Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
KWH1071's Review
from PinkPanther:
One thing I've got to point out that adds to the questionable nature of this review is the comment about "bonus sites and other features have been added."
I'm currently a member. My membership is about to elapse. There is a "Bonus" page, but when I click on it, it is blank - there is no "bonus" content. Please explain what you mean by your comment.
Otherwise I've got to conclude that this is a BS advertisement instead of an honest review.
There is a lot good about this site and it doesn't need to be overly hyped.
|
01-20-09 05:46pm
|
Reply
2
|
Jenny Poussin VIP
(0)
|
Reply of
KWH1071's Review
from lk2fireone:
When someone gives a very high score of 95+, most Pornusers members tend to regard the score suspiciously. That's just the PU mentality. The members don't believe in perfect sites. And they have definite ideas on how almost all porn sites could be improved.
To write a review and list no cons is a definite no-no.
Even if you are completely in love with a site, you should still list at least a few minor cons, just for the sake of appearing non-biased. Your review would be better accepted, and be more persuasive to the PU members.
I like your review, and believe it's your honest opinion.
But before posting any more reviews, a good idea would be to read the thread, "What should a PU review include?", especially the post by Toadsith titled: "Porn Users Cheat Sheet".
Toadsith, a PU member, posted a great outline for writing a review that shows what many of the PU members want to see included in a review.
What you write is up to you. But like I say, your reviews will have greater weight if you write a more balanced review, and maybe include some technical details.
See the thread: What should a PU review include?
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ead.html?threadid=57
|
01-19-09 01:16pm
|
Reply
3
|
Sandy Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
KWH1071's Review
from mbaya:
Does not sound like an unbiased review.
|
01-19-09 08:26am
|
Reply
4
|
Jenny Poussin VIP
(0)
|
Reply of
KWH1071's Review
from mbaya:
No cons for a score of 96 sounds unbeleivable. Sounds like a review written by the site.
|
01-19-09 08:24am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
