| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Quite right. My last join was at the Galleria, and it would putz out every now and then. But Petites is really screwy. The response is sluggish, thumbs don't load, and the pages are built for screen resolutions wider than mine -- a sign that somebody doesn't have their webmaster chops together!
Of course, I've mentioned that last problem before. And I love the happy talk about how they want to hear suggestions on how the site could be improved. Thhssss ...
And they post galleries with several empty pages at the end. That's just laziness! "Click" (nothing), "click" (nothing), "click" (nothing)... Fucking brilliant.
|
12-05-10 02:03am
|
Reply
252
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Thanks for the additional info PP.
Definitely on the list then.
Capn. :0)
|
07-04-10 05:48pm
|
Reply
253
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Advent:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Thank you so much for your feedback. I am passing this on to the team so they are aware of what our members are thinking. Please continue to post feedback, we do listen and we do want to hear the good and the bad.
|
03-30-10 08:19pm
|
Reply
254
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from Advent:
Hey guys,
I see that you find the new design a little confusing. Can I ask you a question? What would you change about the design if you could? You know we are always trying to make the site better for our members and we value your opinion on everything. Please give me some pointers I can pass on to IT and the design team so they can better understand what you guys are looking for.
I hope to hear from you soon.
|
03-30-10 08:59am
|
Reply
255
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from Denner:
To both PP and Drooler:
ATK IS special in design, navigation and content - it's like a 'stepchild' - so to speak.
BUT ATK still has some fine models - also at the Petites site, judging from the previews - so bottom line:
Can any of you recommend it now - for the purpose of the models - or???
|
03-30-10 07:46am
|
Reply
256
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from Drooler:
I agree that it's overwhelming. It takes time to learn how to use it, too. There are too many variables in the content, such as stuff already on the other sites. The good thing is a user gets a ton of stuff, though a chronic user like me has to be more careful so as not to get duplicates.
And they do have plenty of content exclusive to the site. However, I've been very disappointed in most of the photographers, especially recently. They just don't shoot the girls in a way that I like. I prefer the style of Russ T, who had a good run at ATK Galleria a while back. But that's all just me.
|
03-30-10 04:07am
|
Reply
257
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from tangub:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
You might get lucky, they seem to be doing the rounds again with promo emails for the atk sites, i've already received discount offers for hairy and petites sites in the last week.
|
12-11-11 02:39am
|
Reply
258
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
LOL!
That was about as subtle as a brick in the back of the neck!
Cap'n :0D
|
12-10-11 03:23am
|
Reply
259
|
AV Lovers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tom22:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Yes, but a small one that was well placed out of the prime viewing area would work just as well and not annoy their customers.
|
07-31-10 10:17pm
|
Reply
260
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Khan:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Just a quick followup ...
So you know we didn't forget about this one. :)
You should have received an automated email from our system that the error report has now been cleared up. Vanessa has updated that section of her review.
|
11-30-10 08:27am
|
Reply
261
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from tangub:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Hi PP, yes you've correctly answered your own question here in that none of the bonus sites are updating, that also includes the extra movie sites that i've not reviewed Wild On x, Babes on Film, POV XXX, and Cummin At Ya where none of the content is dated so i can't give any indication as to how long since the last updates and the last site Be The Mask lists their last update as May 2009.
|
11-02-10 03:28am
|
Reply
262
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Thanks for confirming that's what you were talking about.
Yes, to answer your question, that error report is still there. FWIW, I missed it the first time I looked too.
If you look at the TBP Review page:
https://www.thebestporn.com/review/babelicious/#review
... in the top section (Site Facts), to the right, look down from the "Bonus Sites" block to the block labeled "REPORT ERRORS" and you'll find your report from the link "1 ErrorReported".
So you know, I'm checking w/ other staffers to see if we can't get that statement about the bonus sites updated. I'll let you know what I find.
Thanks for your patience in this matter.
|
11-01-10 06:48pm
|
Reply
263
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
I'm trying to get to the bottom of your statement that there's inaccurate info in the most recent review. Hopefully, I'll have more info on that w/in the next few days.
But right now, please help me understand your claim that we removed a previous Comment you made on the site. Can you be more specific?
I ask because I checked logs going back to 2007 and the activity I show for you (on this site) is as follows ...
One Review:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2256
Two Comments
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=46536
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=43284
And another 15 assorted replies.
You can check them all at:
PinkPanther Activity
https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=98
I don't show anything you've posted about this site having been removed. So please, help me understand what it is you're saying we removed.
|
10-31-10 07:11pm
|
Reply
264
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from anyonebutme:
Babelicious does not license from InFocusGirls , I-F-G is all exclusive material. But both these sites buy works from some of the same contributing photographers.
But question, does babes.tv contain the archive of all their former works, or is that removed? Thanks
|
03-13-10 03:44pm
|
Reply
265
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Nick C:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Hi Im still here.. I wont go into too much detail but the last year or so for me personally have been very difficult, coupled with the fact that the industry is in decline, Ive struggled with the sites.
I dont have any staff with me now at all and I am on my own trying to do everything. I really want to get Babelicious back to how it was. I do admit that the quality isn't what it used to be. At the start of the new year I am going to try and bring it back to its former glory, including adding all the larger sizes that have been missing for a while (through no fault of my own, but the british customs (but thats another story!).
