| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hey RB
I was one of the:
'I'd like to but don't know how' ... simplyfied..
My main thing is to edit some maybe 1-1,5 Gb videos and grab a scene that's like 300 Mb and delete the rest - tried some freeware - but it seems to take forever and skipped it...
Is this Tmpgenc 4.0 Express easy to use and does it wotk somewhat fast - if so, guess in the long run the $ 99 is well spend....
|
02-22-10 07:00am
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
"[T]heir ankles up around their ears." Around their ears? Ouch! :0
|
02-05-10 10:45pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from RON B:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
COULDN'T AGREE MORE MY FRIEND LMAO.
|
02-01-10 02:32pm
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from jd1961:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Ipad. Coming soon.
|
01-31-10 08:45am
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Ugh, no I would not say she has a very attractive voice at all. Sorry Drooler, I'm going to have to go with RB on this one. Don't you prefer photos anyway?
|
01-01-10 01:43pm
|
Reply
56
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from lk2fireone:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
RB, feel free to talk back to me anytime, even on a wrong button.
|
12-12-09 05:41pm
|
Reply
57
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I agree with this view most of the time, though a good scene doesn't necessarily have to have penetration or any toys...but it certainly doesn't hurt.
Also, I would be inclined to call these scenes girl-girl instead of lesbian as I think there is a significant difference, especially in the target audience being primarily straight (if still pervy) men, not homosexual women. 'Real' lesbian porn tends to be less of a girl-only interpretation of hardcore porn and more of a focus on intimacy and emotion -- and it can still involve toys.
|
12-04-09 03:14pm
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Raging Buddhist said it best (with footnotes!)
|
12-02-09 06:18am
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from exotics4me:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Can't say I agree RB. Western Digital has a whole line of externals that are pre-formatted in Fat32 as were the four WD MyBooks I have. Iomega had been shipping from the factory in Fat32 also until the Prestige line came out. It is listed as one of the features on the box, "Now in NTFS out of the box". The Seagate I have also was pre-formatted in Fat32.
There is at least one thread, maybe two, in the forum talking about externals coming pre-formatted in Fat32. Seems like Drooler had a problem a year or so ago with a pre-formatted Fat32. The newest of my WDs was manufactured in March 2009 and it was Fat32 also.
|
11-27-09 09:07pm
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
They all were FAT32 out of the box. Seagate and WD had software onboard that I copied off then reformatted to NTSF. No problem at all.
IOmega, however, had software that was copyright protected so I could not copy it. The software was not important to me because it was a basic automatic backup utility so I decided to just reformat the drive and lose the software.
But the copy protection apparently blocked the reformat
|
11-26-09 06:47pm
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Monahan:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
That says what I was about to say.
TBP was my go to site before PU came along anyway, so when I checked it out I really liked it.
I voted interaction, but the no bullshit reviews as well as the occasional posts by webmasters explaining why they do what they do is not available anywhere at all on the internet.
I said before and it bears repeating. PornUsers is the Consumers Reports of porn. The only source for unbiased, real people info and an opportunity to share with others infp about sites, downloading, organizing, etc.
|
11-22-09 10:10am
|
Reply
62
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from pat362:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Probably because I don't think it would taste any good even with some fava beans and a nice chianti.
|
11-17-09 05:48pm
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from asmith12:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Do you mean that guys from the site members are GETTING PAID for doing it? :-) If yes, it would probably simplify things, though as the guy has paid for the site, to qualify as "getting paid" for it they will likely need to pay ALL of his previous membership dues, PLUS something "extra".
And obviously even then it will depend on specific location GREATLY (California is one thing, Tennessee is another one, and Europe is a different game altogether), which alone is enough for me to re-iterate that personally I still wouldn't risk it.
|
11-13-09 01:35am
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from asmith12:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
> If the porn itself isn't illegal, why wouldn't it be legal?
I'm concerned about some *@&^#*!&@ thinking it is "sex for money", a.k.a. prostitution, which is illegal in many (or most) places.
And as it is indeed possible to organize such a site as a cover to brothel (like "pay $500 and you WILL get sex with our 'stars'"), I'm afraid courts in places where prostitution is illegal won't be really excited about it. While there is no precedent, nobody knows for sure, but personally I wouldn't take risk trying it.
|
11-12-09 08:54pm
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from NMC2008:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Collecting porn can become obsessive if not handled right, and being obsessed with anything is unhealthy, I will just say this.
