| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
776
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from tangub:
A very tempting offer but there's no way I'm prepared to give my regular credit card details to Manwin's dodgy Cyprus based billing company. Might have to pop out later and add the equivilant of $10 cash to my prepaid card. It's also worth noting that the $9.95 offer is for the first month only as it renews at $27.95.
|
08-31-12 11:10pm
|
Reply
777
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from messmer:
I was a member of Twistys some time ago and hated it. The photos simply were too soft. Not as in "softcore" but soft, as in not crisp and sharp enough. A lot of air brushing and photoshopping going on at that time. If they've done away with that in the meantime, the special price would be a really good deal but since I can't know for sure I passed on the offer.
|
08-31-12 06:41pm
|
Reply
778
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tree Rodent:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks Ik, the price is a very good one from PU. I just noticed it has pre checked cross selling, so look out if you sign up.
|
08-31-12 06:07pm
|
Reply
779
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Yep, I just received this myself. Any idea how much hardcore there is on there?
|
08-31-12 05:44pm
|
Reply
780
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tree Rodent:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks Ik, it's great to receive your positive comments. I know you like to do thorough reviews too, as do most regulars. We all take pride in that.
I agree not only about sorting through garbage to find the gems, but also on some networks (Teen Mega World, and Karup's for instance), bad navigation makes it such a nightmare and chore finding the stuff I want, I end membership after just one month, and think I miss a lot of good material.
If there is one underrated pro for porn sites it is navigation and having decent home pages. If you only have a certain amount of time to view porn you don't want to spend hours searching for something that is downloadable.
I agree about those low quality dvd's, but only a few years ago they were cutting edge quality! We are getting too spoilt.
|
08-31-12 04:59pm
|
Reply
781
|
Sasha Blonde
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Claypaws:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Ah, I see where you are coming from now. We have a different approach to photos and stories. I am enough of a cynic to consider all the personal stories and bios to be pure fiction. For me, the personality comes through in a set of well lit, focused images in which the model engages with the camera. Sasha has hardly any of those on any site at all.
|
08-22-12 05:10pm
|
Reply
782
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from elephant:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yeah I did read that the Diesel network lease some of their content from the same place as teen mega world so that's why they look similar but also have this other guy shoot for them and he makes lots of the art style production ones, so sadly they are not all in this style.
|
08-22-12 12:33am
|
Reply
783
|
Sasha Blonde
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Denner:
Very fine, informative review....!!
One I as easy could take as a warning as a recommendation (not looking at the score)
Sasha Blond certainly has something and much of her material can be seen elsewhere, but as Lk2 mention - the site itself (been there) is primarily Sasha....and in my humble view: her vids could be much better edited/produced/directed or whatever.
Her solo vids are ok, her hc/bj vids are quite a problem...in my words: strange - and not very erotic (a mess) - seen two or three of those last which was pretty god - the rest not.
Difficult site - but well reviewed here, thanks!
|
08-21-12 02:02pm
|
Reply
784
|
Sasha Blonde
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from Claypaws:
A good review and, IMHO, deadly accurate too. I am a current member of the Diesel Network and consequently also of Sasha Blonde.
I get the same sense of not much personality from the collection of photo sets and videos of all their girls, with a possible exception of Gloria.
Sasha, poor girl, seems not to have been done justice on any of the sites in which she appears. MET art most captures her beauty but in a distant and impersonal manner. And Sasha Blonde is even more disappointing. It is a pity because I think she is such a beautiful and interesting model.
|
08-21-12 10:04am
|
Reply
785
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from elephant:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yeah totally , I get the music is nice to some but to me I'd prefer it without, especially when it goes on throughout all the scene.
Yeah Teen Mega World I've been a member of quite a few times now and I do love it but haven't quite seen many of the arty style movies like xart show, its been 6 months though since I was last there so they might be producing them more like this now.
|
08-21-12 09:15am
|
Reply
786
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from elephant:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yeah I guess you are right, I have seen a couple at xart so at least theres hope there might be more, I'm really enjoying the group scenes the most, I have a thing now for gg/b, hope they do many more groups. I guess they do a good mix to keep all happy.
Is there any more sites like these, I know wow girls has some scenes and the diesel network and then theres orgasms.xxx or Dane Jones in this arty soft focus. It is so great, wish all porn had this, makes it very soothing and beautiful, just watched Just the two Of Us with Franziska and Capri, OMG the white soft film is perfect but would be better without music all the way through, I can see why Franziska has now gone to fashion modeling, she really is incredibly gorgeous.
|
08-20-12 03:03pm
|
Reply
787
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from otoh:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Aha, good point - AFAIK there's no anal at Joymii, but there is some at X-Art. Seeing as Anal doesn't do anything for me, that's another slight pro for Joymii - but X-Art remains a good site. I'm also thinking of trying Babes Network, a similar formula...
|
08-20-12 02:11am
|
Reply
788
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from oldfizzywig:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
sorry to say, but I have to second that last comment.
