See, you know what I'm talking about! So when you watch a flick and you witness a man having a hard time FUCKING some sweet pussy fast because it's top notch, you know what he is going through!!
And see, producers don't want to show that because they are too biased into thinking that woman are not superior to men!! THEY ONLY WANT TO SHOW THAT MEN DOMINATE THE PUSSY!! How they do this, this is how:
- They have the man jack off before his session!
- Or they get some good pussy off the camera ( Which isn't a bad thing, but I want to know how good the pussy is ON the camera!!)
How can really good pussy look so easy to fuck fast on film, man?! I tell you man, the cumshots are all bullshit, except the ones where they pull out and immediately shoot, and there is no evidence of cutting to another scene!!!
Since this is a site that continues to excite me more than many, I have to contest the "don't care" allegation.
a) Their stuff is exclusive and that's worth something
b) The production staff has a unique attitude that comes out in their stuff - an affection for a certain grittiness that cuts against the glamour and makes them different from the cookie-cutter character of Twisty's, for example
c) Yeah, they could edit the sets they post and pull out a bunch where the color went off, but these are usually a small number of pics in large updates of 100 pics or more, so for me it's hard to complain about that
d) When they hit it right on, they do astounding work and have done some of the best sets of Annetta Keys, Monika Vesela, Andi Valentino, Jade Hsu (including wonderful recent sets), and others.
e) Their navigation - it's weird and not particularly user-friendly. Sometimes the photosets are on a separate page from their vids, sometimes (as with Mari Possa, one of my faves) the photosets are connected to the vids.
The price - I wouldn't have stayed if I were stuck with their original membership price, even with everything I said above. Their "please don't leave" price when I was going to has kept me around.
Lack of recent updates - this concerns me. After being as consistent as one could hope for, they haven't updated at all since 12/24. One would think that any professional site would have auto-updating set up before they went on vacation or would post a note on their home page about their update plans.
Other sites are being weird about this too, at present, which I find frustrating and avoidable, given the auto-update and clear communication options they could have gone with.
Reason I asked this question is because if you know good good pussy feels, wouldn't you want to see that on a porn flick so it can run through your imagination?
After this edifying exchange with Walter, I did correct the 50% in the first con to ~43%, which is more accurate, it being 3/7 (rounded up, now) although there are those 11 Sundays from May to December '07 with nothing.
Another thing: It might be silly to believe that 100% of a single-model site would be 100% exclusive, which Walter accused me of believing, but I never said that I believed that. I just stated what was so about the site, and I knew there would be non-Jenni content in it before I joined. The visitor's pages made that clear enough.
I put down my $25 and was sorely disappointed. I wouldn't have joined if I had known that the site claim of the high resolution galleries wasn't true. Had it been true, I would have rated it perhaps 10 points higher.
And I wrote the review as a CONSUMER, dammit, not as a seeker of followers. (Where the hell did THAT come from?)
Isn't it fun being an uncompensated reviewer for PornUsers?
C is for Come ON! - You state ">20% of the Jenni content here is elsewhere". If math has not changed that means ~80% IS EXCLUSIVE!
L is for Lazy - You state "outrageous having subscribers pay for small galleries (of small pics, some even of Jenni herself!) that are just promotions of other sites." You failed to read at the top of the page that updates are scheduled 4 days per week "Sunday, Monday, Wednesday & Friday" The galleries you refer to are added to the calendar on the OTHER DAYS of the week.
U is for Unbelievably wrong - The Friends links are ALL in the public area and shared with the members on the calendar pages. Anyone who knew the business you would clearly know that Affiliate content galleries cannot be "re-sold" as member content under the affiliate agreements.
M is for Mind Boggling - "Promos, comprising 50% of the calendar updates" 3 of 7 days is NOT 50%
S is for Silly - Non exclusive would relate to a "multi-talent" site. If a site is for one model (Jenni) it is silly to believe 100% of the content would be exclusive.
Y is for You're Right on One Count - Zip files of high rez galleries need to be updated.
Yo Drool the man, I am going to ask you the same question I asked RagingBudhist, jd, pat, Toad, Woodruff, kman and JayG... Have you ever had some pussy you could NOT fuck too fast because it felt too good?
Anyone can do it if they want to take the time. They're not geniuses, they just load data they share with other hackers. They find the combinations, and the website usually shuts it down in a day. But really, I don't even worry about it, I would just get another password. One time though I noticed a whole bunch of "favorites" in my folder at a side that I didn't put there, so I alerted the site and got a new pass.
No, they have computer generated usernames and passwords. They count on people using the same username over and over to make it easier. Then they let the software do the work. It's not a result of someone hijacking....that would be for your banking records LOL! I just make a notepad for my use/pass, and keep it on my desktop. The only computer a website hacker is going to break into is the website's. But that is very time consuming. They have software where they feed in massive lists of use/pass.
I wouldn't worry about security too much, these sites are hacked on a daily basis. Remember to try to use different USERNAMES, the hackers use usernames to generate passwords.
I assumed the support email referring to Divx and audio only that we received within a few minutes of your PU post was from you. Obviously I was mistaken.
I will pass the other comments on to our team. Thanks for the feedback.
-VERY softcore.
Yes Its, but we are moving towards some harder shots at our users request, keep an eye on future photo-sets.
-Not that many really appealing models.
I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. We feature thin, physically fit girls next door. 95% of our girls ARE NOT professional models. These are real people that you might meet on the street, except they are not overweight and out of shape.
