| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1301
|
Porn Access
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Vegas Ken:
Hey Everyone!
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I talked with the operators of Porn Access and they were able to set us up with the special $5 price as well. The membership recurs at $14.95 after the first month.
As always, Thanks for using our site!!
|
08-04-10 01:35pm
|
Reply
1302
|
Teen Stars Only
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
It is definitely a frustrating network setup, my guess is they think by holding back a few of the sites they will get people to join those on a seperate occasion. The last time I joined the "network" I looked at all their sites to see which was offering the best collection of sites. Sort of stupid, I agree.
|
08-02-10 08:07pm
|
Reply
1303
|
Teen Stars Only
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Tree Rodent:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yes I totally agree with you reasoning behind why they do it. For me there comes a point where I just get sick of it and join a different site because I want an easy time with an easy customer friendly site. I don't mind 3-6 different sites but some of these places take it too far.
Good review that I think tells everyone what sort of content to expect.
|
08-02-10 06:34pm
|
Reply
1304
|
Teen Stars Only
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Check out the Denner review for Teen Mega World, which is over a year old so doesn't have the latest sites on it, but it does go a good way to explaining how complicated it all is. I'm confused. Don't know why these sites don't just have 2 or 3 sites instead of 25 small ones all with the same look and content, or at least similar look and content.
|
08-02-10 03:36pm
|
Reply
1305
|
Teen Stars Only
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
So you didn't even get access to fuckstudies when you joined this site? That is weird because I got access to teenstarsonly when I joined fuckstudies... Definitely a bit of a confusing network - I am pretty sure they give you fewer bonus sites if you join with the discount.
|
08-02-10 11:10am
|
Reply
1306
|
Teen Stars Only
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from slutty:
Good review,
Did you ever get access to 18firstsex.com as a bonus, I got an email from these guys a while ago saying it was a new bonus site, but I guess my membership expired before I could get access. Just curious if you did, and if it is any good.
|
08-01-10 11:55pm
|
Reply
1307
|
Teen Stars Only
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Good review. Your description sounds just like it is one of those sites that has that certain look. So many of those teen sites have that look. You would think it would be relatively easy to make attractive girls look attractive, but somehow they manage to do just the opposite.
|
08-01-10 07:39pm
|
Reply
1308
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Tree Rodent:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
IK - the least they could have done is send over a couple of lap dancers. Come to think of it the least they could have done is absolutely nothing, which is what they did. Shameful.
Drooler - Yeah it also takes me longer to pee than for one of those newbies to write a 3 line review. But that's age. What can we do about the ever increasing threat of the newbie 3 line review? Suicide bombers, that's what. I'd do it myself but had to take an early retirement. Job was just killing me.
Messmer - The trouble is what we want is now a niche. Everything that isn't what the majority consume (whether they comsume it because they really want it, or because it's foist on them) is a niche. You would think your wanting a simple strip from clothed to nude and sometimes involving lingerie would be simple, or my wanting a simple hardcore set of pics or videos with the same style and class as softcore would be easy to find, but it isn't. I'm probably going to end up doing a wittyguy type rant in the forum. I think Drooler and yourself also noticed something about what was missing in some of the Karups sets. Could have done with more ass and whole body shots, although maybe you have to be a real perv to want a whole body shot.
|
08-01-10 05:07pm
|
Reply
1309
|
Male Digital
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from GCode:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I agree, feel free to post even 'gay' site reviews if you want to. There is no discretion between what type of porn you like and want to review. Hell, even some others in the background may want to know some thoughts on sites you like. I'd love to see a Bisexual male's point of view on certain sites. Keep 'em coming and don't be afraid.
|
07-31-10 09:47pm
|
Reply
1310
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tree Rodent:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Shill shill!!!
|
07-31-10 06:31pm
|
Reply
1311
|
Male Digital
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nymano:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thank you, I will try to post some more reviews, and not all of my favorite sites are bi, I like male-female sites too.
|
07-31-10 10:14am
|
Reply
1312
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I flatly refuse to think of the love of porn as a perversion. There may be perversions within porn itself but with 99.9 of the male population liking porn (my made up statistic but I don't think I'm far off) because we were born incurable "voyeurs," liking porn is as natural as eating.
