I don't think that little Lupe is still active. It's a little vague on which came first Zulediy or Little Lupe. Now she calls herself Lupe Fuentes and she's a contract star for Teravisions studio's.
I beleive they are working on a new website for her but I wouldn't hold my breath on when it will be launched. I miss Little Lupe because the new bolt on's are rather large for a petite frane likes her's.
No more issue numbers, huh? I wonder if they have dates. I last viewed one in issue 35, July 1st this year. Next would have been "Sexy Bathing" with a blond, but my time ran out. At least that's probably a place to start to check how often they're updating.
Looks like they're redesigned further, but now you can't view more than a small number of the updates if you're a visitor. As some sites do when they "upgrade," they've stepped forward/backward.
For me, the link at TBP (and PU) to the site leads directly to the actual site, with no PDF file. The preview site itself has lots of hot links to different areas, as well as a small, short sample video that plays continuously. I don't see how they would put that into a PDF file without a lot of effort.
So my guess (and I'm no computer expert) is that this is a problem with your machine. I know that my own PC (and software) can give me problems viewing different sites, where sometimes I can't get the thumbnail pictures at different sites to load.
If you start from 40 and go backwards, it looks to be true that more than 1/2 are no longer updating - I see 5 or so that just stopped updating in September '09, though, so I assume that they updated weekly between Nov '08 and then.
There are 15 or so that are updating weekly and now they gave access to Zoliboy. It looks like the deal now is to give 25 sites to start with that include Pix and Video, Club Sandy and Zoliboy.
They could make the whole thing better with advances in the size of pics and more HD vids, but they're doing solid work on a number of sites, including bonus sites such as DP Fanatics, Cuties Galore, Anal Teen Angels and Lez Cuties.
Nice review. Would really love to give SA a chance but right now just can't see doing it with images at that resolution for that price. There are a few models I want from there, so I'm sure I'll join sooner or later. Sucks, as I think I would have really liked the site.
You know, Denner, the WebMaster is a Member of this Review Site and I see he has replied to your Comments here to Nubiles Member Farrow.
Denner says,
"But the updates in - yes, again the last 6 months or so - has changed to the worse - both in style and models. It's just getting more and more boring - again compared to some of the earlier stuff.
I once gave the site 94 (02-05-09) - today I would be much lower..."
So, Denner, if you do NOT answer the Man how do you expect him to fix what you do NOT like about his Site??? To where you would continue giving him a good score.
Yes, that's a good review. All the technical aspects organized and in easy to read formats really helps. I am afraid he's right about video quality and navigation too. :(
If you can't find the link for something from the updates calendar, try finding it using the model's page. That's what I found out the last time I was a member, a few months ago in response to one of their email discount campaigns. Might not always work, but worth a try perhaps.
That doesn't excuse the lousy webmastering that has plagued the site. All anyone has to do is click to make sure their own links work before taking an update live, and fix the problem if it exists.
Some of their pics aren't exclusive either. I have seen them at other sites. Most are, but not all.
That's all I have to say about this site, which I have decided to just forget. Yeah, the next time I get one of their "offers," I'm going to offer it to my delete key.
Glad you like it, bro. When I came across it at EBI, I thought I would be disappointed myself, but I must say that the photo quality is superb and the models really put on the charm. Kinda reminds me of Teenrotica in that way, but it's not as formula-driven and, with larger pics, better.
Looking forward to the Euphrat photoset on the stairs.
Had a look at your response to Andreas of MC, and his reply to you. I think both of you are non-native with English. But then, George W. Bush could have come up with "disversification" -- though in fact it was Andreas.
"Disversification" sounds like a euphemism for "consolidation," which itself is one for "some of you little people down there are going to lose your jobs."
Anyway, don't get me wrong. I really admire people who take on the challenges of communicating in another tongue. So cheers to both you and Andreas!
Maybe Andreas ought to check out the vibes coming from TeenModels. Not nearly as much of that mysterious "distance" that is so hard to point out the existence of. LOL.
Pretty lame and unrespectful towards the girls to suppose them to give a shit about ... not much to say about something connected with personal taste and impression.
Actually, I'll have to say that the last time I was at the site (a few months ago), they'd at least solved their sluggish server problem.
