Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1201
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from graymane:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
You're probably right, 1k, I guess I was a little hard on the site (pun intended).
And in retrospect, having it to do over I would give them a better grade. It is indeed a beautiful site, it's just I kept stumbling over obstacles that thwarted my expections. I've visited the site less than a dozen times, so inasmuch my month is almost up, that should yield some indication of my interest.
Contrarily, I do favor softcore...it's just I want it to do something for me. If you've read my threads you'll get a good idea of what I like and don't like.....and again, you must've read me wrong or I likely laid things out in a way I prefer hardcore...actually nothing could be further from the truth. I like it in moderation, and if it's done with style and a little class. But we both know scarce that is, don't we.
Thanks, 1k, for taking the time to comment. I appreciate it.
|
10-18-10 09:58pm
|
Reply
1202
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mbaya:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I did not see anything resembling bits or any real nudity. I felt the teasing was not all that well done either.
|
10-18-10 07:14pm
|
Reply
1203
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I think the major difference in this one(aside from the green tinge) is her hair style and she doesn't seem to be wearing any makeup and she's still beautiful.
http://picsgall3.tinseks.com/012/10/001/
I've never been good at guessing age either and as long as she's 18 than I don't need to. I'd hate to have older content from the days when some Countries had different legal porn ages. There is content out there of 16yrs old having sex and that content was legal then.
I have a very good internet connection and I can't complain about my download speed. It's my download limit that's bothering me. I'd love to be able to download big files and maybe one day I will but until then. I try to limit my video files to no bigger than 500Mb.
Even at that size I would eat up my alloted quota with only 50 scenes.
|
10-18-10 07:02pm
|
Reply
1204
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Hi lk2fireone, I have yet to come across anything that offers any good bits other than breasts. It might be there but I doubt it because I have the feeling the answer is in the word "tease" .. I was prepared for that but expected to get my satisfaction from a lot of slow stripping. Except they didn't strip down to what I was looking forward to. :-)
As to the model's name I must confess I have no idea because the numbering of the files is so awkward. The name is usually listed at the beginning of a video but I deleted the file after only a quick look I was so disgusted! Especially since here was such a nice brunette with tons of picture sets plus a fair number of videos and I figured I had found my treasure trove! It was a shock to see a two months old video of her of such poor quality.
I would say, steer clear. The excitement is in the partial stripping. As I said I have yet to see a complete strip and am probably not meant to on this site!
|
10-18-10 03:19pm
|
Reply
1205
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I think that the best phtographers in the world might be able to get away with the natural look but it depends on far too many parameters to say that it's always possible. I think the proper application of makeup and correct use of lighting can alter a models appearance to the point where she almost looks like someone else.
The strangest part about her career is that she has appeared on many websites but only did a few movies. I'm guessing that it has to be by choice because there is no way that a director would pass her up if she was willing to do movies.
She's Daisy at nubile and she almost looks underage in the picture. Mind you she was probably 18 at the time so she wasn't far from it.
I'm also including 3 other links from the same site so you ca compare the difference from one scene to the next.
http://picsgall3.tinseks.com/011/10/001/
http://picsgall3.tinseks.com/012/10/002/
http://picsgall3.tinseks.com/012/10/001/
For some reason I don't think she's in it for the long run and I'm never bothered when a performer chooses a life outisde of porn.
|
10-17-10 05:33pm
|
Reply
1206
|
18X Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I don't know if it was just at the beginning of her career but I've often seen her under the name Benta. The one thing that seems to have remained constant with her is her looks. Some performer can look very different from one site to the other but she always looks about the same. Some sites make her look cuter but that could be because of proper makeup application and better lighting.
|
10-17-10 10:33am
|
Reply
1207
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
There is no real truth in advertising law that is enforced.
Just think about the obvious lies in political ads. You can sue for fraud if an ad misrepresents a product and you buy it, and sometimes an attorney general in a state will sue fraudulent advertising claims to get publicity for a political run, but generally don't count on the government to force advertisers to tell the truth.
(An exception would be products that fall under the Food and Drug Administration's authority, especially prescription drugs).
|
10-17-10 07:49am
|
Reply
1208
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Jay G:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I agree with you completely. When it comes to marketing and, there will always be a small minority of people who are perfectly logical and make well-planned purchases.
I'm neither, though. As I get older I make fewer impulse buys, but I admit I have bought the more expensive brands simply because of a good "feeling" about them (probably from subliminal advertising).
Anyhow, I love the subject and just thought I'd add my two cents again. And, no, I won't be buying a penus-pump anytime soon. :)
|
10-16-10 01:52pm
|
Reply
1209
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yes, there's the Federal Trade Commission Act, which is supposed to protect us from false and deceptive advertising. Advertisers must be able to substantiate the claims that they make with evidence. And ...
