| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1076
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Pinche Kankun:
(Drooler's Reply)
I HATE THAT FUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKING SHIT, TOOOOOO, MAN!!!!! >:(
WHY DO THEY DO THAT SHIT?!!!!! >:(
GET OFF THE FUCKIN' CAMERA!!!!!!!! >:(
|
03-03-08 11:29pm
|
Reply
1077
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Pinche Kankun:
(Drooler's Reply)
No offense Drool man, but if you can fuck some good pussy for hours and not nut... YOU ARE A FUCKING ROBOT!!! :D :D
|
03-03-08 11:22pm
|
Reply
1078
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Davit:
(Drooler's Reply)
Use a DM squire - FDM works great with In The Crack for movies, and DownThemAll is good for pics. Hopefully then, if a download fails, you can just pick it up again once the site is back up.
|
03-03-08 01:25pm
|
Reply
1079
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from homer:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, after being offline, after video download interruptions, things worked fine... for a few days :( because their website is offline again!!!
|
03-02-08 05:08pm
|
Reply
1080
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Davit:
(Drooler's Reply)
I've had a couple of problems since joining the site a couple of days ago, where the site has suddenly gone off-line. And I've found myself randomly logged out on a couple of occasions, which led to all my downloads in my FDM failing and me having to load them all in again once I'd logged back in. Must be that OS issue.
The site has just gone down again. Now there's service for you - it not only dishes up hot babes - it goes down on you too.
|
03-02-08 02:39pm
|
Reply
1081
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, it's always the same---they pan up the camera from the floor slowly to the girls face..."What's your name?" "Are you ready to suck some cock?" "Show me your tits!". And then they cop a cheap feel while I'm screaming at my monitor for him to shut the hell up!
|
03-02-08 02:04pm
|
Reply
1082
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Guess - had these guys been into porn/pornsites as long as a lot of us here at PU have, they might be influenced by some sort of self-irony/self-critic - and avoid those foolish interviews...
I really like the part you mention with Lenka Horokovas answer.
And yes, if you can't do those interviews (if any at all) professionally - drop it.
BTW - a relly good poll, this one. Hope some Co.'s behind websites see it.
|
03-02-08 11:24am
|
Reply
1083
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Davit:
(Drooler's Reply)
Amen.
|
03-02-08 03:55am
|
Reply
1084
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Davit:
(Drooler's Reply)
Haha! Good points well made... EXCEPT: (!)
The point about guys in porn being considered 'props' and therefore we guys are more 'objects' than the women are. That's not a good parallel, as the 'prop' thing is coming generally from other straight guys, not women.
Bet Paul McCartney would relate to the Robin Williams quote right now!
|
03-02-08 03:53am
|
Reply
1085
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Davit:
Great review, Drooler. The token system is now gone. I literally joined this site for the first time in the last 48 hours, and am just blown away by the awesome camera work, both motion and still. I've been downloading like its going out of fashion, I just can't get enough of this style of content (i.e. ass worship). The newer stuff is also superior to the older stuff.
Good point about the 'objectifying' of the women. But in a sense, I think this is less objectifying than, say, catwalk models who are just there to look good and hang clothes on, and are void of personality. I think feminists overstate the whole 'sex object' thing and place way too much relevance on it. Personally, I like my porn performers to have some character and personality, and all the best porn stars are not necessarily the best looking, but are the ones that have warmth and personality. That comes across a lot on this site.
The 'anal twitching' comment - absolutely agree. It's interesting for about 0.3 seconds, we don't need to see it filling our screens for 10 minutes straight!
You mentioned 200-350 pics per gallery. What you have overlooked (if I may say so) is that a great many of these shots are very repetitive. I'm not really into playing 'Spot The Difference' (7 shots of an open pussy in a row at ever so slightly different angles) so I tend to prune my pic sets right down to something more concise.
I'm still gonna give this site a very decent score, as it is just so unique, from what I have seen. I read you were disappointed in the site (although your 83 score suggests it wasn't all bad for you - and that's despite the tokens!).
I feel it's too soon now, but look out for my review in the coming days or weeks.
|
03-01-08 03:03pm
|
Reply
1086
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Davit:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yeah, those machines are soulless and turn me off almost as much as naked men.
|
02-29-08 05:08am
|
Reply
1087
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Davit:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yeah, but most people (at least I *suspect* most people) quit on sites after a month anyway, as the value is gone temporarily at the end of your first month - whether it started with 30, 40 or 50 vids.
I was with Club Sandy for just one month, and quit with hundreds of vids and galleries under my belt. I'll certainly go back once I've been away for a good 6 months, so I get reasonable value again.
I have made the suggestion before: offer various grades of membership at different prices that offer limited quantities. So if you just need to top up with the last 2 months' updates, you would pay, say, $15, and only have access to the last 60 days (and the next 30). First time joiners who want 4 years of material would pay, say, $50 (obviously the more you purchase, the better the value), then maybe $10 for each month they stick around ($10 buys 30 days of updates, with no backlog, for example).
Just a thought. Might not be logistically easy to implement.
|
02-28-08 01:24pm
|
Reply
1088
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Karup:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hi Drooler,
The new members area went online earlier this week. We haven't contacted the review sites to get re-reviews just yet because we wanted to take a week of hearing back from members, working out any kinks, etc... before we did that.