As for the vids, I tried one or two and they were a bore to me, as usual.
The photos were a mixed bag. Some I found exciting of girls like Gwen and Thalia and Judith Fox and Lorena.
But the site does have an annoying tendency to present the girls in a "distant" way that I don't like.
I join every now and then after several months hoping to pick up some sweetness amidst all of the ho-hum, "so what" posing. And I agree that in spite of its strengths (volume, navigation, and speed), the site doesn't make it into the '90's.
If the models don't seem to give a shit, why should the user?
Nice review Denner. I have a question for you, what types of videos are the newer vids like? Are they mostly solo or lesbian? For solo scenes, is it masturbation with toys and fingers or just very softcore type scenes of stripping and so forth? Also, I noticed on the preview that a lot of the newer models seem "new", as you said. Do they also have a good amount of movies or are these newer models mostly just made up of pic sets? Finally, are the frequent movie updates ALL for the newer models or is it just old content being uploaded frequently?
Definitely check out TeenModels. It lets you preview, as a visitor, the complete exclusive videos they shoot. It's the girls masterbating, with no techno sound track of the few I just looked out. The only sound is the girl getting off.
I also downloaded one vid of Euphrat just to see the quality, and it's really good. 3137kbps, 1280x720. So if you like watching girls plunkin' their stuff, you'll probably enjoy it. (There are two types of "stuff" that get the treatment -- one not intended for reproductive purposes.)
So yes, I have joined. Silly me.
The hardcore stuff there is a different story, IMHO. It's from other sources, as the TeenModels webmaster doesn't want "dicks" in the TM content. It tends to be really rough, and the vids are broken into segments, which don't come one right after the other.
Yo, Denner, Ze Dwoolah, here. Yeah, I've been Babeliciousizing, if that can be a word. (Hell, why not?)
And yes, they're getting thinner and thinner with the updates. At least they do 3-4000 px on the photos, but with the vids, that must be a bummer 'cause they don't do them very often.
But one photo update from the whole batch of stuff via Babelicious (SexyBabes, etc.) per day is not uncommon. Sure isn't like it used to be!
Hey, did you notice that Sasha got a boob job? Not a bad one. They look a bit like radio dials, though. A "Techie's Dream," I suppose.
I think of the idea of opening a new sister site as a marketing tool, to increase interest in the site (with the hope that more members will join) and with the possibility that the new sister site might be a source of added revenue. If you look at met-art and metmodels, that is what was done, I believe. The main purpose of metmodels was to increase the revenues (money) that was paid by potential members of met-art. Maybe the owners/operators of met-art and metmodels can claim some artistic or intellectual reasons for the creation of metmodels, but I think the basic reason was just to make more money. There is no real reason for metmodels to exist separately except for marketing purposes: The two sites are the same, except that metmodels is a site with far less content and a much smaller amount of updates. You join metmodels only if you want to see the additional photo-sets that are not posted on met-art. Personally, I don't have the extra money to join both sites, so I spend my money at met-art, which is the much more valuable site because of the massive content and frequent updates.
Sounds like your sort of schizophrenic about this site; bashing it one month and falling back in love the next :) Any chance that you'll finally do a review on this place and put us all at ease over your variations on a theme ;)
Can you tell me exactly what is different then 6 months ago? You say its more and more boring? Do you mean the models are getting more and more boring or the content is? I would love some feedback as we use it alot to improve. Also if you are not a current member how are you seeing the sets?
Actually most of those videos you are seeing as 'new' are even older than 2006. Many of them go back as far as 2004 and are from her old site juliesxxx.com
What happened is that Julie has retired from shooting new material (the last actual 'new' scene of her, with her current brunette hairstyle was shot in 2008). So to fill the void of any new material she has been posting remastered versions of videos from her old site. If you download all the vids on Naughtyjulie you will actually notice that while they are sequentially numbers, the ones being posted as her 'updates' now are earlier in the # sequence, because they were all already on the site from day one but just not linked up to the members page. They were there as padding for the times when didn't have time to shoot new stuff, and now that she has completely stopped shooting new stuff that's all you see in the preview pages, the old videos all being re-issued. It's a drag.
08-18-0912:56pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
