| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1276
|
Reel Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Tallaria:
My bf and i joined this network after seeing the review and the exclusive movies access. You must be having connection problems with your computer Denner because my download speeds are very fast for these movies. I'm using road runner on time warner cable if that helps any.
|
05-27-07 11:45am
|
Reply
1277
|
Rimbledon
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from mbaya:
(Denner's Reply)
I like your story. I have never had it done to me either, so I also would not have known, drunk or not. By the way, the network includes oldfartsyoungtarts.com, which it did not when I wrote my review of that site. In case you forgot it is oldje.com's much cheaper clone.
|
01-20-11 08:33am
|
Reply
1278
|
Rock Star Porn Star
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks, Denner, rearadmiral, my review was honest, but maybe some PU members will enjoy the videos at this site. My tastes are far softer than many PU members, even though I do find some hardcore that I enjoy. I like many Pierre Woodman videos, even though I think he is sometimes abusive to the girls. And I still don't understand how he is able to get them to do what they do, and even apparently enjoy his rough treatment.
But this site was a waste for me.
In spite of that, if you get a membership to this network, and this site happens to be included, you should check it out for yourselves. Because there are some models here who are actually porn stars. So you might easily enjoy the videos more than I do. Or want to view them out of curiosity because of the model in the video.
|
10-03-10 11:57am
|
Reply
1279
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
It's a huge surprise and an even bigger disappointment. Who would think they'd actually REDUCE the sizes of the most recent pics? That hasn't been the direction that most sites have been going (the Babelicious lot notwithstanding, at least until their recent turning back to larger than 1000px, and only on the one site they continue to update).
I can't imagine they wouldn't have the larger sizes from the original shoots, as they have large ones posted of the same models. It's not that costly to continue posting them at least as zips.
You subscribe in good faith and then pay $30 for someone else's very stupid decision. That really pisses me off.
|
03-13-10 01:46pm
|
Reply
1280
|
Rough 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks for the support, Denner. I wanted to download a few videos from the site to see what they were like. But as I said in this review, I can't currently download a complete video file. And a partial file is not playable. That is why I gave the site an extra-low score.
There are other sites in the network that are much better.
|
09-18-10 11:01am
|
Reply
1281
|
Russian Teen Obsession
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GiorgioG:
(Denner's Reply)
Hallo,
actually russianteenobsession.com has 7 videos.
The update of the website are now 2 times a month.
The network has more than more than 200 videos.
The update of the nerwork are not les than 12 times a month.
|
03-17-09 02:47pm
|
Reply
1282
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RLane:
(Denner's Reply)
I don't blame you the only reason why I'm a member is that I had received a special promotion for the site for $7.99.
|
11-22-12 09:31am
|
Reply
1283
|
San Diego Latinas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Douggie:
(Denner's Reply)
I hear ya.
Thanks for your input.
|
05-30-10 07:41am
|
Reply
1284
|
San Diego Latinas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Douggie:
(Denner's Reply)
Sorry you feel that way.
As stated in my post. My rating and review was for Solo video only.
I dont look at pictures and dont care to see another guys dick.
If you would take the time to check em out you would see what I mean. Its stuff you dont see anywhere else that I can think of.
If you get a chance watch these solo videos:
Indira
Zeda
ginger
izzy
sivone
Then decide for yourself.
I can decide in the first ten minutes if a site is worth a crap or not.
As for the exclusitivity, I surf quite a bit Thats the only place I've ssen with these models.
Douggie
|
05-29-10 06:26pm
|
Reply
1285
|
Sasha Blonde
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks for the compliment.