-Models almost never look back when their backs (butts) are to the camera
I will make the suggestion to the photographers
-Only ten videos; downloaded one and the DivX player told me it had no video track
We are adding videos as quickly as possible; You need the latest codec to view the video properly. There are two options available on the video support page (also help was supplied in the reply to the support email you sent.) Unfortunately the way windows is designed, you need the correct codec or compatible player. Both are available and easy to implement from the video pages.
-Several gallery pages have NO thumbs, but at least the zips work
You should have thumbs for all galleries. I will personally check this out.
-Can’t set “view all” as a constant preference for all galleries
The biggest problem that I see in America with parents and porn is the huge amount of single mothers raising sons. Very few mothers are ever going to be accepting of their little boys growing up, especially growing up and finding a woman to lust over. On the other hand, you should see me trying to talk to dads about their daughters ha ha. I've noticed that Americans generally want to believe that we are open-minded as can be, until it hits close to home.
I at least do see an improvement in the number of unexpected pregnancies and see way less young women saying, "I want a baby, so I will have sex just to get that baby". The kids today are showing more intelligence about sex at younger ages, but there is one train of thought that says that is because these kids are so selfish and self-absorbed. They don't want a relationship since that would mean they might have to spend their money on the other person. They don't want kids because it would take away from their freetime.
What I believe has happened is my generation, 26-44 right now, did grow up with more liberal parents. I can remember my dad also giving me Playboy, then my uncle gave me a Hustler. I can even remember my mom buying me a box of condoms before my senior year of high school.
Similar to the wild teens of the past that indulged in alcohol, only to hit legal age, then not really want the alcohol. I think that happened with us with sex. Once it was okay with our parents, it became less desirable to do. I can remember almost looking at sex as something, "You do once married and bored".
Last, where I think we have our biggest problem is trying to explain to a younger person that sex does not equal love, but they shouldn't have sex until they love someone. Makes no sense! I came from the thought, "Try it before you buy it" I guess it depends on how you look at things, like divorce rates and so on. Maybe it is true, once we have had sex and then marry the person later, there isn't that first time for after marriage and it takes away in the long run. I just think that is people these days being less satisfied with life in general. I did think the topic was a great one though.
I'm a huge Sky fan, but I really don't know what she has gotten herself into these days. She is a rapper now if you didn't know. Going by the name of Sky "Spring Break" Lopez. The last time I saw anything new of her, she has both arms completely covered with tattoos now, and is claiming to reach many young women and men with her rap music that has a Christian message. In other words, she is full of it now.
But in her prime, there were very few models who had the total package she had. My favorite video is the one with Krystal Steel. They, according to both of them, were real lovers at the time. Krystal probably orgasms 4 times in the video, Sky 3-4 and both literally are tearing each other's clothes off.
My understanding is, the heavily tattoed man that is seen in all of her newer b/g content is her new husband. He led her away from porn to be a Christian, and led her to body art for Christianity. I should have thought of that line myself! In an interview that we have on the Latin Channel out here in California, she says that by the last two years of her career, "I couldn't even feel the man, this was God punishing me". It was almost scary watching the interview because she now comes off as being very brain washed by someone.
But I agree, she is easily one of the sexiest women porn has seen in a long time. I will have to join this site and grab this content, in the interview she says that she is in the process of buying back all of her content. I know that Vivid has re-released some of their videos, taking her scenes out. And to think, she says she wants to reach young men and women, I see no better way for Sky to reach us all than with her body!
I do think some of it is from Evelyn's site. The content, while very small, is very good. I'm not a huge fan of Vendula, but can recognize her beauty and some of this content is familiar. The other site though, from what I have seen looks to be all new. I think my mind needs a break from porn for about 3 months, all of it is running together!
Enough reconizable names for me to join. I really like Cassia, Brea, Sabrina Sweet, Montana and Charlie, who I believe is really a lesbian. Then the selling point is Sarah Blake, I lived out of the East Coast for several years and knew her agent at the time. Very sweet, charming young woman.
I just hope the navigation is better than the Karups PC site, which from the reviews, it is. Thanks for the information, these days, with so many sites that are just a lot of fluff in the preview with not much content once you join, it is good to have PU to turn to.
More and more sites are going to that click on calender only to not show the updates, that definitely is annoying, and was the reason I hadn't joined Sophie's site until I did. I do have to admit though, if I was running Sophie's site, I would just put a picture of her smiling and leave it at that! Maybe even put a caption out from her head that says, "You know you want to see the rest"! I really wish Mia would come back. I have a very large collection of content of hers, and would imagine it is about everything she has done. I think Sophie is also retiring, or may have already retired as none of her content that is listed as new looks any newer than the other content I have of her. I know the woman is near perfect, but she has to age some...I think.
I'm in complete agreement for Jassie. I don't recognise Klaudia, but there are 100's of amazing european performers with natural small breats. I'd say that most, if not all of my favorite pornstars have had small to medium size breats. It's also why I'm always saddened to see them getting implants, because it changes their entire physical appearance. Not to mention that they often go overboard and get freakin blimps installed on their chest. Here's hoping that women gifted with small breast don't decide to get implants.
I sent your msg to my administrator. I think that our servers works OK (we have new Sun platform since Dec 1), maybe we have temporary problem on international connectivity.
Addition: download speed of ZIP file at 1pm CET: ~280kbps. I think that speeds over ~ 250K are very good, because other big sites have speed mostly ~ 30-40K.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