Please e-mail me at - jeff at karup dot com. I'd like to give you a complimentary user/pass to the site, just as I've offered several people on here, to check it out for yourself.
Regards,
Jeff
|
02-28-08 08:54am
|
Reply
1089
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Khan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Haha .. of course I'm here ... I'm *always* here. ;)
Not sure I'm understanding what you're asking with regards to "ledgers". If you have a specific question, I'll try to answer it.
Maybe I can share some of what I've learned about webmasters who launch new sites that may help the users here at least see why all new sites dont automatically go with what you feel they should.
While there's no hard-fast rules (and there's always exceptions), those opening new sites typically fall into one of three groups.
The first is when an existing network is just adding a new site. Often this is in response to requests from their members about a specific niche. There's a good chance they'll have plenty of content when they launch though there's also a good chance some of it will have been seen elsewhere in their network.
The second is an experienced webmaster who sees a niche that he feels has earning potential. They'll have some content for the site but there's a good chance most of it is licensed from a third party content producer (and may have been seen elsewhere). It's unlikely they'll put a whole lot of content into the site until they see if they'll be getting sign-ups to pay for the extra content.
The third is the brand new webmaster. These are usually VERY inexperienced. Often a surfer who decided they wanted to try their hand at running a site. Many just bought a new camera and think they're now content producers. Amateur sites often fall into this group too. This group often will have fresh, original content but the quality might not be consistent. The problem is, they also tend to underestimate how much content they need to launch a site. As MargulisAZ mentioned, they're often in a rush to start seeing some earnings since by now they've spend far more than they originally estimated.
There will likely be a few webmasters in the first two groups who scan the polls (and reviews) here at PornUsers. I doubt many in the third group do.
Contrary to what many surfers may think, producing good content isn't cheap and at the end of the day, most porn sites are businesses so the owners look for a good return on their investment. Giving away a ton of content at the initial launch and following with frequent updates often doesn't seem (to them) like a good business decision.
Hopefully something in there helps you see the question from the other side of the glass.
|
02-28-08 08:23am
|
Reply
1090
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Davit:
(Drooler's Reply)
You tell 'em Drooler! The fact is, usually before you sign up to a site, its extremely hard - if not impossible - to gauge *quality* as they invariably stick up a load of top notch horny pics and clips on the tour pages to suck you in (if you'll excuse the pun). But that is so often not reflective of the true quality once inside. It may be - it may not.
So we can't really use 'quality' as a criterion when joining - after all, we'd all obviously choose 'top quality' if we could guarantee it. But we can only allow a little faith on that point.
What we *can* gauge objectively is the *quantity* of material available on the sites; that's why this poll is so relevant, IMO. And when you have such sites as Sapphic Erotica, Club Sandy, Pics & Videos, etc. offering hundreds of movies and galleries, one does have raised expectations of what you should get for your buck.
If I could find a fault with this poll, it is that the highest option was '50'. I would have started with '30' and gone up to maybe '100' in my options. But I'm being picky. Good poll.
|
02-27-08 02:55pm
|
Reply
1091
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
I've given up on their sites. Premium price should mean premium service, tech included, and they simply don't deliver.
|
02-25-08 02:56am
|
Reply
1092
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
I see what you mean, thanks!
|
02-24-08 01:51pm
|
Reply
1093
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from jd1961:
How did you get 3.5 months for the monthly price? I'm not sure I understand you.
|
02-24-08 01:38pm
|
Reply
1094
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, a bit strange - about the Pier 999-team. They do not seem to have any problems concerning lack of interest - from PUs at least.
For me, anyway, I thinbk it's a pity with the missing movie-updates - in general their quality is great.
BTW - this may be out of your way, but anyway:
I just stumbled over some outrageous 3D animations - hardcore. It's on an - overall - quite inferior pass/site Euro Sex Nation (with some bonus sites). But this special place with 3D (bonus site) is simply great - ain a new and for me quite new dimension. So you got any good links in that field???
Take care over there, pal...
|
02-24-08 08:15am
|
Reply
1095
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Hey, fine info, Drooler!
(What's M-F BTW?)
Wondered about thier updates - good to see it's returning - still for us movie-nerds, it seems to be worse than earlier. Just a very few new videos in february - and none in january and december 2007 - as far as I see it.
But thanks for YOUR update here!
|
02-24-08 05:52am
|
Reply
1096
|
Sexy Teen Paradise
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from exotics4me:
It is either the same content or we've looked at so much porn that it's all starting to look the same! I'm starting to think we need new poses, maybe the cameramen/women could take all of the pictures upside down or throw in some dwarves running around in the background?
|
02-23-08 09:09am
|
Reply
1097
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
I trust both yours and jd's judgment (based on various reviews and comments), therefore I think I'll give the place a one month try even though it doesn't quite meet my dream of the perfect site. Quality DOES count with me. Thanks for the answer.
|
02-22-08 10:47am
|
Reply
1098
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Nick C:
Thankyou for the detailed review, hope you are still enjoying the site!
Best Regards
Nick
Webmaster
|
02-20-08 08:34am
|
Reply
1099
|
Virtual Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
Maybe you should change your password.
|
02-19-08 06:42pm
|
Reply
1100
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#27
from Pinche Kankun:
(Drooler's Reply)
Ey, do they pinch titties with mouse traps?!!! :D
|
02-18-08 11:30pm
|
