| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
476
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from SteveB:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hi Drooler,
Thanks for the reply!
I genuinely and sincerely intend on doing everything I can to make APD Nudes a simply great erotic nude site given a little time. :)
If you have anymore suggestions please don't hesitate in letting me know.
Best
SteveB
|
12-13-09 02:46pm
|
Reply
477
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from SteveB:
Hi Drooler,
My name is SteveB, I own APD Nudes ... the APD stands for Alluring, Passionate, Desirable ... to answer your question.
Thanks for the comments / review ... good or bad the only way I can work to make APD Nudes better is by hearing honest feedback from users like yourself ... and I assure you that over the coming months I have many plans to improve the site with more content and more features ... my first challenge on this project was to get the site live! I will certainly be taking your comments into account. :)
I have just changed the menu options so the members login link is at the top of the page now for you. :)
The first 6 weeks APD Nudes has been online has certainly been very busy for me (yes, this entire site is run by just one person ... me!) but as things are starting to bed in now .. I have exclusive content of Sophia Knight, Chloe James and Katy Cee and more during the rest of December with more new content coming in January and beyond too. :)
Thanks again.
All the Best,
SteveB
Webmaster - APD Nudes.com
|
12-13-09 06:20am
|
Reply
478
|
Apex Glamour
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from jd1961:
No zip files. Zip files are easy to create. I always wonder if this is a method to get people to stay longer than a month. Click save, Click save.
|
09-30-07 02:16pm
|
Reply
479
|
Ariel's Blog
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
Many thanks for the heads up on eurobabeindex.
www.eurobabeindex.com is a great resource. I hate to think of all the effort that some people used to make it. Would warp my mind to try to cover all those web sites checking out their favorite models.
Seriously, that is one great index, with the model's aliases, a nice photo to identify her, and the web sites she appears at.
There's also the linked forum thread for the model, with pics and links.
Could easily spend weeks or months looking through this site.
|
11-18-08 10:39am
|
Reply
480
|
Ariel's Blog
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from lk2fireone:
Nice, informative review.
Just a side note: If you like the model Ariel: Two of the best photosets I saw of her were posted at Met-art and Metmodels.
The Met-art set was posted 2005.01.04, named "Presenting Gabriela", by Magoo.
The Metmodels set was posted 2006.07.22., named "Fresh", by Magoo.
Ariel was named Gabriela at both Met-art and at Metmodels at that time.
She currently goes under the name of Ariel A. at Met-art.
I don't like the way Magoo colorizes his pictures. I like more lifelike, realistic color tones on the model.
But Ariel really looks like a yummy young girl-next-door in these two photosets, especially the Metmodel photoset. Like you said in the review, the expressions on a girl's face can change a photo from boring to interesting/attractive or vice versa.
She's a sweet, sweet girl, I'd really like to bite into (In my dreams).
More recent photosets of Ariel at either Met-art or Metmodels do not compare to the earliest sets. Glaring hair color, excessive makeup, whatever, she is just not presented as attractively as before. Is there some technical reason why a girl with red hair is more difficult to photograph so that her hair does not look like a dye-job?
|
11-16-08 09:06am
|
Reply
481
|
Ariel's Blog
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Cybertoad:
I would join but seems just so so .
darn she looks hot.
|
09-19-08 12:04am
|
Reply
482
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
Sorry, Drooler, I didn't mean to ignore you. I had simply forgotten all about your comment. I am happy that the webmaster seems to care and that we might see unretouched picture sets down the road yet. Most sets WERE ruined for me, to the point where I decided yesterday not to bother to return to the site even though I had more than a week to go in my subscription.
|
07-24-12 09:51am
|
Reply
483
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
The sites looks FINE - so why this hold back about reviews? a bit strange when you've already have put out the site for members to join - well, just this to ad - replied the latest comment for the site.
And BTW: it still LOOKS good..
|
03-08-10 08:36am
|
Reply
484
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
Aye, I don't know how long I am going to have to keep this crusade going....As long as I am breathing I think! ;0)
I am getting some cooperation, but I wish a few webmasters would grab this concept by the scruff of the neck & do it properly!
