| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Tree Rodent:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
IK - the least they could have done is send over a couple of lap dancers. Come to think of it the least they could have done is absolutely nothing, which is what they did. Shameful.
Drooler - Yeah it also takes me longer to pee than for one of those newbies to write a 3 line review. But that's age. What can we do about the ever increasing threat of the newbie 3 line review? Suicide bombers, that's what. I'd do it myself but had to take an early retirement. Job was just killing me.
Messmer - The trouble is what we want is now a niche. Everything that isn't what the majority consume (whether they comsume it because they really want it, or because it's foist on them) is a niche. You would think your wanting a simple strip from clothed to nude and sometimes involving lingerie would be simple, or my wanting a simple hardcore set of pics or videos with the same style and class as softcore would be easy to find, but it isn't. I'm probably going to end up doing a wittyguy type rant in the forum. I think Drooler and yourself also noticed something about what was missing in some of the Karups sets. Could have done with more ass and whole body shots, although maybe you have to be a real perv to want a whole body shot.
|
08-01-10 05:07pm
|
Reply
677
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tree Rodent:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Shill shill!!!
|
07-31-10 06:31pm
|
Reply
678
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from GCode:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Great decision by Khan and thanks for letting me know.
-GCode
|
03-12-09 07:46pm
|
Reply
679
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Tree Rodent:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Look at the top of the page. He has a talkback badge. It's under "Khan PU Staff."
|
03-12-09 07:26pm
|
Reply
680
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Khan:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
RE: Trust Rating
haha ... funny one guys. Actually it's just a fluke that it even offers a trust rating for staffers. You'll note the badges don't show on my profile. Still, I appreciate the vote of confidence.
Oh, and TheSquirrel, just be sure to leave a reason if you cast a negative vote. BTW, you do know who typically approves the no trust ratings, right? ;) But I promise, if you cast a no trust vote and leave a reason, I'll apply the same loose standard to that as I would if you were casting it for anyone else.
|
03-12-09 07:25pm
|
Reply
681
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tree Rodent:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
As a natural subversive with an evil sense of humour I was tempted to press the "no" button. But the poor old bugger doesn't deserve it.
|
03-12-09 07:19pm
|
Reply
682
|
La Sublime XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from La Sublime:
I know the review is pretty old, next month they will give us a new review, we have also added: video and photo download.
Thank you.
With love, La Sublime.
|
07-14-17 01:50am
|
Reply
683
|
La Sublime XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Amanda:
Thanks for the head's up. Pricing is fixed.
|
07-13-17 10:05am
|
Reply
684
|
Ladyboy Flix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I understand this totally and agree 100%. My main concern is why would this person even bother responded with that answer to these questions? The preview page does not include anything about these questions and it's the 'you get what you see 'saying that pissed me off. I don't see shit, so what the hell do I get? :)
Honestly, I'd rather get no response from this person than that answer. It's that attitude that creates poor sites. While the content may look okay for this niche which is quite small, just what he said has made me totally stray away from the site for now. For instance, if he probably did not respond at all I'd (honestly) probably still be interested in the site but it would be put on a back burner until I had more cash. However, if he would have took the few minutes to at least 'attempt' to write something constructive, I probably would have put it on the high up list.
I just get tired of some webmasters that have the exact attitude of what he quoted, you get what you see. Just seems like lately I can count the companies on one hand that provide even minute customer service or care these days.
BTW, I hope I am not going off on a tangent or am taking your response with a grain of salt in any way. The reason I posted this was to get others opinions to the matter and I do believe in your reply.
|
12-04-09 10:50pm
|
Reply
685
|
Latin Shemales
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from GCode:
Congrats! I'm glad to see you reviewing a site that is not exactly your main interest but still delivering quality details and useful information. Thanks for the read.
|
04-02-11 06:51pm
|
Reply
686
|
Latin Shemales
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Capn:
Congratulations on your 100 up lk2.
A shame it wasn't a site you liked that did it! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-02-11 01:13pm
|
Reply
687
|
Lay The Kat
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from tangub:
A very thourough review lk2, no stone left unturned as usual.
|
11-13-12 11:21am
|
Reply
688
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
You're right. I just ran a speed test and I got 311 Mbps, which is obviously quite different from 311MBps. I didn't know the difference until now. Thanks for pointing that out.
I just did a test and downloaded a scene from Evil Angel and IDM showed I was getting 40 MB/s. It took maybe 30 seconds to download a 1.68GB scene. I thought that maybe I was capped at downloads but I now see that if I'm getting 40MB/s that's probably much closer to my capacity than I thought.
