| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I totally agree, beautiful women, what seems like excellent sex, but incredibly bad camera work....too bad.....hire a cameraman or I'll do it for free.
|
07-11-13 11:16am
|
Reply
352
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from BadMrFrosty:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
To be fair, I think the amateurish lighting and camera work is kind of the point. Its supposed to feel like you are watching a actual party and not a professional porn shoot. The same with the home video site and the public sex site, they are supposed to feel "real". The other sites, especially the massage one, have great lighting and camera work IMHO.
|
03-08-12 09:55am
|
Reply
353
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from RustyJ:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Yes, they are mostly professional although there are some I've never seen before or since then again. Also there are many who were on these sites before they were everywhere.
|
03-08-12 09:00am
|
Reply
354
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment from Tree Rodent:
I have edited my original comment. You get three extra sites not four like I originally said. In my last reply I then went and typed five extra sites. The mix up came because Chicki Porn is Dolls Porn on WTF. Thankfully Frosty is more reliable than I am.
As an addition I would have hoped the camerawork would improve over the years, but the latest "Wild New Year College Orgy," added at the end of last year, on College Fuck Parties, has not only 9(!) parts, it has some of the worst lighting, and worst camerawork I have ever seen.
|
03-08-12 08:48am
|
Reply
355
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
from BadMrFrosty:
Glad to help :)
|
03-08-12 08:13am
|
Reply
356
|
WTF Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
from RustyJ:
If this is the network I think it is, I say it's well worth joining at least once. Yeah, the camera can be shaky, lighting bad and sound is just a radio blasting next to camera but the content is quite fresh and unique. The whole scenes take huge amounts of space though.
|
03-07-12 09:30pm
|
Reply
357
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Good to hear from you. There is very little strip-tease or lingerie at this site, but the sex is mainly heartcore/glamcore, and if you check all the videos (and there are a lot), you might find some that are to your liking. You just have to keep looking, and the models are really pretty.
|
05-07-13 09:45am
|
Reply
358
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from otoh:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks for the reply - didn't mean to lean so heavily on the regional pricing issue! As tangub and denner have noted, although they state £20, they do not seem to be following through on the CCBill page - so it's definitely worth a join.
|
09-02-12 03:07pm
|
Reply
359
|
Yanks.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
And here I was thinking I would never use 5,000 character limit, but ended up cutting a line or two out just to fit everything in. I at least wanted to get something up for anyone that maybe wants to try it out. The expired reviews seemed to be before they merged their sites together so it made a huge difference in the amount of content.
|
08-08-11 04:29pm
|
Reply
360
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
The bulk of the models are on the young and thin side of things. I don't think that they are unhealthy thin per say but some might be.
|
08-05-13 03:26am
|
