You read it right, Teen Dreams is full of content, but some of the content is licensed, which means it can be found on other sites too. The quality of the videos, bitrates and resolution isn't as high as In Focus and really In Focus' quality is higher in all aspects, photos and videos, but Teen Dreams is going to be more content and a much bigger selection of models. ATK Galleria is similar to Teen Dreams, tons of content. I have an ATK membership right now and from scanning the model index, I'm counting roughly 2,240 different models.
Both Teen Dreams and ATK Galleria have been around close to or more than 10 years. My thinking was a site with more models and more content would be a good place to start to kind of get a feel for the models and which ones you like best. Oh and one advantage to Teen Dreams, they have bonus content of Viv Thomas Videos which are some of the more hardcore Euro videos on the internet and you can download them, not just stream like most bonus sites are.
I agree with the others, as I prefer In Focus to Only Cuties. I always thought the biggest difference since both are owned by the same company, is that In Focus has more of the curvier models, mid to late 20s, Only Cuties seems to be more slimmer and less busty and the 18-21 range. My biggest reason for joining Only Cuties was Cindy Hope/Klaudia, who you can see in the preview on the main page at the bottom in a hardcore, reverse cowgirl position.
I haven't had any problems with Vista and this site, but I do know that a member posted last week about having trouble playing Sapphic Erotica videos, also owned by Only Cuties and In Focus company, and if you run into that get a VLC player since some of the newer ones have different codecs than the Windows Media Player plays, VLC is free if you haven't tried it.
I'm not for sure if this would be the place I would start if new to Euro porn. New usually means you don't have the licensed content, so I would probably start with a site with more of the models so you could get familiar with the ones you like the best, a site like Teen Dreams or ATK Galleria, for quantity. One problem you might run into on any Euro model site is that hardcore isn't that common. Most of the Euro models have a few early in their career hardcore shoots, then they move to solo and g/g.
Really, one way to get some of the best Euro models in hardcore, if you are a member of any of the DVD sites like VB, look up the series, Legal Skin and check out the Euro versions, VB has several of those and are mostly b/g hardcore.
Hotter models (recent updates involving Blue Angel under the name Beatrice, for instance), better photography & better "treatment" of the photographs. The newer updates at Only Cuties looked really washed out and boring to me. I don't find that to be the case of InfocusGirls - and the vids at Infocus Girls are simple but have real heat to them. I didn't find recent vids at Only Cuties that I was excited by. They did have material dated in 2006 & 2007 that was much better, though.
It's currently got over 17,600 photosets and over 16,920 videos. (This figure I get by multiplying the number of pages by the number of entries per page, which is 20.)
It's video one day, photoset the other, of the same scene, then they go to the next scene. Updates every day.
It's all exclusive material. There's a real emphasis on solo toy play; nearly every solo set has it. There's also hardcore b/g (7 of the most recent 60 in videos) and g/g (6 of the most recent 60).
The models tend to have pseudonyms unique to the site, but I can recognize some: Josette, Mili Jay, Deny Moore, Era, Lepidotera, Nedra, Zaphira, Mia LaRoche, Betty Saint have all been on since Sept. last year, each making one or more appearances. There are a lot of other models, too. Czech, Hungarian, Russian.
The photo quality and browsing are really good. You can choose a variety of ways to display pages, but the zips are all 2000px photos only.
If you join through paysitediscounts (.com at the end but no www. at the start), it's $19.95, and once you start the signup process, there's a page that lets you join infocusgirls for 3 days for 4.95 (29.95 more if you don't cancel). You cancel by logging into the site, clicking "support" and going from there.
If you enjoy toy play masterbation, I think you'll find that the quality plus quality aspect will be most satisfactory. ;) If you don't, it will bore you pretty quickly, I'd think.
It's a shame that the site doesn't have a visitor's area that shows the latest updates.
Don't I wish that the webmaster of that site would look in and decide to do something about the definition of his videos. There's wmv and then there is wmv. On some sites it's almost HD quality but on AllOver30 the videos are usually a bit too blurry and washed out for me. I love that site and would like nothing better than to see it improve in that ONE area!
Have to agree with you except for my personal irritation about the mosaic. I'd love to see Americans get as creative (drama, sex game shows and crowds) as the Japanese.
I think about 90 percent of the videos ended with a cumshot. I left the site a while ago, one of the main reasons was because they changed the size of their HD videos and they were not presented in true hd 720p but overall its not a bad site.
I haven't been to other ladyboy sites. Despite the missed oportunity of the photographers not (often) performing with the ladyboys I'd still recomend it because there are so many beutiful girls.
That is what I am worried about. Sometimes it can be better to be known as a site that has fake reviews written by site operators or "end of the Earth" fans than to not be known at all. I just hope that people looking for this type of site take the time to look at all the comments and replies to the reviews.
The site might be good, I honestly can not comment there. And that is exactly the problem, after all these recent reviews I still can not even speculate on the quality of the site because the reviews are not usable. I was hoping out of al of this to at least have one good, solid review come from someone who has been there on their own accord and can give us some honest perspective. But I certainly would not ask any of our members to pay the site simply to have that review.
Personally I beleve the best solution to all of this is for the site to offer a one or two day free trail with no credit card information to at least a few of us. This way someone trustworthy can provide a honest and useful review. I say it would have to be someone that has been a member here for at least a few months and more than 20 positive trust votes. This way it would well established that these reviews would have the user's best interest in mind. If the site is not worth joining people need to know, and it very well could be that the site lives up to all the hype. I for one am not going to pay them just to satisfy my ever so slight curiosity.
As for PU getting abused. We can abuse them back. Besides I am sure if this abusive shill reviewing gets out of hand the staff will take addition measures. One perhaps being to mandate for this site the review must have a score of 5 or so and must fill out at least half of the personal question in their profile. This is just one idea, but I am sure they have their methods.
Definitely save your money by not joining this site.
In case you missed it, PU will not accept any reviews of this site for 30 days, because of the suspicious reviews.
I pasted below the comment by Khan announcing that no reviews will be accepted:
..................
..................
Khan - PU Staff 03-12-09 06:52pm
Talk Back TRUST USER? YES (1), NO (0)
OFFICIAL NOTICE !!
Due to the sudden and unexplainable number of new users submitting unusually high scores this past week ... at least a few shown to be shill activity, we are temporarily suspending Reviews for this site.
We'll revisit this decision after 30 days. But until then, any and all Reviews submitted for this site will be summarily declined.
We're sorry for any inconvenience this may cause but feel this action is warranted to curb the high score reviews that contain little or no substance.
Save your change. The opinion of most of the PU members that commented on the recent glowing reviews of this site is that the reviews were not trustworthy. The older PU members think this is just a scam, hyping the site to get new members to join.
You appear to think the same.
03-12-0901:27pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
