I just got this offer and rejoined. The site is really slow. Right now I'm trying to see the list of photo sets for May 2012 (month chosen at random) and after more than 5 minutes nothing has appeared.
I have a 20 MBS fiber optic internet connection and a new Mac Pro with the latest OSX and Safari. I'm frustrated. I'll post again if I get this resolved.
I haven't seen any toys atMetArt either, which is why I like, too. And they've wisely decided to satisfy those who crave the toy insertions (human and otherwise) by creating the sister site SexArt, leaving MetArt free of the phallic probes.
So if FemJoy were to go that route and come up with a "ToyJoy," that would be fine with me. I mean, doesn't the world need yet another? ;)
I would agree models can look better with make up.Some look better natural. So many variables. One critcism of Femjoy's beauties is there is not enough close ups of genitals whether dry or moist.Many have cunts clean shaven & some have bushy pussies. Either way I'm sure many would finger their vaginas & even climax. The site should maintain the same high standard but close ups of labias, some floppy or stiff make it exciting. Some shots show the anus but not all. Karol was a fab example of a woman on knees aiming her arsehole direct at the lens. All sets should include anus shots both open & some of a tight asshole!
Yes, you're right (about your opinion) : it has merit even though I don't share it at all, and exactly for the reasons you're expressing ;)
I think the less make-up there is the better it is. I usually avoid Met-Art because of the generic quality it brings : they're on quantity side instead of the quality one.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that M-A is bad, but it really has nothing special.
That's what I like about Femjoy, that "Girl Next Door" feeling you're speaking about.
And more specifically, the artistic side they bring rather than the erotic one.
If I come back here, that's because they know how to picture nude girls without using artificial elements like make-up, toys...
And watching at the videos, I can clearly see that they enjoy being nude in front of the camera.
But indeed that's also a personal point of view, to each his/her hown :)
Femjoy, I admit, does takes my breath away with their beautiful models and elegant interior sets; and dramatic/gorgeous outdoor shoots. I also like that they are showing more lingerie in their sets insted of nudity. I didn't think I'd gasp at something so simple and plain but I do- great buy for 2 for 1; Femjoy has some beautiful models and sets.
I got what you have to say about Met Art. Though, I wish their resolution from set to set was more consistent. Some have nine MP pixels; others are much higher. otherwise- I agree. though both offer different qualities.
the opposite of Femjoy I can think of is watch4beauty very erotic- artistic/ erotic- I loved that site
Great, thorough review, lk - while you put your opinion out there, as you should, you also gave a ton of info so anybody that is interested in the site should be able to have a lot to help them decide whether or not it's worth joining.
In this case, other PU members haven't expressed a similar opinion because you're just plain wrong!
Hopefully, you recognize that I'm kidding - well, to a certain extent anyway.
You're certainly entitled to your opinion but the refreshing thing about Femjoy is the unsullied beauty of their models - they look great and their photography is very high quality and there aren't very many sites around where gorgeous women are shown without TOO MUCH make-up or too much photo-shopping, so Femjoy is filling a niche that is underserved. They would be fools to reverse course and stop filling that niche. In my opinion.
I've had that "no confirmation e-mail" with ccbill myself with another site.
Basically, whenever I sign up with a site at ccbill, I always save the subscription number so that I can look up the site at ccbill using my email and that subscription number. They don't always list every subscription, as they used to, findable just with email and credit card number.
Not life, just one or two sites. As you know, most of my reviews are quite positive and I really do try to give sites a 2nd chance by rejoining when a bad experience may have been a fluke.
I would suggest Irish Creme but since you are lactose intolerant, maybe some warm brandy? It's not eggnog but you won't notice after a while... :-)
I'm with you on amazon. I spend a fortune with them and am a prime member in addition to prime fresh. Too bad they have bad (presidential) politics. But let's not go there. Jet has better prices on some items and carries some things that amazon doesn't. In my limited dealings with them, their delivery has been as fast if not faster than Amazon. The concept is basically the same though Jet carries only a fraction of the items that Amazon carries. Competition is a good thing.
As to how the bank allows duplicate authorizations - it's because they're for different amounts and the bank can't distinguish that it's a duplicate. Jet initially authorizes for the entire purchase. A day later, they authorize for individual purchases. For example, I purchased 3 items in my latest order. Immediately following placing the online order, they authorized the entire amount. The next day, they authorized each item separately. The bank told me that several of the authorizations were duplicates and they rejected them (I ordered 5 cases of water and apparently they tried to authorize each case separately).
I can't fault the bank - how are they supposed to know? Being a nut when it comes to these things, I called up Visa USA and asked for clarification about Visa's rules. Talk about bureaucracy! I got nowhere. I know I know, I'm an obsessive nut when it comes to these things. ;)
They need time to sharpen their pencils to write the cancellation order ;).
Not to digress.... coincidentally, I was just speaking with my bank about authorizations from jet.com - the company that aspires to be amazon.com. What a racket! It's my third time ordering from them and I keep forgetting about their ridiculous policy. They authorize all purchases twice thereby tying up available funds. The duplicate authorizations go away eventually, but that doesn't mitigate the hardship it may cause by having funds unavailable needlessly. When I questioned jet.com, I was told it was the way their system operates. Great answer! Calling my bank simply to find out if they're allowed to do this was an exercise in patience and I eventually hung up after being transferred around. I personally don't really care about the funds being unavailable - it's the principle. The experience was something out of Kafka. I don't know how they get away with it.