Sasha is a very cute girl. But her vids, and photosets, at this site are not very erotic. Sometimes you don't realize how much the photographer contributes when you look at a photo of a pretty girl, and think, "I could have shot that myself."
|
08-21-12 03:36pm
|
Reply
1286
|
Sausage Party
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from manholelover:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks for the advice. I'm new to all this so still learning. Didn't realise, until now, that having a review "on top" was actually quite important. Point taken. Will slow down! i'm also trying to redress the balance for the lack of gay sites reviewed here...
|
06-27-11 07:42am
|
Reply
1287
|
Score HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
BTW, I edited the review and made things a bit clearer re. Scorevideos. Thanks, Denner.
|
10-25-09 09:48am
|
Reply
1288
|
Score HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Denner's Reply)
The OLD Score site is indeed still alive, Denner. I should have stressed that, except that I was too interested in getting lots of videos in HD so I only put my head in once to get an idea of the quality of the old site!
|
10-25-09 09:29am
|
Reply
1289
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Wittyguy:
I was just trolling by this site, checking it out on the TBP trial offer, and just wanted to add that this site seems dead with still no updates since 2007.
For anyone else who might read this I just want to add that you can preview all of the models (you get a thumbnail look) and based upon what I saw I'd have to say that 90% or more of the hardcore sets are nonexclusive as I recognized almost all of them. So much for their exclusivity claim.
|
11-04-08 12:22pm
|
Reply
1290
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
Looks like it has ceased updating. Have you used the trial ? Is it worth it?
|
05-03-08 04:19am
|
Reply
1291
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(Denner's Reply)
yeah that`s exactly what i meant..thumbs up for the trial! but i don`t think it`s really worth staying there often just because of the other really high quality similar sites.
|
02-06-08 12:23pm
|
Reply
1292
|
Sex A Mexican
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from atrapat:
I remember a similar discussion on Curry Creampie. In fact, several of the scenes, like the Sativa Rose and Keri Sable one, come from a DVD titled "Mexicum" which can be found at DVD sites.
What's even weirder than the performer name change is that you can see Porn.com watermarks on some of the tease thumbnails but this site doesn't seem to be owned by Porn.com.
|
11-15-08 07:46am
|
Reply
1293
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks Denner,
I took a bit of a break from porn, but I did miss PU!
|
11-28-08 05:30am
|
Reply
1294
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks Denner,
I found it difficult to get used to it at first also, but the mosaic is thin now, it used to cover a large area, now it is in oputline shape. One of these days...
|
11-28-08 05:10am
|
Reply
1295
|
Sex Byen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from ace of aces:
(Denner's Reply)
preview..hm ..i was blinded by the rating "good" ^^
the quickrating 50 was mine.
the side was given a "good" from who ever -.-
..think that was a mistake, they wanted to write OMG :)
wish you had warned me earlier :o)..anyway is there a good danish side? ^^
|
11-08-07 10:27am
|
Reply
1296
|
Sex Byen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
I'd be interested to know if there are any good Danish sites out there (aside from Color Climax)
|
11-07-07 10:10am
|
Reply
1297
|
Sex With Kathia Nobili
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(Denner's Reply)
Yeah, the score reflects the amount of duplicate content one eventually ends up with. As a starting site this however is not necessarily worse than the others.
|
01-07-11 08:05am
|
Reply
1298
|
Sexxxy Celeste
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from WeeWillyWinky:
I know these are old comments, but I'm shopping around for a good NN site and saw this. I agree, Denner. It should be general practice just to avoid sites that won't give any stats as to the volume of material they have or the quality thereof, or specs for pics and vids. If they can't do that there is probably something they are hiding, like a lack of quantity and/or quality.
If you have high quantity, you'll use it as a selling point; if you have high quality, you'll use it as a selling point; if you have both, obviously you'll let us know.
|
04-22-08 07:51pm
|
Reply
1299
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from asmith12:
(Denner's Reply)
Perfect, let's try and see how it goes :-).
|
10-02-08 11:00am
|
Reply
1300
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from asmith12:
(Denner's Reply)
Deal :-). And what do you think about my idea (not sure if you've read it or not) to "penalize" sites with such PRE-CHECKED upsells by deducting, say, 10 points from their ratings (clearly stating that 10 points were deducted for PRE-CHECKED upsell during sign-up)? I'm likely to do it in the future (unless somebody gives me a reason why it's a bad idea), and would like to see more people doing the same thing; I'm not sure, but if webmasters read this site (and at least some do), it MIGHT help.
|
10-02-08 10:24am
|
