Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : lk2fireone (0)  

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203)

Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1451-1475 of 1609 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1451
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment from RustyJ:

I wonder what's the point of the watermark anyway. It's not like it stops piracy or anything. Or are there some who use stolen content in their own stuff that they try to sell?

09-30-11  11:08pm

Reply
1452
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from slutty: (lk2fireone's Reply)

yeah looking back at my review it does seem a bit negative given the score, I was mainly trying to point out all the flaws, as this place certainly has its problems.

I did enjoy the site, there were just many scenes where after it downloaded I looked at it and was like, what the fuck is this? I guess I am just willing to overlook the bad for the good in this case...


10-08-10  11:57pm

Reply
1453
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from slutty: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Hey man, a site like this is kind of difficult to review. On one hand they have some excellent content, but then there are other scenes that are pretty big "misses". I am personally a fan of castings with interviews and stuff before the model gets naked, so that is probably why I scored the site so high even though the content is pretty variable. He definitely gets some attractive models, it is just too bad that a lot of the hardcore castings are single-camera on a tripod type deals, although that it pretty much what I expected.

10-07-10  11:08pm

Reply
1454
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from fb fanatic:

I read the summary under one of Clover's most recent videos, and I'm wondering if the description is misleading. Does she really give the guy a blowjob or is it basically a hand-job video? Thanks.

10-29-19  07:58am

Reply
1455
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from exotics4me: (lk2fireone's Reply)

I had been a member 2-3 times before but never had access to All Fine Girls, so I was happy to see it included. I think something must have changed at Wow since the price was also a few dollars lower than listed on PU. I enjoy their content as much as I do any of the teen sites.

The Spectrum part has been a huge deal in this area. Brighthouse, our electric company, partially owned and funded by the state, was approved to offer cable, internet and home phone services to all of its electricity customers. The negative backlash against it involves low-income families that receive reduced electricity bills being able to get near free cable and internet. I personally am not bothered by that. I think if those of us that can afford it can help those who can't afford it, have it and have a little enjoyment/entertainment in their life, I'm all for it.

It still pushed Spectrum to make changes to compete. No one even knew we have Spectrum Gig in this area. It's their first move to compete with Brighthouse. Throughout my life, I have had a provider that eventually became Spectrum (Time Warner and Charter) so they're suddenly wanting to talk about something you talk about, brand loyalty.

There was one catch to my new offer ... I had to switch my mobile service to Spectrum. Spectrum Mobile is on Verizon and that's who I have anyway, we have 5 lines. Spectrum dropped my price on mobile from $238 a month to $125. They upgraded our cable to the gold package with 3 DVRs for $89 a month and upgraded the internet to Spectrum Gig for $79 a month with a new 3.1 modem. I also let them leave the home phone on it for $19 a month which activated a bundle promo of $50 off per month for having 4 services with them.

My Verizon and Spectrum bills in December were a combined $418, this month with all the services on one bill, it's $274. They're also back to doing the no-contract ... contract, where the customer can cancel at anytime without fees but they have to guarantee your price for 12, 24 or 36 months.

I'm finally getting full speed with the Spectrum Gig. It must have taken the modem some time to fully register my connection.


01-29-19  11:05pm

Reply
1456
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from rearadmiral:

I'm glad Jade1 asked that question about the preview pages. I really like the scenes on this site but I haven't rejoined in several years because when I look at the preview pages it doesn't look like the site has updated at all since I was last a member. Now that I know they are updating I may consider rejoining.

04-04-18  01:10pm

Reply
1457
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from Jade1:

When I goto this site (as a non-member) and look at the updates nothing ever shows for me. Does this happen to you?

04-03-18  02:43am

Reply
1458
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from skippy: (lk2fireone's Reply)

I was able to get in after changing my password (for no reason). And I got an email back that said "We see you logged in so everything must be OK now." No mention of the fact that my password was changed without my knowledge and I was charged for but didn't log in for 2 months because I thought the account had expired...the usual case when you can't log in using known-good account credentials. But they are in the business of taking my money, so they did, and technically don't have give any back for any reason, so they didn't.

Part of the problem is that the more obscure billing services, like the one that Diesel uses, Vendo Services, aren't on my checklist to review monthly like ccbill and epoch are. At least they send emails, though. One, ECHST, doesn't even send you a confirmation email when you sign up to a site they service or a cancellation when you cancel so you have no record at all of the charge other than the cryptic information on the credit card bill and no proof that a cancellation was processed.

I need to remember to include the billing service in my reviews...


02-28-17  03:46pm

Reply
1459
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from calissa:

Thorough review. Nicely done.

01-07-17  07:18pm

Reply
1460
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from Pyrenees:

Excellent review! It is especially good to know you get access to both sites. I am not sure if that was the case when I joined years ago. The WHOLE reason I joined was I saw a foursome on Beeg with Klara and Paloma and their front facing double doggystyle is STILL in my top ten all time favorite scenes. There is a 5 min clip of it on Spankbang atm. Anyways thank you for the very good review!

01-04-17  03:57pm

Reply
1461
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Cybertoad: (lk2fireone's Reply)

I was not paying 100% attention when they all became active but yes I can access them all but I think it was at the 2 month mark that happened. The site is pretty amazing they have some amazing Girl, girl, guys scenes that blow me away and seem pretty realistic. On think I tend to like is they don't always use massive cocks, which I appreciate. Why there are some larger ones its not like other sites.
I digress one thing I didnt put in the review is I got no notice of new access to the other sites, just one day the top menu allowed it or I noticed. Not really a negative as I didn't join to get all three but was a nice bonus. I also thing upon joining that should be clear might help others join. Maybe that changed the last three months but I never noticed I checked on another browser to see what it says they do mention wowporn being included free on one of the join pages.


