| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1351
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from RagingBuddhist:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I'm not knocking the total amount of content or the update schedule. But I think it's fair to say that, with the ratio of videos to photo sets, someone who's primary interest is video might be disappointed here.
|
03-27-10 02:56pm
|
Reply
1352
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
A lot of sites, even 'softcore' push their videos in the tours.
I still think, over time, we will get greater polarisation of sites to either specialise in video or photosets.
There are already many exclusively video sites.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-10 07:09am
|
Reply
1353
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Conspiracy theorist squirrel to the rescue - TBP marks higher because they earn money every time someone signs up through them. So it makes sense not to mark them too low.
|
03-27-10 06:36am
|
Reply
1354
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Capn:
I think some of that may be the Video Clan v. the Photoset Clan.
TBP seems largely video dominated in its reviewing.
They count few videos as a minus.
PU have at least an element of Photoset Clan in evidence, myself included in that.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-27-10 05:25am
|
Reply
1355
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from BadMrFrosty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I think I was born a dirty old man :)
|
03-22-10 02:12pm
|
Reply
1356
|
Zemani
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Denner:
Zemani sure has got something... I can recommend checking out Droolers review...
|
03-22-10 12:32pm
|
Reply
1357
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from BadMrFrosty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Pink Visual are actually based here in Prague I think. Or at least they produce a lot of material here. I have seen a lot of classified ads in newspapers where they are looking for amateur girls to take part in these big orgy scenes, either actively or just as part of the crowd.
I would say that they are blocking access within the Czech Republic themselves as part of a promise to the girls that there would be no chance of daddy or someone they know coming across the site and recognizing them. Which is actually the main reason I wanted to join, you never know who you might see :)
|
03-22-10 12:09pm
|
Reply
1358
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Basil:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Because this is how it should be ;) You pay your hard-earned money and you expect to get complete service back, not just access to pictures and videos ;)
|
03-20-10 01:18pm
|
Reply
1359
|
Muse.org
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tangub:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for the info, think i might give this one a miss for now and maybe sign up at MPL.
|
03-19-10 10:18am
|
Reply
1360
|
Muse.org
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from tangub:
Thanks for the review, can you tell me if the site is updating again now and if so how often?. The updates section of the tour shows the last update as 4th December 09. I've had this site in my list of sites to join for a while because they have some stunning looking models but i'm not convinced they have enough content to even justify a 1 month membership.
|
03-19-10 03:07am
|
Reply
1361
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from turboshaft:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I agree that the old warehouse is probably the worst place to shoot but I find it's because it can be really creepy and weird, like the scene of a crime rather than something erotic and enjoyable.
|
03-14-10 06:16pm
|
Reply
1362
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from orgasmation:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Well, yes, personal tastes differ, though I've seen more reviews of this site that complain about the iffy camerawork. I did read good things about Explicite (on a different review site) and signed up on that basis, only to find that I had chosen a very flaky time to do so - the site was malfunctioning for several days. OK, problems happen, but the attitude of the owners is important, and their lack of response was the key factor. I felt more like a cash cow than a valued customer!
|
03-12-10 03:06am
|
Reply
1363
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Monahan:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Ditto.
By and large it's difficult to imagine that a babe can have a real orgasm under the circumstances with the heavy lighting and all the camera men, directors, "grips" and so on all around her as the stunt cock is being told to adjust position for better camera angles and so forth.
Orgasms are a product of several factors occurring at the same time and usually when the couple is into the act in an intimate and non-distracting environment, which is just not very likely whilst "performing" on command in front of an audience.
That said, I've seen some scenes where the babe is rather convincing that she's achieving an orgasm, which, after all, is what the fantasy requires. I'm good with a babe who can give a realistic and convincing orgasmic performance
|
03-06-10 10:16am
|
Reply
1364
|
Real Teenie GFs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
True, but at least those sources will state somewhere what the price you will be charged is. This site bills your card immediately.
