Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Review
from walnut:
Beuatiful Girl???? DUDE you need you eyesight checked. Butt f**king ugly!!!
|
03-27-09 08:45am
|
Reply
2
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jeffrey99:
(hogosos's Reply)
That's cool and all, unless you don't want your reviews taken seriously? If you do, then you need alot more detail. As for Bam it's in your face, that all has to do with what your desktop resolution is at. If it's at 640x480, then yeah anything image will be life size. If it's like most of us here and alot bigger, say 1440x900, then a 640x480 image is nothing more then a thumbnail.
Your review has no facts, it's nothing more then opinion.
|
03-12-09 05:02pm
|
Reply
3
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(hogosos's Reply)
How long would it take to simply look for us? Also, there is no reason to jump all over us over typos. We can all appreciate getting you jollies from whatever does it for you, but a lot of us are collectors as much as we are pervs. So we really want to know that is on the site.
|
03-12-09 02:05pm
|
Reply
4
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Review
from badandy400:
This is yet another very subjective review to a site that has had a lot of attention because of these type of reviews. There is no fact in this, only personal opinion. It read the same as the other reviews that have been scrutinized and I again suspect it is the same person or someone from the same group being asked to write these and told what to say.
Everything in this review I could have wrote, and I have never subscribed to this site. If you read the first review written by JoeMushashi you can see that he complains about a lack of cum shots. And guess what, that is the only real con listed here. Image that, a site where a shemale wears boot and nylons, of course they do it is to make the performer appear more feminine.
The simple fact of the matter is that this review really did not tells us anything new and I must concur with Jeffrey with the conclusion that this is yet another ad. Seriously, we are not buying t and this is making the site look back, thus we will not buy a membership to the site and warn others against it.
|
03-12-09 10:29am
|
Reply
5
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
hogosos's Review
from Jeffrey99:
Could use alot more detail in your review. Example, what's the image resolution? How about the video resolution? How often is the site updated? As of know your review is more of a ad, then a review. You make your review sound fake.
|
03-12-09 09:53am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
