| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
526
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Advent:
Thanks for the feedback Drooler. I will pass it on to the guys.
|
12-09-11 03:45pm
|
Reply
527
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
I know it's a stretch but could "Premium" have taken the pictures and corrected the color tone before publishing them? I agree that CRT monitors sometimes give you a better picture but when I look at picture sets of two different photographers one looks great the other looks bluish/pink on the same flat screen monitor. Toby's sets (not all) also look darkish compared to others. When I complained at AO30 the answer was that he uses some sort of screen to soften and tint his sets, while SeanR, at the other extreme slightly over-sharpens HIS sets. And to end on a positive note, I noticed yesterday that Toby's shoot of my favorite model was, for once, just right! Hooray!
|
11-20-08 01:00pm
|
Reply
528
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
I agree that experimenting with new stuff has its dangers, I certainly would be turned off by food smearing! :-) Do you have sets by Toby at "Premium?" He's the photographer that drove me crazy on the other ATK sites with his bluish/pinkish tinges to just about every set they published. And he's ubiquitous ... I found him everywhere, it seemed. AllOver30 was one of the sites. However, I find some of his latest sets quite acceptable so maybe some of my criticisms got through.
When it comes to formula, Older Women and Aunt Judy were the worst.
|
11-20-08 07:45am
|
Reply
529
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from ChrisK:
Yes, we did have a bad crash this past Spring. So bad that the entire site was completely lost and the design destroyed. It was a huge blow to us and we worked almost 24/7 to get it rebuilt. Without the design and the structure we were forced to put the content back up in a structure we did have, that of the other sites. Otherwise it would have been many more months until we could have relaunched. All content had to be manually put back and it was a huge job. Though the original design of the site was lost the content remains the same.
It was a malicious attack that brought the site down but we learned from it and instituted safeguards to prevent it from ever happening again. We're very committed to this site and we continue to move forward. Feedback is always welcome and appreciated.
|
10-02-07 11:42am
|
Reply
530
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Capn:
Well, I am not a member, but being intrigued, I took a look at the model listing & the answer is not what I would have thought sight unseen.
Sight unseen, I would have gone for the dark haired lady.
On closer inspection the blonde you quote, Angie, actually isn't really blonde, ( Collar & cuffs don't match ).
Unfortunately Devi is fully shaven, which I don't care for.
I don't put either very high on favourites list, but after a recount, I would go for Angie.
HTH
Cap'n. :0)
|
09-23-10 09:20am
|
Reply
531
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Angi and Devi are nonstarters for me.
Zhenja at AV Erotica is one of my favorites at that site. She is named Geki A at Metart. At Metart she was in a girl-girl photoshoot, but the lesbianism was ultra-softcore, per Metart style, with Anita B.
I asked this question before, but did not find the reason. The AV Erotica photosets for the model named Lora have been deleted. Was any reason given for this? I really liked that girl.
She appears at other sites, named:
Lora at Domai
Darsi A at Metart
Darsi at Metmodels
|
09-23-10 04:10am
|
Reply
532
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, thanks for quick response on the pricing of averotica site.
You must live on the East Coast, or else you are a night owl like me. Lol.
I'm thinking of rejoining Just Teen Site for 1 month.
Haven't been a member of Just Teen Site since early 2006, and they've added a lot of pics since that time. Also gives me a chance to see the vids at Just Teen Movie.
I've read your review of Just Teen Site, and looked over the models.
I still have the photosets of Just Teen Site I downloaded back in early 2006, but the site was small back then, and it's definitely worth a second visit for me.
|
11-22-08 04:37am
|
Reply
533
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from lk2fireone:
Drooler, did you get a special price at $24.95 for several months' membership to averotica?
If yes, can anyone else get that price, or a discounted price for averotica?
Current prices for membership at the site are listed as:
Monthly: $29.95
3 months: $49.95
6 months: $99.95
Pornusers shows a 1 year membership at $99.95, but the averotica site itself shows a 6-month membership for $99.95.
|
11-21-08 10:32pm
|
Reply
534
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
Maybe the best review I've seen here at PU in a very long time.
Here are details for every user!!
Where does Drooler find these sites???? (nada at TBP yet)
Even if the video-section still is quite small, I'll keep a eye on this site.
Thanks, pal.
|
02-10-08 08:00am
|
Reply
535
|
Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
Every cam girl and porno babe I can think of is in LOVE with those industrial strength back & pussy rubbers.
|
05-02-10 09:56am
|
Reply
536
|
Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Oh, you've been here, Drooler - man, I do not get the picture, the erotic, the...whatever about that strange mechanism - is it the rocking thing - something that could help JFK from his back pain - not sure - but still laughing....
|
05-02-10 08:17am
|
Reply
537
|
Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from lk2fireone:
You keep coming up with all these off-the-wall sites. Don't mean this site specifically, but where are we supposed to come up with the money to try them all? :)
|
09-18-09 06:24am
|
Reply
538
|
Aziani
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from nygiants03:
(Drooler's Reply)
allright thanks for letting me know. I am a big fan of Rachel Aziani's site, so this site must be pretty good.
|
06-06-07 12:19pm
|
Reply
539
|
Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from nygiants03:
The set up sort of looks like a smaller version of FTV girls except with more pornstars, is it similar? Also is this site run by Rachel Aziani or is there no relation?
|
06-06-07 06:35am
|
Reply
540
|
Babe Centerfolds
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Man, I know that feeling!!!!!!:
"Sometimes I think I'm just fated to find sites that aren't that hot, but not completely bad either, and write reviews of them, especially these days."
