| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from turboshaft:
(Drooler's Reply)
I just joined a few days ago and they do have quite a bit of old-but-new-to-you releases (previously unreleased) as well as some so-so remasters. I like the video remasters because it seems in the past ('90s through early 2000s) they weren't as concerned about video releases as they are now and a lot of this stuff just didn't make it to the site or wasn't archived for long periods like they do now (which go back to April 2007).
The photo remasters are really nothing special in my book; much bigger sizes but a lot of them are from when ALS was shooting on film and they just don't digitize as well as pictures originally shot digitally (sounds obvious, but some film can look great even when it's been scanned). I assume these are from negatives or slides or something similar but the colors look too dark and deep and the film grain is obvious in the higher resolution photos. I don't think they are really worth all the trouble unless you have a real boner for a model from years ago.
Also, a note about their video download options, much like a recent thread, there doesn't seem to be any noticeable difference between quality in older ones. For example a recent Brea release shot in the mid-2000s; it was shot in SD and the download options are either a 640x480 DivX or a 720x540 WMV. It's a short four minute video of her, well, let's say making a very good excuse to clean the bathroom floor. ; ) Anyway the WMV is slightly bigger in resolution but the file size is 16MB smaller and I can't see any difference in quality.
Their HD releases however are offered in three options of two sizes; 1280x720 in MP4 and DivX plus massive 1920x1080 WMVs that are around twice the file size of the DivXs and MP4s, and the qualitative difference is noticeable here (as are the gargantuan space requirements).
They are shooting some super hot new models, but it's still fun to look at previous models without having to take up vast swaths of hard drive space with half hour bonus videos.
|
03-09-10 01:35pm
|
Reply
377
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
The sites looks FINE - so why this hold back about reviews? a bit strange when you've already have put out the site for members to join - well, just this to ad - replied the latest comment for the site.
And BTW: it still LOOKS good..
|
03-08-10 08:36am
|
Reply
378
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Advent:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks guys for your comments. I am passing all of this on to the design team for them to look at. You all know we are member driven and we want your feedback good or bad so we can make the site better for you.
|
03-08-10 08:14am
|
Reply
379
|
Club Jana Cova
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment from Drooler:
I see that the new review is coming out now in less than a week. Thanks to all!
|
03-07-10 01:35pm
|
Reply
380
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(Drooler's Reply)
Sites seem to vary about the labeling of re-mastered material. ALS Scan has heavily promoted some re-mastered releases - put them out as bonuses. I thought they looked like crap, personally. Perhaps enough people did that they decided to just remaster some stuff that wouldn't look like crap - the stuff I mentioned above looks good - and don't make a big deal about it.
FTV Girls has promoted some re-releases, I've noticed.
1-by-Day used to do clear labelling, then they stopped - probably for the marketing reason.
I suspect that for the majority of the porn-loving public, new is considered better than "back in the day" or other re-packaging of older material.
|
03-07-10 08:23am
|
Reply
381
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from SteveB:
Further to my earlier post, I have just been informed by my developers that the issue has now been resolved.
Please let me know (preferably via the provided support email address) if you are still experiencing this issue on the site.
SteveB
APD Ndes Support
|
03-06-10 11:06am
|
Reply
382
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from SteveB:
Hello Again Drooler,
I was notified of this issue by another member of APD Nudes late last night. Our developers were made aware this morning and have assured me that the issue will be resolved within the next 24 - 72 hours.
Unfortunately, it is sometimes the case with a site that is being constantly developed that small bugs are not picked up in the development stages.
If you had contacted support, in the first instance, then I would have been able to notify my developers earlier and so the issue would have been resolved more quickly.
I will happily refund your membership fees on this occasion as a gesture of good will. If you want your fees refunded please contact me directly via the support email address.
APD Nudes Support
|
03-06-10 10:04am
|
Reply
383
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
Another one!!!!!!
A bummer for Drooler and other members - and again: How can sites like this go online?
Do not give a damn if it's $ 7.50 or $29.95 - it's the same Deal or NO deal...
Apart from the idea of a general 'Special Notice' at TBP - this experience from a fellow PU, who's certainly not a rookie here, should turn into a PU-warning about this site.
And again general: 'Kick ass' here and let's be united at PU - like Danny Joe Brown from Molly Hatchet said: 'Nobody walks on me'!
|
03-06-10 08:38am
|
Reply
384
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Aloha....went to preview as soon as, I saw this - but that preview does not seem very good. And where is/are all the old/archived material AND models?
Anyway, bro - thanks for heads-up on this - certainly gotta spend some time browsing previews at all sites in this deal - and the 19.95 could be ok... (that 'In The Mask' I remember as fun)
|
03-06-10 05:23am
|
Reply
385
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
2:
BTW: got a mail-thing going with a Peter (guess one of the webmasters)from 21 Sextury - and I promised him to send links to some of those 2008-videos - but really: should that be a task for a paying user?
Still, I'm on it....
|
03-05-10 07:42am
|
Reply
386
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Denner:
I'm just a persistent m.....f....
But all is not well at Club Sandy or Pixandvideo - they still got problems with a whole lot of 2008-videos..
