I'm not sure why they require their online customers to contact them directly. I somehow feel that they do it because some people will feel too embarassed and therefore keep the membership open instead of speaking to a person. In any case, I still wasted a certain amount of time trying to find an online method of cacelling the memberhip.
Thanks, bro - tried to locate that 'Anita' - no luck so far.
and BTW: Yes - been a member of Brazzers too in the past, but stay away now - also thanks to a lot of negative things going on there described so well at PU - a shame (a bit), because some of the material at that bonus site looks swell....
Yes, well put:
'Hasn't anyone told them that they're sitting on a gold mine? I mean, of girls who are sitting on their gold mines .... (a-hem) ... '
It would be great to see this site 'blossom'
BTW, Drooler, need your help here:
Found a great video with Nessa (aka a lot according to EBI) - the video was from I Know That Girl - do you, (ha,ha) Know that site - alas it's a part of the Brazzer-Co. - so I'm not much hooked on joining, but...they seem to have a fine mix..
Another BTW: At EBI welcome-page there's a photo of five girls (with Mandy Dee in the middle) who's the blond model to the far right?
I agree with you about not having enough light on the scene. I think they are really too dark, it's like going back to 1970's porn again. I didn't join the site, I just looked at their preview vids. Yep, they need to turn on the lights, no doubt.
While this site is good at what it does, there's nothing wrong with also making use of what else is is out there to get an idea of what awaits inside the porn site. We both agree that this site's main tour pages are lacking in good details.
Definitely sarcasm in my words. Though even if the site listed out the specs for their members area, you'd still want independent verification of it, right? Preview galleries are already trickling out across tgp sites for anyone to look at.
It's a whole different style, where the "only" sites compete against more the likes of ATK, Karups, etc., this site probably is positioned to be on the level with Met-Art, Femjoy, etc.
Instead of office clothes or formal dresses with but an occasional glimpse of the girl's naughty bits, this site uses sexy skimpy lingerie, more outdoor settings, and a helluva lot more skin. They are largely different in substance.
All I know is I like what I see, and not a concern in my mind about image dimensions & zip downloads, I'm confident they will more than fine. Regardless, site owners lie, why would you think to look at the tour for information? ;-)
"Tweedle Dum" ; mmmm, sounds promising and with oh so much potential ... or lack thereof depending on one's perspective.
Back to the issue at hand, when you consider websites as a whole, then for god sakes yes do some re-touching. Most of the photographers taking pics out there don't understand that the dials and menus on cameras today are there to help make pictures look better. Leave your point and click at home and figure out what the hell you're doing.
As for the primo sites like Met-Art, there already is some airbrushing going on I bet but it's done well for the most part so I don't mind. It's when it goes overboard like Playboy or Suze that it sometimes gets annoying.
As much as I like Eve Angel - I do NOT like that kind of billing deal/policy - that alone will keep me from joining...thanks for the warning. (just saw this now when looking at the latest review)
Drooler said:To a point anyway. When the girl's been so overly, Tweedlely-dum done, and she looks like something that could be hanging around in the older woman's room in that "rape with the precious work of art" scene in Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange, well, it might be worth considering that things have been taken a little too far.
My term is "Twistied," not "Tweedlely-dum" -a take on the Twistys site's over use of photoshop on its photos and why I am a member of the site just for the videos that cannot be photoshopped. So many of the Twistys babes look almost like they were computer simulations rather than real naked girls.
My response to the poll is no photoshop. If she can't pass muster without photoshop, does she really belong on a porn site in the first place?
There were no updates in all of 2008.
The updates in 2009 just started a few months ago.
That is why the site is offering a free one-year membership to anyone who had a 1-year membership in 2008.
They are also offering a free 6-month membership to anyone who bought a 1-year membership in 2009 during rhe period it was not updating.
I joined for 1 year in March 2009, so I am supposed to get a free 6-month extension of my membership. I sent an email requesting the extension on Dec. 01, but have received no reply yet.
My name is SteveB, I own APD Nudes ... the APD stands for Alluring, Passionate, Desirable ... to answer your question.
