| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1426
|
Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
Sorry to hear that. I was seriously thinking of joining, but now...no way.
|
12-20-07 02:05pm
|
Reply
1427
|
FM Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Hey Denner,
I’ve found a few of these FM Teens models on other sites:
-Anna (the fuller bodied) in FM Issue 1 is Atena at MetArt, Anita at JustTeenSite, Paulina at FemJoy
-Anna the thin and breathtaking foxy blond in FM Issue 8 is Anna S at HegreArt (though her personality seems to come out better at FM Teens!)
-Nastya in Issue 15 is Mai at MyPreciousVirgins
I have this nagging feeling that I've seen the lighter-skinned Natasha (Issue 13) in hardcore somewhere, but scoured TryTeens and GirlsGotCream (both Russian sites, I think), but found nothing. (Maybe on one of their bonus sites?)
Still, as you said, these FM Teens girls are seen anywhere else for the most part. They're really cute!
|
12-20-07 12:57pm
|
Reply
1428
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Drooler:
Hey Denner, thanks for the review. I'd been wondering about OnlyTease and it really is one I'll pass up on until it can be renamed "Only Tease, but THEN ..."
Congrats on hitting the Hardcore User Badge (strains of Pomp and Circumstance in the background).
|
12-19-07 02:11pm
|
Reply
1429
|
88 Square
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nbaby8:
(Denner's Reply)
You've just broke my Thai fantasy =(
|
12-18-07 07:47pm
|
Reply
1430
|
FM Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Your FM Teens review was not at any point difficult to understand, and besides that there weren't many grammar mistakes or mispellings. Had it been unclear, that would have been a different story, but it wasn't. And you said a lot about the site; it wasn't a slapdash job like a lot of them are here. So I respectfully disagree with the single point decision.
Besides, we need reviews like yours, and this is on the web (international). Just a bit of leniency on 2nd language aspects, I think, is in order. You've gone to the trouble of getting your English to a pretty solid level and that should be taken into account.
BTW, a few of the models at FM Teens I have seen on other sites. I'm tracking them down and making a list I'll send you. It could be useful as well to other PUs who like keeping their babe files organized.
|
12-13-07 12:54pm
|
Reply
1431
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from ace of aces:
do you know how many videos in total are on that site? i never been at that site before. is it for a firstimer a try worth?
|
12-12-07 04:28am
|
Reply
1432
|
Pacino's Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from PinkPanther:
I saw a promo at NNBoards when this site first started - since I'd been lusting after his babes on his other sites at the time, I went for a 3-month membership. It's a decent site. They update every few days with pics and vids, but the excitement level over time is not that high for me, so I won't be renewing.
There's some nice POV stuff, including BJ stuff, but there seems to always be something that throws it off from being above the level of good - he's not hard or the angle's not that interesting or...
At the rate that they're updating, and if they get other photographers involved and work on some of the weaknesses of the site, this site could seriously rock over time.
|
12-10-07 06:12pm
|
Reply
1433
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Depends on how long I've been out in the cold, how much "ink" has built up, and whether it's in script or monotype, block style.
But even "DROOL ...." is at least a word.
|
12-09-07 12:34pm
|
Reply
1434
|
Hot Adri
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Drooler:
I dunno, Denner. This could nice, but the idiots don't let you see what or how much a subscriber would be getting -- never a good sign. Too bad for them!
This girl IS a doll, though. She's Adrienne Manning at Penthouse, and just plain Adrienne at NextDoor-Models. Those baby blues and that face of hers could melt a man's heart.
|
12-09-07 11:21am
|
Reply
1435
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
from Drooler:
Good review Denner. I don't get why you've been given 99 points instead of the 100 (i.e., 2 pts for this review), so you can graduate cum laude with the Hardcore User badge. It's a hellava lot better than the average review here.
I think what's lacking at this site is the spark of excitement. The girls are lovely but they pose as directed and are shot from the photographer's POV. I just saw Jamie Lynn's latest at DD, and it was just another disappointment! It could have been a real sweetie, 'cause I've seen her turn on the charm before. But these gets have the girls looking down, looking away, keeping their eyes closed, being too detached. 3000px don't matter then!
