| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(james4096's Reply)
FAT32 has an advantage, or maybe "had" (I haven't kept up with the Mac world enough), in that it was both Windows and Mac compatible. And that's why I'd kept that old FAT32 unchanged. But it didn't turn out so well ...
And reformatting to NTFS takes HOURS, nearly DAYS with the huge capacity drives. But it's worth it.
|
04-16-09 10:50am
|
Reply
177
|
Shemale Yum
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from GCode:
You mentioned this was a site from grooby. I joined a site called shemale japan and commented that this particular site did a set up where they would have a model that gest updated with the first movie which is an interview and strip (that's it) then usually after that you get a bj or masterbation but I noticed that a few cut off before cumshots. Then the third update was usually a total masterbation scene with or without a cumshot. I told this to someone who asked me a question about the site and they misinterepted what I meant and told the webmaster that the models never came. However, the webmaster made a reply to me and said that this format was how all the grooby sites were structured. Therefore, is this the case for this site? Is it a mix and mash of video scenes of the models stripping and a guessing game if they cum or not?
|
04-15-09 12:14pm
|
Reply
178
|
Christina Model
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from mbaya:
I really don't know anything about her. What was she doing when she wasn't legal? Did she have a site? Just curious.
|
04-15-09 06:34am
|
Reply
179
|
Christina Model
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from williamj:
NO zips is a real bummer
|
04-15-09 06:16am
|
Reply
180
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
from badandy400:
Vent! I feel your pain on this. I have seen a decent number of sites that advertise other sites or networks. It gets old very fast. And when they use flashing banners it is enough to make me leave a site. Something that webmasters should look into avoiding.
|
04-14-09 09:47pm
|
Reply
181
|
Butt Lounge
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
from mbaya:
I see the site has not updated since 2004. Another obvious negative is that the free tour has almost no content.
|
04-14-09 06:48pm
|
Reply
182
|
Nude 2 Rude
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(james4096's Reply)
I just joined 2 days ago but I will write a full site review for sure within 1 or 2 weeks. As far as your question now, I count 47 on each video update page with 3 update pages, so I'd say roughly 130-140 videos with some being 1-4 parts of a scene because the vids can be quite big, the highest res is 1920 X 1080 (1080i) HD WMV (not bad for 12.95? :)). As for the pics, there are roughly 75-85 models but these models are also categoized as model A with Model B if they are together with another model in a lesbian or threesome scene with about 1-8 sets per model. The site is a bit small and the organization could be better, but so far it seems to be quite good for the bang for buck niche.
|
04-02-09 09:57pm
|
Reply
183
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(james4096's Reply)
I couldn't argue with you that Videobox is a top site, James. You do get your money's worth, especially as a PU reviewer. My biggest complaint is the monotonous sameness of most of the new DVDs being added. I think if they struck out into different territory once in a while (niche contents) to make their collection a bit more diverse they would be able to maintain their score in the nineties. But after three subscriptions my assessment is around 80. Still a pretty good score, I think.
|
04-02-09 06:20pm
|
Reply
184
|
Brittany's Bod
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(james4096's Reply)
as i read youre reply i was happy that i haven`t joined that site. sad waste of money as it seems for you :( but anyway thanks for info
|
04-01-09 11:17am
|
Reply
185
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
from GCode:
Sounds absolutely stupid and pointless. However, I really have no intentions on joining this one soon but thanks for the heads up for sure. I like pics just as equal to vids and implementing this is outrageous imho.
|
03-31-09 08:05pm
|
Reply
186
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from Xororos:
I agree 100%. I was very disappointed with the site. I'll probably write a review myself, although yours covers it very nicely.
|
03-31-09 11:55am
|
Reply
187
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(james4096's Reply)
No problem with about 90% of the videos I download but with the other 10% I get that little screen popping up requesting my log-in information all over again. I doubt that DRM had anything to do with it because it happened to me with a couple of new ones they just put up as well.
|
03-28-09 03:58pm
|
Reply
188
|
We Love Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from mbaya:
Very nice and complete review that contained a lot of useful information.
|
03-28-09 12:38pm
|
Reply
189
|
XXX Sativa Rose
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from HeyManNiceShot:
(james4096's Reply)
No, it does not seem to be part of a network of porn stars.
|
03-24-09 04:51pm
|
Reply
190
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from messmer:
Thanks for the review! The "no zip factor" is always the deal breaker for me, especially if the pictures are as small as you say. No subscription to this site.
|
03-17-09 11:28am
|
Reply
191
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from Goldfish:
I'm more of a video guy myself but I like a good photography site on occasion. Good to know this site has the false leads with the videos and the sub-par photos. No thanks!
|
03-17-09 04:17am
|
Reply
192
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
from badandy400:
Does not sound too promising. Guess I will have to put them on my avoid list for now. Thanks for the review.
|
03-16-09 04:40pm
|
Reply
193
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Hottie:
(james4096's Reply)
What's a never nude????
|
03-06-09 10:06pm
|
Reply
194
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from ControllingMind:
(james4096's Reply)
On reflection, I tend to agree with you. Mofos was my second ever review and when I made it I was annoyed at the problems I had there. Now that I am getting more used to reviews and site scoring, I am considering editing the review and might bump up the score to between 65-70.
I still don't like mofos compared to other similar sites and still say brazzers have took advantage by introducing mofos to get more money from members(same as reality kings and the muffia sites). It looks as if Brazzers shoot some scenes for either site, then decide which site gets the scene. One of the recent mofos scenes was even a 'brazzers says' gameshow scene. Mofos though tends to include more black and ethnic girls than brazzers.
Yes 1 update a day I think is enough for a lot of people. I just wish they hadn't started the 3 per day advertising, that could have influenced many members to join. The log out issue meant I could never put a lot of files in a download cue. I don't know if the links are also rotated, because I could never resume the broken downloads.
|
03-06-09 08:49am
|
Reply
195
|
Adult Bouncer
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
from Denner:
Agree - was a member a few times in "the old days"...
But browsed through it recently - and skipped it - now I see it was for a good reason.
Once they had some of the best latin-stuff around - a couple of socalled Brazil-sites - they're gone now.
I first found Vivi Fernandez here - still got those three videos of her from the site - the best latin-stuff ever.
They also skipped some fine euro-sites..
Well, I take this as another good warning and will not join again.
|
03-03-09 08:13am
|
