| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from lk2fireone:
(Drooler's Reply)
If you are still a member of Wow Girls, or one of the Diesel Access Sites, then you can see the Live Shows the girls put on. It's a live chat show put on by Diesel, that features a few of the Diesel model girls live. This is different from the link that Diesel provides to a commercial live chat forum, that is called diesel.livetopcams.
On the Diesel Live Shows, which features actual Diesel models, Angelica performs occasionally.
I don't usually watch the Diesel Live Shows, but I caught one with Angelica recently. It was the first Angelica show I have watched. She had a guy with her (her boyfriend, I would assume), and they were going at it.
Completely free show. Not a private show. Just a regular live chat show.
The other Diesel girls strip completely, and masturbate, or talk/type with the audience. Completely free.
But this was the first time I saw a Diesel Live Show where the model had a guy with her and they were doing it.
Angelica looks as good in the Live Show as she does in her photosets and videos. And she is hot.
She has a live show scheduled for tomorrow, Friday, 02:00 am - 4:00 am, Eastern Standard time.
Sometimes the models don't show up for a live show. But if you are awake at this time, with access to the live show, you might want to tune in.
If you can't watch it live, Diesel (at the Diesel Access network, and also at Wow Girls site) has "Live Show Archive", where you can see a tape of past shows.
But in that case, I prefer to watch a regular taped studio video of the girl, because the production values, the definition, the lighting, the colors, etc., are better quality.
|
01-03-13 06:23pm
|
Reply
102
|
Casting Couch X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tree Rodent:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yep, that's why I always give trials a misss. Same for sites with pre checked cross sells. If it looks like a site that is likely to try and trick you out of your money, it's best to give it a miss.
|
12-08-12 07:31pm
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from skippy:
(Drooler's Reply)
Ditto for me. The MA network is tops, although you don't get access to all of the sites without paying extra.
|
12-08-12 10:25am
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Cybertoad:
(Drooler's Reply)
LOLOLOL Drooler
|
11-20-12 07:55pm
|
Reply
105
|
Emily Addison.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Cybertoad:
(Drooler's Reply)
I hear ya Drool, I think it surprised me that it was open a year and stopped updating about 8 months in. I agree I have seen it a hundred times too. But this is got to be a new shorttimers record LOL
|
11-05-12 08:06pm
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from gaypornolover:
(Drooler's Reply)
Oh you little tease!
|
10-28-12 09:02am
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from gaypornolover:
(Drooler's Reply)
What did you do?!
|
10-26-12 01:14pm
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Toadsith:
(Drooler's Reply)
lol - "oogie", I'm so going to add that to my repertoire of synonyms for sex.
|
10-18-12 05:56pm
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Toadsith:
(Drooler's Reply)
Ohhh, good one. Antarctica would fit in too as it is the driest continent, and coldest for that matter.
|
10-18-12 12:51pm
|
Reply
110
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Maybe Diesel is saving for the not included-in-network: Wow Girls?
|
10-02-12 07:21am
|
Reply
111
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from joekramer08:
I hate pussy closeups, in movies and in pictures. I wish all porn producers would just stop doing them. I want to see the whole girl - not just her pussy. idiots.
|
10-01-12 02:59pm
|
Reply
112
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from lk2fireone:
By the way, have you seen Candice Luca. aka Candice Love, Kaylee, Lennox A?
She's only been around starting this year, but she's got photosets over a large number of websites. Some of her photosets are really good. And her videos are definitely worth watching, as well.
|
10-01-12 11:37am
|
Reply
113
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I'm still a member of the Diesel network with access to all their sites (excluding Wow Girls).
Normally, I'm more into pix than vids.
But some sites and networks emphasize vids over pix. And that's my take on Diesel.
The pix have improved quite a bit in the last few years at Diesel. But the vids are the main reason to join this network.
The vids and the incredibly cute teens they feature.
I agree the photosets could be improved. Especially where they waste a lot of time on pussy closeups. Maybe that's due to popular demand, or what they think is popular demand.
But like I say, I join Diesel for the vids. For pix, there are much better sites. Except there are a number of photosets of models that are worth viewing, and keeping, as well. Because the models are gorgeous.
|
10-01-12 11:24am
|
Reply
114
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I'm sorry to hear that you're not satisfied with the network. I haven't rejoined recently but I probably still will. I was watching some of their stuff this morning and the videos are really well done. The women on the network are really amazing too. I hope that as your membership goes on you'll find more satisfaction.
|
09-30-12 11:59am
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Off topic: Oh, yes: comfortable shoes from that brand - and now they're better looking than in the old days.....and now a pretty big brand worldwide....and those folks from a village in a remote part of Denmark are richer than ever....among the Top 10 in this small country.
|
09-24-12 06:26am
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(Drooler's Reply)
I too try to keep the porn and the politics off my TV. Don't want to attract neighbor kids to my windows and be guilty of them watching politics.
|
09-21-12 05:15am
|
Reply
117
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Mort:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, I have also just made the mistake of re-joining for another look, and am even more disappointed than a few years ago. Really boring photosets - the latest look like 20 or so shots of almost identical poses (perhaps a hand moved?) and the girls are way too made up or photoshopped for any of their natural appeal to show.
A site to avoid if you are looking for anything with lasting interest in pics, and the videos are no better.
Oh well, I won't be renewing or getting caught again.
|
09-18-12 02:30am
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Claypaws:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler. You have brilliantly expressed how I feel too.
|
09-05-12 05:01pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from marcdc1:
(Drooler's Reply)
Drooler, I think this is my favorite answer well said.
|
08-31-12 12:05pm
|
Reply
120
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from slutty:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yeah, its too bad, I did just join Wow and it is pretty good, although smaller. It is good that they dropped the price, because $30 is probably a bit much for a site that is this sized.
|
08-07-12 08:20pm
|
Reply
121
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(Drooler's Reply)
For what's it's worth Drooler, I think Wow Girls is a great value. I'm probably a bit biased because it's a site full of women who look like they came directly from my fantasies...
|
08-07-12 04:12pm
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Toadsith:
(Drooler's Reply)
I know you asked "who really cares?" but I figured I'd note that Peaches is just a smidge over 5'10" (178cm). If she is exactly 178cm, then she actually is 5' 10-393/5000" (5'10.0786").
Sorry, I was bored.
|
08-06-12 07:06pm
|
Reply
123
|
Sinful Goddesses
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from marcdc1:
Good catch thanks!
|
07-30-12 05:52am
|
Reply
124
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
Sorry, Drooler, I didn't mean to ignore you. I had simply forgotten all about your comment. I am happy that the webmaster seems to care and that we might see unretouched picture sets down the road yet. Most sets WERE ruined for me, to the point where I decided yesterday not to bother to return to the site even though I had more than a week to go in my subscription.
|
07-24-12 09:51am
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#22
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Absolutely.....
|
07-15-12 07:47am
|
