| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
Classic stuff!
I really prefer the edge of the early works...
War Child's Back Door Angels was a classic.
The 'angry young man' years! ;0)
|
11-21-09 11:38am
|
Reply
502
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Capn:
Yep, I love that stuff, especially the early work!
Minstrel in the Gallery is a favourite of mine.
On topic.
A lot of these sites stretch their definitions :0(
|
11-21-09 08:45am
|
Reply
503
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Boy-o. Great resemblance with Jethro Tull.... "Thick as a Brick" - damn fine album, BTW - thanks for that inspiration/input - going to put the old vinyl on right now...
|
11-21-09 05:57am
|
Reply
504
|
Smooth Skinned Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from guhe:
(Drooler's Reply)
ok, deal, i'm honna join fuckedhard18, maybe you are right, i'll make a review then.....
|
11-17-09 06:08pm
|
Reply
505
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, SA (not Sturm Abteilung, LOL) but Suburban Amateurs are - BTW - doing a much better job, after all...
Cheers, bro!
|
11-15-09 06:04am
|
Reply
506
|
Girls In Nature.org
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from TheRizzo:
Hey Drooler, thanks for bringing this site to my attention. I love outdoor sets and this site speaks to me. Going to take the plunge next week and check it out.
|
11-12-09 11:57pm
|
Reply
507
|
French Doll.fr
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mr smut:
(Drooler's Reply)
Damn' it! Now I'll surely have some trouble to get to sleep :-\ She also did some very erotic stuff for Petites Parisiennes as far as I'm concerned she's the prettiest and most sexy girl over there!
Thanks again,
Smut
|
11-12-09 02:55pm
|
Reply
508
|
French Doll.fr
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks, I didn't know that. Guess I'll have to get back to Hergre sometime in future :-)
|
11-12-09 02:44pm
|
Reply
509
|
Girls In Nature.org
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from lk2fireone:
The navigation for the preview section (and probably the member area of the site) seems extremely cumbersome. The site really needs a programmer to make the site easier to use, to show what models are available, and their photosets and videos. A simple site design like Met-art or MPL Studios would be a big improvement.
But the $14.95 monthly membership (recurring) seems attractive. I've been seeing more monthly memberships in the $15-20 range lately, maybe as a result of the recession.
The $14.95 monthly membership (recurring) is what is listed at PU/TBP. When I go to the site itself, using the PU/TBP link, the monthly price (recurring) I see listed is $16.95.
|
11-11-09 05:38pm
|
Reply
510
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(Drooler's Reply)
I had to throw that Drooler con in! The good news is that both Peter and Damon, 21st Sextury staff, have said more improvements are coming. I don't know though if picture size is one of them, but they have really surprised me with this offer and especially with the tumbling recur price.
|
11-02-09 01:57pm
|
Reply
511
|
Blue Fantasies
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Twisty's might be better off consolidating the content from this site into the main site as a separate Category, like they do with Twisty's Hard.
|
11-01-09 11:38am
|
Reply
512
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from ControllingMind:
(Drooler's Reply)
LOL Nah, you ate from the bowl to begin with. Bitch flakes have too much sugar in them anyway, I prefer Cunt Krispies myself.
|
10-31-09 01:57pm
|
Reply
513
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#21
from ControllingMind:
(Drooler's Reply)
Your reply to this poll, was just a guise to fuck it up with your gibberish about 'control'
The irony is, it is you who was insinuating what someone else should or should not do. Therefore you are trying to be the 'controller' in this case.
If you are really concerned about being in control, then maybe you could be the leader of your clique.
|
10-31-09 08:51am
|
Reply
514
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from ControllingMind:
(Drooler's Reply)
I never expected a poll about site access to turn into religious debate.
If you were to believe in karma, then each person is in control of their own destiny. It is their own good or bad actions which define it. No spirtitual forces can alter their life decisions.
Faith doesn't have to include christianity. If you have no faith in what you are trying to achieve, you will ultimately fail. Giving someone a belief is a good thing, as long as it's not false hope.
P.S. God is angry with this athiest blasphemy. He will destroy your porn external hard drives using unseen forces and controlling mind in disguise.
|
10-29-09 01:52pm
|
Reply
515
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Nick Spillum:
Hi Drooler,
You're right, we are still offering 1280px size photos - we have focussed a lot more on video with this release of the web site.
We'll re-look at the picture sizes in the future though.
|
10-29-09 06:15am
|
Reply
516
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from ControllingMind:
(Drooler's Reply)
How/why do you consider that as 'controlling'?
|
10-29-09 04:11am
|
Reply
517
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
The quality of the models used to be better in the past. Sadly, they now rest in their archive. I think with the shaved look becoming the norm it must be getting harder and harder to engage the lookers. I like the idea of natural and hairy and because this is almost the only site catering to that niche I am being drawn back to it time and time again but this time will be my last.
There is something about the photography from all their photographers that is mind numbingly boring, as I mentioned already above. If there were more babes I might put up with a less than exciting set of pictures now and then but nowadays one will find the same poses and outfits found on less than outstanding models right across the board, or so it seems. It's enough to make you want to quit. I have seriously considered just letting the rest of my subscription go but then who would do the protesting within the site? And so I'll keep giving my ones and twos out of five for most of the photo sets until the subscription expires. :-)
|
10-28-09 04:13pm
|
Reply
518
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from RagingBuddhist:
(Drooler's Reply)
Funny - I never heard that in the David Clayton Thomas version : - )
|
10-27-09 11:28pm
|
Reply
519
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Andrea:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thats ok, it was good of you to bring it to our attention. The problem was fixed about 30 mins ago :)
|
10-16-09 02:29am
|
Reply
520
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Andrea:
Hi Drooler
That was caused by a bug when we added our new flash movie system. Non members can now view a preview of every single movie in the site on the tour also, so this is a major step forward, as no movie preview was available before.
Our programmer is just fixing the bug with the image gallery pages not showing thumbs, by the time you read this it wil be back to usual - in other words you can view all the pages as before.
|
10-16-09 12:50am
|
Reply
521
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Capn:
They are messing about with the headers on the thumbnail pages at the moment as well.
They haven't got it fully sorted.
TBH I wish they hadn't bothered. I preferred how it was before.
Cap'n. :0(
|
10-15-09 02:24pm
|
Reply
522
|
FM Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Well, it's normal loading of the site now.
And your right about the forward/backward - tried to find a way to see what new sets has come up - lige the numbers 34-35-36 ect. but can't find those...
|
10-12-09 05:29am
|
Reply
523
|
Club Nikki Nova
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from danapril:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, her newer sets are 1200x1800 and the file sizes are a little less than 500KB per pic.
|
10-11-09 08:42pm
|
Reply
524
|
Eve Angel Official
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from badandy400:
I really do not like it when sites do this. It makes me feel like there is too much possibility of the cancellation not going through and getting billed again. I much prefer the direct cancel link method.
|
10-05-09 04:37pm
|
Reply
525
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from nutcrackr:
(Drooler's Reply)
Are you seeing this latest stuff Drooler? A set just released today.
Pure A - Accept (Majoly) is a prime example of the crap I am a disliking. Her face looks like a plasticine doll and her skin has no definition because somebody has taken out the blur brush and gone crazy.
I mean I've even noticed some other artists doing similar stuff now on Met-Art to varying degrees. RYLSKY has taken the wonderful face of Loreen and decided her smooth skin wasn't smooth enough by itself and applied a very agressive filter over some of the close shots.
Is this fakeness appealing to anybody? I registered to these sites to see some genuine beauty and they insist on photoshopping a lot of models. :(
|
10-01-09 06:07am
|