The FTC seems have as much in the "balls" department as does the FDA.
|
10-16-10 02:12am
|
Reply
1210
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from RustyJ:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Could work for me. Especially when cancelling a subscription, I DL this and that and afterwards look at my collection and wonder what the hell was I thinking when I wasted my time with all this junk ;)
|
10-15-10 09:25am
|
Reply
1211
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from tangub:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for the extra info lk2fireone.
|
10-15-10 03:52am
|
Reply
1212
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from tangub:
Thanks for an interesting review. On checking out the bonus sites here the preview of the one called Spring time Beauties caught my eye with lots of cute models but on checking out Drooler's review of it from 2 years ago seeing "No Zips" listed in the cons means i will probably give it a miss. Have you checked out this site and is "No zips" still the case.
|
10-15-10 02:51am
|
Reply
1213
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
lk2......sincerely thanks for this info/update - about network/which site/sites...(sorry, did not remember the comment in question).
The above is really a great help - not only for this user - but for PUs in general - to get the best deal for our money.
Great input.
|
10-12-10 08:18am
|
Reply
1214
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Denner:
FINE review, lk2...., thanks.
Never seen this site before - did not know the girl/model.
But she sure looks cute/sweet at the preview...
A good hint for the list of a possible joining...
|
10-12-10 06:31am
|
Reply
1215
|
Young Courtesans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
yeah, but based on those comments I would be hesitant to join their sites until I hear otherwise! Hopefully someone will take the plunge and update us sometime soon...
|
10-12-10 12:47am
|
Reply
1216
|
Young Courtesans
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from slutty:
based on other user comments from this company's sites, it also seems as though streaming only is common with them...
|
10-11-10 12:08am
|
Reply
1217
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RustyJ:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Me neither. If I know who I'm looking for, Google is good enough.
|
10-10-10 02:53am
|
Reply
1218
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
yeah looking back at my review it does seem a bit negative given the score, I was mainly trying to point out all the flaws, as this place certainly has its problems.
I did enjoy the site, there were just many scenes where after it downloaded I looked at it and was like, what the fuck is this? I guess I am just willing to overlook the bad for the good in this case...
|
10-08-10 11:57pm
|
Reply
1219
|
Rocco Siffredi
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
There were a few times this summer when I used to get more than 50 spam emails a day. I'm not sure if hotmail is filtering some out but I seem to be getting less spam at the moment. I don't consider special offer for sites as spam so much as advertising.
I thought about changing my email adress but I've had this one since I first joined hotmail and sooner or later I'll make a mistake and then I'll also get spam on the new address.
|
10-08-10 08:10pm
|
Reply
1220
|
Rocco Siffredi
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from pat362:
I get at least one special offer a day to join a site at a special price and that's because I'm a past member of anal acrobat. I don't think I've even bothered to look at one of them because most of the sites they offer simply don't look good.
|
10-08-10 06:49pm
|
Reply
1221
|
Rocco Siffredi
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from messmer:
I get that all the time, lk2fireone. I am being bombarded with offers to rejoin Bangbros. at a special rate that's no better than the deal we can get through TBP. Plus, over the months, I have also had all kinds of offers to rejoin sites even though I was a member at the time.
|
10-08-10 06:26pm
|
Reply
1222
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Hey man, a site like this is kind of difficult to review. On one hand they have some excellent content, but then there are other scenes that are pretty big "misses". I am personally a fan of castings with interviews and stuff before the model gets naked, so that is probably why I scored the site so high even though the content is pretty variable. He definitely gets some attractive models, it is just too bad that a lot of the hardcore castings are single-camera on a tripod type deals, although that it pretty much what I expected.
|
10-07-10 11:08pm
|
Reply
1223
|
All Gravure
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Ergo Proxy:
It is known that the japanese society puts morality on top of many things. Concerning sexuality they got even more prude after the american garrison. Prostitution and pornography is officially forbidden. So it is not surprising that even hardcore sites are not really that hardcore. I find this Gravure site pretty interesting despite the softcore content (I am no member though).
|
10-07-10 11:32am
|
Reply
1224
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I just hope when that time comes that we will still want to watch it! I hope I'll never lose that desire! LOL.
|
10-06-10 06:07pm
|
Reply
1225
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
LOL, well, here's the truth: I have never watched an actual physical Porn DVD on my television, so I automatically assumed DVD quality would at least have to give me as good a picture as I get with my non-HD movie DVDs and even though a site like VideoBox seems to be slightly better than others there are many scenes in it that are of terrible quality and that's why I couldn't understand Maggie's reference to the excellent picture quality.
I guess she's more even handed and experienced and kept in mind that you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear when she made her judgment on the site. :-)
|
10-06-10 03:26pm
|