In hindsight I wish I just had one site to look after, and put all my efforts into that site... I think I launched too many and couldn't give them the care and attention they deserved. In the last year I have stopped updating Dreambabes, Eurobabes, BabesUK and I dont want anymore to suffer the same fate. (although they have tonnes of content there and well worth visiting still)
Well I guess this out of the norm to tell you guys how it is, but im an honest guy and would rather tell the truth than make excuses. Im not a huge company, its just me :D
Please support me as best you can. I will start to get Babelicious some hot new content and get it back to where it was.. thats my promise for 2010 :D
BTW.. I did get all the videos encoded into flash, which makes it much easier to watch.. did you guys like that?
All the best, happy new year!
|
12-29-09 07:28am
|
Reply
266
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from anyonebutme:
I suppose I have a different view on this site because I keep one of those emails saved that give access to their sites at $10/month. For that price, 90 updates in that month, not that bad of a deal (talking updates on all sites combined). A few months ago they put up some new photosets with a favorite girl of mine, some sets that have never been anywhere else, and I was glad to sign up and download them.
They could have gone the way of so many other sites and stopped updating completely. So they have to get credit there. They show all the available updates in the preview pages, so sign up when you see something you like, let them be when there are no updates you like.
The recent photos at 1000px, might be that's the only resolution they got from the photographer who sold them the sets. Who knows? Better they are out there than nothing at all. If you don't want them, then don't buy them. But someone else out there may love those girls and want the updates they do still put out.
|
12-12-09 07:57am
|
Reply
267
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Oh, yes PP - cannot agree more.
BTW: Babes.tv used to be one of my favorites. Still keeps some of my most precious videos from a time when that site was TOP - so went back a couple of times in this year of 2009 - and got just damn disapointed.
Alas, the site is history....
|
12-12-09 07:30am
|
Reply
268
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from Denner:
Apart from the nice quote from 'Jackie Brown' - PP certainly got a point here... Babelicious used to be - well, just great. New material all the time. Then they started to marketing those other socalled bonus-sites - but what are they now - nada. (apart from the former glorious Babes.tv).
And, alas - even Babes.tv is on the same deroute.
How long will they survive - this is not a place to bet - but I'm tempted...
|
12-12-09 07:04am
|
Reply
269
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from Drooler:
Sorry, but I think I spoke too soon. Reminds me that you can't assume ANYTHING in this world.
What I mean is that I see now that most of the pics in Babelicious and Sexy-Babes from the start of this month are now only available at 1000 px! What in the name of fuck do they think they're doing? Regressing back to 1999?
They might as well keep the site up but forget the updates. Who the hell wants images that small these days? The same shit can be found in a variety of larger sizes at a number of sites.
It really is an astoundingly stupid move on their part.
|
12-12-09 04:50am
|
Reply
270
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from Drooler:
Babelicious really has gone the way of way-dull, formula-driven strip and toy play sites, just as Nubiles and Karupspc have. All used to be better sites in terms of interesting content, even though they've done redesigns and upped their server speeds and image and video sizes.
They're kind of analogous to rock bands that had strong fan bases until they sold out to gain mass appeal and from then on just churned out one mediocre piece of work after another, stuff that all sounds the same. And the disappointed fans complain!
But I wouldn't want any of these sites to shut down. They all have enormous archives of good stuff, still there to be enjoyed.
|
12-11-09 11:30pm
|
Reply
271
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Thanks PinkPanther, I thought I had seen her before, but couldn't figure out where. I will have to join Teen Dreams soon, some of that content that shows in the preview of Teen Dreams on her main page is the same content on Babelicious, I think. But there is a lot more on Teen Dreams.
I agree, Teen Dreams has some of the worst aliases for the models. I remember when I first joined it and couldn't find Sandra Shine. I had no idea she had been listed as Judit. Maybe the worst of all, one of the few other newer models that I really like is Black Angelica and she is listed as Nicky. I've never seen her listed as anything different than either Black Angelica or Angelica except the K spelling Angelika, how they get Nicky is beyond me! On the good side, I hadn't been on TD in nearly 6 months and looks like they are getting some interesting new models including this one Satin that I see in the updates.
Thanks for the tip!
|
02-20-09 02:22am
|
Reply
272
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from JBDICK:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
PinkPanther
I just wanted to say, thank you for pointing out these things to me. Don't get me wrong, I love the sites, but I'm getting use to the format and it's not distinct enough to distinguish it from its peers, ie. clubsandy, pixnvideo, 1by-day, teendreams.
What I was getting at was that the crispness of the video you see at Alsangels and Alsscan is very distinct for them, it's their signature and their format for shoot is unique.
like met-art or hegre have distinct signatures...
BUT ultimately...they do have the right girls...which is why I joined. because I thought I might find some new stuff I hadn't seen before...no regrets but I'll pick another one from the top reviews for my next membership...No mistaking that TBP and PU are helping me find the sites I like though...
cheers...JBDICK, and genuinely...thanks for your reply
|
07-04-08 10:44am
|
Reply
273
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Nick C:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Good to hear! (no pun intended haha)
Nick
|
02-25-08 04:25am
|
Reply
274
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Hey Panther - I certainly do not disagree with you on the point about their fine material of honeys.
I have enjoyed this site several times.
Now I realize they have joined Babelicious and Sexy-babes.tv.
And that also is ok by me.
But my point is still, that I miss more frequent and more exclusive video-updates for the entire - socalled - network.
best
Denner
|
11-03-07 10:22am
|
Reply
275
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Review
from Nick C:
Thank you so much PinkPanther for your review! Look out for some 100% HiDef videos on the site very soon! :D
|
03-21-07 09:28am
|
