| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
801
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Jayz:
Update: Alternatively on the new tour homepage, each gallery has a FULL COVER link under it's cover thumbnail. You can use this link to view the photoset covers, rather than being directed to their guest galleries.
If you have any further questions, comments, or suggestions about our new tour page or MetArt in general, MetArt developers are open and willing to hear to them. -JC
|
02-10-11 01:28pm
|
Reply
802
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jayz:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Hi lk2fireone, Thanks for the post regarding the new MetArt tour page. I just wanted add clarity to a few things that were brought up in your post:
1. Viewing Photoset Covers: When you are directed to any MetArt guest gallery i.e. when you see galleries with thumbnails, the full-sized cover can still be viewed, simply by re-clicking the smaller cover — to the left of the model information section — in the guest galleries.
2. Archives History: Our new tour page provides a lot more photosets now. You can now view our older photosets in the Archives tab.
Hope this helps. Please message me if you have another other questions. — JC
|
02-10-11 01:08pm
|
Reply
803
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Yeah, this is one of the sites that is trying to deal with the economic downturn by doing a lot more advertising in a prominent place on their home page and aiming for affiliate income.
I preferred the old version of the home page, which focused more on the material that I'm paying my membership for. But I love the site and wish them well, so if affiliate income is what they need to keep going and to maintain the incredible quality and rate of content, I say, "Do what you gotta do, MetArt"
I also agree about the navigation being improved - and it was always quite good - and the presentation of the photo-sets being improved from what it was before.
|
02-10-11 06:32am
|
Reply
804
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Agreed!
|
12-30-10 05:30am
|
Reply
805
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
"The end of a love affair...." - I really like that one, lk2 - and by Golly or what ever it is in the English language.......they deserve it!!!!!
Nobody mess with PU. (which means us)
Bottomline - they DO mess with TBP/PU here - a stupid move by those guys....
|
10-29-10 07:45am
|
Reply
806
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yes, that post was removed.
We were contacted by Met Art and told that were not authorized to offer that "deal" from our site and thus, we'd have to remove the link.
|
10-29-10 05:59am
|
Reply
807
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Sevrin:
Yeah, it's been like that for quite some time. The next day updates are correct, but everything earlier in the month is hit-or-miss. Since you can't access the thumbnails directly from that page, I only ever use it to see who's going to be up tomorrow. It's a little messed up that we need to go to a public page to see what content will be available to members the next day.
They are, however, doing a little work on the website currently, so they might add coming attractions for members, too. Model voting now no longer causes pages to refresh and there's an expanded biography available on the page that displays all the content available for a given model.
|
07-22-10 04:54am
|
Reply
808
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from PinkPanther:
They must have fixed it - looks fine to me
|
07-21-10 06:09pm
|
Reply
809
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Yeah - in your dreams - maybe if it was made by one of those crazed directors of Japanese adult vids
|
05-03-10 06:12pm
|
Reply
810
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Cybertoad:
Really she is back?? Her site went like belly up was surprised to here this.
|
04-02-10 07:29am
|
Reply
811
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Count me in with lk - the amount of excellent material for my tastes is pretty much un-paralleled, though there are many sets that I'm not interested in - given their rate of updates, I'm rarely going a day without finding a photo-set that I like quite a bit.
Their vids set the standard for "how boring can you be?"
Their cam shows - which go on for much of the day - are frequently wonderful. Though if you're craving babes banging themselves and screaming "EddieRascal411, fuck my ass now!", stick to the cam shows at Naughty America - you won't see that here.
|
01-04-10 08:01am
|
Reply
812
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from asmith12:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Just a purely personal opinion :-): for me fake smile is SO MUCH worse than fake boobs, and in "fake smile" department Met Art is FAR ahead of the Playboy :-((.
|
11-03-09 12:50am
|
Reply
813
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks, man. There seem to be 1-2 reviews of MetArt per month. Good to keep close tabs on things. Maybe I'll crank one out for Caesar Augustus.
|
07-09-09 01:15pm
|
Reply
814
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from oogles:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Good point; I suppose I need to clairfy.
I have been a member three times, but the first time was for ONE YEAR. That's how I moved through most of the content. Then I returned twice for one month each just to catch up on the new stuff.
