| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
726
|
Stunners
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Monahan:
Is the trial a full access trial or is it limited?
|
02-19-09 11:54am
|
Reply
727
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from kkman112:
(Drooler's Reply)
Haha, Drooler! If you ever find a vid like that, send it to me! LOL!
I don't really care either-way - it should be up to the girl and the producer. The girl should be able to decide if she wants to and the producers/directors should be able to decide if it is something that goes along with the theme of the site.
|
02-13-09 05:58am
|
Reply
728
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Worm:
(Drooler's Reply)
My comment is for people who dont know its a softcore site. I said if you like soft porn its very good... but if you want hardcore like me then it can be weak.
|
02-09-09 06:01am
|
Reply
729
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
Once again I find myself agreeing with you, Drooler!
|
02-03-09 07:11am
|
Reply
730
|
Jack's Teen America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
Streaming Quicktime is something you expect to see on someone's homemade website.
I wouldn't have a problem with these companies setting up sites to promote their DVDs, but it should be for a nominal fee, not the going rate for a premium site.
People should avoid this site.
|
02-02-09 07:02am
|
Reply
731
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, bro - plain and simple: don't even waste the dollar and the clicks joining. The photos are also still the same old standard and the quality nothing to speak off....
|
02-01-09 10:46am
|
Reply
732
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from The Bishop:
I have to agree largely with your comment going hardcore isn't the answer, and also agree I'd prefer if they just added more quality sets of good looking girls.
However I do think there are a good deal of decent looking girls in there, but also some not so, 'ugly solo' as you put it :)
|
01-31-09 07:02am
|
Reply
733
|
Blue Fantasies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Shap:
(Drooler's Reply)
We are waiting on the sync to complete :)
|
01-30-09 07:53am
|
Reply
734
|
Blue Fantasies
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Shap:
Hi Drooler. That was a total screw up by us. For some reason during the watermark process (which is automated) the watermark was multiplied in size (I believe because of the larger sized picture).
It was definitely a one off and I hope to have this fixed today.
|
01-29-09 07:30am
|
Reply
735
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
I plead guilty...been lurkin' here several times and waiting for two thing:
1) The updates
2) The conversion-rates to get straight.
So I look for news about this site, too...
|
01-28-09 07:27am
|
Reply
736
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from badandy400:
(Drooler's Reply)
Now be nice Drooler...we need to be entertained every now and then. :)
I know this is from a pretty old posting, but it still cracks me up.
|
01-25-09 01:08am
|
Reply
737
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(Drooler's Reply)
That would help. but lately DLTA hasn't been working for me at paysites.
Maybe I'm doing something wrong?
|
01-24-09 06:14pm
|
Reply
738
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from williamj:
(Drooler's Reply)
Smart tinking. I was thinking the same thing.
|
01-24-09 05:01pm
|
Reply
739
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from jd1961:
This is why I love PU.
I was thinking of giving this site a go, but your comment made me wise.
No zips? Honestly, I'm beginning to think this is a ploy sites use to extend your membership. You can only click and save so much at a time. It's too much of a drag. Zip filing is as easy as 1-2-3. There simply is no excuse not to have zip files.
Thanks.
|
01-24-09 06:41am
|
Reply
740
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wittyguy:
(Drooler's Reply)
In their new forum they do have a section on photo sizes. Basically the only word posted from Holly Randall (who's now running the show) is that "it's in discussion" about going up 1600 or 1800 on the pics. I can't imagine that there's much to discuss but there it be :)
|
01-22-09 08:47pm
|
Reply
741
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Ace DDF:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hi,
Thanks for the info about the wrong ZIP filenames. It was simply because the same ZIP program that created the packages was used. The problem has been corrected.
As for Windows blocking the ZIPs, that really is a Windows issue. Have you managed to solve it? Maybe it is worth looking at options in your Antivirus/Unpacker program.
Best regards,
Endre
|
01-19-09 03:06pm
|
Reply
742
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from messmer:
Hi Drooler, I find that having older women in the line up is a plus for the site, even if some wrinkles should start showing. Hardcore is not my thing so I politely turned down their offer to re-subscribe. To me hc will never be an improvement but I know that many people asked for it so I'm happy for them that they are finally getting their wish.
|
01-19-09 12:33pm
|
Reply
743
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
I really like the idea of resurrecting an older but popular poll. New people and new ideas can be far more interesting than a poll question that seems forced just to have a new one.
|
01-11-09 10:05am
|
Reply
744
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from TheRizzo:
(Drooler's Reply)
Cheers Drooler, Denner was bang on about you knowing! And finding a great price like that I am going to check it out tonight. Look for a review within the next day or two.
|
01-07-09 03:35pm
|
Reply
745
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Monahan:
(Drooler's Reply)
Exactly.
If a well written review by a PU member identifies issues with which I cannot abide, I will not sign up regardless of price or any other consideration.
If a PU review identifies features that I like, then the site will not have DRM or other negative aspects.
The only subjective element that remains will be price (I just cannot agree to spend more than $30 on any site ever. A site must be a real winner, based on the reviews if I'm willing to pop for $25-$29.99. If a site is under $25, I'll usually bite if the PU review says it's a good site.
I'll also pop for a "Full Trial" of any site if the price is $2 per day or less and the biller is CCBill or Epoch.
Download limits don't bother me because I try to be selective in what I keep. Also I'm not a big photo guy so absence of a zip isn't a big deal either. Occasionally I'll see a babe that I'd like to have a photo set for, but I won't make a go/no go decision based on that characteristic alone.
|
01-02-09 06:57pm
|
Reply
746
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
I had considered doing the exact same thing, but 1byday has a model that I had never seen before, looks very exotic named Yoha, and she has several sets put up recently. So I figured with my luck that my 5 days to 1byday would run out and they would up 2-3 more new sets of her!
I think they have changed some of those bonus sites. I downloaded a couple of sets from "Euroteenerotica.com" of Eve Angel that have this for a file name on the zip, "Eurogirlsongirls" oops ha ha! I also know there used to be the very rare Anetta Keys blowjob clip on onlyblowjob.com but it isn't there anymore. Maybe they should just consider combining these similar to how Twistys has done? I'm guessing it would seriously boost their membership joins.
I had checked that taboo site as well, but didn't see much that interested me, though I did like the Zuzanna Z sets on it. She reminds me of Mia Stone. Oh, have you seen Wivien/Vivien/Wanda? Her new sets are some of the best I've seen from any model. What a body, fake boobs and all, that is probably the best boob job I've seen. I had only seen one set of her on vivthomas with Eve, she seems to have caught Denys eye now.
The only latex suit set that I've really liked is the Aria Giovanni ones. Aria has to be one of the few models that fills a latex suit out completely. I always wondered if Julie wore a girdle, if not she had an incredible hips to waist ratio!
|
01-01-09 08:44pm
|
Reply
747
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
ANOTHER ONE!!!
Close to scam - is this desperation or what? - just checked out the video-updates - not even worth the six bucks...
Almost fell for the "trap" myself, but skiped it thanks to Ze Droolah for the update/warning!
|
12-31-08 08:30am
|
Reply
748
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from williamj:
Bummer thanks for the update.
|
12-31-08 08:24am
|
Reply
749
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
yeah - I read that - photos - that's what I responded to.
|
12-29-08 09:18pm
|
Reply
750
|
ALS Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
Would they look that good if they were changed?
A while ago at ALS Scan, they released a bonus where they remastered very old video and it looked like shit to me. I deleted them a few seconds after I downloaded them.
|
12-29-08 07:01am
|