Thanks for shedding some light on that for a non-tech guy.
But... I get 40MB/s from Evil Angel and get less than 1/40th of that from Legal Porno. I'm still mad at them!
|
03-29-17 02:40pm
|
Reply
689
|
Lesbian Factor
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from elephant:
Nice honest review. Yeah I'd say 75 is a fair enough score for this site, its a okish edition to anyone into lesbian porn but trailing behind in many ways to some of its competition and does seem a bit dated.
|
05-13-12 09:03am
|
Reply
690
|
Lesbian Girl On Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from WeeWillyWinky:
Excellent review, lk2!
|
05-24-16 11:57pm
|
Reply
691
|
LetsDoeIt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from yujin:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Lol xD
|
12-03-18 08:37am
|
Reply
692
|
Little Caprice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I agree with you because it diminishes her appeal, makes her look less wholesome. I know that may sound funny when talking about a girl that does porn but that's how I view it. It's like she sold out and in way she has. The money a softcore model was getting for her work was not enough so she went hardcore and in my case the girls doing hardcore went the escort route. The difference with ours is that at least she's working with people that are tested and it's in a controlled environment. Girls that escort open the door to so many problems that it's going to affect the porn industry one day.
|
07-17-11 09:59am
|
Reply
693
|
Little Caprice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I know this will probably sound strange but it really bothers me to read about porn performers doing prostitution. My appologies doing escort duties. I suppose past porn girls did the same thing but I never heard anything about it so the old expression ignorance is bliss applied. These days it isn't who escorts but who doesn't. I know a couple of porn peformers that are adamant that they don't and never will and I believ them but they are rare. I gues when you have sex on screen with an actor for money than it's easier to have sex with a stranger in a hotel for money.
|
07-17-11 09:37am
|
Reply
694
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
This is exactly how I feel about this site. I joined 3 weeks ago and I did download a couple of scenes at first. I don't rememebr having as many problems downloading at the time and then I only came back a week later. That's when I noticed the slowdown navigating and the unbelievably slow download speed. Needless to say I didn't do any downloads and I've been visiting every few days and trying to download but I get the same speed.
Too bad because I was really hopeful.
|
10-11-09 07:12pm
|
Reply
695
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jook:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Nah, just joking about the CAPS. CAP away. -)
|
09-24-17 04:11am
|
Reply
696
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from jook:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Another comprehensive review! You're like a machine, haha.
As you probably recall, I've struggled on how best to review networks. It's been a gut-wrenching decision that's kept me up at night. -) Seriously, I decided to go a similar route that PU does with their reviews - review by the site with little consideration to other sites included with membership. And they get scored on their own merits. Or I'll review a network taken as a whole.
So, sorry, I have to disagree with giving a score to an individual site in a network either higher or lower based on being part of a network. I find it a bit misleading. I know scores should be taken with a grain of salt, but it's what first catches the eye.
Regardless, I still appreciate your reviews (CAPS and all!) and appreciate that you spit them out relentlessly.
|
09-23-17 03:02pm
|
Reply
697
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from pat362:
NICE REVIEW AND I RESPECT THE REASON FOR YOUR SCORE BUT I DISAGREE WITH IT BECAUSE I DON'T THINK IT DESERVES THAT SCORE ANYMORE THAN I THINK ANY SITE THAT STOPPED UPDATING 7 YEARS AGO DESERVES A SCORE ABOVE 80%. NOW GRANTED THE TMW ACCESS MAKES THIS SITE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE APPEALING BUT I ARGUE THAT NO ONE WHO PAYS 15$ FOR JUST THIS SITE WOULD BE HAPPY WITH HIS PURCHASE AND INSTEAD WOULD BE REALLY PISSED.
THAT SAID IF YOU WERE A FAN OF LOLLY OR STUMBLE ON SOME OF HER OLD GLAMOUR STUFF AND WANT TO SEE HER DO HARDCORE PORN THAN THIS IS THE SITE TO GO TO.
|
09-19-17 11:41am
|
Reply
698
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Oh cool, good to hear she is still in the biz, I'll go and do more searching.
|
05-27-12 02:57am
|
Reply
699
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from elephant:
Yeah nice review, Got a say I agree she would wear you out fast lol, very sexy girl, shame you don't really see her about these days, maybe retired like most of the Russian ones do. Some return back to porn but sadly not many, I'm still waiting for Bethany, Zanna, Lukava and Sarah to return but doubt it now lol.
|
05-27-12 01:03am
|
Reply
700
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Stas RC:
Thanks for your review!
|
05-24-12 02:10am
|
