Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : lk2fireone (0)  

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203)

Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 376-400 of 1609 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
376
Visit Czech AV

Czech AV
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from slutty: (lk2fireone's Reply)

thanks lk2, can't believe I have written that many reviews in the past few years...

10-01-12  10:11pm

Reply
377
Visit Czech Casting

Czech Casting
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from jook: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Thanks!
It's always a pleasure writing a complimentary review.
I haven't been overly active in joining sites. And the ones I joined, I had nothing new to add to previous reviews. Which is all your fault. It seems you reviewed most every site on the Internet -). And we're all the lucky beneficiaries for that.


04-20-18  04:15pm

Reply
378
Visit Czech VR

Czech VR
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from skippy: (lk2fireone's Reply)

I reread and edited the review (2am reviews are not always the best...) and borrowed your "conventionally attractive" term. :-)

Thanks again!


02-03-17  08:56am

Reply
379
Visit Czech VR

Czech VR
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from skippy: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Thanks! I try to be as detailed as possible and when I run into something that is far from the norm, good or bad, I like to elaborate. This one had some cool features, but compared to the leaders out there, the quality just wasn't there.

Your term conventionally attractive is perfect. Very few 18-24 year- olds are not attractive in some way. But very few look like Anjelica or Malena Morgan. Very hard to describe that without sounding like a complete ass.

You should get a set of Google cardboard glasses for your Android or iPhone, just to try it. There are a few sites that will send you a pair for free when you sign up. VR is very cool, but using a full-blown VR headset takes a little more effort than just sitting down at your desk or whatever.


02-03-17  08:18am

Reply
380
Visit Daring Sex

Daring Sex
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from gaypornolover:

Yep - gotta agree, that's one well-written review with everything in it!

05-13-12  06:19pm

Reply
381
Visit Daring Sex

Daring Sex
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from Tree Rodent:

Have to agree with the above - outstanding revue.

05-13-12  05:03pm

Reply
382
Visit Daring Sex

Daring Sex
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from badandy400:

One of the better reviews I have seen as of late. It really reminds me of my format, so I must obviously approve!

05-13-12  04:26pm

Reply
383
Visit Daring Sex

Daring Sex
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from Cybertoad:


outstanding review, great details


05-13-12  01:18pm

Reply
384
Visit Dark X

Dark X
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Shen: (lk2fireone's Reply)

I really appreciate your kind words. However, there's always room for improvement!

02-13-19  07:05am

Reply
385
Visit David Nudes

David Nudes
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment from tangub:

I'm still getting the error message when trying to visit the site from my desktop pc but oddly I am able to visit the site from my mobile phone.

07-10-17  07:30am

Reply
386
Visit David Nudes

David Nudes
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment from tangub:

I'm seeing the same error message. Let's hope it's just a temporary problem.....I would hate to see another site on my join list disappear before I've had a chance to join it.

07-08-17  02:33pm

Reply
387
Visit David Nudes

David Nudes
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from rearadmiral: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Unless the site goes belly-up in a month or two... But I'm guessing that guys like us would do enough research to minimize that risk.

03-07-13  01:22pm

Reply
388
Visit David Nudes

David Nudes
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment from rearadmiral:

Interesting membership option. I'm not sure I'd consider it given the volatility of the business though. But who knows? If Evil Angel or Kink made such an offer I might take the plunge.

03-05-13  02:47pm

Reply
389
Visit David Nudes

David Nudes
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment from Drooler:

I read some time ago at eurobabeindex that Lizzie of evasgarden (etc.) is either the girlfriend or wife of one of their photographers. That's not fair, either! ;)

But about DavidNudes, I find the site layout to be very confusing. You click "photos" at the top and you get a page with a bunch of videos listed first. Obviously, this is a fundamental flaw.

I'd joined once maybe early last year. Again the layout, and consequently the navigation, was confusing. And so many of the photosets were too dark! (Could they pony up for some lighting equipment at some point?) I wound up not getting ANYTHING and just avoiding logging in.

There's a lot of hype about the site. And that's pretty much it.


01-06-10  04:50am

Reply
390
Visit David Nudes

David Nudes
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from Tatyana: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Yep, I am Tatyana the webmaster and Tatyana the model:) I guess you would say I have a broader job description than most models do. And yes, I'm sorry but I am married to David... But he is the only photographer that I would model nude for, so there is a bright side to it for you:) Thank you for the kind comments!

01-15-09  05:05pm

Reply
391
Visit David Nudes

David Nudes
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment from lk2fireone:

Tatyana the model is married to the site photographer, David Weisenbarger. But at least he is willing to share her photographs with us. He does a nice job capturing this lovely young woman on film, along with other young models. Extremely nice photos in the style of met-art (teen/young-women glam photos).

01-15-09  12:37pm

Reply
392
Visit DDF Beauties

DDF Beauties
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from Drooler: (lk2fireone's Reply)

I still remember my math teachers saying, "Show your work!" But it's basically going to be something between 70 and 75, all other things being pretty good. Seems to apply to best, for my purposes anyway, to sites that just repackage old content (like the one under review here) or that obsess about toy play at the general expense of other things. My review of Teenrotica is like that.

11-21-08  04:42pm

Reply
393
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from sean68:

As is seen more and more these days especially on this site, straight sex seems less and more anal, mmmmmf, silicone enhancements, rough acts. Hardly any natural assets, erotica sensuality.

Would be great to hear site recommendations about sites that have natural and sensual sex acts involving naturally endowed actors.


12-04-18  06:55am

Reply
394
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from tangub: (lk2fireone's Reply)

I was just having a look at the tour pge at 1 By Day and it looks like it has not even had any new updates for nearly a year so looks like they're giving up on the solo stuff. Like you I much prefer Met or MPL anyway.

08-07-18  11:27am

Reply
395
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Comment from tangub:

I've not been a member for a few years but 1 By Day always used to be their main solo glamour site as I recall. Last time I was there they were still updating with solo sets pretty much daily if I remember correctly. DDF Busty also had a lot of solo glamour content but obviously featuring large breasted ladies. I didn't really care much for the other hardcore sites in the network.

08-07-18  10:56am

Reply
396
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Loki: (lk2fireone's Reply)

I work really hard to make my reviews informative and try even harder to be polite and concise when making comments on PU. It's not always easy, as I tend to be a hothead. ;-)

That said, I kind of see it as my duty to report broken links on a porn site, so other people can get the benefit.


03-01-18  09:02pm

Reply
397
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from Loki:

You mentioned some DDF links not working. I've experienced the same thing, and always found that DDF corrected the problem when they were notified of the broken link.

03-01-18  05:08am

Reply
398
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review from Onyx:

Thanks for the review.

02-27-18  07:02pm

Reply
399
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from exotics4me: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Used to be a joke with Khan. Back years ago, the limit on reviews was 1,500 characters, I hit it on every review. Then it was raised to 2,500 characters, I hit it on every review. Then it was raised to 5,000 characters ... and I hit it on every review. The joke was if it was raised any higher I would end up spending my life here writing reviews trying to hit the character limit.

I'm the same way though. I write a review as if I was talking to someone so the rambling gets in there, I've even repeated myself in some reviews.


12-21-15  11:51pm

Reply
400
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from Amanda: (lk2fireone's Reply)

Hi lk2fireone,

I'll talk to our dev team and see what can be done. :)


12-21-15  05:36am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 376-400 of 1609 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 1.45 seconds.