| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
1 Pass For All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review from Tree Rodent:
There was no room to lay out the sequence of events for my first 24 hours of membership. Above is an abbreviated version. Here is the long unedited one. Incidentally since that first day, I have had no trouble accessing material.
First night of membership, most of the sites didn't load so any type of viewing or downloading was impossible. I mailed customer services and unsurprisingly, given their record as documented on here, received no reply. I mailed Epoch who said to try a different browser. I had already tried that, however the next day the sites were functioning properly.
One download later and I received a message that I had been banned for logging in too many times. I mailed them to say that's because I tried to log in at a number of sites several times to see if any were working. I was supposed to apply to them to reset my password, but given their lack of any customer support, thought this would be impossible. I complained to Epoch, who said it wasn't their concern. I said it was their concern as they were supposed to be a reputable billing agent dealing with reputable websites. After a while with me talking about complaining to my credit card company, the Epoch person said they may refund me if I didn't hear in 24 hours from the network. Unbelievably, it was easy to reset my password as it appeared to be automated. Just as well, as no one seems to be in customer service at 1 Pass For All Sites. They should be renamed No Customer Support For Any Site.
The next day I finally heard from them saying they had temporary hosting problems, but now everything was fixed, and that if I wanted my money back to contact Epoch and they would refund. They also sent me a new password. My reply was "Customer support on your network seems awful, but the material although for the most part not updating, seems very good. As long as the network continues to function I am satisfied enough not to ask for my money back. The network happened to go down the very first night I was a member, and there is no customer support, so that is not a good impression if the site isn't merely laying down and dying, and scraping out a few last memberships - which is what it gives the impression of doing."
|
10-03-12 02:39pm
|
Reply
27
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review from Tree Rodent:
Yep Cap'n, same applies here, which probably makes us sort of weird. Being weird is something I came to accept, and eventually be proud of. Better that, than be mainstream sheep, being told what to watch, what to think, and what to consume.
As a final PS before the review gets buried, I think I had better add that if you go to the model directory or photos on 18 Eighteen, you will find a wealth of archive softcore photos. Finding hardcore is very rare, but the softcore picture archives go back ten years. I should have put that in the review, but being more a hardcore fan I virtually ignored it, and the navigation is not user friendly, so I gave up searching. There is also some hardcore in there which is not listed under hardcore.
|
02-04-11 06:08am
|
Reply
28
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Perhaps we are.
Speaking for myself though, surprisingly enough ;0) I have never been mainstream in pretty much anything I have taken an interest in.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-04-11 02:44am
|
Reply
29
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Quite agree on the gyno closeups.
Those I can really do without.
Much rather have a full body shot.
Fine review BTW!
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-03-11 01:33pm
|
Reply
30
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from graymane:
Damned fine review, treehopper. You hit a home run with this one, fellow ...and touched all the bases.
I'm especially impressed with your piece on closeups. That alone was enough to turn me off ... despite the sought-after youth factor.
|
02-02-11 03:45am
|
Reply
31
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
TheSquirrel said: "... you have to go to The Best Porn and click on ..."
Technically, it'll work from any of the links for the site from either PU or TBP. Just so there's no confusion to anyone reading along. :)
|
01-14-11 02:10pm
|
Reply
32
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment from Tree Rodent:
Silly bugger - me that is. When I referred to the $10 discounted price through Porn Users, I of course meant TBP. I'm sure anyone who reads it will know what I mean. Just in case they don't - you have to go to The Best Porn and click on 18 Eighteen and follow the link to get the discounted sign up price.
Ik - yep I finally found a place that got me back on the straight and narrow, and downloading legit porn again.
|
01-14-11 01:41pm
|
Reply
33
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Glad you were able to find a site that meets your strict standards. Hopefully the sites you join will provide satisfaction for the price you pay. Looking forward to reading your review.
|
01-13-11 10:48pm
|
Reply
34
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Ed Freiland:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Hi,
Thanks again for the feedback guys. If you have any direct questions or simply need our assistance contact us via email or open a ticket.
TheSquirrel: if you afraid of the pre-checked cross sale only, I'm sure I can help you to decline it. (for example simply uncheck the box)
Kind regards,
Ed
|
10-14-13 12:57am
|
Reply
35
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from Monahan:
Great review, Squirrel. You may have seen my issues with this site ranging from deceitful (nah, downright lying calling it like it is)so the cross selling you dislike is consistent with their lousy business practices.
As you did, a super careful PU who pays close attention to, and who dodges the dishonest practices can drain out some pretty terrific content for a very fair price.
The shame is that these guys don't need to be shady dealers; their site is good enough to make good money by playing it straight and honest.
|
06-14-13 09:41am
|
Reply
36
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review
from graymane:
Gotta say, Squirrel ...I'm somewhat marveled over this review.
One can readily conclude from its volume alone that you must pour over doing these things. Among other things, they appear meticulously thought out and done with a touch of professional flare..
|
06-14-13 02:11am
|
Reply
37
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I must be living under a rock since I didn't know there was a third "21" site. I'd never heard of 21 Naturals before. If it is as good as the other two I'll definitely have to give it a try.
|
04-30-13 06:00pm
|
Reply
38
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Their points system is probably the coolest thing that any site I can think of does for their long-term members. You earn points, then after you're no longer a member, you can log into the site with your same login info and use your points to get sets that you want.