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-16-10 05:24pm
|
Reply
485
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from anyonebutme:
(Drooler's Reply)
While this site is good at what it does, there's nothing wrong with also making use of what else is is out there to get an idea of what awaits inside the porn site. We both agree that this site's main tour pages are lacking in good details.
|
12-20-09 01:06pm
|
Reply
486
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from anyonebutme:
(Drooler's Reply)
Definitely sarcasm in my words. Though even if the site listed out the specs for their members area, you'd still want independent verification of it, right? Preview galleries are already trickling out across tgp sites for anyone to look at.
|
12-20-09 08:33am
|
Reply
487
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from anyonebutme:
It's a whole different style, where the "only" sites compete against more the likes of ATK, Karups, etc., this site probably is positioned to be on the level with Met-Art, Femjoy, etc.
Instead of office clothes or formal dresses with but an occasional glimpse of the girl's naughty bits, this site uses sexy skimpy lingerie, more outdoor settings, and a helluva lot more skin. They are largely different in substance.
All I know is I like what I see, and not a concern in my mind about image dimensions & zip downloads, I'm confident they will more than fine. Regardless, site owners lie, why would you think to look at the tour for information? ;-)
|
12-20-09 12:17am
|
Reply
488
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Capn:
Yes.
Also I am a little puzzled as to why they have not used their 'trademark' 'Only.....' nomenclature.
:0/
|
12-19-09 02:27pm
|
Reply
489
|
Artfemme
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RLane:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks for the reply and I'll take this off my list.
|
05-10-12 06:41pm
|
Reply
490
|
Ashley Doll
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from RLane:
Great review and I'm hoping there will be a price change soon. The first time I saw her was at Met-Art and that's when I started to like her. I'm glad someone posted a review and I hope I can join this site soon.
|
10-11-14 09:58pm
|
Reply
491
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Capn:
Well, that is a step in the right direction at least.
Hopefully they will roll that out to their other sites soon.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-16-11 02:16pm
|
Reply
492
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Advent:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks guys for your comments. I am passing all of this on to the design team for them to look at. You all know we are member driven and we want your feedback good or bad so we can make the site better for you.
|
03-08-10 08:14am
|
Reply
493
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
Oh dear! :0/
Progress isn't necessarily in a forward direction, is it?
It sounds to me like that one hasn't been thought through.
I wonder if the old format could be made available as a display option for those that don't care for the new look?
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-25-10 04:57pm
|
Reply
494
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from RagingBuddhist:
(Drooler's Reply)
It wasn't a matter of cancelling the subscription - I haven't been on one of their sites in a couple of years. This was about the emails trying to get people to re-up.
|
01-24-10 04:46am
|
Reply
495
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thank you.
You guys helped me a lot here. I'm more into solo stuff, so that much suits me just fine. But it looks like this one stays on the back burner until the full-length content builds up. I don't mind clips too much as long as they don't fade in and out.
|
11-25-09 07:46am
|
Reply
496
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from exotics4me:
I just clicked the comment to post a comment about the full set zips. I haven't downloaded any of them yet, but will be sure to check them with the WinRar software as I download them. I'm starting to think that $20 on WinRar to replace WinZip was one of my best investments!
|
03-27-09 11:29am
|
Reply
497
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Read that Drooler-comment again and again, folks at ATK...
"You don't post it until you make sure it's ready! "
And it's NOT only zips - the delays of split videos-files for days and days are a disaster - and sometimes you do not get the last part or parts of a video - a fact this user have complained about before...
Is the word: botch?
|
03-27-09 06:13am
|
Reply
498
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Wittyguy:
"Strip, strip, strip, strip, nude". Sounds like these gals would be great at refinishing furniture ;) Maybe that's why their staying clothed, those chemicals can be nasty.
|
03-26-09 12:07pm
|
Reply
499
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from 2 Free K:
Those per-gallery-page zip downloads are a real drag. Great review.
|
08-15-08 05:09am
|
Reply
500
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from ChrisK:
I just wanted to jump and say "thanks" to Drooler and all the folks who take the time to comment on our sites. I'd like to take the opportunity to respond to some of the things that have been said:
1. We make extensive use of the voting feature on the sites so I encourage members to use it. This coupled with member feedback helps us gauge what everyone likes and what we need to buy. Our content is 100% member driven.
2. Regarding exclusivity, we do our best to purchase only exclusive content. There are some exceptions to that when we license content, but these are a very small percentage of our overall package. You will find some of the same models on other sites for sure. You will also find some well-known models including ones that have become mainstream. We have a lot of content of girls before they made it big.
We're constantly researching and working on ways to improve the sites. I'll check back here from time-to-time to see if I can offer any helpful information. Thanks again!
|
10-02-07 11:13am
|