Hmm, this is interesting. I'll have to admit I didn't watch all of Pierre's stuff but I've never seen him abuse a girl and enjoy pain. Maybe that was just a phase in his porn career...maybe...
As for why does he get so many hot women. Well, he has money :P
He does not have sex in many of the videos. I can't really say why. As to the pain level, I didn't think that was a factor here. The sex was in my opinion, standard gonzo type, often not on a good angle so it was not as closeup as in some videos I have seen. Thanks for the nice words as I feel appreciated to hear them.
Yes, I am usually very carefull with pre-checked offers of this kind, but in this case I missed it. I just looked, and the pre-checked agreement appears on the right column, in the page where you have to enter your card information, etc. It's not exactly hidden, but I suppose I missed it because I was focused on entering all card details, etc.
It WAS temporary - back to normal loading of site....strange about your problem with some thumdnails - sorry, have not got an answer to that - maybe Droller would know...
REVIEW(CONTINUES):
Analyzing the Chloe Cherry-James Deen video: James Deen gives his usual performance of treating the model rough: he forces her to gag on his cock deep in her throat, smear her dripping saliva over her face, shove his fingers into her mouth to dominate and show her who's the boss, choking her, grabbing her hair and pulling, etc.
Chloe is a cute girl, and she seems to go along willingly with her abuse.
So the video features Deen's style of dominance and sadism, while the model submits to his rough treatment.
I would categorize Deen as a slightly softer version of Pierre Woodman, who seems to enjoy forcing women beyond their normal limits to submit to his rough treatment.
In some videos, I've seen Woodman forcing the model to drink his piss, which, along with his slaps, forcible anal intercourse which often seems like rape, and other rough treatment, just adds to Woodman's enjoyment. But models put up with it, and even smile and kiss Woodman at the end of most of his videos.
So I have some trouble watching James Deen or Pierre Woodman perform in a video.
There are too many stories about James Deen abusing porn performers.
And Pierre Woodman built his reputation forcing women to have rough sex. Sometimes against their will, which might or might not be scripted.
But both performers seem to get off treating the women they work with as pieces of meat to be degraded and/or treated roughly, in a domineering fashion.
Their attitude seems to be: I'm big, tough, and will fuck these women harshly, and the women will enjoy it and worship me.
I remember one video where the woman tells Woodman she doesn't want to be filmed, so he tells her he is stopping the video, and he shuts off a light, but continues to film her anyway.
So, Woodman can tell you one thing, and do the opposite. Which is common in real life.
But it drains my enjoyment of any scene with James Deen or Pierre Woodman because I believe they enjoy degrading women: on the other hand, I do enjoy sites like Pure Taboo, where there is a twisted pleasure in abusing women, but that seems more scripted, and I believe the sex is more consensual, so that's just me, where I don't believe the models are being treated harshly in real life.
Fantasy BSDM is fine, but when it moves into real life, the boundaries blur, and I have a problem watching or enjoying it.
The New Sensations network does not have a lot of BDSM videos, but I guess they add a few to give some variety to the storylines.
My preference is more in the heartcore line, where the performers are trying to please each other, hopefully with some affection or tenderness and lots of kissing.
At the same time, the Pure Taboo site at Adult Time is one of my favorite sites in the network, because of the element of tension in some of the videos, as well as the offbeat, twisted stories and the cinematic-style of the videos which is first class.
Giving the site a score or 85. Good site, but network access raises the score.
THE FRESH OUTTA HIGH SCHOOL SITE IS NICE-SIZED, WITH OVER 290+ VIDEOS TO WATCH.
IN ADDITION, YOU HAVE ACCESS TO THE BASIC NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK, WHICH HAS--
22 SITES CATERING TO DIFFERENT NICHES;
6500+ EXCLUSIVE VIDEOS;
2500+ PORN STARS;
UNLIMITED ACCESS;
MULTIPLE WEEKLY UPDATES;
HD QUALITY VIDEOS.
SO YOU CERTAINLY GET ACCESS TO A HUGE AMOUNT OF HARDCORE VIDEOS.
AND SOME OF THE VIDEOS ARE OF VERY HIGH QUALITY.
THE LESBIAN EXPERIENCE IS A GLAMCORE SITE WITH LOVELY MODELS, HIGH PROFESSIONAL CAMERAWORK AND SETTINGS, EXPENSIVE COSTUMES, THAT CAN COMPETE FAVORABLY WITH ANY GLAMCORE SITE ON THE INTERNET.
SO OVERALL, THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK IS A WORTHWHILE JOIN.
AND THE FRESH OUTTA HIGH SCHOOL SITE, WHILE NOT THE BEST SITE IN THE NETWORK, HAS SOME WORTHWHILE VIDEOS TO BE ENJOYED.
GIVING THE SITE A SCORE 0F 85, BECAUSE OF THE NETWORK ACCESS.
IF THE SITE WAS A STAND-ALONE SITE, THE SCORE WOULD BE MUCH LOWER.
I SHOULD ADD THAT YOU CAN DOWNLOAD ALL THE VIDEOS IN MULTIPLE FILE TYPES AND MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS.
THE SITE (AND NETWORK) IS NOT ONE OF THE NEW STREAMING ONLY SITES.
I know, lk2fireone, I was grinding my own particular axe at your expense (pun intended).
Believe me, I understand having to budget one's self for this kind of entertainment.
This is a BIG issue for me, and I think I might start a thread in our forum about it: the concept of value in light of the Internet, and how ideas of value have changed dramatically in the last few decades.
Sorry, mate! You're right, and I was just being an (_!_)
09-19-1508:01pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