Whoever does it, it is a dishonest practice and I would raise hell with a newspaper or other company that did the same.
|
03-01-10 06:54pm
|
Reply
1365
|
My Sexy Kittens
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from OneMan:
It's a moot point actually, as the price is 19 euros for everyone. I had to pay the full price regardless of whether I joined via the PornUsers link or not.
|
02-18-10 02:12pm
|
Reply
1366
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Helvetic:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Just my hopes to still be able at 99...
|
02-17-10 01:03am
|
Reply
1367
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Aw, don't I know all about stupid dialog and amateurish acting!! Especially when it comes to those MILFs meeting friend of son. The THIRTY year old "boy" always wears his baseball cap on backward and sports one of those down past the knees shorts. He finds out that his friend isn't home and five seconds later both MILF and friend of son are involved in heavy action for twenty minutes. They don't even take the time to show the MILF getting undressed. I am so sick of seeing this scenario repeated over and over. Arghhh! Please, someone give me a good introduction with good or reasonable dialog and acting. I am certainly with you when it comes to those fake, nasal moans and groans.
|
02-06-10 11:56am
|
Reply
1368
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Sub Poll to the Poll: How many of you think that any kind of sexual activity gets stupid and boring if it has to be stretched out to last twenty minutes per scene? I couldn't count the times I fast forward to the end of a clip. That's why I keep asking for a story to go along with a scene.
As to hand-jobs: total indifference.
|
02-06-10 08:58am
|
Reply
1369
|
SF Bay Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for a detailed response and opinions. I am totally 100% with you on the weight of PU reviews over TBP. However, one of the reasons I was trying to found out more is that fact that this comment was over a year ago and sometimes (most of the time no, I know) sites change things they are doing wrong and improve. So, I suppose I was attempting to see if anyone joined the site recently and can compare with Drooler's negative feedback. Then, maybe they would know if the site has stayed the same or improved based on these comments. Until that happens, I would never join this site based on what Drooler has been through and commented on.
I usually skim through new and old TBP reviews that have decent reviews, then go straight to PU to see what has been said about sites. Usually the combo of TBP, PU, and the tour (with the PU comments pulling the most weight) is what helps me whether I'll join a site or not.
I have stumbled upon what are considered average or maybe slightly above average Asian softcore sites but I have only come across one site specializing in this category involving Asian Americans from the company Grooby. Maybe the site you are talking about is 88 Square? I've been trying to dig out Asian American sites for awhile to no avail, maybe something will pop up someday.
Thanks again for your response and intuition. The site probably has not changed shit and until I can get a clear cut answer otherwise, I will be moving on :)
|
02-02-10 11:57am
|
Reply
1370
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from turboshaft:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I definitely agree photos are getting pretty big, especially when you consider the vast majority are 72ppi JPEGs (web standard, intended to reduce load times), which are still compressed files no matter how well they were shot or edited. I still spoil myself and go for the biggest sizes when they are available but sometimes sites fall short of my screen-filling demands. Like my recent subscription to SimonScans which is really surprising me in the size, or lack thereof, in its photos.
|
01-29-10 02:26pm
|
Reply
1371
|
Club Jana Cova
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks, man! And that other site was Showcase Eufrat, which, judging from the feedback, ought to be called "Showcase Crap Site."
|
01-21-10 01:19pm
|
Reply
1372
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I know what you are getting at. As I wrote my remarks I was wondering if I was right in my knee-jerk reaction to the subject, after all we still watch Jimmy Dean, Elvis Presley, Clark Gable etc. But to me there's a huge difference between watching "Gone With The Wind" and "Cum Cocktails." While the porn starlets do scenes like that willingly (I hope), I would feel I was demeaning their memory if I watched a hard core scene of theirs after their death. But of course I don't expect the same reaction from everyone. I was just surprised to find myself alone in this.
|
01-21-10 12:55pm
|
Reply
1373
|
Club Jana Cova
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Rick:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Spammers go after backlinks for SEO benefit (google) plus the minor benefit of the few eyeballs that hit those pages. I don't know the technical nature behind it, but once they flag an open posting form, it can get ugly.
BTW, eventually we will have a log-in engine at TBP and of course registered users won't ever have to be inconvenienced with it. This will take time though. :(
|
01-21-10 09:00am
|
Reply
1374
|
Club Jana Cova
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Rick:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Trust me, we're not a fan of the captcha verification either... but it seems to be the most reliable when we need it.
For nominations, we tried it for a few weeks without the captcha and got a ton of spam in the nominations comments. This isn't an area where we monitor closely, so it was necessary to put it back.
BTW, the words are tough to make out sometimes. Some may know already, but even though there's 2 words, you only have to type 1 of the two words in the field to verify successfully.
p.s. Thanks for the nominations, we'll get this one reviewed soon.
|
01-21-10 08:23am
|
Reply
1375
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for this support - or maybe also sharing some views...
I'm mostly a sc-fan, too - but my main interest is softcore-videos/solo-videos (not much into lez) - but, still building up a pretty fine library of sc-photosets. (Like the old days, LOL).
|
01-17-10 06:07am
|
