a mixture of scenes: some solo softcore, some solo masturbation, some lesbian, some boy-girl. A few have multiple girls in them. Many of the scenes are also quite lengthy, sometimes pushing an hour in length.
If you combine the appearances of some models among all 4 sites, some of them appear incredibly often. Nancy A has over 400 appearances, Anjelica over 300, Gina Gerson over 200, Nancey 199, Paula Shy over 150, Hayli Sanders and Sybil 150 each, Mila Azul over 140, Leona Mia over 130, etc. That suggests to me either they pay incredibly well, or else they just have the knack of keeping a girl happy enough to keep coming back for more.
There are also 3 newer sister sites, Angels.love, Nancy.love, and Sensual.love. If you are a member of Wowgirls then the sign-up to each of these is $9.95 for a month. I haven’t partaken yet but they look very interesting. For Angels.love, all the scenes feature at least 2 girls plus a guy. For Nancy.love, every scene includes Nancy A, and supposedly none of that content appears in the main four sites. And Sensual.love is lesbian.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large amount of content – 258 models, 1551 photo galleries, 362 videos
Updates come every third day, so usually you get 10 per month
The Babes are gorgeous
Very high quality photography
A little more explicit than Met Art
Cons:
I’d really like to see this get back to every-other day for content – every third day feels kind of light
Full page ad on each logon – easy enough to click past
Bottom Line:
I reviewed this site back in 2018, and this is my first time back since then. The site has grown a lot in terms of numbers, about double what it was back then. But it is still a site featuring the photographer Arkisi. The models are still gorgeous, the network still runs very efficiently, the navigation is still good. Really nothing to complain about.
The site is maintained by Met Art, but technically it is not part of the Met Art Network. So if you join the full Met Art Network, you get 10 sites, but not this one. (That also applies to Rylsky Art, Stunning 18, and ALS Scan – the editorial content is controlled by the artist for those sites, while the technical part of running and maintaining the site is done by Met Art)
I think the content is still slightly more explicit than that on Met Art – a little more spreading, a little more fingering, a few more toys. It is 99% solo content.
There isn’t a lot of striptease action on this site – I’d say more than half of the photo sets begin with the model fully nude. The videos do start with a little more clothing, but even if they have some clothes on, it isn’t a lot – like just a bathrobe or just pjs.
The models with the most appearances include: Mila (66), Nancy A (40), Gloria Sol (38), Loretta A (34), Elina (31), Serena Wood (29), Nika N (29), Keira B (28), Lisa Dawn (28), Dita V (27).
The regular monthly price is $29.99. The standard PU discount runs at $19.99, and there are fairly frequent specials for $9.99 for a month, followed by $19.99 recurring. Billing is with Rocket Gate, but PayPal is also an option. It is very easy to cancel when the time comes. Annual is $99 per year, and a lifetime sub is offered at $500 (which also includes a bonus where you can select a second site in the MA network to get a 1-year sub).
If you enjoy soft core glamour photography you should absolutely pick up a one month subscription when it is offered for $10.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The site is big. 2,200+ videos, 2,100+ photos, 1,100+ female models.
Membership also includes Nubiles.net. This site requires a separate logon, but the same user ID and password works on both.
There is a wide variety of themes, which are broken down into “Series”, such as Moms Teach Sex, Family Swap, and Step Siblings Caught. There’s also some pretty straight forward boy-girl action
Cons:
No lesbian content at all as far as I can tell. Although if it’s 2 girls 1 guy then the girls do spend a little time with each other.
Every logon starts with a full page of ads, and ads are quite prevalent throughout the site.
Bottom Line:
This is a pretty standard hard core boy-girl site. There is a heavy emphasis on things like goofy setups, which they break out into Channels or Series, like Step Siblings Caught, Moms Teach Sex, My Family Pies, Reality Sis, etc.
Nubiles Casting is one of the series, and I actually reviewed it as a separate site a few years ago. It had stopped updating in December 2015, but it started up again in April 2024, and it has been posting monthly updates since then. So I am happy to see this one make a comeback – I think this one offers a unique approach to casting.
Nubiles.net is included in the Nubiles Porn subscription, and is an excellent site in its own right. I reviewed that one separately last month.
Also, when I signed up I chose a one year, non-renewing membership, and the membership did expire as expected with no rebilling. So that is one way to avoid repeated unintended charges, and the price was the same as a one year recurring membership. So kudos to them for offering this.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The site is enormous. 13,800+ Photo Sets, 13,000+ Videos, 2900+ Models.