That's why in the bottom line section I recommended taking a one year subscription deal if you have never been a member before.
I also agree with you that most of the video is 'skippable.'
|
07-08-09 07:15pm
|
Reply
815
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Mr Fountain:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yeah, Met Art has become a keeper for me. Just takes my breath away..If you like softcore; I like only tease; Nubiles.net; Phil Flash (great vids)stripper type tease, Ftv Girls has the best collection of the hi def teaser videos where they dress in the bathroom and try on different outfits and public strip down to nudity., also some great pics - yet they are outnumbered by the vids..;. If you want a bargain, I would join Dattic, under dionysian archives... you get great stuff for $15 non recurring...
|
11-21-08 06:05pm
|
Reply
816
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Mr Fountain:
I rejoined Met Art a few weeks ago.. and I have seen many sites (usually two a month)... This site has taken a porn vet's breath away.. and I have been brought to my knees with the caliber of beauty of their sets..the most stunning nude site I've been a member of..the models, the richly decorated sets, models acessories, lingerie, ballerina outfits, dreamy settings..striking shoot locations...all of it just makes me gasp when some of the sets download onto my screen..I can look at their sets for hours...I haven't looked at the vids much yet..I have been a member of met models one time.. and haven't yet tried erottica archives but maybe someday...
|
11-21-08 10:03am
|
Reply
817
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Nasos:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks mate :)
Hope next week I'll do Holly Randall.
|
08-16-13 09:17am
|
Reply
818
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from SelenaMetArt:
I agree with PinkPanther. ~smiles~ Personal preference for style certainly comes into play with MichaelNinn.com, as it does with any other site. The partnership truly is a win/win/win...not only for Ninn and MetArt, but for porn aficionados that love his work, and the lovely ladies that are part of helping create his vision.
|
02-04-13 11:35am
|
Reply
819
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from PinkPanther:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Actually, I think Ninn is partnering with MetArt for the financing. His stuff is a lot more expensive to produce than the standard porn stuff, so he needs a backer with bucks. MetArt seems to have the bucks as well as a related sensibility.
|
01-14-13 09:59pm
|
Reply
820
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from PinkPanther:
The vids - when you click on them to get a free preview - look very good. Ninn's definitely a stylist, so you either like his style or you don't.
Ninn and Met Art are a great partnership!
|
01-13-13 10:15pm
|
Reply
821
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from tangub:
I came across this site the other day and thought it looked quite interesting, I didn't realise it was part of the MetArtNetwork though. Hopefully MetArt will send a promotional email with a nice discount to join.
|
01-13-13 09:41am
|
Reply
822
|
Michael Ninn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Capn:
Looks flashy & pretentious to me, I'm afraid.
Intro video is pretty, but lacks substance.
Preview area mostly soft focus & retouched.
He obviously loves himself though. ;)
Cap'n.
|
01-12-13 04:04pm
|
Reply
823
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RagingBuddhist:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
lk2 - Wait 'til you have the pleasure of not only getting a response but not getting a response AND getting berated by the webmaster on here for not contacting them first.
|
01-31-13 03:52am
|
Reply
824
|
Molly's Bedroom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Just ran a fast check on the Lana bonus-site:
Still updating on photosets - and quite a lot in 2012 and earlier - but no vid-update since 2007.
She does not look older at all those new pix-sets, so guess it's like Teendreams (for one) older material, but not earlier released...there are tons of sets with Lana...a little over 120 sets - both hc, solo and a few lez. And it really looks ok in pix style and quality...
|
10-17-12 11:43am
|
Reply
825
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yes, I was surprised myself, lk2fireone. Epoch are usually very good when it comes to requests like that. First I tried to get in touch through their on-line support but found that they no longer had my purchase number in their data base, then I decided to send an email to support regarding the matter complete with the details of the purchase, yet, as I wrote, they never responded. If it had been a very active site with loads of daily updates I might have pushed a bit more for an answer but because only one more (not so hot) update was at stake I let things slide. So, if this comment can be a warning to others then I can rest easy about the "lost week." Still would love to know what was behind the "ban" though.
|
05-25-12 03:26pm
|
