| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from KET924aab:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yeah Drooler, its really annoying how some sites like CNN.com have pop-ups (pop-up fucking anyway) that defeat any blocker I've tried!
|
05-01-13 09:31pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from jberryl69:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well I too like Tanner, like her scene in Face Fucking, Inc. She does that kind of stuff well.
|
04-27-13 03:06pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from jberryl69:
(Drooler's Reply)
haha.. point taken though my comment was more her body type sans the tats.
|
04-27-13 06:00am
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from jberryl69:
(Drooler's Reply)
You mean like Tanner Mayes?
|
04-26-13 07:51am
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from marcdc1:
(Drooler's Reply)
I think Drooler says it best. Between the vague definitions of what will be virtual sex the fact that nothing replaces the real thing, I wonder if we'll ever be there.
To my the relevant movie reference comes from a 90s Sly Stallone film (I think it was Demolition Man), in the movie he has virtual sex with a future woman, then they have non-virtual sex and of course there's no comparison.
|
03-28-13 05:09am
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from RagingBuddhist:
(Drooler's Reply)
You can drag that shortcut arrow below the taskbar, too. If there's a TweakUI for W7, you can fade the arrow or remove it altogether.
|
02-23-13 07:14am
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from RagingBuddhist:
(Drooler's Reply)
I don't know how any Windows beyond XP work, but I know on XP you can change the icon to anything you want. Before I had Rocketdock, I used a completely transparent icon for a desktop shortcut and dragged it down to where the name of the shortcut was below the taskbar. That way, nothing showed at all. But I knew, for instance, that the bottom right hand corner was one of my shortcuts. Super stealth mode.
|
02-22-13 08:23pm
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from marcdc1:
(Drooler's Reply)
Ah that explains the demise of black berry! No cum timing app! Lol. Brilliant analysis Drooler.
|
02-16-13 05:18am
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
Lol If I was at a seafood restaurant that's probably what I'd order.
And I have about as much interest in feet as I do in seafood, by the way. Two tastes that I have yet the slightest understanding of why people prefer them.
|
01-26-13 08:35pm
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks, Bro...really appreciate that reply.....
|
01-12-13 05:58am
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
If you are still a member of Wow Girls, or one of the Diesel Access Sites, then you can see the Live Shows the girls put on. It's a live chat show put on by Diesel, that features a few of the Diesel model girls live. This is different from the link that Diesel provides to a commercial live chat forum, that is called diesel.livetopcams.
On the Diesel Live Shows, which features actual Diesel models, Angelica performs occasionally.
I don't usually watch the Diesel Live Shows, but I caught one with Angelica recently. It was the first Angelica show I have watched. She had a guy with her (her boyfriend, I would assume), and they were going at it.
Completely free show. Not a private show. Just a regular live chat show.
The other Diesel girls strip completely, and masturbate, or talk/type with the audience. Completely free.
But this was the first time I saw a Diesel Live Show where the model had a guy with her and they were doing it.
Angelica looks as good in the Live Show as she does in her photosets and videos. And she is hot.
She has a live show scheduled for tomorrow, Friday, 02:00 am - 4:00 am, Eastern Standard time.
Sometimes the models don't show up for a live show. But if you are awake at this time, with access to the live show, you might want to tune in.
If you can't watch it live, Diesel (at the Diesel Access network, and also at Wow Girls site) has "Live Show Archive", where you can see a tape of past shows.
But in that case, I prefer to watch a regular taped studio video of the girl, because the production values, the definition, the lighting, the colors, etc., are better quality.
|
01-03-13 06:23pm
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from skippy:
(Drooler's Reply)
Ditto for me. The MA network is tops, although you don't get access to all of the sites without paying extra.
|
12-08-12 10:25am
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Cybertoad:
(Drooler's Reply)
LOLOLOL Drooler
|
11-20-12 07:55pm
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from gaypornolover:
(Drooler's Reply)
Oh you little tease!
|
10-28-12 09:02am
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from gaypornolover:
(Drooler's Reply)
What did you do?!
|
10-26-12 01:14pm
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Toadsith:
(Drooler's Reply)
lol - "oogie", I'm so going to add that to my repertoire of synonyms for sex.
|
10-18-12 05:56pm
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Toadsith:
(Drooler's Reply)
Ohhh, good one. Antarctica would fit in too as it is the driest continent, and coldest for that matter.
|
10-18-12 12:51pm
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Off topic: Oh, yes: comfortable shoes from that brand - and now they're better looking than in the old days.....and now a pretty big brand worldwide....and those folks from a village in a remote part of Denmark are richer than ever....among the Top 10 in this small country.
|
09-24-12 06:26am
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
I too try to keep the porn and the politics off my TV. Don't want to attract neighbor kids to my windows and be guilty of them watching politics.
|
09-21-12 05:15am
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Claypaws:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler. You have brilliantly expressed how I feel too.
|
09-05-12 05:01pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from marcdc1:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, I think this is my favorite answer well said.
|
08-31-12 12:05pm
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Toadsith:
(Drooler's Reply)
I know you asked "who really cares?" but I figured I'd note that Peaches is just a smidge over 5'10" (178cm). If she is exactly 178cm, then she actually is 5' 10-393/5000" (5'10.0786").
Sorry, I was bored.
|
08-06-12 07:06pm
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Absolutely.....
|
07-15-12 07:47am
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from jberryl69:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler says, "It makes a poor substitute."
I'm unsure what you are referencing here dude Drooler.
I'm not a big fan of 3-D but I've seen one (Hugo) that certainly added to the feel and scope of the movie.
|
07-12-12 02:18pm
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Cybertoad:
(Drooler's Reply)
I agree Drooler well said.
|
07-12-12 07:01am
|