Now your're there, Drooler - try to take a look at these videos, just as examples - only in bad quality - 'medium quality':
Club Sandy:
Nicol Needman 2008-05-11
Peaches 2008-06-15
Angelica Heart 2008-07-01
Jana Maho 2008-07-08
Nicola 2008-07-27
Got them all from the 'former' Club Sandy in MUCH better 'high quality'
And others from 2008 I want to re-download - but not in THAT so called 'medium quality'... there's no 'high quality'
|
03-05-10 07:02am
|
Reply
387
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from ksauz:
Yes, it seems something's going wrong these days! Give us the good old exclusive 1by-Day!!!
|
03-04-10 03:04pm
|
Reply
388
|
Play With Faye
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(Drooler's Reply)
ah, ok. that means that you also didn`t have visited that site?
by the way, what does "FYI" mean?
|
03-02-10 09:01am
|
Reply
389
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
Oh dear! :0/
Progress isn't necessarily in a forward direction, is it?
It sounds to me like that one hasn't been thought through.
I wonder if the old format could be made available as a display option for those that don't care for the new look?
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-25-10 04:57pm
|
Reply
390
|
Judy Jade
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
from Denner:
Verunka - yes, that's her stagename, for sure - is one of my favorites, too.
There GOT to be sites for photofans - sites like this, agree - there an overwhelming amounts of video-sites out there (still, got some great videos with Verunka)
(Thanks a lot, BTW - for - again - another support at 'that' thread - and I know you write an input like that, because you're serious - no da,da,da,da..)
Cheers, bro
|
02-25-10 06:20am
|
Reply
391
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from mbaya:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hi Drooler,
I also use DIVX Author. I found it a pain at first, but now that I have the hang of it, I really like it. The videos don't degrade much. I play them on WMV media player and on VLC media player. They play just fine on my WD media player hooked up to HD TV. I cut very long videos, especially ones with huge file sizes.
|
02-23-10 07:03am
|
Reply
392
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(Drooler's Reply)
The Cap'n and I have been asking for fairly slow stripping from the moment we joined, Drooler. It's supposed to be in the works. And I so agree about toy play. I started a thread on that very subject at their forum today without having read your remarks. I'm glad you made them because I mentioned to the webmaster that most members of this forum were against toys. This backs up what I wrote nicely.
|
02-22-10 02:16pm
|
Reply
393
|
Thai Girls Wild
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
Right, bro - but this site - you won't believe it (and then again, oh, you would) - they got full screen transparent watermarks in the videos!
Comming up 4-5 times during a clip and lasts maybe 10 secs - and, of course during the best parts - and the photos: worse than useless - some just like screen caps - but then again - it's the same guy who has those two other low quality thai sites...
|
02-22-10 01:29pm
|
Reply
394
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Tatyana:
You are actually the first person who has had trouble navigating the site, I am surprised. Couple of things to clear up.
The models page does indeed show all the models of David-Nudes, there are 42 of them and Riyeesa is there. The "Meet the Sexy Girls of DN" link is part of the footer and shows on every page so that you can jump to any of the site sections (models, photos, or videos) from the bottom or top of any page of the tour.
Each model is photographed in both crisp studio lighting, and natural lighting, to show the different sides of her and the photographer's artistic views. That way you get the sharp pics that show every pore of the girls skin mixed with the natural lighting pics that have an overall artistic impact. The DN tour has over a 1000 pages that show exactly what you will be getting when you become a member. Just take some time to look around:)
|
02-20-10 04:17pm
|
Reply
395
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
from Capn:
That doesn't sound very promising! :0/
I like the 'stream of consciousness' comment.
Although I did run short of breath with that sentence! LOL
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-20-10 12:59pm
|
Reply
396
|
Brooke Lee Playmates
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(Drooler's Reply)
Yes, I took another look the other day too.
Nothing much has changed to my mind. :0/
|
02-20-10 02:35am
|
Reply
397
|
Club Nella
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from slutty:
(Drooler's Reply)
Thanks, Drooler. Extremely helpful. Are the older "natural" videos and photos equal quality, or worse?
Thanks again!
|
02-19-10 02:41pm
|
Reply
398
|
Club Nella
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tom Veller:
(Drooler's Reply)
Hi Drooler,
thanks for reminder, but both links to ClubNella from Myglamoursite (www.clubnella.com/members and clubnella.com/members) working here without problem.
Regards,
Tom,
site staff
|
02-19-10 06:49am
|
Reply
399
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pornwatcher:
(Drooler's Reply)
Considering that they already have thousands of zip files with the site, I don't mind that they only have a few updates per month. I prefer them to take their time to take new pictures, rather than rushing and uploading the site with rushed, low quality pictures.
|
02-15-10 07:33am
|
Reply
400
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Drooler's Reply)
'allo, 'allo..Ze Droolah
At least I got a fast answer (In the Crack): They were working on it - that currency deal - but I was welcome to pay in cash or money order!
No way I'll send cash in an envelope - and a money order to Canada would exceed the $47 - a lot, so.... In The Crack is on hold.
|
02-13-10 05:21am
|
