Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : PinkPanther (0)  

Feedback:   All (1639)  |   Reviews (48)  |   Comments (196)  |   Replies (1395)

Other:   Replies Received (941)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 451-475 of 941 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
451
Visit Evil Angel Network

Evil Angel Network
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment from PinkPanther:

That was probably the most amazing web cast I've never seen - 2 1/2 hours of a shoot that was invaded early on by Aiden Starr and then by various EA folks who couldn't keep their hands off Dana Dearmond - can't blame them. John Stagliano is a genius - get the right girls - get them going crazy and ask nicely for what you want, but mainly let them use their imaginations and filthiest initiative - and then just enjoy it. Lots of face-slapping, hair-pulling, spitting, boob-grabbing, face-sitting, clothespin-pussy-displays and the most body-rocking orgasms I've ever seen. The two women who came in with complete intensity ended looking totally stoned, smiling and utterly relaxed and lovely - loved it!

04-10-09  07:33pm

Reply
452
Visit Exotic 4K

Exotic 4K
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from mbaya: (PinkPanther's Reply)

Thanks for letting me know. I just shot another email to the site.

09-09-15  07:05am

Reply
453
Visit Exxxtra Small

Exxxtra Small
(0)
REPLY TO #7 from LKLK: (PinkPanther's Reply)

So those channels work as a form of cross-advertising.
I assume that's the main reason they are added.
Like when a site allows condensed versions of its videos on tube sites.
Some people consider it piracy, but I think a lot of it is allowed by the originating sites.
But I'm not a lawyer, or in the Adult business, but that's my guess.


12-28-19  04:16am

Reply
454
Visit Face Down Ass Up University

Face Down Ass Up University
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from Capn: (PinkPanther's Reply)

Aye, been there done that.

Generally a bit too hardcore for my preferences TBH

Cap'n. :0)


04-25-10  09:21am

Reply
455
Visit Face Down Ass Up University

Face Down Ass Up University
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Review from rearadmiral:

Thanks for the review PinkPanther. Based on your review I think I'll give this site a try.

04-25-10  05:08am

Reply
456
Visit Face Down Ass Up University

Face Down Ass Up University
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Review from Capn:

'So there's more nudity and toy play, etc in FDAU, while you have access to the classic non-nude stuff, which I still find very hot and erotic - more than most of the solo-girl stuff being done today.'

I think you have hit on an important point there.
Subtlety and eroticism has largely been lost in favour of graphic toy play.

From a personal standpoint though I find that too many 'tease' sites skimp on full nudity.

Cap'n. :0/


04-25-10  02:31am

Reply
457
Visit Face Down Ass Up University

Face Down Ass Up University
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Review from dracken:

Maybe I'm echoing other users when I'm asking how much boy-girl action is there? You say small amount, does that mean 10-20 videos?

Thanks, for a very nice review.


04-24-10  09:01pm

Reply
458
Visit Face Down Ass Up University

Face Down Ass Up University
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Review from Goldfish:

That has to be the best site name I've seen in a while. LOL.

I'm not a huge soft porn guy but I like the Phil Flash stuff. Maybe I'll check it out.


04-24-10  03:51pm

Reply
459
Visit Femjoy

Femjoy
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment from Drooler:

Oh, yes! Take, for example, some of that yummy stuff of Franziska of ALS Scans fame. And of Ariel/Piper Fawn. Well, I could on ... FemJoy's one of those few sites that really does the booty right!

08-17-10  04:22pm

Reply
460
Visit Femjoy

Femjoy
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from lk2fireone: (PinkPanther's Reply)

OK, I'm expecting a second vote of no confidence from Mr Fountain, on my opinion that femjoy models would be improved by more makeup.

But are there any PU members that agree with me? Or is this too much of a niche/nitpicking idea to concern my fellow PU members?

I don't have anything against natural. But makeup can bring out a girl's beauty. If you compare the photosets of the models below, I think the photosets of those models are, in general, better looking at met-art than at femjoy.

Photoshop is used more at met-art. As long as it's not overdone, it can add.

But that's a matter of personal taste. Just as two people looking at a list of models will probably not rank them all in the same descending order of beauty/attractiveness.


Angelina B(femjoy) aka Indiana A(met-art)

Anina(femjoy) aka Anna AO, Anna AS(met-art) aka Sinner and other names at metmodels

Brigita(femjoy) aka Natalia A(met-art)

Desiree (femjoy) aka Desire A(met-art)

And there are a bunch of other models that are featured at both femjoy and also at met-art, where you could compare the relative attractiveness of the photosets.


06-08-09  07:43pm

Reply
461
Visit Femjoy

Femjoy
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Mr Fountain: (PinkPanther's Reply)

Dang, first time I've seen it set up like that. The $19.95 first month is some nice bait though.

08-30-08  06:35am

Reply
462
Visit Femjoy

Femjoy
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment from RagingBuddhist:

I'm just curious if the special isn't in response to a lack of new signups and/or renewals. Maybe my comment from last year rings true? $35 for a mostly picture site is STEEP!