Thanks for the comments / review ... good or bad the only way I can work to make APD Nudes better is by hearing honest feedback from users like yourself ... and I assure you that over the coming months I have many plans to improve the site with more content and more features ... my first challenge on this project was to get the site live! I will certainly be taking your comments into account. :)
I have just changed the menu options so the members login link is at the top of the page now for you. :)
The first 6 weeks APD Nudes has been online has certainly been very busy for me (yes, this entire site is run by just one person ... me!) but as things are starting to bed in now .. I have exclusive content of Sophia Knight, Chloe James and Katy Cee and more during the rest of December with more new content coming in January and beyond too. :)
Short answer: do not join this website, I would score it as a "40"
Long answer:
Despite many indexes claiming this to be Eufrat's official site, it is not. She has nothing at all to do with the operation of the website other than one single weekend of photoshooting done back in early 2006. I've mentioned to those indexes that this is not her official site, but they don't care one bit.
I was a member there year & a half ago, too far in the past for an "official" review, but here goes:
All-in-all, the site contains just over 4,000 exclusive photos of Eufrat, and 18 videos that are simply recording the photoshoots.
This is how the site works, there are in total 26 exclusive photosets of anywhere from 150 to 250 photos each, which are divided up into about 100 download-able galleries. There are an additional 80 download-able galleries included which consist of 50 images randomly plucked from the 26 photosets.
From the 180 galleries I describe above, this website only gives you access to about 30 of them, and the owner does not ever rotate them. You cannot even view a single full photoset from what they provide access to.
When I was a member, there was only one page on the entire website which was not fully updated to the "new layout", and had an old link that included the necessary url variable to gain access to view & download all the photosets. I cannot guarantee this link is still there. If it is, the site *might* be worth the small price. I suspect that page has been "updated", and if so, this site is worthless.
Anyway, assuming there is access to everything, each photoset is separated into 3 to 5 zip sets, depending on the number of photos the set contains. The photos are numbered in reverse numerical order, so flipping through them sequentially you are viewing them in reverse time, each set begins with the clothes off and ends with her clothes on.
The site's "tour" also suggests you gain access into the full network of Showcase sites, but this is not true, what you get is about 10 sample galleries of the other girls, no complete photosets to view.
If anyone *still* wants to try out this site for themselves, I think I can recall which url variable needs to be changed, but I would need someone to post what the full url of one of the photo gallery pages is.
But it truly is a shame such a top model has this "official site" tied to her name.
I guess I was fine with this site only because I had full access, and know enough programming to put together a vbscript program to easily rename the files into the proper sequential order. Otherwise, there are plenty of better sites with much better photos of Eufrat.
Heck, I don't know - but some of those easteuro-girlsites still haunts me.
And again - like at MetArt - tho old video-freak are taking in more and more of the photoset-material - got a new and huge libary for the sets - a revival, maybe.
Lena and Milla are great at AvErotica - got this Rose as a favorite at the moment - because she just looks like one of the ealiest girlsfriend in the teen-years (got quite a lot of videos of her from other sites) - and guess the next to join will be AvErotica - NOT a bad site, no bad at all - it looks like...
Thanks for the head-ups.
Yeah - exactly - and why I say "They stopped caring, so should you."
It's the same thing at their "premium" site, Babes.tv, which is posting the same mish-mash of licensed available-anywhere crap as the other sites.
And they've stopped updating Dreambabes.com, Eurobabes.com, etc - while leaving on the Sexybabes.tv "Bonus Sites" page that "Many of these sites are updated daily while others are updated once per week." DB and EB were both sites that had updates that had a different personality than Sexybabes.tv - and that's what's gone completely from these sites is any hint of personality or any indication that there is anybody in the company running these sites that's doing anything other than telling the company that they're licensing from - send us this many photo-sets this often - and then posting them.
I disagree with the comparison with Nubiles. I know that you don't like the direction that they have gone. I actually think that Nubiles are putting up a lot of good stuff and they clearly care about what they are doing - they're not running their site on auto-pilot as these people clearly are doing.
Drooler, have they been using more photoshop or a similar process at metart? I don't mind some photoshop at metart, but lately it seems to be used over-much and the photosets, even of attractive models, are less appealing. The coloring and appearance of the model seems fake instead of real.
Wanted to let you know that we did purchase some memberships yesterday for sites that had over 2 nominations. This site obviously was one of them.
What we found when signing up though was the site only accepts JCB and Discover card, neither which we have. Very unusual since I'd guess most consumers (in the US at least) don't carry either.
We'll try our best to get a pass direct from the company, but this could take some time.
The nominations have been very useful as a whole, please continue to use them! Thanks.
12-06-0905:12pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