But here and BTW: Clicked at the Justine Joli link.
THAT looks like something different and quite attractive concerning the video-preview.
And, Drooler: let's face it. It's getting more and more difficult to find that - or those - special site(s) that ONCE AGAIN will make the world rattle and shake - porn-wise.
But I think that we both will keep on looking, 'cause this is somewhat the name of the game....
Good to hear from you again, bro.....
Another BTW: Have you by any chance been back at this one site you once (a long time ago) recommended: Top Miss (the french thing)?
I just did not dare to try it - only reason is that I could not find a way to cancel rebill (Any time I join, I always look for a way out - if it's not CCBill or the new Epoch....
|
06-21-08 06:39am
|
Reply
541
|
Babe Centerfolds
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
Like some newspaperfolks talk about: News you can use!
This is a review you can use.....preview looks fine and I could easyly be tempted.
But I'll save my money on this one.
Thanks, Drooler!
|
06-15-08 07:41am
|
Reply
542
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from PeterSeven:
Such a shame, this site isn't worth the money anymore. Even now almost a month further and still updates with a pitiful 1000 px.
|
01-24-10 03:12am
|
Reply
543
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from mr smut:
1000px on the long side at the end of 2009 that's ridiculous! 10 years before it would have been o.k. but as of today it's a shame :-(
|
12-28-09 11:05pm
|
Reply
544
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yeah - exactly - and why I say "They stopped caring, so should you."
It's the same thing at their "premium" site, Babes.tv, which is posting the same mish-mash of licensed available-anywhere crap as the other sites.
And they've stopped updating Dreambabes.com, Eurobabes.com, etc - while leaving on the Sexybabes.tv "Bonus Sites" page that "Many of these sites are updated daily while others are updated once per week." DB and EB were both sites that had updates that had a different personality than Sexybabes.tv - and that's what's gone completely from these sites is any hint of personality or any indication that there is anybody in the company running these sites that's doing anything other than telling the company that they're licensing from - send us this many photo-sets this often - and then posting them.
I disagree with the comparison with Nubiles. I know that you don't like the direction that they have gone. I actually think that Nubiles are putting up a lot of good stuff and they clearly care about what they are doing - they're not running their site on auto-pilot as these people clearly are doing.
|
12-12-09 05:50am
|
Reply
545
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
I reckon that is a fair assessment.
You can work to a niche or formula without it getting tired, but the creative effort put in has to be there.
If it isn't it soon shows.
|
12-11-09 11:39pm
|
Reply
546
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from anyonebutme:
It's only on a few of their zip sets. Double-click on the file to open the zip file in Windows Explorer, select the directory that is inside the zip file, copy it, and paste it where ever you want.
It happens. Their service should be a little better, but you can indeed get at the files inside the zip sets. I did download that specific one to test.
|
09-09-09 04:11pm
|
Reply
547
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, Bro...joined Teenmodels - and from this user to another:
THANKS!
Just like you said.
Spending a fine time browsing and also browsing the "naughty" section - which is NOT bad at all.
And the motherload here at Teenmodels is just what I've been looking for - GREAT videos - (and great photosets,too)
BTW: I also gave an answer to Andreas of MCN - see it, if you like...
|
08-31-09 05:43am
|
Reply
548
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
It's strange - or maybe not, Ze Dwoolah (wauw - a great new alias) - but some of "our" old sites seems to be suffering - I'm (as you know) NOT to much into the photoset-deals - but maybe it's time, again.
Because it seems like most of those good ol' sites are turning more and more to the pix-deals - and that's ok - if they just forward that message.
And not having been a member of Babelicious for 3-4 months or so, I'm annoyed by their videoclip-updates - glad I only went for the cheap 3-days deal - man, I can download those updates in an hour or so...
BTW: Do you have some new comments on one site in particular: Teen Models - never got around to join, but it looks like my next project...?
|
08-27-09 08:44am
|
Reply
549
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Some web sites don't use zip files, to reduce the chance of piracy. But a web site that posts zip files that their subscribers can't open is obviously more intelligent than a non-zip web site. This way, the pirates will waste their time trying to crack the un-usable zip files, instead of trying to steal the individual photos and videos.
Not replying to emails for customer support might also be part of the piracy defense.
Some pay sites I've joined don't answer emails. I can't say what percentage, because I rarely send emails to the pay sites I join, but there have definitely been times, when I had a problem and I emailed support, that I got no reply.
I know you've had similar experiences.
The old expression, "grin and bear it", seems to apply.
|
08-16-09 08:53am
|
Reply
550
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
I'll also considers this as a fine warning - bad for the user - and even worse that the webmaster or owner do not give a damn about contact from/to users/paying costumers....
I did not expect that from a site like Babelicious - will stay away till they fix this problem.
|
08-16-09 03:52am
|