It includes access to a number of sites, including Nubiles Porn. You will need to log in separately to Nubiles Porn, but the same User ID and password will work there. And Nubiles Porn is so large it deserves its own review.
Nearly every solo photo set or video involves some kind of self-stimulation, either “touches herself” or “play with toys”. Some of the models will also appear in boy-girl or girl-girl scenes.
With this many models, there is a wider variation of body types than you might find on more glamorous sites. Few are actually chubby, but they range from skinny to full bodied.
The “Advanced Search” gives you a huge number of things you can drill down onto.
The pricing is very reasonable, especially when you add the Nubiles Porn as a bonus.
Cons:
A lot of the sets are filmed/photographed using the same set, over and over again. So not much effort into finding mansions or gorgeous tropical locales for the shooting.
Not much imagination in the posing or locales.
Vast majority of models have only 4 photo sets and 4 videos.
Download speeds feel slower here than I usually experience on other sites. It is not terrible, just not best-in-class.
More than 90% of the models are white, so not much ethnic variation.
Bottom Line:
It feels like nearly every woman that has appeared in porn has appeared on Nubiles.net. It really feels almost like a casting site, in the sense that so many women with a prolific portfolio have had an appearance on this site early in their career. Maybe not their first-ever, but still early. I imagine they don’t pay as well as some sites – you don’t see a woman with a huge portfolio coming back here later in her career. Unlike most sites that fall into the casting genre, the vast majority of the content here is solo.
I do think for many of the models here, this probably is their first go at nude modeling, so you get some shyness here that other sites may not experience. Some find that a negative, but for myself I really enjoy that aspect. And for many, first time will end up being only time. But when I say shyness, since nearly all of them end up touching themselves, her legs will eventually open. And that moment of revelation is one of life’s sublime pleasures.
The PU discount gets you in at $14.98 a month, or $99.95 for a year. Even if Nubiles Porn was not included this would be an excellent value at this price, and with the added bonus it’s almost a no-brainer.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
All of these models have appeared on one or more of the Met Art sites. So you can be sure that they are extremely beautiful.
You get all the benefits you would expect from any other site in the MA network. Technical support via email is excellent. I also have not needed a lot of tech support either. I’ve never had an issue with their billing. Navigation is identical to the main Met Art site, as are comments, tags, etc.
I simply adore the pic of Eddison that is usually displayed on the site’s home page.
Cons:
Some of these might qualify as “barely hairy” – so if you’re into a really full bush you won’t find a lot of that here. Even a small tuft of unshaven hair is enough to get added to this site. Most of the women have trimmed pubic hair, and a small percent have armpit hair.
Updates are infrequent and irregular. For January 2025 they came on Jan 2, Jan 3, Jan 5, Jan 7, Jan 22, and Jan 25. Next month it was Feb 2, Feb 5, Feb 9, Feb 12, Feb 26. The oldest photo set on the site is dated 5/4/2001, although this site didn’t appear as a stand-alone site until well after that.
The standard price for Love Hairy used to be quite reasonable, but now it matches any other MA site most of the time. At the time of this posting, the PU “discount” is $29.99 – I would never pay that much for this site. So wait for a holiday discount.
Bottom Line:
Love Hairy is one of the sites in the Met Art network. I don’t believe any of the content is exclusive to Love Hairy – in fact you can usually tell from the cover photo where it appeared originally on one of the other MA sites. The set is identical to the one posted on the originating site – exactly the same number of pics, same photo size options, same everything.
Even before joining, you can do a good amount of reconnaissance on the site. On the Models page, you can sort by Top Rated, Newest, Alphabetical, Most Viewed, Most Favorited, or Most Appearances. And if you click on the model herself, it will take you to a page where you can see which movies and which photo sets she appears in. Then you can get a page of thumbnails or usually a short clip of the video.
Old timers like me generally prefer the natural (unshaved) look for a grown woman. This site gives us the chance to see all the lovelies that appear on the MA network with their pubes intact, all in one place. If you’ve already joined multiple MA sites, you’re going to see very little new content here. But it is a convenient option when you really miss the good old days.
The best time to join is almost always on a holiday – most Met Art sites will offer discounts where it costs between $5 and $10 for a month. I got in at $7.99 for a month, and I think at that price this is an excellent value.
I doubt anybody would take out a long term membership to this site. But if’s definitely worth joining if you appreciate the natural look and can get it at a discounted price.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
