| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1651
|
Sexy Employee
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Drooler:
Last year I saw this site hyped on Eurobabeindex. At that time, it didn't have much content, but even now it seems like a fairly average site with a few nice exclusive things in it.
Thanks for pointing out the degree to which it isn't exclusive. That yellow couch (with the orange painting on wall) seems to show up on a lot of Euro sites, and it has practically become a "caution light" for would-be subscribers. (Good color choice, then.)
Thanks for the informative review!
BTW, I think the girl with the big naturals you were describing is Simona (aka Simi, Olivia, Sarka, Erika, well here we go again with that rot). She's really sexy, and what a handful! If you haven't seen her hardcore at 1byday, be sure to if you ever join. She really swings her tits into the guy's face.
|
08-25-07 11:50am
|
Reply
1652
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from jd1961:
The Tussinee "gold site" is a ripoff...i have a few of her HC videos, and they are just fine, but the extra charge is outrageous. I've never heard of this at any other site.
|
08-23-07 11:57pm
|
Reply
1653
|
Thainee
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Khan:
Sounds like you're tripping some automated script that is used to protect the site. Just wondering, are you opening multiple connections at once (attempting several downloads)?
Good luck getting it resolved.
|
08-23-07 03:13pm
|
Reply
1654
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Thanks for checking. It doesn't surprise me. It might not ever change. Oh, well.
|
08-23-07 01:41pm
|
Reply
1655
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(Denner's Reply)
Hey Denner, I'm going to review Little Mutt later today. I have really enjoyed the site. My only real letdown was that I thought it was all amateurs, but I know a few of the models aren't amateurs. Ramona who has been on FTV and in several hardcore movies and Peaches, the dark haired, tall gorgeous model who is on every Euro site. The videos are looking good for me 640x480. I will give more details in my review, but overall, it has made a good impression with me. The staff on the site are very nice too.
|
08-23-07 07:53am
|
Reply
1656
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
OK. Thanks for trying and getting back to me!
|
08-23-07 03:07am
|
Reply
1657
|
Teen Flood
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from PinkPanther:
Thanks, Denner. I was a member briefly quite a while ago - wasn't thrilled, but have thought about joining again every once in a while - I appreciate the reality check.
|
08-22-07 05:57pm
|
Reply
1658
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
Hey, Denner, m'man. I haven't been to Danni's in a long time. Are they still doing just 1024 pics or are they finally doing larger ones? I'd be interested to know. Thanx.
|
08-22-07 03:53pm
|
Reply
1659
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Too bad that TeenFlood doesn't do that limited time offer for $9.99 anymore. I think it was just for 3 days. Anyway, agreed, there is a lot of crap on it. A lot of the photo stuff from the past year or so can be seen on sites like TeenDreams, Zexy (forgot the rest of it, but don't bother), Twistys, and AmateurKingdom (AMK), but AMK at least has better quality versions than lousy TeenFlood. I think Xisty and maybe even Babelicious has some of it, too.
Wow! Now I have REMORSE.
|
08-22-07 01:52pm
|
Reply
1660
|
Kerotic
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
The KScan network or whatever it's called sure knows how to make things look yummy -- to the visitor. Once you see Lucy Stratilova laying on the bed, about to turn belly down for some "peacemaking," the mind starts to replay the credit card info.
I've bought into it 2-3 times myself, but it's always such a downer once you get in. The images are mostly really funky, with poor color control (orangey Sandy and Sophie, pinky Bambi, greyish Orsi, etc.).
And they tell you "we're not professional photographers." For $30?! What a cop out.
There's lots of sites, but it's like rummaging through a line of waste cans just to find something worth it. That was my experience, anyway.
|
08-19-07 09:43am
|
Reply
1661
|
Girls Of Spice Lab
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
They probably hired the same site designer, which (who?) most likely does independent work-for-hire on a contract basis. That would explain the similarity.
As for GlamDeluxe, I waited 6 months before rejoining. Have gotten just a fraction of the content, but that's due to my strigent requirements.
I should have "procrastinated" longer!
And they still don't have zips of the pics, so there's a lot of abrasion on the mouse pad.
|
08-19-07 09:24am
|
Reply
1662
|
Pretty 4ever
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Drooler:
I second the comment about cutting off the top of the girl's head, her arms, part of an ass cheek, etc. For God's sake, the photos go up to 3456px, so all of the girl can be in a shot. No need to get so damned space-efficient that we have to chop away at the subject with a photo editor.
