| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
Love it!
|
11-06-11 01:52am
|
Reply
177
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Angel Hott is coming to ALS on Tuesday,11/1
|
10-29-11 09:58am
|
Reply
178
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks for that FYI, Ze Droolah.....
But it also makes me wonder:
Why start "in the middle" of an entire photoset?
It kind of reminds me of "wham-bam-thank-you ect...." - where you miss all the "foreplay", which also goes for solo material, sets and vids...I've seen it with vids too many times, alas...
|
10-03-11 05:37am
|
Reply
179
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from g00gle:
I didn't go for a trial - just paid for a months subscription. mastercard worked for me.
|
10-01-11 02:13am
|
Reply
180
|
Nextdoor Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Monahan:
Drooler,
I just found this site and of course I immediately went to PU to see what has been said about it.
Yours is the only posting and it's 15 months old so I'd like to know if you've gone on the site recently. Their preview site looks good but has no info about how many videos are available. It also brags about 5 updates per week, but it also talks about "new model Mondays." Does that mean that the other four are recycled or are they new shoots of current models?
Thanks,
Jack
|
09-26-11 08:27am
|
Reply
181
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
Be aware that "stretching things a bit" is also considered a form of abuse... : - 0
|
09-20-11 02:03am
|
Reply
182
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, I like that "zombie" site input. That suits it well. Teenrotica is nowhere near "downright lousy" - maybe except for the vids - but I have rally enjoyed quite a few of the pix sets - BUT: with no more updates..."Hasta la vista, baby" - have already canceled rebill.....
|
09-19-11 06:24am
|
Reply
183
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from slutty:
(Drooler's Reply)
I tried a couple of roundabout ways to get to the content as well, and from reading the forum it seems clear that they expect users to pay the $19.99 or whatever. Unless I am misunderstanding something. I sort of doubt that they are including it with new members either.
I agree it is a good network, with a nice variety and good options, too bad they are pulling stuff like this though. I guess that's just the way it goes.
|
09-12-11 11:37pm
|
Reply
184
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
Seems to be a growing trend with the Euro models and even worse, the videos that show the picture shoot and the photographer tells the model to give him the orgasm face! It seems to have replaced the finger touching the bottom lip, "I've been naughty" look though I don't know which is worse.
|
09-12-11 11:20pm
|
Reply
185
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
What you say convinces me, once again, that beauty (or sex appeal) is in the eye of the beholder. I downloaded the farm girl photo set of Barbara at Errotica and then deleted it after viewing, because I just didn't like it.
I'm trying to be a little picky. Because even though Hard Drive storage is so cheap, I'm filling up these external hard drives with photo sets and videos I will probably never look at twice.
|
09-10-11 03:29am
|
Reply
186
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
I really liked Barbara Ds first photoset, but I found her other photosets to be much less appealing. It continually amazes me how a single model can look extremely attractive in one photoset, and so much less so in other photosets. You might expect this variation due to different photographers shooting the same model. But even the same photographer can make a model have a large difference in how attractively she is presented.
Anyhow, I agree that the new naming convention at Metart is more descriptive. But like Drooler states, the older system was far easier to use, in the sense the identifying section, e.g. SRT_141, was easy to list and keep track of. I am still trying to figure out how to keep a record of these long file names for a photoset.
|
09-09-11 09:14am
|
Reply
187
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
I see your point. It really does look like a (much) younger version of Cybil Shepard. But Barbara D's breasts look they've had some aftermarket enhancements. Don't think Cybil had any adjustments made.
|
09-08-11 09:31am
|
Reply
188
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from jamy:
it's corrected thanks to Brad who told me that on the forum. Sorry for inconvenience, but the forum, especially the 'site glitches' subject is the place to mention that kind of annoying stuff, and usually it's corrected a few hours later.
|
09-07-11 06:26pm
|
Reply
189
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from BradlyH:
(Drooler's Reply)
I personally don't think It's carelessness, I really doubt jam is just saying oh well and what ever to his work. Arguably it is to a degree of carelessness because to any route of any mistake there is a hint of carelessness..... but that's looking into things a little too deep.
You are right, and in some terms i agree. This is PU and this is what we do- Give people the heads up and earn the badges.
|
09-07-11 12:12pm
|
Reply
190
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
I've heard of a number of guys who like to keep some in the tank so that afterwards they can flush the pipes, so to speak, normally when they get to a working bathroom of course. And I've even read, as an actual recommendation from doctors, that women should urinate fairly soon after sex as a way to help avoid urinary tract infections. (Depends on the individual woman and her susceptibility to UTIs, and again this is in a toilet, not the bed/couch/backseat of your car!) I guess sex really is dirty...
Here's a quote from the Mayo Clinic's site, so you don't think I'm making this up and then you all vote to have Khan send me off to the crazy house for good! From Mayo Clinic: "Take these steps to reduce your risk of urinary tract infections:[...]Empty your bladder soon after intercourse."