And there's not enough good ass either. At least the very recent redux of Phoenix Ray had a nice one of her in a futt-buck pose, now at 1600px. And she was alive enough before the camera. Doesn't happen nearly enough at this site.
|
12-09-07 10:47am
|
Reply
1436
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Pinche Kankun:
(Denner's Reply)
Thank you Den Man, let these people know!! They need to understand that there are certain things the world doesn't need to see!
|
12-09-07 09:23am
|
Reply
1437
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Pinche Kankun:
(Denner's Reply)
Was Lucy fine?
|
12-09-07 09:15am
|
Reply
1438
|
Private.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
I'm sorry I should make this clear---I consider DRM to be spyware. That is when you play one of those videos, the DRM is being used to restrict individuals' use of their own copies of published works. To enforce these restrictions, DRM software must monitor and control a computer users' behavior. Frequently it reports on what it sees. That's by definition spyware. This is why these sites must be boycotted, given an automatic 20 points off in reviews, and brought to the attention of everyone. These sites must be made to suffer financially, even to the point of ruin. This site, Private, which produces quality porn, has for years overcharged on their product. They were one of the first companies to go online. But they do not deliver for the money. Imagine going to a bookstore and buying a book and taking it home to read it. But to open it, you must call the bookstore, and get their permission!
|
12-08-07 03:14pm
|
Reply
1439
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
On the US popularlity of the Lexus, I don't know how it stands these days. But I look at some of the Audis and just start salivating.
Hey, good one on "testing models close to release, so to speak." Wow. Clever! I mean, we NEED to keep things kinda dirty here.
|
12-08-07 02:56pm
|
Reply
1440
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Denner, have you test-driven that car from France that runs on air? Seriously, I saw it on TV. It runs on compressed air and does pretty well from what the documentary said.
How does this relate? Well, surely you think about porn while testing the cars.
And we don't want the polar ice caps melting and flooding those precious porno web servers.
|
12-08-07 09:38am
|
Reply
1441
|
Euro Babes Fever
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Aw, Denner, when I saw that you'd gotten ahead of me in the rankings, I just thought, "Good for Denner!" Couldn't happen to a better user.
|
12-08-07 09:21am
|
Reply
1442
|
Euro Babes Fever
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Denner,
Thanks for the warm welcome! I guess I didn't keep my promise to stay off them nasty porn sites for 9 moons. Instead, I picked another turkey!
Somehow these sites with "fever" in the name, I dunno, they seem to be "plagued" with problems, huh-huh.
|
12-08-07 08:42am
|
Reply
1443
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(Denner's Reply)
Funny how hi-def brings with it a new set of problems: greater stretches of precious hard drive real estate getting traded for a clearer view of zits, scars, scratches, welts, birthmarks, and (as jd pointed out) dental cavities in progress.
I'm chuckling because it's just one more example of how solutions nearly always mean new problems. Like the automobile. When was last time we had to step around horse manure on the street? (Whoops, the street's under water now!) LOL.
C'est la vie!
|
12-08-07 06:38am
|
Reply
1444
|
Moon Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from Mr Bogue:
Hey Denner,
The issue you experienced (server outage) and what RON B experienced (problems with locating the forgot password? link) were completely different. Read the reviews before making incorrect comments like this.
Moon Angel
|
12-06-07 08:16pm
|
Reply
1445
|
18 Pussy Club
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
I'm sorry I didn't do a review of this low rent site this past summer, but I was so unimpressed that I visited twice, and just removed it from my bookmarks.
|
12-05-07 06:35pm
|
Reply
1446
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
I'm a member too, it's OK it seems to be missing something though I can't put my finger on it. Maybe I don't like American models right now, there seem to be quite a few. Of course, the Shay Laren sets are nice!
|
12-05-07 06:28pm
|
Reply
1447
|
Mystique Magazine
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
Yeah, you know the porn shops around here still sell used (rented) DVD's for $40-$45. They treat the customer like a pusher treats a junkie.
|
12-05-07 06:22pm
|
Reply
1448
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
It will be a while, I've only been a member 2 days. But I love authentic Japanese porn, I've already downloaded some great stuff. This is a strict site though---they have a list of banned download managers, and if you go over the D/L limit, they suspend for 15 hours. And failed logins result in a 30 minute wait! But there is no DRM, and they update daily and frequently.
|
12-02-07 03:59am
|
Reply
1449
|
Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from jd1961:
(Denner's Reply)
Go to the homepage, scroll down to the bottom, and read the little link "Your California Privacy Rights".
|
12-01-07 08:40pm
|
Reply
1450
|
Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
from jd1961:
And if you read the fine print, you will discover that they sell your personal information to spam agents!!! Unless of course you have had business dealings with them, then you are exempt. Playboy is SO 20th century!!!
|
12-01-07 12:29pm
|
