| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Capn:
That doesn't sound very promising! :0/
I like the 'stream of consciousness' comment.
Although I did run short of breath with that sentence! LOL
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-20-10 12:59pm
|
Reply
677
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
Personally, I think the model Tatyana is as good as you get. She's gorgeous, in my opinion, and the best thing at the site.
Her photosets alone are worth a 1-month membership, in my opinion. But if the models don't appeal to you, or you don't care for the photographs, then the site is a waste of your time and money.
I think the photographs are high quality. Yes, some of the photographs are too dark, but that's a flaw you find at almost all sites, on some of the photographs (poor lighting, poor focus, poor this-or-that).
But if you didn't find anything worth downloading, that must have been a real disappointment.
Sorry your membership turned out to be a waste of time and money. As you pointed out recently, there's always risk when joining a site.
|
01-06-10 12:30pm
|
Reply
678
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from TheRizzo:
(Drooler's Reply)
Cheers Drooler, Denner was bang on about you knowing! And finding a great price like that I am going to check it out tonight. Look for a review within the next day or two.
|
01-07-09 03:35pm
|
Reply
679
|
DDF Beauties
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from lk2fireone:
Your review score for DDF Beauties is amazing.
I've been having problems coming up with a sensible scoring method for a site. But after examining your mathematical model, I realized you deserve a "Professor of Scoring" badge.
If there is no such badge, Pornusers should give it to you anyway.
|
11-21-08 09:06am
|
Reply
680
|
DDF Beauties
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Wittyguy:
I have to admit, yours is the most original mathematical scoring system on a review that I've seen so far. Thanks for the heads up on this; I sort of figured it didn't have much new to offer.
|
11-20-08 10:06pm
|
Reply
681
|
DDF Beauties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, it's always easy with hindsight (is that the right word?).
Anyway I think that could be my case here - like some kind of thought that exactly DDF's new sites are a matter of known content.
I've run through every new thing they come up with - trying to scan the content - which sometimes are NOT that easy. But when succeding, yes: I've seen that, and that and that before....
Sure, you could have left them alone, but then again they are good at promoting new sites and wet your appetite.
But as you state: They must realize, that they'll get called on it...
|
11-08-08 06:55am
|
Reply
682
|
DDF Beauties
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
Another fine review from Drooler - and somewhat of a good "warning".
It's maybe not strange that DDF keeps comming up with new niche sites - they are also in it for the money.
But for the sake of the users I think they are a bit too smart. Every new site I've seen from DDF has content where an overwhelming amount is taken from other sites and, yes as Drooler points out: If you have been a member of the motherload: 1byday, you have seen most of it before.
I'll suggest that users who are not familiar with the DDF productions start up with 1byday.
|
11-08-08 02:28am
|
Reply
683
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
It is an all European site but it's just proof that North American mentality affects other Nations. Not to mention that they know a large part of their paying members are going to come from North America so you want to appeal to them.
|
03-20-11 06:17pm
|
Reply
684
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
Sadly I think it's a by product of American culture. There is a strong belief that bigger is better so it makes sense that many porn site would try to appeal to that mentality. The reality is very different because often bigger isn't better. It's usually more but more crap is not a good thing.
I think that's why ddf claims they have 10 sites for 30$ because that looks great. The reality is that they really only have 5 sites that upodate with truly new content while all the others are BS.
|
03-20-11 08:12am
|
Reply
685
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
Your the perfect example of why it's a bad decision for sites to do those things. I can appreciate any site looking for a way to cut cost so that they can stay in business but it should not be at the cost of their members trust. Instead of trying to update each site with new content then simply limit the updates to a couple of them.
Keep the other sites open so that new customers can get the older content. This way you have happy new customers and can retain your older paying customers as well.
|
03-20-11 06:45am
|
Reply
686
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(Drooler's Reply)
I was never a big DDF fan per say but I was a huge Hands on Hardcore one so part of my annoyance with them is the fact that content from one site somehow disapears from the original site and reappears on another of their site as a new update. I guess newbies wouldn't necessarily recognize that but it's rather annoying for a guy like me who remembers that update from the prior site.
On the other hand they aren't charging a lot for all their content so it's hard to be hangry at them.
|
03-19-11 05:33pm
|
Reply
687
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
The bad thing is, I don't know which would be worse if the Eve sets had the video and photo sets on 1byday or like it is where they are only giving the photo sets. That's kind of a backdoor method of cross-sales. Reminds me of those extremely cute Ally Bank commercials where the guy asks the little girl if she wants a pony. She says yes, he gives her a toy pony. The other little girl says yes, he brings out a live one. The one with the toy pony gives him a look like, "what the hell?"
Would you believe that I didn't even enter the Meet Eve contest? There was probably a catch there too. I talked to Denys years and years ago is an email, back when photographers were just normal, really lucky, guys, these different business practices just don't seem like something he would do. If he is off shooting new material and they need to fill 1-2 updates here and there with content from their other sites, I can understand that, but 8 in 6 weeks is a little much.