I have over 1000 normal porn dvd-r discs(joining rental sites), and then I have over 1000 porn data dvd-rs(joining paysites), that's crazy and expensive, so the less room I have to work with the better imo, but this is just me talkin about me.
|
11-05-09 12:09am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Yeah, it's might nicer than a hobby such as:
1. shoot innocent people with high-powered rifle through hole in trunk of specially adapted "DC Terrorist" car
2. relocate
3. reload
4. repeat
And I said I'd buy a new hard drive. In fact, I'm probably going to get ANOTHER ONE fairly soon. I'll shunt my videos on to that.
I collect mostly pics, and I'm really choosy about them. I already went through months of tossing out old stuff last year. Or was that the year before? Whatever. What's left is primo! It stays!
|
11-04-09 05:56pm
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Hey, some women like Tic Tacs...they just refuse when I offer one!
|
09-09-09 08:15pm
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I use Ginseng instead.....
Sharpens the........erm.....memory too! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
09-09-09 09:02am
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from turboshaft:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
If they are in college, I get the impression they are working their way out of it.
|
08-26-09 09:45pm
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from GCode:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
I used these age ranges because there was a huge forum post (I think it was about fake boobs) and the tattoos thing got brought up with a few arguments that maybe younger people would be more tolerant of tattoos than older folk, just do do the normalcy of tattoos these days. So, I was interested in what the difference in opinions would be in the different age ranges. You only get 6 options in these polls to write in responses so it was limited, if I had a choice and with more options I would probably do an 18 - 25 range, 26-35 range, 36-50 range, then 50+ but obviously that would be redundant and it's not like were doing scientific research here :) I just thought maybe 18-35 would be more of the 'younger generation' and maybe over 36 would be a bit in the 'older generation'. I know you were probably just being sarcastic but I thought this did owe a bit of an explanation.
|
07-25-09 08:56pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from pinkerton:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Regarding the comment about blowing a load on a girl's face, quite a few girlfriends in my past have admitted fantasising about having a guy cum on their face and chest, and I've obliged them quite a few times. Not saying that all women like it, but obviously some do so cumshots aren't all that unrealistic.
|
11-06-08 01:57pm
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from The Clyde:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Not really into "keeping it real" this is a fantasy, that DOES NOT include my wife/girlfriend.
BTW.. facials in real life aren't that out of the norm. :)
|
11-06-08 05:58am
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from jd1961:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
But some porn smells bad !
|
03-19-08 12:28pm
|
Reply
74
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Complacency has a lot to do with it. As long as people don't feel uncomfortable enough, they tend to do little or nothing. Most people, anyway. (The strivers will always be working to get more and/or create more.)
And then there's hubris. It's funny how the Spitzer sex scandal brought on a discussion of the pitfalls of having too much of that. It's nothing new, though, considering myriad other scandals involving gov't and/or business, and those events that should be considered scandals (e.g., the Libby pardon, the phony WMD in Iraq) by our "liberal" (yeah right) media.
I don't know if Winston Churchill meant stupidity when he said something to the effect that probably the best evidence against democracy can be found by having a chat with the average voter.
|
03-18-08 03:15am
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(RagingBuddhist's Reply)
Eisenhower famously warned about the military-industrial complex, but now we've got a corporate/government-military-industrial complex with elected leaders that just pay us lip service and allow crises like the present one to take place and then use them as opportunities to look as if they're doing something by tacking on bandaids, as you call them too, such as this "Economic Stimulus" nonsense.
It's actually not hard to fathom that they actually intentionally allow these problems to fester so they'll have something to hoot about come election time, telling us what they'll do to fix these problems they've created for us in health care/insurance and in financial sectors, to name two. As you can tell, I don't have a whole lot of trust in the government.
They don't even have the money for this "stimulus" anyway! The government's in the worst debt it's ever been in! It's ridiculous! Will I spend some of mine on porn? What difference would it make? And they tell us to go out and spend it. Excuse me, but hasn't the problem been one of insolvency? Wouldn't a better savings rate have a more lasting effect? They must really think we're dumb, and maybe a lot of us are.
|
03-16-08 04:49pm
|