That's just awesome!
|
01-30-13 08:22pm
|
Reply
39
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
from RustyJ:
Points are also good for buying the occassional Sextury/Sextreme scene while you are a member on the other side.
|
01-30-13 01:18am
|
Reply
40
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
from bibo:
You can also buy those points for a reasonable price (basically a VOD system). A scene usually goes for 295 points and you can buy 1000 points for 10€ (whatever that is in $), so basically it's 3 videos for a tenner. Considering the fact, that the quality of the updates have been suffering lately and I rarely find new scenes worth of downloadinng, I thnk that's a fair trade.
On the other hand, there is a new wave of "personalized spam" going on at the moment, which seem to be connected to the 21 network (see my thread in the forum).
|
01-29-13 09:16pm
|
Reply
41
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Monahan:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
What Denner and Squirrel say.
One good thing about the pix standards on this site is that they don't just post every single shot as many other sites do. In a single session, I see 200 as the absolute maximum number of photos. More than that necessarily means a lot of duplication and thus user time in viewing and extracting excess stuff.
|
09-14-11 08:46am
|
Reply
42
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks for the kind words. Yeah the site is good, of course, it's not my primary thing to view but I really wanted some content of Sandy. I never had anything of her, so I considered everything else as a bonus. A good bonus though! I can see how the masses love this network, it surely is quality for the Euro models.
A site must be something if it gets renewed subscriptions though because when I do that it's a dime a dozen these days. I would surely rejoin on a later date. Many might think my score was a bit low but maybe I am jaded when it comes to this type of content. But, I'm glad I joined and I got some great stuff. It seems you did too :) Take care and ttyl.
|
08-14-11 08:47pm
|
Reply
43
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from schlemihl:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
As soon as the facts which lead to my estimation will change, I will post a report here. Until this I will abide by my above reasoning. Until now no reaction or communication on the part of 21sextury.com.
|
08-05-11 06:31am
|
Reply
44
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from exotics4me:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I'm not a fan of the gynecological shots either. One of the things I should have mentioned in my earlier reply, I also reviewed both Pix and Video and Club Sandy in the low 90s in 2007 on here. So they've consistently been high scorers for me. Those two sites in particular were standalone sites in 2007, but I used to join with the two combined for $45 a month because those two have a nice blend of glam/softcore/midcore/hardcore. I really think those three teen sites they have add a lot. I'm usually not into the teenish models, since I like the mid-20s to mid-30s, more elegant looking models, but the three teen sites, Cuties Galore, Anal Teen Angels and Lez Cuties are very similar to say Nubiles. I will post on Cap'n's thread in the forum about networks with a few other strengths this network has.
|
04-01-11 10:50pm
|
Reply
45
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
That's the good thing with this network. Pix and Video, Club Sandy and Footsie Babes are more softcore than hardcore. I think one way to see how highly I've thought of these sites is to look at the old individual reviews I did of them. Pix and Video a 92 in July 2009 and Club Sandy a 94 in July 2010. Those are just 2 of the 37 sites. Even looking at the PU average scores on the sites by themselves gives a good view.
Asshole Fever 87.2
Lez Cuties 85.2
Nude Fight Club 80.6
Anal Teen Angels 88.7
Gapeland 91.5
Footsie Babes 84.5
DP Fanatics 96.0
Cuties Galore 83.0
The Pix and Video PU score suffers from being reviewed during the time period when they were having their server issues. I was even surprised by the TBP review since TBP only scores the network an 89, but also scores Pix and Video, by itself, an 88.5. That's why I think a network like this one is hard to review since it's hard to determine how to balance all these sites and scores out. To me, having 10 sites that I would rate 85 or up all included in one package is the most I could ask for.
Oh and yeah, I've been a member many times in the past, just not through the network. Some of my first reviews here on PU were of Club Sandy and Pix and Video, which were $30 a month each back then. With so many updates though, they keep me coming back.
|
03-31-11 10:25pm
|
Reply
46
|
Adult Mobile, formerly Mile High Media
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I agree. I make sure to save the confirmation email because they have three or four billing sites, and of course you have to provide a lot of information and a capcha to cancel. I think they purposely make it hard to cancel.
|
01-26-14 05:08pm
|
Reply
47
|
Adult Mobile, formerly Mile High Media
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I agree that this is high quality. But be careful accepting the same offer to join one of the sites I mentioned in my comment because I think those are identical sites that just look different. The issue would be some duplication but 100% duplication and therefore a waste of money.
I use their $5 offers a lot too. They're great value. Many of their sites offer a cheaper trial though and if all you're doing is dropping in to get a few recent movies that could be the better option.
|
01-26-14 09:16am
|
Reply
48
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
As much as I regret what I have to spend on these sites, it does give me access to some older titles that I want to see. The "channel" idea really cuts down on the cost, and with 8000 titles on the channel I subscribed to it will probably be a good value.
Thanks for your kind comments.
|
03-12-12 06:06pm
|
Reply
49
|
African Goddesses
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from mbaya:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Tjhanks for your kind words. I have a few reviews left to write up.
|
03-04-12 01:21am
|
Reply
50
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thank you Squirrel.
|
02-07-14 04:20am
|