The one thing I really like about the multiple sites is the remastered old videos. DDF has two of my top 3 Sandra Shine videos, one is of her and Rita Faltoyona with a guy. Sandra completely sells her desire to jump in with the guy in it. The other is Sandra on a Sybian. The DDF Prod site has those in full scenes and about double the resolution I had them in and they were in parts. Eve has a few as well. Peaches. I thought that was a really nice move. Also, I had never been a member on DDF Busty or Cherry Jul until they went to this format. Still, 15 KB/s, isn't going to let me see much about those sites.
|
01-05-10 11:13am
|
Reply
688
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Heck, I don't know - but some of those easteuro-girlsites still haunts me.
And again - like at MetArt - tho old video-freak are taking in more and more of the photoset-material - got a new and huge libary for the sets - a revival, maybe.
Lena and Milla are great at AvErotica - got this Rose as a favorite at the moment - because she just looks like one of the ealiest girlsfriend in the teen-years (got quite a lot of videos of her from other sites) - and guess the next to join will be AvErotica - NOT a bad site, no bad at all - it looks like...
Thanks for the head-ups.
|
12-12-09 06:08am
|
Reply
689
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Oh, oh, oh....another deal attacking the saving-accounts...LOL - BTW: Even as a member - again - of 21Sextury, I'm tempted....
BTW: Went around AV Erotica again - it SEEMS like they are doing some very fine updates - also here I'm tempted - been here lately????
|
12-11-09 09:00am
|
Reply
690
|
Defloration.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from mbaya:
I see it is still very rare, close to nonexistent, to find a true defloration video. Somehow, I knew a whole website of this would be have to be fake.
|
01-11-10 11:50am
|
Reply
691
|
Defloration.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
I think the phrase was used at PU before:
'sweet review' - and that's what this is - the Drooler-ditto.
Fun to see this old site blossom and, of course to get a review.
A special site for sure, but a site that does something extra, too.
Been a member earlier - and it seems to update pretty good.
Nobody can complain about the models - and the newbie-models, THANKS!
Understand the score, too - from another point of view, maybe: the videos.
Still think it's a bit strange/funny to watch wellknown pornmodels - even the newer ones - 'bleed' - from loosing their 'virginity'. Who in this deal/product volunteered to give blood from a finger-cut? The colour is better than ketchup.
Bottom line: A different and a quite special/subtle review from Drooler here...thumbs up!
|
01-10-10 05:55am
|
Reply
692
|
Denude Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Wittyguy:
Great review as always. I'm guessing by the site name and review that this is pretty soft (no lez, no toys, etc.)? Just wanted to double check with da' man before considering their trial.
|
04-06-09 03:42pm
|
Reply
693
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from deadelvis:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks guy`s for your concern.
After about 6 years of using the major porn sites this is only the second time i have been ripped off.
I think PornUsers is the best thing since sliced bread for giving
an accurate guide to how good or bad sites are.
I wonder how independent review sites like TBP really are ?
|
06-15-08 04:04am
|
Reply
694
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(Drooler's Reply)
Did some Googling and I think it almost has to be cancer related. One site is saying that, in lieu of flowers, the family is requesting donations be made to either the Surfrider Foundation or Heal the Bay or The John Wayne Cancer Foundation.
I also saw a site with pictures of him and one showed him wearing a light blue rubber band bracelet - the color signifying prostate cancer awareness.
|
02-11-13 04:00pm
|
Reply
695
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from zachvenice:
Thanks for the feedback, Drooler. You may want to check out our new tour and what we have to offer. We currently add about 5-10, 3000-pixel sets a month as well as 2 HD video updates (about 8 non-HD). Our style has since evolved into quite a bit more eye contact and tease before the 'goods' are shown.
|
04-23-08 03:23pm
|
Reply
696
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from zachvenice:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks for the review. The only thing that I would like to add is that the video-editing has been cut back quite a bit. You will see more restraint practiced in the majority of our video sections. There is only one particular video update per month that will purposely be stylized, called Dream Flicks.
|
04-23-08 02:15pm
|
Reply
697
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, Drooler
Tha Admin at PU did not find it great, just GOOD, according to a reply from Khan.
So I live with 99 for the time beeing.
Congrat. with the new HD badge - I'll come after it, I think -but for a period I'll be out on the road....
best
Denner
|
12-11-07 10:13am
|
Reply
698
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Once again - good warning from Drooler.
Been at this site three or four times over the years - and considered it again.
But, no way - thanks Drooler.
I'll find somewhere else to use my money.....
|
09-09-07 08:52am
|
Reply
699
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Monahan:
Great review, Drooler. You touched on a number of characteristics that would not be obvious without plunking down some money for a month's sign-up. They, along with TBP's alert that DRM is used, has made me decide that I'll try this site later rather than sooner.
|
06-17-07 08:53am
|
Reply
700
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from roseman:
DRM made me not to join this site. Pitty ...
|
06-08-07 08:32am
|