But there's one exception: legs from the upper thighs down can be cut off in those shots where the girl presents her lovely behind -- without her hands grabbing it in every shot. And please have her looking at the camera! I hate it when they look uninterested.
Technically, this comment's for you Denner, but I want photographers and content editors to read this, too.
Thanks for the review; it presents the important info in concise form.
|
08-18-07 04:42am
|
Reply
1663
|
Matt's Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
I see your point about the differences of opinion about Matt's once I start remembering how some other sites get a wide range of scores and comments, too, either here or across the spectrum of adult review sites. People can really vary in tastes ... and also in experience (a-hem). And sometimes it might even be their motives.
And I'm with you about being disappointed. The quality at Matts ... it's time for that to improve consistently, especially in the lighting and image clarity. I've had enough of that kind of "amateur" shtick.
My last membership, which was recent, terminated a week short of the subscription time, but you know what? I didn't even bother dealing with it. Just didn't think it would be worth the trouble.
|
08-16-07 02:20pm
|
Reply
1664
|
Club Silvia Saint
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from jd1961:
Silvia Tomcalova is sort of semi-retired nowadays. I think she got married. She has a lot of great sets over at Suze Randall.
|
08-15-07 07:05pm
|
Reply
1665
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
What...don't you like midget videos? :)
|
08-15-07 07:01pm
|
Reply
1666
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
I did have a problem also, and they wrote me back. They are having trouble with CCBill, which they say they don't like at all, and are in the process of setting up alternative billing options. I did get into there today though. Looks great. The new sets are separate, the old are stored in an attractive archive.****I see by your other reply that you were already a member there. I had triuble getting in initially, for the reason I wrote****
|
08-06-07 01:22am
|
Reply
1667
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from nygiants03:
Yea that site can get hacked easy because you formulate your own password and username. Those kind of sites usually are hacked most frequently because people dont make then complicated enough, where other sites like abby winters make this really confusing password which is very hard to hack.
|
08-05-07 05:40pm
|
Reply
1668
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from nygiants03:
no problem here
|
08-05-07 08:10am
|
Reply
1669
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from exotics4me:
I've had the same thing happen on Teen Dreams, the first time was well over a year ago. The bad thing, back then they thought the members were sharing their username and password. And sent pretty rude emails to the members about it. Once they realized we really weren't sharing our info, they backed off and are being really nice about it now. I enjoyed my time on there with their forum and such. You can spend a day just reading all of the amusing posts!
|
08-03-07 12:22am
|
Reply
1670
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from apoctom:
Thanks for the comment. I was a member a long time ago and wasn't terribly happy with the video quality or the number of models. Seeing these new updates might get me to try the site again.
|
07-31-07 08:12pm
|
Reply
1671
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
That does look good, now it's called one by day, one by night. I see they are using the magazine format also. Thanks for the update.
|
07-30-07 07:51pm
|
Reply
1672
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Gazette Risque:
(Denner's Reply)
Thank you for that nice compliment :)
It's nice to know your reviews are appreciated.
|
07-30-07 08:46am
|
Reply
1673
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from lurifax:
Having months of experience of both Porn Access and Videobox, you got me mightily confused in your comparison of the two...
I would not even mention the two in the same context, as Videobox is vastly superior to the other.
By all means, take an other month to look at Porn Access...
...after which you may revalue your opinion.
In a separate comment to the site I have accounted for a number of let-downs, which, taken together, explains my opinion about your 'review'.
|
07-23-07 11:05am
|
Reply
1674
|
Lap Dance Gone Bad
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from exotics4me:
I was wondering how this network would do. I found the name of this site to be amusing. Lap Dances Gone Bad. I'm thinking if I paid for a lap dance, and the woman decided to throw sex in with the lap dance, that wouldn't be a bad thing! Thanks for the review, maybe in a year or so, I will look back at it. The webmaster seems very enthusiastic that they are improving.
|
07-22-07 05:42pm
|
Reply
1675
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from jd1961:
I think your score is generous. I am dsappointed in this site. The site tells us what a legendary photographer this guy is. Maybe for the JC Penney catalog, but erotic? Not much, IMO.
|
07-10-07 12:18am
|