Responding to something the rearadmiral wrote: If the powers-that-be launch the occasional attack on porn it is not because they themselves dislike it but because they want to ensure their re-election with the help of the distaff part of their constituency plus the 00.1 percent of the unnatural males. :-)
|
07-30-10 09:52am
|
Reply
1313
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I suspect that the powers-that-be think we deserve no respect at all. Crucifixion maybe, but not respect.
|
07-30-10 08:34am
|
Reply
1314
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Khan:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
lk2fireone said: "I assume that Rick is the site owner, and Khan is the head honcho for PU submissions/posts, but who is the webmaster? The guy that "runs" the site?"
Yes, Rick is the owner and ultimate decision maker. I run the day-to-day stuff checking w/ Rick on questionable items. Kevin (our tech guru) keeps things running smooth. Then factor in the TBP Editor I work with (Rose Ann) and webmaster liaison (Ken) for things that need their attention. So basically, it's a team effort.
|
07-28-10 10:37am
|
Reply
1315
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Sevrin:
Yeah, it's been like that for quite some time. The next day updates are correct, but everything earlier in the month is hit-or-miss. Since you can't access the thumbnails directly from that page, I only ever use it to see who's going to be up tomorrow. It's a little messed up that we need to go to a public page to see what content will be available to members the next day.
They are, however, doing a little work on the website currently, so they might add coming attractions for members, too. Model voting now no longer causes pages to refresh and there's an expanded biography available on the page that displays all the content available for a given model.
|
07-22-10 04:54am
|
Reply
1316
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from PinkPanther:
They must have fixed it - looks fine to me
|
07-21-10 06:09pm
|
Reply
1317
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Goldfish:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I am fan of the girls even though I have some issues with the way the people who run the site(s) conduct their business. My suggestion is if you have been a member of either 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn recently, don't bother with the other. They tend to share content across sites.
|
07-18-10 03:44pm
|
Reply
1318
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Goldfish:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
FYI Young Legal Porn is a recently renamed site. It used to be Youngporn.net. If you were a member of the network before and thinking this is a new site, think again.
|
07-18-10 06:59am
|
Reply
1319
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#26
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Absolutely...! Could not agree more....
|
07-18-10 06:14am
|
Reply
1320
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from slutty:
Good catch man, it is also interesting that it is cheaper to get the 14 site pass through this site than through younglegalporn ($35 vs $40).
|
07-15-10 02:14pm
|
Reply
1321
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from BadMrFrosty:
They obviously got their business lessons from the same place as the marketing department for 21sextury. I still don't fully understand how anyone in business thinks that confusing your customers is a good idea.
|
07-02-10 05:26am
|
Reply
1322
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from DpornGuy:
I've noticed that once they stop adding new content to their new sites, they get added to the network, like hometeenvids or whatever its called, and the nubile girls hd site too, they added them i think (and launched like 2 or 3 new sites). I guess once they stop updating those sites, they'll add them to the network too... Pretty ridiculous really.
|
07-02-10 05:13am
|
Reply
1323
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Goldfish:
I agree the access is confusing. It also seems to change with the wind. One time I joined Teen Sex Mania and had no network access. The next time I joined I had access to several sites, including Teen Sex Movs.
|
07-01-10 07:10pm
|
Reply
1324
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Totally agree with Ik2fireone.
Third party billers work hard to keep their relationship with credit card companies. Too many complaints about faulty billing practices would end up blackballing the biller (Vendors are subject to pretty strict control by the big Creditcard companies). US customers are very lucky that consumer credit card protections were passed by congress in the nineteen seventies to prevent fraudulent billing, a protection which I believe is now universal.
|
06-30-10 04:08am
|
Reply
1325
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
My question is why would anyone want to purchase the same old toy over and over again if it only differs very slightly from a previous one? I've been doing this myself for quite some time (multiple subscriptions to VideoBox and Videosz,) but think I've reached a point where, if someone doesn't attempt to sell me a new and original toy soon, I'm going to give up on this whole Porn business! :-)
There are too many mindless imitators out there .. and folks who support them unquestioningly with their money and reviews. Bigger is not always necessarily better. Judged by the wealth of contents, and some of Videobox's innovations, a ninety sounds fair but going by the quality (not technical) of the contents all these sites should get no more than an 80.
I am beginning to think that it all boils down to a) people who don't know anything about true eroticism, this is on the producer's side, b) the length of time one has watched porn, and c) one's age. This paragraph has been written to make me look more objective! :-)
And I find that your remarks: "Even though I personally don't care for most of the DVD material at this site." are far from confused and very objective. :) And I do know what you are getting at, most DVD sites are pretty much the same and among its peers VB is the best so why not rate it highly? Can't argue that, I just had to vent!
|
06-26-10 12:35pm
|