08-27-08  12:25pm

Reply
463
Visit Femjoy

Femjoy
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment from Denner:

Ok price - fine tip, thanks PP

08-27-08  06:28am

Reply
464
Visit Fetish Network

Fetish Network
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from Tonto1: (PinkPanther's Reply)

Yeah PinkPanther, that doesn't sound like a very successful business model now does it?

Albeit, i'm still kinda new at this, but i've had nothing but clear lines of communication with the other sites that I have checked out and certainly no problems cancelling.

I'm with you on the good content part, they have some pretty crazy stuff on there not to mention some relatively familiar names in porn, but the whole lapse in communication is a 'no go' for me. Doubt I will be returning.


09-03-17  06:01am

Reply
465
Visit Fetish Network

Fetish Network
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment from elephant:

Some of these businesses really don't get it, first off you create regular good content, you make everything easy to join and cancel with a well known processor like ccbill or epoch and watch how many more people you get joining and start getting people recommending and profits rise.

08-20-17  02:01am

Reply
466
Visit Fetish One Pass

Fetish One Pass
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from BadMrFrosty: (PinkPanther's Reply)

Difference in this case is they dont seem to care, I emailed them 5 days ago alerting them to the issue but today I can still download the photo set with the ID scans. Not good

04-28-11  11:59pm

Reply
467
Visit Finest Models

Finest Models
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from LawrenceG: (PinkPanther's Reply)

Hi PinkPanther,

Sorry to hear you had problems upon joining. We did have a page selection bug (as mentioned by Drooler) which probably prevented you from viewing all the Tila Tequila content. That bug has been corrected.

Rest assured, we have not removed any Tila Tequila content and updates of her post-2006 we even upgraded to contain 4256 image resolutions.

I would be more than happy to give you a complimentary month so you may have another look at the site. Just email me at info@finestmodels.com .

Thanks!

-Lawrence


05-18-09  01:35pm

Reply
468
Visit Flashy Babes

Flashy Babes
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from exotics4me: (PinkPanther's Reply)

I will have to check that out, I hadn't noticed her before joining this site that had her solo site on it. She isn't the type I usually go for, but she has something extra, that I can't explain. Thanks for the tip.

08-10-08  12:06am

Reply
469
Visit Frank's TGirl World

Frank's TGirl World
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from garenne33: (PinkPanther's Reply)

Hi Pink Panther,

I only wanted to know what the download limitation was. If you think it concerns "24h users" (whom I am not) you already know more than I could learn.
I was refused ANY INFORMATION ABOUT THE DOWNLOAD LIMITATION and I consider it most suspect, especially as the customer service bases its refuse to give any information on not being "self-defeating" : a very warlike view of customer relationship and service.
I shall avoid this site until they clearly indicate the extent of their download limitation and they can also limit the recruitment of people who ignore the basics of customer service.


08-20-19  07:34am

Reply
470
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment from Wraith0711:

I would be curious to see if the file sizes are the same. Some sites post remastered scenes without saying it's been done. Maybe this is the case?

03-24-23  05:56am

Reply
471
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #12 from Claypaws: (PinkPanther's Reply)

I'm glad the info was interesting, PinkPanther. She certainly is sexy. Despite being a regular repeat member of ATK Galleria, Nubiles and Karupsha, I have not downloaded any of her videos, so I never saw the jaw thing. But I do have most of her photo sets and on my next join to ATK Galleria, I will get her photo sets that they added since my last membership there.

05-26-12  02:05am

Reply
472
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from Monahan: (PinkPanther's Reply)

I agree 100%. See my reply to Drooler.

The previews show me that the site content has exactly what I like and that there's a ton of content that I have to look forward to, so the periodicity of updates really isn't much of an issue. It becomes one only after I run out of currently available content, which looks like it won't be happening soon.


09-17-07  08:56am

Reply
473
Visit Funny BDSM

Funny BDSM
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from asmith12: (PinkPanther's Reply)

> The price has kept me away.
I'm not surprised; $50/month is really outrageous.

> for such a determinedly rough sex site.
I don't think it's really "rough", there are much rougher sites out there (such as SadoSlaves). Personally I'm not a big fan of rough SM (and especially don't like "abuse" theme), so what turned me on about FunnyBDSM was it's funny part.


01-29-08  07:06am

Reply
474
Visit Glamour Models Gone Bad

Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from The Collector: (PinkPanther's Reply)

This is all very true, it is in fact a good site but its just not a "great" site I there was bits and pieces that i enjoyed but as a whole it lacked that special something that keeps you intrigued and excited, perhaps I just didn't have and chemistry with this site.

06-17-11  02:12am

Reply
475
Visit Glamour Models Gone Bad

Glamour Models Gone Bad
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from TrashMan: (PinkPanther's Reply)

All the sites are on the network, for the same price. So I don't think it matters.

02-18-09  08:24pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 451-475 of 941 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.82 seconds.