This whole time all these porn girls were just trying to stay healthy, not fulfill some screwball fantasy! (That's my excuse for watching it--health and well-being...)
|
09-06-11 10:00pm
|
Reply
191
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from BradlyH:
I would say more then half of the sites i have subscribed to had at least one mixed set dead links or even spelling errors. Not defending Petites Parisiennes in the matter just saying i find this to be common among particular sites.
Have you brought the Site Errors to the attention of the web master ?
|
09-06-11 06:14pm
|
Reply
192
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from otoh:
There are sometimes slip-ups here with broken links... I forgive them though, since it's a one-man operation and he's both affable and usually quick to correct anything once mentioned.
|
09-05-11 02:43pm
|
Reply
193
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
BTW........and "hot damn" at this end, too.
I KNOW you're not into solo vids, much - but: just went through my stash with Monika S. and that one particular video at Babespotting.tv where she makes a dance in the doorway to a/her bedroom.......bro, how can anybody sit still watching that...LOL...
|
08-31-11 08:00am
|
Reply
194
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, thanks for the heads up here - at Teenrotica - got to join, now. And oh, yes that special Rachel can make me go for days hunting. Never realized earlier how much she's done - and not even here they got it all:
http://www.indexxx.com/models/5184/rachel-evans/
AND: if you ever get new material of our Monika Schimkova, this fellow PU would be thankful to hear about it...
|
08-31-11 07:42am
|
Reply
195
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
First a reply to the poll: not much into facials, unless the girl takes care of things - and then it ALL depends on how the model acts in general...
Second:
Got to ask the Drooler about a favorite: Rachel "The Body" Evans:
Does she have hc at Teenrotica ...and of course: are there vids, too???
(Sorry if I mix things a bit here)
|
08-30-11 07:22am
|
Reply
196
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from otoh:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hmm... well, I know there are some sites geared towards girls with gymnastic abilities, maybe I should try them. ;)
|
08-28-11 01:01am
|
Reply
197
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks, Drooler - hope you'll enjoy the site...
And funny - though we seem to have the same taste in models - almost - it's still a lot of vids contra sets (softcore) - and in my stash from this site is almost only vids - and those of the model they wrongly call "French" - Monika Shimkova/Carmen Scott/Marie Sheridan are my favorites (she's got it all, lol) - take a look, bro...
|
08-22-11 08:16am
|
Reply
198
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Most "social conservatives" I know really don't have any interest in anything like this. The only efforts in the USA in the last 20-30 years have been to limit children's access to porn but not to stop porn altogether.
As for the .xxx, if it's voluntary, I'm good with it. But making it mandatory would create a definitional nightmare. No one can conclusively define porn.
USSC Justice Potter Stewart in a 1964 decision:
"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.”
— Justice Potter Stewart, concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio 378 U.S. 184 (1964), regarding possible obscenity in The Lovers.
|
08-14-11 11:16am
|
Reply
199
|
Earl Miller
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Earl Miller Pho:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thank you for commenting about EarlMiller.com.
EarlMiller.com doesn't split solo videos into multiple updates but we do update longer videos (around 45 mins) (girl/girl, boy/girl, threesome, bts) as 12-15 minute segments.
EarlMiller.com makes the full scene of those segmented videos available to members after the final segment goes live for those that prefer not to watch video in segments. (***This does not count as one of the daily updates.)
Years and years ago Earl only had video shot as behind the scenes during his photoshoots however he's been posting full video scenes in addition to the behind the scenes video since 2004.
EarlMiller.com posts both production video and behind the scenes video. In behind the scenes video you will often see strobe flashes because photography is what is happening. In production video that doesn't happen.
In May, June, July 2011 in terms of bts video vs production video posted- In each of these months there were two behind the scenes videos posted- all other video was production video
There are usually two- one hundred piece photosets updated as two parts each in a week. That same week there are some solo videos or a full production boy/girl or girl/girl video, or a bts video of a couples scene.
There are a handful of glass toy shots in most of the photosets but they are very large edits in the hopes that members who don't like the toy shots or have other preferences still have a plentiful set of enjoyable images.
EarlMiller.com is a 13 year old site that updates 6 days every week + occasional 7th day update with no recycled content.
Something to look forward to:
We're celebrating Earl Miller's 40th year in the adult business in 2012 and kicking it off with the launch of a multi scene episodic work unlike anything he's ever done before on September 1, 2011.
We're sorry to hear you found the site to be "thin" considering the vast quantity and variety of content including amateur solos, glamour solos, girl-girls, boy-girls, and threesomes. We hope you'll check back in the future to see if we're moving in a direction you prefer.
EarlMiller.com has already posted more than 600 full length videos, more than 1500 photosets, and 550 models in the past 13 years and all of it is available to members from day one of their membership.
|
08-08-11 11:31pm
|
Reply
200
|
Earl Miller
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks for this heads-up, Drooler....no pressure, friend - but guess a review from you of this site would be appreciated big time - not only by this user, but...
It's kind of funny/strange that no words(comments or alike) have been up here for years - it's not a minor one, as I see it..
Well.......if you get the time...
|
08-08-11 10:27am
|