|
08-19-12 04:32pm
|
Reply
789
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from elephant:
This does sound good, shame I'll probably end up missing out I wouldn't join for the normal price as not into pics too much but is tempting, they do have some jawdroppingly cute girls there. You need a lot of spare time with Metart I always found in the past, its so vast it can overwhelm you, is still going strong though and has some great photographers so worth a buy for sure on this deal.
|
08-19-12 03:51pm
|
Reply
790
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yeah its really surprised me too how much I;m liking the change but would love to see also some anal scenes shot in this style, are there any or any of the other sites like this that do anal scenes shot in this arty style.
|
08-19-12 03:26pm
|
Reply
791
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Claypaws:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Clear and in focus is what I like too :-) It is infuriating how often neither of those is achieved.
The exif data can be a useful learning aid to determining what might have influenced those properties.
My point about not having seen any exif data on MET sets is that exif data can also identify date of shooting. It is far easier to remove exif data than to alter it and sites could get into very deep water if they altered an exif shooting date to a more recent value. Hence, if exif data is present, I trust its validity. But sites may have perfectly honourable motives or causes for its removal and I am not suggesting that so doing implies any element of deception.
|
08-10-12 07:51am
|
Reply
792
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Claypaws:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I realised you were making an amusing point but I took the opportunity to respond with a serious one. Some models do appear to defy aging, it is true. There probably is not a great amount of noticeable change in a fit woman between ages 21 and 26, which is possibly the age group most models fall into, even the "18 year-olds". And I also suppose that the ones who become very well known and successful also get very good at applying makeup which is inconspicuous yet covers blemishes and any minor signs of aging.
I hope these words too are clear. Thank you for the compliment.
|
08-10-12 07:33am
|
Reply
793
|
Graphis
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from op9527:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Agreed. My wife wants to move on to a different site already, generally we stick around a site for a few months. Never seen her dislike a site this bad, I figure it was because she could not obtain any presents or fanfare items. I on the other hand, will stick around for a while.
|
08-09-12 03:25pm
|
Reply
794
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Khan:
There was (obviously) an error in the script that did the auto-conversion of currancy type. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.
Should be fixed now.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
|
08-09-12 02:39pm
|
Reply
795
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Claypaws:
I do not know if this applies to Eufrat as I have never followed her. But most sites would buy a whole stack of photo sets from a photographer. A photographer does not hire a model and do one set of 50 pictures. He (or she) hires the model and shoots 5 to 10 sets. Or he hires her for two days when she is in the area and shoots 20 sets. If a site likes a model, I guess they might buy 3, 5 or 10 of those sets, or all 20. Some sites, like Nubiles, release their purchase over consecutive days. Others drag out the release over weeks, months or years. I would need to examine MET sets very carefully to see if sets released a year apart show any evidence of having been shot at different times. Have you ever seen any exif data in a MET set?
Of course, there are some very successful internet models, and Eufrat is probably one of those, Sophie Moone is another, whose careers go on for many years. They will be hired for multishoot sets repeatedly and you will see material shot years apart.
All I am saying is that things are not necessarily what they seem. Sites like to give the impression that they maintain a relationship with the models over years. Maybe they do with some. But I bet there are very few of those.
|
08-09-12 12:25pm
|
Reply
796
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Drooler:
If Eufrat is an android, then I've got a very leaky battery! She has grown completely into a woman of enormous charm and sex appeal. I'll NEVER get tired of her.
|
08-09-12 11:24am
|
Reply
797
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from rearadmiral:
No idea. But... if you happen to find out that you're right would please let me know who the manufacturer is. Just out of curiousity, of course. Not because I want to order the "Gloria" model or anything like that...
|
08-09-12 10:36am
|
Reply
798
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from tangub:
I reckon Carina A. (aka Suzie Carina) must be another android when you think her most recent update here was April 2012 and I have old ATK galleries of her stashed on my hd that were dated 2002. She looks a bit older than in those old pics, (I'm sure she couldn't have been any older than 18 in those) but you'd never guess the difference is 10 years.
|
08-09-12 10:12am
|
Reply
799
|
Graphis
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tangub:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
To be honest I've never joined a purely Japanese site. It seems difficult to find a good quality photographic site that caters for English speaking US/Europeans and with a trusted biller. I've looked at this Graphis site before but found Cap'n's previous comments about difficulty cancelling off putting. The only Japanese site I've got bookmarked for a possible join is All Gravure but I have a feeling that is going to be very softcore bordering on non-nude.
If only there was a site with the same quality as Met-Art or MPL Studios but featuring purely Japanese and Asian models I would join tomorrow. It certainly seems to be a niche that is under catered for unless anybody knows differently.
|
08-09-12 09:16am
|
Reply
800
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from tangub:
Those dollar prices you quoted are a little bit out also because the 1980.00 Japanese Yen price they charge for a month comes to a little over $25 at today's exchange rate.
|
08-09-12 07:40am
|