04-15-16  08:20am

Reply
1462
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from sonofzog: (lk2fireone's Reply)

It's been awhile since I was subscribing to Wow Girls but as I recall, after paying for 30 days I was automatically registered to use Wow Porn and after 60 days I had access to the third site.

As I cull my porn collection I note that a lot of my favorite videos came from Wow Girls/Porn etc. I'm seriously thinking of going back. I do find some of the navigation annoying; if I'm looking at multiple pages of one model and look at a video, I do not want to be sent all the way back to page 1, especially if I've gotten to page 3 or later.

The distribution across three sites also makes it more of a challenge to dl all the desirable videos of one particular model.


06-24-15  02:36pm

Reply
1463
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #25 from jberryl69: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Not really - they seldom ask their performers to deep throat.

03-06-13  12:51pm

Reply
1464
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #22 from jberryl69: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Well you were "partially" correct and while forceful cock shoving can be involved, it is not a prerequisite for the completion of the act. But the "all the way down a girl's mouth and throat" is what deep throat is. With the website we are discussing I do understand that it is not gonzo - which is good. I'm trying to expand my acquisition of deep throat of a different type (Carmen Monet in Porn Pros "Deep Throating Queen" as an example using it's softly shot scenes). She does all the heavy lifting.

I could not ascertain from your reply if they do or don't show this -

"If a guy has his dick down a woman's throat, she is a willing participant, and there is very little pain involved.

She is trying to give the guy pleasure, and he is also mainly trying to please her.

So if there is deep throat fucking, it's the soft kind"

I think the word "IF" makes for confusion. Can you rephrase your answer in a more direct way? Thanks.

PS - When I spoke of gonzo, it IS what is mostly out there - not my fault the choices are so limited. I prefer the willing and direct participation of the girl. Gonzo guys face fucking is not erotic. Gonzo can be willing - see just about any Mike Adriano oral and it's the girls working, so gonzo in itself doesn't have to incorporate the forced action.


03-06-13  09:47am

Reply
1465
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from jberryl69:

Just have one question - since you know my niche is deep throat, then you'll understand the question - When they say deep throat in a scene, what is one going to see here?

03-06-13  05:33am

Reply
1466
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #18 from slutty: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Once again, thanks for the info lk2, it may be that they are being lazy with the preview page on Wow Porn, but as a few examples they have posted (these all had the same setting, model, outfits, and scene name as ones I downloaded last year from Wow Girls):

Anjelica "Save Me"
Momoko "Tight Snatch Hunter"
Angela Pamona "Dream of any straight man"
Bianca "Toys are fun"
Luiza Pamona "lovely threesome"

These are just a few I noticed, perhaps it was just stuff they put in to get the site going or their preview page is wrong, I can't really tell if the newer stuff overlaps (not trying to be combative, was mainly just curious if Wow Porn really added much value).


02-09-13  12:12pm

Reply
1467
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #16 from slutty: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Thanks for the info,

Odd since several of the preview pictures are of scenes I am almost certain I already have, perhaps it is just edited differently ala DDF or just so happens to be same model/furniture/location.


02-08-13  09:58pm

Reply
1468
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #14 from slutty: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Thanks for the info lk2, I just meant from looking at the previews of the site a lot of the content on Wow Porn looked like content that was already on Wow Girls.

02-05-13  06:35pm

Reply
1469
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #9 from KET924aab: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Thanks for that excellent break down. I'll probably go with Young Legal Porn--looks like a great site!

02-04-13  05:08pm

Reply
1470
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from slutty:

Great review lk2,

I agree it is a very good site. Any opinions on Wow Porn, seems to mostly just be mostly the b/g type material right from Wow Girls? Perhaps just cause it is a new site...


02-04-13  04:14pm

Reply
1471
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from dieselman:

Dear lk2fireone!

Thank you so much for your excellent review! We are very glad about it!
Thank you for your time to work on this review!

I am also glad you liked that surprise of getting access to WowPorn at no additional costs! All WowGirls members receive it for free from a first day (and vice versa)


02-04-13  09:17am

Reply
1472
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from rearadmiral: (lk2fireone's Reply)

To make things more strange, Wow and Diesel are separate corporate entities too...

I checked my email, but like you I don't have that offer. They must have targeted specific former members.


02-03-13  06:45pm

Reply
1473
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from KET924aab:

Yes, great review lk2fireone. It's hard to figure out which Diesel site to join first. Any advice?

02-03-13  11:25am

Reply
1474
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from rearadmiral:

Great review! (I'll admit to being a bit biased as I think these Wow sites and the Diesel sites are among the best on the 'net.) These sites seem to do everything right.

02-03-13  05:37am

Reply
1475
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from tangub: (lk2fireone's Reply)

I would guess from their point of view it wouldn't make sense to send a promotional join offer to excisting full paying members if indeed you are paying the full price. I don't very often rejoin sites and looking at the date of my review for Young Legal Porn its been 15 months since I had a Diesel membership so I guess it pays to play "hard to get" :)

02-03-13  01:15am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1451-1475 of 1609 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.98 seconds.